1887

Abstract

A Gram-stain-negative, aerobic, rod-shaped and non-motile novel bacterial strain, designated MAHUQ-58, was isolated from soil sample of a rice field. The colonies were observed to be light pink-coloured, smooth, spherical and 0.6–1.0 mm in diameter when grown on nutrient agar (NA) medium for 2 days. Strain MAHUQ-58 was found to be able to grow at 15–40 °C, at pH 5.5–10.0 and with 0–1.0 % NaCl (w/v). Cell growth occurred on tryptone soya agar, Luria–Bertani agar, NA, MacConkey agar and Reasoner's 2A agar. The strain was found to be positive for both oxidase and catalase tests. The strain was positive for hydrolysis of Tween 20 and -tyrosine. According to the 16S rRNA gene sequence comparisons, the isolate was identified as a member of the genus and to be closely related to WM-3 (98.9 % similarity), LYBRD3-7 (97.7 %), JCM 18195 (97.6 %) and SgZ-6 (97.2 %). The novel strain MAHUQ-58 has a draft genome size of 4 536 129 bp (46 contigs), annotated with 4064 protein-coding genes, 60 tRNA genes and four rRNA genes. The average nucleotide identity (ANI) and digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) values between strain MAHUQ-58 and four closely related type strains were in the range of 85.5–89.5 % and 29.5–38.0 %, respectively. The genomic DNA G+C content was determined to be 67.0 mol%. The predominant isoprenoid quinone was ubiquinone 9. The major fatty acids were identified as C, summed feature 3 (C 6 and/or C 7) and summed feature 8 (C 6 and/or C 7). On the basis of dDDH and ANI values, genotypic results, and chemotaxonomic and physiological data, strain MAHUQ-58 represents a novel species within the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed, with MAHUQ-58 (=KACC 22005=CGMCC 1.18518) as the type strain.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005534
2022-10-18
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Migula W. Uber ein neues system der bakterien. Arb Bakteriol Inst Karlsruhe 1894; 1:235–238
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Morimoto Y, Uwabe K, Tohya M, Hiramatsu K, Kirikae T et al. Pseudomonas atagosis sp. nov., and Pseudomonas akappagea sp. nov., new soil bacteria isolated from samples on the volcanic island Izu Oshima, Tokyo. Curr Microbiol 2020; 77:1909–1915 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Yu Z, Chang M, Wu M, Yang G, Zhou S et al. Pseudomonas oryzae sp. nov. isolated from a paddy soil in South China. Arch Microbiol 2013; 195:815–822 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. He W-H, Wang Y-N, Du X, Zhou Y, Jia B et al. Pseudomonas linyingensis sp. nov.: a novel bacterium isolated from wheat soil subjected to long-term herbicides application. Curr Microbiol 2012; 65:595–600 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lin S-Y, Hameed A, Liu Y-C, Hsu Y-H, Lai W-A et al. Pseudomonas sagittaria sp. nov., a siderophore-producing bacterium isolated from oil-contaminated soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:2410–2417 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Yang G, Han L, Wen J, Zhou S. Pseudomonas guangdongensis sp. nov., isolated from an electroactive biofilm, and emended description of the genus Pseudomonas Migula 1894. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:4599–4605 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chaudhary HJ, Peng G, Hu M, He Y, Yang L et al. Genetic diversity of endophytic diazotrophs of the wild rice, Oryza alta and identification of the new diazotroph, Acinetobacter oryzae sp. nov. Microb Ecol 2012; 63:813–821 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Akter S, Huq MA. Fluviicola chungangensis sp. nov., a bacterium isolated from rice field. Arch Microbiol 2020; 202:293–298 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Xie CH, Yokota A. Zoogloea oryzae sp. nov., a nitrogen-fixing bacterium isolated from rice paddy soil, and reclassification of the strain ATCC 19623 as Crabtreella saccharophila gen. nov., sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:619–624 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Jeon Y, Lee S-S, Chung BS, Kim JM, Bae J-W et al. Mucilaginibacter oryzae sp. nov., isolated from soil of a rice paddy. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:1451–1454 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Huq MA, Akter S. Characterization and genome analysis of Arthrobacter bangladeshi sp. nov., applied for the green synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their antibacterial efficacy against drug-resistant human pathogens. Pharmaceutics 2021; 13:1691 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Akter S, Huq MA, Yi TH. Lysobacter humi sp. nov., a bacterium isolated from rice field. Arch Microbiol 2016; 198:1005–1012 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Lane DJ. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M. eds Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematic New York: Wiley; 1991 pp 115–175
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kim O-S, Cho Y-J, Lee K, Yoon S-H, Kim M et al. Introducing EzTaxon-e: a prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:716–721 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:4876–4882 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acids Symp Ser 1999; 41:95–98
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kimura M. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1983 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics nalysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Alanjary M, Steinke K, Ziemert N. AutoMLST: an automated web server for generating multi-locus species trees highlighting natural product potential. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 47:W276–W282 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Lim JM, Kwon SJ, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Shi W, Sun Q, Fan G, Hideaki S, Moriya O et al. gcType: a high-quality type strain genome database for microbial phylogenetic and functional research. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:D694–D705 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ et al. The SEED and the rapid annotation of microbial genomes using subsystems technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42:D206–14 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Wayne LG, Brenner DJ, Colwell RR, Grimont PAD, Kandler O et al. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1987; 37:463–464
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Stackebrandt E, Goebel BM. Taxonomic note: a place for DNA-DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1994; 44:846–849 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Huq MA. Chryseobacterium chungangensis sp. nov., a bacterium isolated from soil of sweet gourd garden. Arch Microbiol 2018; 200:581–587 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Cappuccino JG, Sherman N. Biochemical Activities of Microorganisms. In In Microbiology, A Laboratory Manual Menlo Park, CA, USA: The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Co; 1992 pp 188–247
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Huq MA. Caenispirillum humi sp. nov., a bacterium isolated from the soil of Korean pine garden. Arch Microbiol 2018; 200:343–348 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Sasser M. Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids. MIDI Technical Note 1990; 101:Newark, DE: MIDI Inc
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Hiraishi A, Ueda Y, Ishihara J, Mori T. Comparative lipoquinone analysis of influent sewage and activated sludge by high-performance liquid chromatography and photodiode array detection. J Gen Appl Microbiol 1996; 42:457–469 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Collins MD, Jones D. Distribution of isoprenoid quinone structural types in bacteria and their taxonomic implication. Microbiol Rev 1981; 45:316–354 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005534
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005534
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error