Evaluation of bacterial recovery and viability from three different swab transport systems
References (8)
- et al.
Comparison of 3 swab transport systems for direct release and recovery of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis
(2008) Quality Control of Microbiological Transport Systems: Approved Standard
(2003)- et al.
Comparison of Copan eSwab with the Copan Venturi Transystem for the quantitative survival of Escherichia coli, Streptococcus agalactiae and Candida albicans
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis
(2010) - et al.
Comparison of the Copan ESwab system with two Amies agar swab transport systems for maintenance of microorganism viability
J Clin Microbiol
(2008)
Cited by (9)
Comparison of the certified Copan eSwab system with commercially available cotton swabs for the detection of multidrug-resistant bacteria in rectal swabs
2022, American Journal of Infection ControlA comparison of cotton-tipped and nylon flocked swabs for culture of Neisseria gonorrhoeae from oropharyngeal samples
2021, Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious DiseaseCitation Excerpt :Several studies have shown the ESwab system from Copan (a nylon flocked swab that is immediately placed in Amies medium after sampling) further increases bacterial recovery and enhances bacterial culture performance compared to direct plating,(Saegeman et al., 2011) and other swabs and transport media. ( Nys et al., 2010; Tan et al., 2014; Warnke et al., 2014b) There has been increasing use of ESwab for diagnostic testing of STIs.( Williamson et al., 2019) It is possible that the ESwab system could improve culture positivity of N. gonorrhoeae compared to the dry FLOQSwab on its own.
Cross-country transport and isolation and identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae by use of alternate sources of blood supplemented media among laboratories in India
2019, Indian Journal of Medical MicrobiologyRapid detection of Group B streptococcus directly from vaginal–rectal specimens using liquid swabs and the BD Max GBS assay
2017, Clinical Microbiology and InfectionCitation Excerpt :This has increased the potential to detect GBS directly from clinical specimens without the need for pre-enrichment when PCR is used. A number of studies have shown that nylon flocked swabs are superior to, and have a higher sensitivity than, the traditional cotton-tipped rayon swabs [21–23] for a number of different bacteria, including GBS [24]. Verhoeven et al. demonstrated that these flocked swabs attained a greater sensitivity in the detection of Staphylococcus aureus compared with rayon swabs (97.1% versus 74.3%) and also yielded larger amounts of bacteria in quantitative cultures, particularly in cases of low in vivo bacterial loads [25].
Reply of the authors
2015, Journal of Microbiological Methods