Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to identify antimicrobial resistance and class 1 integrons among Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC).

Methods: Two-hundred and seventy-four STEC recovered from poultry, cattle, swine and humans were characterized by antimicrobial susceptibility testing, screened for the presence of class 1 integrons by PCR, and assayed for integron transfer by conjugation.

Results: Ninety-three (34%) of the isolates were resistant to streptomycin, followed by 89 (32%) to sulfamethoxazole, 83 (30%) to tetracycline, 48 (18%) to ampicillin, 29 (11%) to cefalothin, 22 (8%) to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, 18 (7%) to gentamicin, 13 (5%) to chloramphenicol and 10 (4%) to cefoxitin. Class 1 integrons were detected in 43 (16%) of the 274 isolates. The adenyl acetyltransferase gene, aadA, which confers resistance to streptomycin, was identified in integrons from 41 (95%) of these 43 isolates, and the dfrA12 gene, which confers resistance to trimethoprim, was identified in integrons from eight (19%) of the isolates. The sat1 gene, which confers resistance to streptothricin, an antimicrobial that has never been approved for use in the United States, was identified in integrons from three (7%) of the isolates. Transfer of integrons by conjugation between strains of E. coli resulted in transfer of antimicrobial-resistant phenotypes for ampicillin, chloramphenicol, cefalothin, gentamicin, tetracycline, trimethoprim, sulfamethoxazole and streptomycin.

Conclusions: Antimicrobial resistance is common in STEC. Class 1 integrons located on mobile plasmids have facilitated the emergence and dissemination of antimicrobial resistance among STEC in humans and food animals.

Introduction

The emergence of antimicrobial-resistant bacterial pathogens is a public health problem. The resistance phenotypes most commonly observed for Escherichia coli have been those to tetracycline, sulphonamides, ampicillin and streptomycin. However, resistance to clinically relevant, front-line antimicrobials such as fluoroquinolones, expanded-spectrum β-lactams, and third-generation cephalosporins has emerged among E. coli.1,2 This in turn has led to antimicrobial treatment failure of infections caused by E. coli in humans, examples of which include fluoroquinolone-resistant bacteraemia in persons undergoing cancer chemotherapy3 and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole-resistant acute uncomplicated cystitis in women.4 Furthermore, the isolation of antimicrobial-resistant E. coli from the intestinal flora of healthy humans and animals, together with data which show E. coli readily transfer their plasmids to other E. coli strains5 and to strains of different genera (e.g. Hafnia alvei6 ), suggests commensal E. coli strains may be an important reservoir of transferable antimicrobial resistance genes. Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) have been an important cause of food-borne illness worldwide. Currently, research is urgently needed to determine the antimicrobial resistance profiles among STEC.

Integrons are DNA elements that may contain transferable antimicrobial resistance gene cassettes. At least five classes of integrons have been described, the majority of those from clinical isolates belonging to class 1. Class 1 integrons have been identified in generic E. coli strains recovered from food animals, water, food and humans. Relatively little is known about the occurrence of class 1 integrons in STEC.

The objective of this study was to identify antimicrobial resistance and class I integrons among STEC isolates recovered from humans and food animals.

Materials and methods

E. coli isolates

Two hundred and seventy-four STEC strains recovered from sick animals (n = 193) and human patients (n = 81) during 1985 to 2000 and consisting of serogroups O26 (n = 57), O103 (n = 72), O111 (n = 63), O128 (n = 7) and O157 (n = 75) were from the Gastroenteric Disease Center at The Pennsylvania State University. The isolates were grown on trypticase soy agar (Difco, Detroit, MI, USA) supplemented with 5% defibrinated sheep's blood (Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, MD, USA) and stored in trypticase soy broth (Difco) containing 15% glycerol at −80°C.

Antimicrobial susceptibility determination

Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles were determined by broth microdilution with the PASCO MIC/ID (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA) or Sensititre (Trek Diagnostic Systems, Westlake, OH, USA) systems. The following antimicrobials were included in the panels: cefoxitin, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, ceftriaxone, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, sulfamethoxazole, gentamicin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and streptomycin. E. coli ATCC 25922, E. coli ATCC 35218, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 51299 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 were used as quality controls. All experiments were conducted, and the results interpreted, according to guidelines of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS).7

Identification of class 1 integrons and associated resistance genes

DNA templates, oligonucleotide primers and PCR conditions (including positive and negative controls) to detect the presence of class 1 integrons have been described previously.6 All PCR amplicons were purified using a PCR purification kit (Boehringer-Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN, USA) and sequenced using an ABI Prism 3700 DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems). DNA sequences were analysed by searching the GenBank database using the BLASTn algorithm (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).

Conjugation

Integron-positive STEC strains CVM 9320, CVM 9574, CVM 9279, CVM 9530 and CVM 9514, each of which was nalidixic acid-susceptible, were used as donors in conjugation experiments. A nalidixic acid-resistant strain (CVM 19752), which did not contain an integron, was used as the recipient. Experiments were performed by filter mating.8 Transconjugants from each mating were characterized by antimicrobial susceptibility testing (see above). The presence of class 1 integrons among transconjugants was confirmed by PCR (see above).

Results and discussion

Ninety-three (34%) of the 274 STEC isolates were resistant to streptomycin, followed by 89 (32%) to sulfamethoxazole, 83 (30%) to tetracycline, 48 (18%) to ampicillin, 29 (11%) to cefalothin, 22 (8%) to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, 18 (7%) to gentamicin, 13 (5%) to chloramphenicol, and 10 (4%) to cefoxitin. These results agree with those from previous studies from our laboratory in which E. coli, including STEC, have been found resistant to penicillins, sulphonamides and tetracyline.1,2 Forty-three (16%) of the STEC isolates contained class 1 integrons (Table 1). The integrons ranged from 0.65 to 2.0 kb in length (Table 1), with a 1.0 kb gene cassette found in 41 (95%) of the integron-containing isolates. Integrons were found in isolates of serogroups O26, O103 and O111. Forty-one (95%) of the 43 class 1 integron-containing STEC isolates were resistant to one or more antimicrobial.

The aadA gene cassette, which putatively encodes resistance to streptomycin, was found in class 1 integrons from 41 (95%) of the 43 integron-containing STEC isolates. We observed structural variants of the aadA gene, including aadA1, aadA2, aadA7, aadA12, aadA21 and aad23b which matched the sequence data reported in GenBank with accession numbers listed in Table 1; however, none of these variants were novel. That aadA was found in STEC isolates of various serogroups suggests dissemination by a common genetic element. Eight of the aadA-containing integrons also carried the dfrA12 cassette, which putatively encodes resistance to trimethoprim. These findings are similar to results from previous studies indicating cassettes for aminoglycoside and trimethoprim resistance are common in class 1 integrons.9,10 Three isolates, each from cattle, contained integrons that carried the sat1 gene cassette. sat1 encodes putative resistance to streptothricin, a drug that has never been approved for therapeutic use in the USA.

The presence of class 1 integrons did not necessarily correlate to antimicrobial resistance phenotype. For instance, though sulphonamide resistance is typically associated with the presence of class 1 integrons, four of the integron-containing STEC isolates (three of serogroup O111 and one of serogroup O26) were susceptible to sulfamethoxazole. sul1 may not have been present or expressed. Similarly, two isolates containing aadA were susceptible to streptomycin. The sequence data indicated that no frame-shift mutations were detected. It has been shown, however, that silent integron-borne aadA genes may be expressed when transferred to a new host by conjugation.6aadA is not known to be regulated by attenuation, thus, the differential expression may result from the lack of a transcriptional activator in the donor, or a repressor in the E. coli recipient strains. Three strains carried one gene cassette (aadA) yet were resistant to eight or more antimicrobials, suggesting elements besides class 1 integrons were involved in antimicrobial resistance among the STEC isolates. Seven strains carried two aadA genes, which may have contributed to high-level streptomycin resistance.

Each of five E. coli donor isolates transferred class 1 integrons to an E. coli recipient strain in vitro (Table 2). The observation that resistance phenotypes for ampicillin, chloramphenicol, cefalothin, gentamicin, tetracycline, trimethoprim, sulfamethoxazole and streptomycin were transferred suggests resistance genes in addition to aadA were present on the same plasmid or on a different plasmid that was co-transferred. One of the transconjugants (19752/9279) showed an MIC of cefalothin of ≥32 mg/L, which was greater than those of the donor (8 mg/L) and recipient (8 mg/L) strains. We believe that this might be due to the synergy with resident β-lactamases present in the recipient strain, since chromosome-encoded β-lactamases are present in most Gram-negative bacteria and these enzymes are often expressed at low levels. Another possibility might be due to the lack of a transcriptional activator in the donor, or a repressor in the E. coli recipient cells. Yu et al.9 have shown that among E. coli strains isolated from urinary tracts from patients in Korea, the prevalence of dfrA17 (putative trimethoprim resistance) was due to horizontal transfer of class 1 integrons through conjugative plasmids. Data demonstrating E. coli transfer plasmids to other genera, including Hafnia6 raise further concern about dissemination of class 1 integrons identified here. We conclude that class 1 integrons have facilitated emergence and dissemination of antimicrobial resistance among STEC in humans and food animals. The observation that the class 1 integrons identified here (i) contained multiple antimicrobial resistance cassettes and (ii) were horizontally transferable underscores the need for further research designed to limit the spread of these elements among bacterial populations.

Present address. Food Safety and Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, USA.

Present address. China Agricultural University, Beijing, The People's Republic of China.

§

Present address. Elanco Animal Health, Basingstoke RG21 6XA, UK.

Table 1.

Information about the 43 class 1 integron-containing STEC identified in this study

O type
Source of isolation
No. of isolates
Gene cassette(s) size (kb)/genes
Matched with accession no. in GenBank
26cow20.65/sat1X15995
26cow11.0/aadA7; 2.0/aadA2, orfF, dfrA12AF224733, AF335108
26cow11.0/aadA1AB126601
103aturkey11.0/aadA1AB126601
103acow11.0/aadA1AB126601
111cow131.0/aadA1AB126601
111bcow61.0/aadA7AF224733
111cow21.0/aadA12AY665771
111cow11.0/aadA21AY171244
111cow11.0/aadA23bAB189176
111unknown31.0/aadA1; 2.0/aadA2, orfF, dfrA12AB126601, AF335108
111cow21.0/aadA1; 2.0/aadA2, orfF, dfrA12AB126601, AF335108
111human21.0/aadA1AB126601
111unknown21.0/aadA1AB126601
111turkey11.0/aadA1AB107663
111apig11.0/aadA7AF224733
111cow11.5/aadA2, dfrA12AB154407
111cow10.65/sat1; 1.0/aadA1X15995, AB186119
111human11.0/aadA1; 2.0/aadA2, orfF, dfrA12AB126601, AF335108
O type
Source of isolation
No. of isolates
Gene cassette(s) size (kb)/genes
Matched with accession no. in GenBank
26cow20.65/sat1X15995
26cow11.0/aadA7; 2.0/aadA2, orfF, dfrA12AF224733, AF335108
26cow11.0/aadA1AB126601
103aturkey11.0/aadA1AB126601
103acow11.0/aadA1AB126601
111cow131.0/aadA1AB126601
111bcow61.0/aadA7AF224733
111cow21.0/aadA12AY665771
111cow11.0/aadA21AY171244
111cow11.0/aadA23bAB189176
111unknown31.0/aadA1; 2.0/aadA2, orfF, dfrA12AB126601, AF335108
111cow21.0/aadA1; 2.0/aadA2, orfF, dfrA12AB126601, AF335108
111human21.0/aadA1AB126601
111unknown21.0/aadA1AB126601
111turkey11.0/aadA1AB107663
111apig11.0/aadA7AF224733
111cow11.5/aadA2, dfrA12AB154407
111cow10.65/sat1; 1.0/aadA1X15995, AB186119
111human11.0/aadA1; 2.0/aadA2, orfF, dfrA12AB126601, AF335108
a

Strains were used as donor strains in conjugation experiments.

b

One strain from this group was used as donor strain in the conjugation experiments.

Table 1.

Information about the 43 class 1 integron-containing STEC identified in this study

O type
Source of isolation
No. of isolates
Gene cassette(s) size (kb)/genes
Matched with accession no. in GenBank
26cow20.65/sat1X15995
26cow11.0/aadA7; 2.0/aadA2, orfF, dfrA12AF224733, AF335108
26cow11.0/aadA1AB126601
103aturkey11.0/aadA1AB126601
103acow11.0/aadA1AB126601
111cow131.0/aadA1AB126601
111bcow61.0/aadA7AF224733
111cow21.0/aadA12AY665771
111cow11.0/aadA21AY171244
111cow11.0/aadA23bAB189176
111unknown31.0/aadA1; 2.0/aadA2, orfF, dfrA12AB126601, AF335108
111cow21.0/aadA1; 2.0/aadA2, orfF, dfrA12AB126601, AF335108
111human21.0/aadA1AB126601
111unknown21.0/aadA1AB126601
111turkey11.0/aadA1AB107663
111apig11.0/aadA7AF224733
111cow11.5/aadA2, dfrA12AB154407
111cow10.65/sat1; 1.0/aadA1X15995, AB186119
111human11.0/aadA1; 2.0/aadA2, orfF, dfrA12AB126601, AF335108
O type
Source of isolation
No. of isolates
Gene cassette(s) size (kb)/genes
Matched with accession no. in GenBank
26cow20.65/sat1X15995
26cow11.0/aadA7; 2.0/aadA2, orfF, dfrA12AF224733, AF335108
26cow11.0/aadA1AB126601
103aturkey11.0/aadA1AB126601
103acow11.0/aadA1AB126601
111cow131.0/aadA1AB126601
111bcow61.0/aadA7AF224733
111cow21.0/aadA12AY665771
111cow11.0/aadA21AY171244
111cow11.0/aadA23bAB189176
111unknown31.0/aadA1; 2.0/aadA2, orfF, dfrA12AB126601, AF335108
111cow21.0/aadA1; 2.0/aadA2, orfF, dfrA12AB126601, AF335108
111human21.0/aadA1AB126601
111unknown21.0/aadA1AB126601
111turkey11.0/aadA1AB107663
111apig11.0/aadA7AF224733
111cow11.5/aadA2, dfrA12AB154407
111cow10.65/sat1; 1.0/aadA1X15995, AB186119
111human11.0/aadA1; 2.0/aadA2, orfF, dfrA12AB126601, AF335108
a

Strains were used as donor strains in conjugation experiments.

b

One strain from this group was used as donor strain in the conjugation experiments.

Table 2.

Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of E. coli strains used in conjugation experiments

Antimicrobial MIC (mg/L)
CVM strain no.
Strain type
FOX
CHL
TET
CIP
GEN
NAL
SMX
SXT
CEF
KAN
AMP
STR
19752recipient48<440.532<160.12/2.388162<32
9320donor<0.532160.015145120.25/4.7516<83264
19752/9320transconjugant4323240.5325120.12/2.388163264
9574donor88320.015145120.25/4.7516641664
19752/9574transconjugant483240.5325120.12/2.38816264
9279donor8832<0.015145122/38864464
19752/9279transconjugant483240.5325122/383264264
9530donor1616320.030.545120.5/9.51664864
19752/9530transconjugant483240.5325120.12/2.38816264
9514donor16832<0.010.545120.12/2.38816264
19752/9514transconjugant483240.5325120.12/2.38816464
Antimicrobial MIC (mg/L)
CVM strain no.
Strain type
FOX
CHL
TET
CIP
GEN
NAL
SMX
SXT
CEF
KAN
AMP
STR
19752recipient48<440.532<160.12/2.388162<32
9320donor<0.532160.015145120.25/4.7516<83264
19752/9320transconjugant4323240.5325120.12/2.388163264
9574donor88320.015145120.25/4.7516641664
19752/9574transconjugant483240.5325120.12/2.38816264
9279donor8832<0.015145122/38864464
19752/9279transconjugant483240.5325122/383264264
9530donor1616320.030.545120.5/9.51664864
19752/9530transconjugant483240.5325120.12/2.38816264
9514donor16832<0.010.545120.12/2.38816264
19752/9514transconjugant483240.5325120.12/2.38816464

AMP, ampicillin; CHL, chloramphenicol; CEF, cefalothin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; FOX, cefoxitin; GEN, gentamicin; KAN, kanamycin; NAL, nalidixic acid; SMX, sulfamethoxazole; STR, streptomycin; TET, tetracycline; SXT, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. CVM 19752 was the recipient strain in all experiments. MICs in bold indicate those changed as a result of conjugation.

Table 2.

Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of E. coli strains used in conjugation experiments

Antimicrobial MIC (mg/L)
CVM strain no.
Strain type
FOX
CHL
TET
CIP
GEN
NAL
SMX
SXT
CEF
KAN
AMP
STR
19752recipient48<440.532<160.12/2.388162<32
9320donor<0.532160.015145120.25/4.7516<83264
19752/9320transconjugant4323240.5325120.12/2.388163264
9574donor88320.015145120.25/4.7516641664
19752/9574transconjugant483240.5325120.12/2.38816264
9279donor8832<0.015145122/38864464
19752/9279transconjugant483240.5325122/383264264
9530donor1616320.030.545120.5/9.51664864
19752/9530transconjugant483240.5325120.12/2.38816264
9514donor16832<0.010.545120.12/2.38816264
19752/9514transconjugant483240.5325120.12/2.38816464
Antimicrobial MIC (mg/L)
CVM strain no.
Strain type
FOX
CHL
TET
CIP
GEN
NAL
SMX
SXT
CEF
KAN
AMP
STR
19752recipient48<440.532<160.12/2.388162<32
9320donor<0.532160.015145120.25/4.7516<83264
19752/9320transconjugant4323240.5325120.12/2.388163264
9574donor88320.015145120.25/4.7516641664
19752/9574transconjugant483240.5325120.12/2.38816264
9279donor8832<0.015145122/38864464
19752/9279transconjugant483240.5325122/383264264
9530donor1616320.030.545120.5/9.51664864
19752/9530transconjugant483240.5325120.12/2.38816264
9514donor16832<0.010.545120.12/2.38816264
19752/9514transconjugant483240.5325120.12/2.38816464

AMP, ampicillin; CHL, chloramphenicol; CEF, cefalothin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; FOX, cefoxitin; GEN, gentamicin; KAN, kanamycin; NAL, nalidixic acid; SMX, sulfamethoxazole; STR, streptomycin; TET, tetracycline; SXT, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. CVM 19752 was the recipient strain in all experiments. MICs in bold indicate those changed as a result of conjugation.

The study was made possible by grant USDA/NRI 2000-02600 from the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

References

1.

Schroeder CM, Meng J, Zhao S et al. Antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli O26, O103, O111, O128, and O145 from animals and humans.

Emerg Infect Dis
2002
;
8
:
1409
–14.

2.

Schroeder CM, Zhao C, DebRoy C et al. Antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli O157 isolated from humans, cattle, swine, and food.

Appl Environ Microbiol
2002
;
68
:
576
–81.

3.

Carratala J, Fernandez-Sevilla A, Tubau F et al. Emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in fecal flora of cancer patients receiving norfloxacin prophylaxis.

Antimicrob Agents Chemother
1996
;
40
:
503
–5.

4.

Brown PD, Freeman A, Foxman B. Prevalence and predictors of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance among uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolates in Michigan.

Clin Infect Dis
2002
;
34
:
1061
–6.

5.

Johnson AP, Burns L, Woodford N et al. Gentamicin resistance in clinical isolates of Escherichia coli encoded by genes of veterinary origin.

J Med Microbiol
1994
;
40
:
221
–6.

6.

Zhao S, White DG, Ge B et al. Identification and characterization of integron-mediated antibiotic resistance among Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolates.

Appl Environ Microbiol
2001
;
67
:
1558
–64.

7.

National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Tenth Informational Supplement M100-S11. NCCLS, Wayne, PA, USA, 2001.

8.

Clewell DB, Yagi Y, Dunny GM et al. Characterization of three plasmid deoxyribonucleic acid molecules in a strain of Streptococcus faecalis: identification of a plasmid determining erythromycin resistance.

J Bacteriol
1974
;
117
:
283
–9.

9.

Yu HS, Lee JC, Kang HY et al. Prevalence of dfr genes associated with integrons and dissemination of dfrA17 among urinary isolates of Escherichia coli in Korea.

J Antimicrob Chemother
2004
;
53
:
445
–50.

10.

Sanchez S, McCrackin Stevenson MA. Hudson CR et al. Characterization of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli isolates associated with nosocomial infections in dogs.

J Clin Microbiol
2002
;
40
:
3586
–95.

Author notes

1Division of Animal and Food Microbiology, Office of Research, Center for Veterinary Medicine, U.S. Food & Drug Administration, 8401 Muirkirk Road, Laurel, MD 20708, USA; 2Department of Nutrition and Food Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA; 3Gastroenteric Disease Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA