Epistatic interactions can moderate the antigenic effect of substitutions in haemagglutinin of influenza H3N2 virus

References

1. Smith DJ, Lapedes AS, de Jong JC, Bestebroer TM, Rimmelzwaan GF et al. Mapping the antigenic and genetic evolution of influenza virus. Science 2004; 305:371–376 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
2. Koel BF, Burke DF, Bestebroer TM, van der Vliet S, Zondag GCM et al. Substitutions near the receptor binding site determine major antigenic change during influenza virus evolution. Science 2013; 342:976–979 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
3. Das SR, Hensley SE, Ince WL, Brooke CB, Subba A et al. Defining influenza A virus hemagglutinin antigenic drift by sequential monoclonal antibody selection. Cell Host Microbe 2013; 13:314–323 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
4. Kryazhimskiy S, Dushoff J, Bazykin GA, Plotkin JB. Prevalence of epistasis in the evolution of influenza a surface proteins. PLoS Genet 2011; 7:e1001301 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
5. Koelle K, Cobey S, Grenfell B, Pascual M. Epochal evolution shapes the phylodynamics of interpandemic influenza A (H3N2) in humans. Science 2006; 314:1898–1903 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
6. Koelle K, Rasmussen DA. The effects of a deleterious mutation load on patterns of influenza A/H3N2's antigenic evolution in humans. Elife 2015; 4:1–31 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
7. NC W, Thompson AJ, Xie J, Lin CW, Nycholat CM et al. A complex epistatic network limits the mutational reversibility in the influenza hemagglutinin receptor-binding site. Nat Commun 2018; 9:
   [Google Scholar]
8. Wu NC, Xie J, Zheng T, Nycholat CM, Grande G, NC W, Paulson JC, Lerner RA et al. Diversity of functionally permissive sequences in the receptor-binding site of influenza hemagglutinin. Cell Host Microbe 2017; 21:742–753 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
9. de Wit E, Spronken MIJ, Bestebroer TM, Rimmelzwaan GF, Osterhaus ADME et al. Efficient generation and growth of influenza virus A/PR/8/34 from eight cDNA fragments. Virus Res 2004; 103:155–161 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
10. Hirst GK. Studies of antigenic differences among strains of influenza a by means of red cell agglutination. J Exp Med 1943; 78:407–423 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
11. Hensley SE, Das SR, Bailey AL, Schmidt LM, Hickman HD et al. Hemagglutinin receptor binding avidity drives influenza a virus antigenic drift. Science 2009; 326:734–736 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
12. Li Y, Myers JL, Bostick DL, Sullivan CB, Madara J et al. Immune history shapes specificity of pandemic H1N1 influenza antibody responses. J Exp Med 2013; 210:1493–1500 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
13. Li Y, Bostick DL, Sullivan CB, Myers JL, Griesemer SB et al. Single hemagglutinin mutations that alter both antigenicity and receptor binding avidity influence influenza virus antigenic clustering. J Virol 2013; 87:9904–9910 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
14. Skehel JJ, Wiley DC. Receptor binding and membrane fusion in virus entry: the influenza hemagglutinin. Annu Rev Biochem 2000; 69:531–569 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
15. Wiley DC, Wilson IA, Skehel JJ. Structural identification of the antibody-binding sites of Hong Kong influenza haemagglutinin and their involvement in antigenic variation. Nature 1981; 289:373–378 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]