Clinical Investigation
Preliminary Case-control Study to Evaluate Diagnostic Values of C-Reactive Protein and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate in Differentiating Active Crohn’s Disease From Intestinal Lymphoma, Intestinal Tuberculosis and Behcet’s Syndrome

https://doi.org/10.1097/MAJ.0b013e3182959a18Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

There are few evidences of C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and white blood cell (WBC) in differentiating active Crohn’s disease (CD) from intestinal lymphoma (IL), intestinal tuberculosis (ITB) and Behcet’s syndrome (BD). This study is designed to investigate potential differential capacity of the 3 biomarkers between these disorders.

Methods

A hospital-based case-control study was performed. A total of 29 active CD, 25 IL, 30 ITB and 17 BD patients were collected. Laboratory parameters were drawn from the first blood test results on admission.

Results

In active CD group, the level of CRP was 20.2 = 4.26 mg/dL, which was statistically lower than IL (59.9 = 10.8 mg/dL, P < 0.0001). Similarly, the level of ESR reached its lowest point in active CD group (23.8 = 3.18 mm/hr), compared with 46.6 = 6.46 mm/hr in IL group (P = 0.0002). CRP showed a possible diagnostic value in differentiation of IL from active CD (odds ratio = 1.028, P = 0.046). CRP also exhibited a superior ability (area under curve [AUC] = 0.821) than ESR (AUC = 0.797) and CRP+ESR (AUC = 0.800) in distinguishing active CD from IL. The optimal cutoff value was 19.7 mg/dL, and the sensitivity and specificity were 62.1% and 96.0%, respectively.

Conclusions

A significant decreased level of CRP and ESR was confirmed in active CD compared with IL. Current study demonstrated a possible differential value of CRP between active CD and IL. Further studies would be performed to validate their clinical significances.

Section snippets

Ethical Consideration

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University.

Study Population

This is a hospital-based case-control study. The study population included patients newly diagnosed as active CD and registered in the electronical Jinling Hospital inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) database between January 2008 and December 2011. Controls, including IL, ITB and BD, were individuals newly diagnosed in the same period and age, gender, body mass index and geographically

Demographic Information

Twenty-nine active CD, 25 IL, 30 ITB and 17 BD patients were collected in this study. Age, gender, body mass index (Table 1) and geographic distribution (data not shown) were similar among these groups. All enrolled patients were homogenous Chinese.

According to the Montreal classification of Crohn’s disease,10 L1 (ileal) was the most common disease location (41.4%) and B2 (stricturing) was the most common disease behavior (48.3%) in CD group. The CDAI score was 238.6 = 12.5 with maximum and

DISCUSSION

In clinical care of patients with IBD, biomarkers are currently used in conjunction with invasive testing, such as endoscopy and radiology, to support making diagnosis,11., 12. differentiating between CD and ulcerative colitis (UC),13., 14. monitoring disease activity12., 15. and predicting responses to therapy.16., 17. During the last decade, a series of serological and fecal biomarkers has brought significant concerns in the field of IBD.

For many reasons, blood-based biomarkers seem to be

REFERENCES (30)

  • J.D. Lewis

    The utility of biomarkers in the diagnosis and therapy of inflammatory bowel disease

    Gastroenterology

    (2011)
  • C.N. Bernstein et al.

    World Gastroenterology Organization Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of IBD in 2010

    Inflamm Bowel Dis

    (2010)
  • Criteria for diagnosis of Behcet’s disease. International Study Group for Behcet’s Disease

    Lancet

    (1990)
  • J. Satsangi et al.

    The Montreal classification of inflammatory bowel disease: controversies, consensus, and implications

    Gut

    (2006)
  • A.D. Sutherland et al.

    Review of fecal biomarkers in inflammatory bowel disease

    Dis Colon Rectum

    (2008)
  • Cited by (39)

    • High sensitive and selective C-reactive protein detection by means of lossy mode resonance based optical fiber devices

      2017, Biosensors and Bioelectronics
      Citation Excerpt :

      CRP measuring is not specific for any condition but it is a fairly sensitive biomarker of inflammation and has been proven very useful in determining disease progress as well as the effectiveness of treatments in inflammations, infections, tissue necrosis, surgery, burns, cancer, cardiovascular diseases or coronary heart disease risk (Danesh et al., 2004; Lau et al., 2005; Llombart et al., 2013; Pepys and Hirschfield, 2003). Thus, CRP has emerged as an effective disease biomarker in human body with an even more sensitive and accurate reflection of the acute phase response than the ESR (Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate) in some cases (Liu et al., 2013). The median concentration of CRP is 0.8 mg/L and always less than 12 mg/L in apparently healthy individuals with higher values in elder people.

    • Predicting bacteria causing acute bacterial rhinosinusitis by clinical features

      2020, Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The serum CRP is increased in response to inflammation following interleukin-6 secretion by macrophages and T cells.12,13 Compared to ESR, the CRP is more sensitive in identifying the increased inflammatory responses.14 The ESR may be normal while the CRP is elevated.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This work was supported by from the National Nature Science Foundation of China Grant 81270478/H0312 and the Climb Program in Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province for Distinguished Scholars Grant BK2010017.

    The authors have no financial or other conflicts of interest to disclose.

    View full text