Original Article

The Impact of Resident Physician Coverage on Emergency Department Visits in South Carolina

Authors: Kevin J. Bennett, MS, Elizabeth Baxley, MD, Janice C. Probst, PHD

Abstract

BackgroundThis study examines emergency department (ED) visits to assess the potential impact on rural and minority patients if the practice of resident moonlighting was limited.MethodsBilling data from all South Carolina ED visits in 1998 were linked to the physician licensure file. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine patient characteristics predictive of being seen by a resident physician.ResultsResident physicians attended 3.4% of visits for patients residing in rural areas and 1.4% of those from urban areas. The odds of being treated by a resident were higher among persons living in health professional shortage-designated or rural areas, minorities, and persons with government insurance.ConclusionPatients from vulnerable populations have greater odds of being seen by a resident physician for an ED visit. These populations may be placed at risk for reduced access to health care services if limitations on resident physician moonlighting impair the ability of rural hospitals to staff EDs.

This content is limited to qualifying members.

Existing members, please login first

If you have an existing account please login now to access this article or view purchase options.

Purchase only this article ($25)

Create a free account, then purchase this article to download or access it online for 24 hours.

Purchase an SMJ online subscription ($75)

Create a free account, then purchase a subscription to get complete access to all articles for a full year.

Purchase a membership plan (fees vary)

Premium members can access all articles plus recieve many more benefits. View all membership plans and benefit packages.

References

1. Burt CW, McCaig LF. Trends in hospital emergency department utilization: United States, 1992–99. Vital Health Stat 13 2001; 150: 1–34.
 
2. Mills RJ; U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, U.S. Census Bureau. Health Insurance Coverage: 2000. Available at: http://www.census.gov/prod/2001pubs/p60-215.pdf. Accessed July 30, 2003.
 
3. McCaig LF, Ly NL. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2000 emergency department summary. Adv Data 2002; 326.
 
4. American Hospital Association. Emergency departments: An essential access point to care. Trend Watch 2001;3(1):1–8. Available at:http://www.hospitalconnect.com/ahapolicyforum/trendwatch/content/twmarch2001.pdf. Accessed July 30, 2003.
 
5. McCaig LF, Burt CW. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 1999 emergency department summary. Adv Data 2001; 320: 1–34.
 
6. McGirr J, Williams JM, Prescott JE. Physicians in rural West Virginia emergency departments: Residency training and board certification status. Acad Emerg Med 1998; 5: 333–336.
 
7. Hall WL, Nowels D. Colorado family practice graduates’ preparation for and practice of emergency medicine. J Am Board Fam Pract 2000; 13: 246–250.
 
8. Hyde JC, Fottler MD. Determinants of physician vacancy rates in rural hospitals. J Rural Health 1994; 10: 38–48.
 
9. Williamson HA, Rosenblatt RA, Hart LG. Physician staffing of small rural hospital emergency departments: Rapid change and escalating cost. J Rural Health 1992; 8: 171–177.
 
10. Williams JM, Ehrlich PF, Prescott JE. Emergency medical care in rural America. Acad Emerg Med 2001; 38: 323–327.
 
11. Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education; ACGME Work Group on Resident Duty Hours. ACGME extends deadline for comments on the proposed common requirements for resident duty hours. Available at: http://www.acgme.org/new/residentHours602.asp. Accessed July 30, 2003.
 
15. Moorhead JC, Gallery ME, Mannle T, et al. A study of the workforce in emergency medicine. Ann Emerg Med 1998; 31: 595–607.
16. Brooks RG, Walsh M, Mardon RE, et al. The roles of nature and nurture in the recruitment and retention of primary care physicians in rural areas: A review of the literature. Acad Med 2002; 77: 790–798.
17. Rosenblatt RA, Schneeweiss R, Hart LG, et al. Family medicine training in rural areas. JAMA 2002; 288: 1063–1064(letter).
18. Malaty W, Pathman DE. Factors affecting the match rate of rural training tracks in family practice. Fam Med 2002; 34: 258–261.