- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
R. J. De Rosa, J. Patience, K. Ward-Duong, A. Vigan, C. Marois, I. Song, B. Macintosh, J. R. Graham, R. Doyon, M. S. Bessell, O. Lai, D. W. McCarthy, C. Kulesa, The VAST Survey – IV. A wide brown dwarf companion to the A3V star ζ Delphini, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 445, Issue 4, 21 December 2014, Pages 3694–3705, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu2018
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
We report the discovery of a wide comoving substellar companion to the nearby (D = 67.5 ± 1.1 pc) A3V star ζ Delphini based on imaging and follow-up spectroscopic observations obtained during the course of our Volume-limited A-Star (VAST) multiplicity survey. ζ Del was observed over a five-year baseline with adaptive optics, revealing the presence of a previously unresolved companion with a proper motion consistent with that of the A-type primary. The age of the ζ Del system was estimated as 525 ± 125 Myr based on the position of the primary on the colour–magnitude and temperature–luminosity diagrams. Using intermediate-resolution near-infrared spectroscopy, the spectrum of ζ Del B is shown to be consistent with a mid-L dwarf (L5 ± 2), at a temperature of 1650 ± 200 K. Combining the measured near-infrared magnitude of ζ Del B with the estimated temperature leads to a model-dependent mass estimate of 50 ± 15 MJup, corresponding to a mass ratio of q = 0.019 ± 0.006. At a projected separation of 910 ± 14 au, ζ Del B is among the most widely separated and extreme-mass ratio substellar companions to a main-sequence star resolved to date, providing a rare empirical constraint of the formation of low-mass ratio companions at extremely wide separations.
1 INTRODUCTION
Since the discovery of the brown dwarf GJ 229 B (Nakajima et al. 1995), over a hundred examples of brown dwarf companions to main-sequence stars have been catalogued (e.g. Bird & Metchev 2010). Recent surveys designed to characterize the frequency of substellar companions to nearby stars have found a significant deficit of brown dwarf companions relative to both planetary-mass and stellar companions (Grether & Lineweaver 2006; Lafrenière et al. 2007; Vigan et al. 2012; Nielsen et al. 2013). The dearth of brown dwarf companions is most striking when compared to known planet-hosting systems: an order of magnitude more planetary-mass companions have been discovered to date, despite being more technically challenging to detect. Understanding the frequency and properties of companions intermediate to stellar and planetary-mass companions, and determining the shape of the companion mass ratio distribution, will allow for the formation of such companions to be placed in the context of both binary star and planet formation theories (e.g. Chabrier et al. 2014).
At wide angular separations, typically greater than an arcsecond, substellar companions are readily accessible to spectroscopic follow-up observations to characterize their atmospheres (e.g. Schultz et al. 1998; Leggett et al. 2008; Janson et al. 2010; Chilcote et al. 2014). These wide substellar companions represent important benchmark objects with which atmospheric and evolutionary models can be tested. By assuming coevality of the companion with the main-sequence primary, the observed degeneracies between age, mass, and luminosity for these objects can be broken (e.g. Dupuy, Liu & Ireland 2009; Kasper, Burrows & Brandner 2009; King et al. 2010; Deacon et al. 2012). Considerable effort has been made in identifying wide substellar companions to main-sequence stars, with studies utilizing both all-sky photometric surveys (e.g. Gizis et al. 2001; Pinfield et al. 2006; Faherty et al. 2010) and dedicated multi-epoch surveys (e.g. Deacon et al. 2014) discovering numerous examples, predominantly with field-age solar-type primaries.
In this paper, we report the astrometric and spectroscopic confirmation of a newly discovered wide substellar companion to the A3V star ζ Delphini (hereafter ζ Del), observed over a five-year baseline during the course of our Volume-limited A-Star (VAST) multiplicity survey (De Rosa et al. 2011, 2012, 2014). The companion to ζ Del joins the small list of known brown dwarf companions to early-type (<F0) stars: HR 7329 B (Lowrance et al. 2000), HD 100546 B (Acke & van den Ancker 2006; Mulders et al. 2013), HD 180777 B (Galland et al. 2006), HR 6037 B (Huélamo et al. 2010, discovered to be a binary brown dwarf by Nielsen et al. 2013), HIP 78530 B (Lafrenière et al. 2011), HD 1160 BaBb (Nielsen et al. 2012), and κ Andromedae b (Carson et al. 2013; Bonnefoy et al. 2014a). The large majority of these substellar companions were discovered using direct-imaging techniques; precision radial velocity searches for low-mass companions to A-type stars are complicated by the limited number of metallic lines, and their broadening caused by rapid stellar rotation. With the relatively low yield of brown dwarf companions in recent large-scale surveys of nearby, young (<1 Gyr) stars, the detection of an individual companion still represents a significant advancement in our understanding of these objects.
2 PROPERTIES OF ζ Del A
Observed as a part of our VAST multiplicity survey, ζ Del A is an A3V star (Slettebak 1954) located at a distance of 67.5 ± 1.1 pc from the Sun (van Leeuwen 2007), with Teff = 8336 K, log (g) = 3.72 dex and a slightly subsolar metallicity of [Fe/H]=−0.05 (Table 2; Erspamer & North 2003). Previous speckle interferometry measurements, and the adaptive optics (AO) measurements presented here, exclude the presence of a bright (ΔV ≲ 3) stellar companion beyond 0.03 arcsec (2 au; Hartkopf & McAlister 1984), and any stellar companion to the bottom of the main sequence beyond ∼0.9 arcsec (60 au). Eight substellar candidates were identified within the AO imaging presented in this study within a separation of ∼15 arcsec from ζ Del A, as shown in Fig. 1. Searches for stellar companions beyond the field of view of the AO images have yielded a null result (Shaya & Olling 2010; De Rosa et al. 2014). ζ Del A is listed as having either a spectroscopic companion or radial velocity variations by Hartkopf & McAlister (1984), although no further spectroscopic observations could be found in the literature confirming or rejecting these variations. Hartkopf & McAlister (1984) also list the star as potentially being photometrically variable, though subsequent Hipparcos measurements exclude variability amplitudes greater than 0.01 mag (Adelman 2001).
ζ Del A is not a known member of any stellar moving group or association, and is not well suited for age determination through either gyrochronology or chromospheric indicators due to the lack of surface convection zones and diminishing chromospheric activity observed for A-type stars (e.g. Barnes 2003; Mamajek & Hillenbrand 2008). An age can therefore only be estimated through a comparison of the observed and derived parameters with theoretical stellar evolution models. Two grids of models were used to estimate the age (Siess et al. 2000; Bressan et al. 2012). The position of the star on the temperature–gravity and the colour–magnitude diagrams (CMDs) was used to estimate the age, with the CMD shown in Fig. 2. The temperature and surface gravity of ζ Del A were estimated from high-resolution optical spectroscopy (Erspamer & North 2003). Optical and near-infrared absolute magnitudes colours were computed from measurements within the Tycho2 (Høg et al. 2000) and 2MASS (Skrutskie et al. 2006) catalogues, respectively. The bolometric luminosity of ζ Del A was then estimated to be log (L/L⊙) = 1.687 ± 0.015 based on the observed B−V colour, a bolometric correction (Flower 1996), and the solar bolometric magnitude of Mbol, ⊙ = 4.74 (Drilling & Landolt 2000). These observed and derived stellar properties are summarized in Table 2. The age for ζ Del A was estimated to be ∼400 Myr using the Siess et al. (2000) grid, and ∼630 Myr using the Bressan et al. (2012) grid. While neither of these grids take into account the effects of stellar rotation (e.g. Ekström et al. 2012), the effect on the age estimate is most significant for stars near the zero-age main sequence, where a small change in the observed luminosity and temperature of a star can cause a large change in the age derived from its position on the CMD relative to theoretical isochrones (Collins & Smith 1985). As ζ Del A has evolved away from the zero-age main sequence, the effect of rotation on the age estimate is likely to be small.
Taking both of these age estimates into account, we assigned an age of 525 ± 125 Myr to ζ Del A, consistent with its location on the CMD intermediate to the A-type stars within the 300–500 Myr Ursa Majoris moving group (King et al. 2003; Zuckerman & Song 2004) and 625 Myr Hyades open cluster (Perryman et al. 1998), as shown in Fig. 2. The 125 Myr uncertainty on the age corresponds to the range of ages estimated from the two model grids, as opposed to a formal statistical uncertainty. Another age diagnostic for early-type stars is the presence of a circumstellar debris disc (e.g. Gáspár, Rieke & Balog 2013). Based on the expected photospheric flux of ζ Del A at 22 μm, and the reported W4 magnitude within the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer catalogue (Wright et al. 2010), we find no evidence of an infrared excess indicative of the presence of warm circumstellar material, consistent with the age estimated for ζ Del A relative to the bulk of debris disc-hosting early-type stars (Rieke et al. 2005; Su et al. 2006). No longer-wavelength Spitzer or Herschel measurements were found within the literature. The mass of ζ Del A was estimated as 2.5 ± 0.2 M⊙ based on the position of the primary on both the temperature–surface gravity and CMDs relative to mass tracks within each model grid.
3 AO IMAGING OBSERVATIONS AND RESULTS
3.1 Observations and data analysis
ζ Del was initially observed on 2008 September 8 using the Near-InfraRed Imager and Spectrometer (NIRI; Hodapp et al. 2003) in combination with the ALTitude conjugate Adaptive optics for the InfraRed (ALTAIR; Herriot et al. 2000) system on the Gemini North telescope. The observing strategy consisted of a sequence of short integrations with the narrow-band Brγ filter in which the primary star remains unsaturated, followed by longer exposures in the wide-band K′ filter to achieve sensitivity to faint stellar and substellar companions. The unsaturated sequence consisted of images obtained at four dither positions on a 256 × 256 subarray of the NIRI detector, each consisting of 400 co-added frames of 0.021 s. The saturated sequence, using the full 1024 × 1024 array, also used a four-point dither pattern, at which two co-added frames of 25 s were obtained. The ALTAIR field lens was used to reduce the effect of isoplanatism.
In order to determine if any of the identified substellar companion candidates were physically bound, additional observations were obtained with Gemini/NIRI in similar configuration in 2010 and 2013. Fig. 1 shows the 2010 June 6 Gemini/NIRI observations in which the heavily saturated primary can be seen, in addition to eight candidate substellar companions. Observations were also obtained with the KIR instrument (Doyon et al. 1998) on the Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope (CFHT) in 2009 and with the Arizona Infrared imager and Echelle Spectrograph (ARIES; McCarthy et al. 1998) on the MMT in 2013. For the CFHT/KIR observations on 2009 August 31, a sequence of 20 0.5 s exposures were taken using the narrow-band H2(v = 1–0) filter in a four-point dither pattern on a 512 × 512 subarray of the KIR detector. This was followed by a saturated sequence of 27 60 s exposures taken using the wide-band K′ filter in a four-point dither pattern on the full 1024 × 1024 array. For the MMT/ARIES observations on 2013 September 18, a sequence of nine 0.9 s exposures were taken using the narrow-band Kc, 2.09 filter, in combination with a neutral density filter, in a nine-point dither pattern. This was followed by a saturated sequence of nine 4.9 s exposures using the wide-band KS filter in a nine-point dither pattern.
All of the images were processed through the standard near-infrared data reduction process consisting of the following steps: dark frame subtraction, division by a flat-field, bad pixel identification and removal, and sky subtraction. For the Gemini/NIRI observations, the field distortion was corrected based on the information provided on the Gemini website.1 The position of the primary in the unsaturated images was estimated from a Gaussian fit using the gcntrdidl procedure, while in the saturated images the position was determined through a cross-correlation of the diffraction spikes caused by the secondary mirror supports (Lafrenière et al. 2007). For each set of observations, the images were shifted to a common centre using the measured position of the primary, and rotated such that north was up and east to the left based on the astrometric information encoded into the image headers.
3.2 Astrometry
Based on a visual inspection of the images obtained over the multiple epochs, one of the candidate substellar companions (hereafter ζ Del B) was observed to remain stationary with respect to the centroid of ζ Del A, with the remaining candidates moving with the magnitude and direction consistent with that of a background object. The relative pixel positions of each object within each of the observations were measured by comparing the centroid location of each object measured using the gcntrd routine with the position of the saturated primary estimated previously. In order to convert the pixel position into an angular separation and position angle, the plate scale and orientation of each observation was required. Comparing the pixel position of Trapezium cluster members in observations obtained in 2010 with both CFHT/KIR and Gemini/NIRI, and in 2013 with MMT/ARIES, with previous astrometric measurements (McCaughrean & Stauffer 1994), enabled a measurement of the plate scale and angle of true north for each instrument, given in Table 1.
Instrument . | Date . | MJD . | Filter . | Plate scale . | True north . | Separation . | Position angle . | ΔK . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | . | . | . | (10−3 arcsec px−1) . | (deg) . | (arcsec) . | (deg) . | (mag) . |
Gemini/NIRI | 2008-09-08 | 54717.2398 | K′ | 21.27 ± 0.12 | 0.51 ± 0.30 | 13.51 ± 0.08 | 143.35 ± 0.30 | – |
CFHT/KIR | 2009-08-31 | 55074.4203 | K′ | 34.75 ± 0.09 | −2.38 ± 0.13 | 13.47 ± 0.04 | 143.12 ± 0.14 | 10.83 ± 0.27 |
Gemini/NIRI | 2010-06-08 | 55355.6308 | K′ | 21.27 ± 0.12 | 0.51 ± 0.30 | 13.51 ± 0.08 | 143.05 ± 0.30 | – |
Gemini/NIRI | 2013-05-07 | 56419.6402 | K′ | 21.27 ± 0.12 | 0.51 ± 0.30 | – | – | – |
MMT/ARIES | 2013-09-18 | 56554.7627 | KS | 40.57 ± 0.18 | 3.22 ± 0.24 | 13.53 ± 0.06 | 143.18 ± 0.24 | 10.99 ± 0.16 |
Instrument . | Date . | MJD . | Filter . | Plate scale . | True north . | Separation . | Position angle . | ΔK . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | . | . | . | (10−3 arcsec px−1) . | (deg) . | (arcsec) . | (deg) . | (mag) . |
Gemini/NIRI | 2008-09-08 | 54717.2398 | K′ | 21.27 ± 0.12 | 0.51 ± 0.30 | 13.51 ± 0.08 | 143.35 ± 0.30 | – |
CFHT/KIR | 2009-08-31 | 55074.4203 | K′ | 34.75 ± 0.09 | −2.38 ± 0.13 | 13.47 ± 0.04 | 143.12 ± 0.14 | 10.83 ± 0.27 |
Gemini/NIRI | 2010-06-08 | 55355.6308 | K′ | 21.27 ± 0.12 | 0.51 ± 0.30 | 13.51 ± 0.08 | 143.05 ± 0.30 | – |
Gemini/NIRI | 2013-05-07 | 56419.6402 | K′ | 21.27 ± 0.12 | 0.51 ± 0.30 | – | – | – |
MMT/ARIES | 2013-09-18 | 56554.7627 | KS | 40.57 ± 0.18 | 3.22 ± 0.24 | 13.53 ± 0.06 | 143.18 ± 0.24 | 10.99 ± 0.16 |
Instrument . | Date . | MJD . | Filter . | Plate scale . | True north . | Separation . | Position angle . | ΔK . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | . | . | . | (10−3 arcsec px−1) . | (deg) . | (arcsec) . | (deg) . | (mag) . |
Gemini/NIRI | 2008-09-08 | 54717.2398 | K′ | 21.27 ± 0.12 | 0.51 ± 0.30 | 13.51 ± 0.08 | 143.35 ± 0.30 | – |
CFHT/KIR | 2009-08-31 | 55074.4203 | K′ | 34.75 ± 0.09 | −2.38 ± 0.13 | 13.47 ± 0.04 | 143.12 ± 0.14 | 10.83 ± 0.27 |
Gemini/NIRI | 2010-06-08 | 55355.6308 | K′ | 21.27 ± 0.12 | 0.51 ± 0.30 | 13.51 ± 0.08 | 143.05 ± 0.30 | – |
Gemini/NIRI | 2013-05-07 | 56419.6402 | K′ | 21.27 ± 0.12 | 0.51 ± 0.30 | – | – | – |
MMT/ARIES | 2013-09-18 | 56554.7627 | KS | 40.57 ± 0.18 | 3.22 ± 0.24 | 13.53 ± 0.06 | 143.18 ± 0.24 | 10.99 ± 0.16 |
Instrument . | Date . | MJD . | Filter . | Plate scale . | True north . | Separation . | Position angle . | ΔK . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | . | . | . | (10−3 arcsec px−1) . | (deg) . | (arcsec) . | (deg) . | (mag) . |
Gemini/NIRI | 2008-09-08 | 54717.2398 | K′ | 21.27 ± 0.12 | 0.51 ± 0.30 | 13.51 ± 0.08 | 143.35 ± 0.30 | – |
CFHT/KIR | 2009-08-31 | 55074.4203 | K′ | 34.75 ± 0.09 | −2.38 ± 0.13 | 13.47 ± 0.04 | 143.12 ± 0.14 | 10.83 ± 0.27 |
Gemini/NIRI | 2010-06-08 | 55355.6308 | K′ | 21.27 ± 0.12 | 0.51 ± 0.30 | 13.51 ± 0.08 | 143.05 ± 0.30 | – |
Gemini/NIRI | 2013-05-07 | 56419.6402 | K′ | 21.27 ± 0.12 | 0.51 ± 0.30 | – | – | – |
MMT/ARIES | 2013-09-18 | 56554.7627 | KS | 40.57 ± 0.18 | 3.22 ± 0.24 | 13.53 ± 0.06 | 143.18 ± 0.24 | 10.99 ± 0.16 |
The pixel scale and orientation of each instrument were used to convert the measured pixel offset between ζ Del A and B into an on-sky angular separation and position angle for each observation, which are listed in Table 1. This process was repeated for seven additional candidates resolved in the vicinity of ζ Del A. The astrometric motion of each candidate was measured relative to the position in the 2008 Gemini/NIRI data set. The relative change in the positions of eight candidate companions from the first epoch, plotted alongside the expected motion of a background objects based on the parallax and proper motion of ζ Del A, are shown in Fig. 3. Each subsequent measurement of ζ Del B was within the uncertainty of the original epoch, consistent with a physically bound companion. In contrast, the seven additional candidates followed the expected motion of a background object (Fig. 3). The changes in the separation and position angle of ζ Del B measured relative to the 2008 Gemini/NIRI data set are also inconsistent with the expected motion of a background objects, as shown in Fig. 4.
In order to quantify the significance of the astrometric confirmation, the χ2 statistic is computed based on a comparison of the position of ζ Del B with that expected of a background object (|$\chi _{\rm BG}^2$|), and with that expected of a bound companion with no orbital motion (|$\chi _{\rm CPM}^2$|). Definitions for |$\chi _{\rm BG}^2$| and |$\chi _{\rm CPM}^2$| are given in Nielsen et al. (2012). Comparing the measured position of ζ Del B with the expected motion of a background object leads to a |$\chi ^2_{\rm BG}=39.38$|, corresponding to a reduced χ2 = 6.56 with 6 degrees of freedom. The measurements are inconsistent with the hypothesis that ζ Del B is a stationary background object, with a probability derived from the χ2 statistic of PBG ∼ 10−6. Fitting the measurements to the expected constant separation and position angle of a bound companion yields a |$\chi ^2_{\rm CPM}=6.29$|, corresponding to a reduced χ2 = 1.05. Based on the value of |$\chi _{\rm CPM}^2$|, the hypothesis that ζ Del B has a fixed separation and position angle can only be accepted at a low confidence level (PCPM = 0.39), due to the relatively small annular proper motion of ζ Del A. Whilst the confidence of the astrometric confirmation is relatively low, additional spectroscopic evidence was obtained to support the hypothesis that ζ Del B is a bound companion (Section 4).
3.3 Photometry
As the primary was saturated within all of the images in which ζ Del B was detected, it was not possible to measure a magnitude difference in an individual image. Instead, the flux from the primary was measured using aperture photometry within the short integrations taken with a narrow-band filter. This flux was then scaled according to the relative exposure times of the unsaturated and saturated exposures, and the relative transmission of the narrow- and wide-band filters. While the former quantity is precisely recorded within the header of each image, the latter can be significantly biased by both the temperature at which the filter transmission curve was measured, and the colour of stars being observed due to differences in the effective wavelength of the two filters.
The relative transmission of the CFHT/KIR H2(v = 1 − 0) and K′ filters and the MMT/ARIES Kc, 2.09+ND1 and KS filters were determined empirically using measurements of early-type stars within the Trapezium cluster obtained with each filter combination. Exposure times were selected to minimize the number of saturated stars within each image. A linear fit to the flux for each unsaturated star measured within each pair of narrow- and wide-band filters gave an estimate of the relative transmission of 25.4 for the CFHT/KIR observations, and 127.7 for the MMT/ARIES observations. Using these scaling factors, the flux of ζ Del A within the unsaturated observations was scaled and compared with that of ζ Del B measured within the saturated observations. The magnitude differences measured within the CFHT/KIR and MMT/ARIES observations are listed in Table 1. No measurement of the magnitude difference was made for the Gemini/NIRI images due to the limited number of images for which ζ Del B was within the field of view; the Gemini/NIRI data were only used for the astrometric analysis.
4 SPECTROSCOPIC OBSERVATIONS AND RESULTS
An intermediate-resolution (R ∼ 1800) spectrum of ζ Del B was obtained with the Gemini Near Infra-Red Spectrograph (GNIRS; Elias et al. 2006) mounted on the Gemini North telescope on 2013 October 11 in order to confirm the substellar nature of the object, and reject the possibility of a background star with a similar proper motion to ζ Del A. GNIRS was operated in cross-dispersed mode, providing simultaneous coverage to wavelengths in the range 0.9-2.5 μm, using the short blue camera with the 32 lines mm−1 grating and the 0.3 arcsec slit. ζ Del B was observed in an ABBA pattern, with 300 s per exposure, and a total on-source integration time of 1800 s. The slit was orientated at a position angle of 270 deg, with no contamination from ζ Del A seen within either the raw or reduced spectra. An argon lamp and a flat-field lamp were observed to measure the wavelength scale and variations in the detector response. Finally, a spectrum of the B3V star HIP 104320 (Teff = 19 000 K; Cox 2000) was obtained, to correct for telluric absorption in the spectrum of ζ Del B.
The observations of ζ Del B, and the telluric calibrator, were reduced using the GNIRS-specific tools provided within the Gemini iraf package. Cosmic rays were identified by comparing pairs of images at each dither position, and were removed by interpolating neighbouring pixels. The spectra were then divided by a flat-field, and sky-subtracted. The spectral trace was measured and corrected to straighten the spectra within the 2D images, and the wavelength solution was derived from the position of the lines within the argon lamp spectrum. The spectrum of ζ Del B, and the telluric calibrator, at each nod position was extracted using a nine pixel (1.35 arcsec) rectangular aperture extended perpendicular to the dispersion direction. An adjacent aperture was used to construct a sky spectrum to remove any residuals from the sky-subtraction caused by variations in the strength of the sky lines over the course of the observations. Both sets of observations were scaled by the exposure time, such that the spectra were expressed in units of ADU s−1. The six individual spectra of ζ Del B were median-combined, divided by the telluric spectrum, and multiplied by a Teff = 19 000 K log (g) = 4.5 bt-settl model atmosphere (Allard, Homeier & Freytag 2012), scaled to the 2MASS KS apparent magnitude HIP 104320. No residual spectral features intrinsic to the B3V telluric standard remained within the calibrated spectrum of ζ Del B, indicating a good match between the telluric calibrator and the bt-settl model atmosphere.
The final flux-calibrated spectrum of ζ Del B is shown in Fig. 5. From this spectrum, the apparent magnitudes in the 2MASS JHKS and MKO JHK′KSK photometric systems were computed using the filter transmission curves given in Cohen, Wheaton & Megeath (2003) and Tokunaga et al. (2002), respectively. The MKO filter transmission curves were multiplied by the transmission of the atmosphere above Mauna Kea,2 assuming a precipitable water vapour column of 3 mm. The resulting MKO filter curves are overplotted on Fig. 5 for reference. The apparent magnitudes estimated from the flux-calibrated spectrum, and computed absolute magnitudes and corresponding near-infrared colours, are given in Table 2. The MKO KS = 15.35 ± 0.17 of ζ Del B measured within the MMT/ARIES data set, assuming a negligible colour transformation between the 2MASS and MKO photometric systems for the A-type primary, is consistent with the magnitude derived from the flux-calibrated spectrum.
Property . | Value . | Value . | Unit . |
---|---|---|---|
Identifiers | ζ Del, 4 Del, HD 196180 | ||
HIP 101589, HR 7871 | |||
ζ Del A | ζ Del B | ||
Parallax | 14.82 ± 0.23a | mas | |
Distance | 67.48 ± 1.05a | pc | |
μα, μδ | 45.52 ± 0.26, 11.74 ± 0.17a | mas yr−1 | |
BT | 4.768 ± 0.014b | – | mag |
VT | 4.660 ± 0.009b | – | mag |
2MASS J | 4.821 ± 0.284c | 17.17 ± 0.09d | mag |
2MASS H | 4.484 ± 0.033c | 16.19 ± 0.08d | mag |
2MASS KS | 4.357 ± 0.036c | 15.43 ± 0.07d | mag |
MKO J | 4.821 ± 0.284e | 17.18 ± 0.09d | mag |
MKO H | 4.484 ± 0.033e | 16.26 ± 0.09d | mag |
MKO K′ | 4.357 ± 0.036e | 15.55 ± 0.07d | mag |
MKO KS | 4.357 ± 0.036e | 15.46 ± 0.07d | mag |
MKO K | 4.357 ± 0.036e | 15.40 ± 0.07d | mag |
2MASS MJ | 0.675 ± 0.286 | 13.03 ± 0.10 | mag |
2MASS MH | 0.338 ± 0.047 | 12.04 ± 0.09 | mag |
2MASS |$M_{{\it K}_{\rm S}}$| | 0.211 ± 0.049 | 11.28 ± 0.08 | mag |
BT–VT | 0.108 ± 0.017 | – | – |
2MASS J−H | 0.337 ± 0.286 | 0.98 ± 0.13 | – |
2MASS H− KS | 0.127 ± 0.049 | 0.76 ± 0.11 | – |
2MASS J− KS | 0.464 ± 0.286 | 1.75 ± 0.12 | – |
BCV | 0.088 ± 0.012f | – | – |
BCK | – | 3.31 ± 0.09g | – |
Mbol | 0.523 ± 0.037 | 14.59 ± 0.12 | mag |
L⋆ | 48.63 ± 1.66h | 0.00012 ± 0.00001h | L⊙ |
log (L⋆/L⊙) | 1.687 ± 0.015 | −3.94 ± 0.05 | dex |
Spectral type | A3Vi | L5 ± 2j | – |
Teff | 8336k | |$1550^{+250}_{-100}$|l | K |
log (g) | 3.72k | |$5.0^{+0.5}_{-1.0}$| | dex |
[Fe/H] | −0.05k | – | dex |
Age | 525 ± 125m | Myr | |
Mass | 2.5 ± 0.2m | – | M⊙ |
– | 55 ± 10n | MJup | |
– | |$40^{+15}_{-5}$|o | MJup | |
Mass ratio | 0.021 ± 0.004n | – | |
|$0.015^{+0.006}_{-0.002}$|o | – | ||
ρ | 13.51 ± 0.08p | arcsec | |
θ | 143.35 ± 0.30p | deg | |
aproj | 912 ± 15 | au | |
a | |$907^{+723}_{-236}$|q | au | |
P | ∼104r | yr |
Property . | Value . | Value . | Unit . |
---|---|---|---|
Identifiers | ζ Del, 4 Del, HD 196180 | ||
HIP 101589, HR 7871 | |||
ζ Del A | ζ Del B | ||
Parallax | 14.82 ± 0.23a | mas | |
Distance | 67.48 ± 1.05a | pc | |
μα, μδ | 45.52 ± 0.26, 11.74 ± 0.17a | mas yr−1 | |
BT | 4.768 ± 0.014b | – | mag |
VT | 4.660 ± 0.009b | – | mag |
2MASS J | 4.821 ± 0.284c | 17.17 ± 0.09d | mag |
2MASS H | 4.484 ± 0.033c | 16.19 ± 0.08d | mag |
2MASS KS | 4.357 ± 0.036c | 15.43 ± 0.07d | mag |
MKO J | 4.821 ± 0.284e | 17.18 ± 0.09d | mag |
MKO H | 4.484 ± 0.033e | 16.26 ± 0.09d | mag |
MKO K′ | 4.357 ± 0.036e | 15.55 ± 0.07d | mag |
MKO KS | 4.357 ± 0.036e | 15.46 ± 0.07d | mag |
MKO K | 4.357 ± 0.036e | 15.40 ± 0.07d | mag |
2MASS MJ | 0.675 ± 0.286 | 13.03 ± 0.10 | mag |
2MASS MH | 0.338 ± 0.047 | 12.04 ± 0.09 | mag |
2MASS |$M_{{\it K}_{\rm S}}$| | 0.211 ± 0.049 | 11.28 ± 0.08 | mag |
BT–VT | 0.108 ± 0.017 | – | – |
2MASS J−H | 0.337 ± 0.286 | 0.98 ± 0.13 | – |
2MASS H− KS | 0.127 ± 0.049 | 0.76 ± 0.11 | – |
2MASS J− KS | 0.464 ± 0.286 | 1.75 ± 0.12 | – |
BCV | 0.088 ± 0.012f | – | – |
BCK | – | 3.31 ± 0.09g | – |
Mbol | 0.523 ± 0.037 | 14.59 ± 0.12 | mag |
L⋆ | 48.63 ± 1.66h | 0.00012 ± 0.00001h | L⊙ |
log (L⋆/L⊙) | 1.687 ± 0.015 | −3.94 ± 0.05 | dex |
Spectral type | A3Vi | L5 ± 2j | – |
Teff | 8336k | |$1550^{+250}_{-100}$|l | K |
log (g) | 3.72k | |$5.0^{+0.5}_{-1.0}$| | dex |
[Fe/H] | −0.05k | – | dex |
Age | 525 ± 125m | Myr | |
Mass | 2.5 ± 0.2m | – | M⊙ |
– | 55 ± 10n | MJup | |
– | |$40^{+15}_{-5}$|o | MJup | |
Mass ratio | 0.021 ± 0.004n | – | |
|$0.015^{+0.006}_{-0.002}$|o | – | ||
ρ | 13.51 ± 0.08p | arcsec | |
θ | 143.35 ± 0.30p | deg | |
aproj | 912 ± 15 | au | |
a | |$907^{+723}_{-236}$|q | au | |
P | ∼104r | yr |
Note:avan Leeuwen (2007), assumed to be equal for both components, bHøg et al. 2000, cSkrutskie et al. (2006), destimated from the flux-calibrated GNIRS spectrum of ζ Del B, enegligible 2MASS–MKO colour transformation for an A3V star, finterpolated from B−V versus BCV table in Flower (1996), gestimated from spectral type–BCK relation in Liu, Dupuy & Leggett (2010), hcalculated from Mbol, assuming Mbol, ⊙ = 4.74 (Drilling & Landolt 2000), iCowley et al. (1969), jestimated from comparison with SpeX library (Fig. 7), kErspamer & North (2003), lestimated from adopted spectral type and equation 3 of Stephens et al. (2009), mestimated from Siess et al. (2000) and Bressan et al. (2012) evolutionary models, nestimated from system age and absolute KS magnitude (Fig. 8, top panel), oestimated from system age and adopted temperature (Fig. 8, bottom panel), pastrometry measured in 2008 Gemini/NIRI observations, qcalculated using the probability density function for the factor a/aproj computed by Dupuy & Liu (2011), assuming a flat eccentricity distribution and no detection bias, rcalculated assuming a face-on, circular orbit.
Property . | Value . | Value . | Unit . |
---|---|---|---|
Identifiers | ζ Del, 4 Del, HD 196180 | ||
HIP 101589, HR 7871 | |||
ζ Del A | ζ Del B | ||
Parallax | 14.82 ± 0.23a | mas | |
Distance | 67.48 ± 1.05a | pc | |
μα, μδ | 45.52 ± 0.26, 11.74 ± 0.17a | mas yr−1 | |
BT | 4.768 ± 0.014b | – | mag |
VT | 4.660 ± 0.009b | – | mag |
2MASS J | 4.821 ± 0.284c | 17.17 ± 0.09d | mag |
2MASS H | 4.484 ± 0.033c | 16.19 ± 0.08d | mag |
2MASS KS | 4.357 ± 0.036c | 15.43 ± 0.07d | mag |
MKO J | 4.821 ± 0.284e | 17.18 ± 0.09d | mag |
MKO H | 4.484 ± 0.033e | 16.26 ± 0.09d | mag |
MKO K′ | 4.357 ± 0.036e | 15.55 ± 0.07d | mag |
MKO KS | 4.357 ± 0.036e | 15.46 ± 0.07d | mag |
MKO K | 4.357 ± 0.036e | 15.40 ± 0.07d | mag |
2MASS MJ | 0.675 ± 0.286 | 13.03 ± 0.10 | mag |
2MASS MH | 0.338 ± 0.047 | 12.04 ± 0.09 | mag |
2MASS |$M_{{\it K}_{\rm S}}$| | 0.211 ± 0.049 | 11.28 ± 0.08 | mag |
BT–VT | 0.108 ± 0.017 | – | – |
2MASS J−H | 0.337 ± 0.286 | 0.98 ± 0.13 | – |
2MASS H− KS | 0.127 ± 0.049 | 0.76 ± 0.11 | – |
2MASS J− KS | 0.464 ± 0.286 | 1.75 ± 0.12 | – |
BCV | 0.088 ± 0.012f | – | – |
BCK | – | 3.31 ± 0.09g | – |
Mbol | 0.523 ± 0.037 | 14.59 ± 0.12 | mag |
L⋆ | 48.63 ± 1.66h | 0.00012 ± 0.00001h | L⊙ |
log (L⋆/L⊙) | 1.687 ± 0.015 | −3.94 ± 0.05 | dex |
Spectral type | A3Vi | L5 ± 2j | – |
Teff | 8336k | |$1550^{+250}_{-100}$|l | K |
log (g) | 3.72k | |$5.0^{+0.5}_{-1.0}$| | dex |
[Fe/H] | −0.05k | – | dex |
Age | 525 ± 125m | Myr | |
Mass | 2.5 ± 0.2m | – | M⊙ |
– | 55 ± 10n | MJup | |
– | |$40^{+15}_{-5}$|o | MJup | |
Mass ratio | 0.021 ± 0.004n | – | |
|$0.015^{+0.006}_{-0.002}$|o | – | ||
ρ | 13.51 ± 0.08p | arcsec | |
θ | 143.35 ± 0.30p | deg | |
aproj | 912 ± 15 | au | |
a | |$907^{+723}_{-236}$|q | au | |
P | ∼104r | yr |
Property . | Value . | Value . | Unit . |
---|---|---|---|
Identifiers | ζ Del, 4 Del, HD 196180 | ||
HIP 101589, HR 7871 | |||
ζ Del A | ζ Del B | ||
Parallax | 14.82 ± 0.23a | mas | |
Distance | 67.48 ± 1.05a | pc | |
μα, μδ | 45.52 ± 0.26, 11.74 ± 0.17a | mas yr−1 | |
BT | 4.768 ± 0.014b | – | mag |
VT | 4.660 ± 0.009b | – | mag |
2MASS J | 4.821 ± 0.284c | 17.17 ± 0.09d | mag |
2MASS H | 4.484 ± 0.033c | 16.19 ± 0.08d | mag |
2MASS KS | 4.357 ± 0.036c | 15.43 ± 0.07d | mag |
MKO J | 4.821 ± 0.284e | 17.18 ± 0.09d | mag |
MKO H | 4.484 ± 0.033e | 16.26 ± 0.09d | mag |
MKO K′ | 4.357 ± 0.036e | 15.55 ± 0.07d | mag |
MKO KS | 4.357 ± 0.036e | 15.46 ± 0.07d | mag |
MKO K | 4.357 ± 0.036e | 15.40 ± 0.07d | mag |
2MASS MJ | 0.675 ± 0.286 | 13.03 ± 0.10 | mag |
2MASS MH | 0.338 ± 0.047 | 12.04 ± 0.09 | mag |
2MASS |$M_{{\it K}_{\rm S}}$| | 0.211 ± 0.049 | 11.28 ± 0.08 | mag |
BT–VT | 0.108 ± 0.017 | – | – |
2MASS J−H | 0.337 ± 0.286 | 0.98 ± 0.13 | – |
2MASS H− KS | 0.127 ± 0.049 | 0.76 ± 0.11 | – |
2MASS J− KS | 0.464 ± 0.286 | 1.75 ± 0.12 | – |
BCV | 0.088 ± 0.012f | – | – |
BCK | – | 3.31 ± 0.09g | – |
Mbol | 0.523 ± 0.037 | 14.59 ± 0.12 | mag |
L⋆ | 48.63 ± 1.66h | 0.00012 ± 0.00001h | L⊙ |
log (L⋆/L⊙) | 1.687 ± 0.015 | −3.94 ± 0.05 | dex |
Spectral type | A3Vi | L5 ± 2j | – |
Teff | 8336k | |$1550^{+250}_{-100}$|l | K |
log (g) | 3.72k | |$5.0^{+0.5}_{-1.0}$| | dex |
[Fe/H] | −0.05k | – | dex |
Age | 525 ± 125m | Myr | |
Mass | 2.5 ± 0.2m | – | M⊙ |
– | 55 ± 10n | MJup | |
– | |$40^{+15}_{-5}$|o | MJup | |
Mass ratio | 0.021 ± 0.004n | – | |
|$0.015^{+0.006}_{-0.002}$|o | – | ||
ρ | 13.51 ± 0.08p | arcsec | |
θ | 143.35 ± 0.30p | deg | |
aproj | 912 ± 15 | au | |
a | |$907^{+723}_{-236}$|q | au | |
P | ∼104r | yr |
Note:avan Leeuwen (2007), assumed to be equal for both components, bHøg et al. 2000, cSkrutskie et al. (2006), destimated from the flux-calibrated GNIRS spectrum of ζ Del B, enegligible 2MASS–MKO colour transformation for an A3V star, finterpolated from B−V versus BCV table in Flower (1996), gestimated from spectral type–BCK relation in Liu, Dupuy & Leggett (2010), hcalculated from Mbol, assuming Mbol, ⊙ = 4.74 (Drilling & Landolt 2000), iCowley et al. (1969), jestimated from comparison with SpeX library (Fig. 7), kErspamer & North (2003), lestimated from adopted spectral type and equation 3 of Stephens et al. (2009), mestimated from Siess et al. (2000) and Bressan et al. (2012) evolutionary models, nestimated from system age and absolute KS magnitude (Fig. 8, top panel), oestimated from system age and adopted temperature (Fig. 8, bottom panel), pastrometry measured in 2008 Gemini/NIRI observations, qcalculated using the probability density function for the factor a/aproj computed by Dupuy & Liu (2011), assuming a flat eccentricity distribution and no detection bias, rcalculated assuming a face-on, circular orbit.
5 PROPERTIES OF ζ DEL B
5.1 Spectral type, effective temperature, and surface gravity
The spectral type of ζ Del B was estimated through a comparison with empirical spectra of field brown dwarfs within the SpeX Prism Spectral Library.3 The GNIRS spectrum of ζ Del B and the SpeX spectra were smoothed by convolution with a 50 Å Gaussian, and interpolated to the same wavelength scale. For each object within the SpeX library, the spectrum was scaled to minimize the reduced χ2 when compared with ζ Del B, calculated over the wavelength ranges 1.05–1.35 μm, 1.45–1.80 μm, and 1.98–2.40 μm. In this case, the χ2 statistic is equivalent to the G statistic, defined by Cushing et al. (2008), as the weightings are uniform across the entire wavelength range of the spectrum of ζ Del B. Fig. 6 shows the spectrum of ζ Del B compared with the M-, L-, and T-dwarf near-infrared spectral standards from Kirkpatrick et al. (2010) and Geißler et al. (2011), which are all available within the SpeX library. Fig. 7 shows the reduced χ2 as a function of spectral type for all of the objects within the SpeX library, with the spectral standards highlighted, from which a spectral type of L5 ± 2 was adopted for ζ Del B. The mid-L spectral classification is consistent with the spectral type estimated from various spectral indices defined in the literature, given in Table 3 (McLean et al. 2003; Allers et al. 2007; Burgasser 2007). This range of spectral types corresponds to an effective temperature of |$1550^{+250}_{-100}$| K, using the spectral type–temperature relations of Stephens et al. (2009) derived for field brown dwarfs. The spectrum of ζ Del B was also compared with bt-settl synthetic spectra (Allard et al. 2012), with a best-fitting effective temperature of Teff = 1650 ± 200 K and surface gravity of |$\log \left(g\right)=5.0^{+0.5}_{-1.0}$|, based on a χ2 minimization of the observed and model spectra.
Index . | Value . | Spectral type . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|
H2O A | 0.55 ± 0.08 | L3.6 ± 2.2 | McLean et al. (2003) |
H2O B | 0.61 ± 0.14 | L5.5 ± 3.3 | McLean et al. (2003) |
H2O C | 0.66 ± 0.14 | L3.1 ± 5.6 | McLean et al. (2003) |
H2O D | 0.85 ± 0.10 | L3.1 ± 2.6 | McLean et al. (2003) |
H2O | 1.35 ± 0.18 | L4.6 ± 6.3 | Allers et al. (2007) |
H2O J | 0.78 ± 0.13 | L4.8 ± 3.9 | Burgasser (2007) |
H2O H | 0.72 ± 0.10 | L5.7 ± 3.8 | Burgasser (2007) |
CH4 K | 1.07 ± 0.08 | L1.6 ± 3.9 | Burgasser (2007) |
Index . | Value . | Spectral type . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|
H2O A | 0.55 ± 0.08 | L3.6 ± 2.2 | McLean et al. (2003) |
H2O B | 0.61 ± 0.14 | L5.5 ± 3.3 | McLean et al. (2003) |
H2O C | 0.66 ± 0.14 | L3.1 ± 5.6 | McLean et al. (2003) |
H2O D | 0.85 ± 0.10 | L3.1 ± 2.6 | McLean et al. (2003) |
H2O | 1.35 ± 0.18 | L4.6 ± 6.3 | Allers et al. (2007) |
H2O J | 0.78 ± 0.13 | L4.8 ± 3.9 | Burgasser (2007) |
H2O H | 0.72 ± 0.10 | L5.7 ± 3.8 | Burgasser (2007) |
CH4 K | 1.07 ± 0.08 | L1.6 ± 3.9 | Burgasser (2007) |
Index . | Value . | Spectral type . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|
H2O A | 0.55 ± 0.08 | L3.6 ± 2.2 | McLean et al. (2003) |
H2O B | 0.61 ± 0.14 | L5.5 ± 3.3 | McLean et al. (2003) |
H2O C | 0.66 ± 0.14 | L3.1 ± 5.6 | McLean et al. (2003) |
H2O D | 0.85 ± 0.10 | L3.1 ± 2.6 | McLean et al. (2003) |
H2O | 1.35 ± 0.18 | L4.6 ± 6.3 | Allers et al. (2007) |
H2O J | 0.78 ± 0.13 | L4.8 ± 3.9 | Burgasser (2007) |
H2O H | 0.72 ± 0.10 | L5.7 ± 3.8 | Burgasser (2007) |
CH4 K | 1.07 ± 0.08 | L1.6 ± 3.9 | Burgasser (2007) |
Index . | Value . | Spectral type . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|
H2O A | 0.55 ± 0.08 | L3.6 ± 2.2 | McLean et al. (2003) |
H2O B | 0.61 ± 0.14 | L5.5 ± 3.3 | McLean et al. (2003) |
H2O C | 0.66 ± 0.14 | L3.1 ± 5.6 | McLean et al. (2003) |
H2O D | 0.85 ± 0.10 | L3.1 ± 2.6 | McLean et al. (2003) |
H2O | 1.35 ± 0.18 | L4.6 ± 6.3 | Allers et al. (2007) |
H2O J | 0.78 ± 0.13 | L4.8 ± 3.9 | Burgasser (2007) |
H2O H | 0.72 ± 0.10 | L5.7 ± 3.8 | Burgasser (2007) |
CH4 K | 1.07 ± 0.08 | L1.6 ± 3.9 | Burgasser (2007) |
The observed spectrum does not exhibit the strong triangular shape of the H-band continuum seen in the lowest surface gravity brown dwarfs (e.g. Lucas et al. 2001; Allers et al. 2007), consistent with the higher surface gravity estimated for ζ Del B from the comparison with the model spectra. The shape of the H-band peak can be quantified using the H-cont index defined by Allers & Liu (2013). While the H-cont index for ζ Del B of 0.92 would suggest a lower surface gravity than field objects, Allers & Liu (2013) note that numerous older dusty field brown dwarfs also exhibit similar behaviour, and caution against using this index alone to diagnose low-surface gravity. The remaining Allers & Liu (2013) indices which could be measured using the GNIRS data, Fe HJ = 1.2 and K IJ = 1.2, are consistent with the field population, and suggest a high surface gravity for ζ Del B.
Individual spectral features are also diagnostic of surface gravity. The strength of the sodium (Na i) line at 1.1396 μm and the potassium (K i) doublets at 1.174 and 1.248 μm, indicated in Fig. 5, are observed to depend strongly on the spectral type and surface gravity of an object (Gorlova et al. 2003), being significantly weaker within the spectra of the youngest objects of a given spectral type (Allers & Liu 2013). The equivalent widths of these lines, which were calculated using the method described in McLean et al. (2003), are given in Table 4. The strength of these lines within the spectrum of ζ Del B suggest a surface gravity more similar to those found for field brown dwarfs (e.g. McLean et al. 2007), than found for younger objects (e.g. Bonnefoy et al. 2014b). The presence of a deep 12CO 2–0 bandhead at 2.29 μm, indicated in Fig. 5, is a potential indicator of low surface gravity (e.g. Cushing, Rayner & Vacca 2005), based on the depth of the bandhead within the spectra of M-type giants relative to M-dwarfs of the same spectral type (Kleinmann & Hall 1986). Without an empirical relation between the strength of this absorption and surface gravity for a given brown dwarf spectral type, the significance of the deep absorption seen in the spectrum of ζ Del B cannot be quantified.
Feature . | Wavelength . | Equivalent width . |
---|---|---|
. | (Å) . | (Å) . |
Na i | 11 396 | 11.3 ± 0.5 |
K i | 11 692 | 10.8 ± 0.4 |
K i | 11 778 | 11.9 ± 0.4 |
K i | 12 437 | 6.8 ± 0.4 |
K i | 12 529 | 9.4 ± 0.7 |
Feature . | Wavelength . | Equivalent width . |
---|---|---|
. | (Å) . | (Å) . |
Na i | 11 396 | 11.3 ± 0.5 |
K i | 11 692 | 10.8 ± 0.4 |
K i | 11 778 | 11.9 ± 0.4 |
K i | 12 437 | 6.8 ± 0.4 |
K i | 12 529 | 9.4 ± 0.7 |
Feature . | Wavelength . | Equivalent width . |
---|---|---|
. | (Å) . | (Å) . |
Na i | 11 396 | 11.3 ± 0.5 |
K i | 11 692 | 10.8 ± 0.4 |
K i | 11 778 | 11.9 ± 0.4 |
K i | 12 437 | 6.8 ± 0.4 |
K i | 12 529 | 9.4 ± 0.7 |
Feature . | Wavelength . | Equivalent width . |
---|---|---|
. | (Å) . | (Å) . |
Na i | 11 396 | 11.3 ± 0.5 |
K i | 11 692 | 10.8 ± 0.4 |
K i | 11 778 | 11.9 ± 0.4 |
K i | 12 437 | 6.8 ± 0.4 |
K i | 12 529 | 9.4 ± 0.7 |
5.2 Bolometric luminosity and mass
In order to determine the bolometric luminosity of ζ Del B, a K-band bolometric correction of BCK = 3.31 ± 0.09 was estimated using the adopted spectral type and the spectral type–BCK relation for field brown dwarfs presented in Liu et al. (2010). Applying this correction to the measured K-band magnitude leads to a bolometric magnitude of Mbol = 14.59 ± 0.12 and a bolometric luminosity of log (L/L⊙) = −3.94 ± 0.05 for ζ Del B, assuming Mbol, ⊙ = 4.74 (Drilling & Landolt 2000). Using evolutionary models at an age of 525 ± 125 Myr (Baraffe et al. 2002), this bolometric luminosity corresponds to an effective temperature of ∼1950 ± 100 K, higher than the values estimated from both the adopted spectral type and the best-fitting model atmosphere. A similar discrepancy is also seen for the 800 Myr brown dwarf binary HD 130948 BC (Dupuy et al. 2009) and the 100 Myr brown dwarf CD-35 2722 B (Wahhaj et al. 2011), where the effective temperatures derived from the evolutionary models using the age and bolometric luminosity are ∼100–300 K hotter than predicted from the spectral type.
The bt-settl atmospheric models (Allard et al. 2012) and the Baraffe et al. (2002) evolutionary models were used to provide an estimate of the mass of ζ Del B, exploiting the strong dependence on age of the mass of substellar objects of a given luminosity or temperature. Using the measured K-band magnitude for ζ Del B, and assuming an age of the system of 525 ± 125 Myr, the evolutionary models yield a mass of 55 ± 10 MJup (Fig. 8, top panel). Alternatively, using the effective temperature derived from the adopted spectral type leads to a lower mass estimate of |$40^{+15}_{-5}$|MJup (Fig. 8, bottom panel). Combining these mass estimates with the mass of the primary given previously, the companion-to-primary mass ratio of the ζ Del system was estimated to be between 0.023 ± 0.004 using the K-band magnitude and |$0.015^{+0.006}_{-0.002}$| using the adopted effective temperature.
5.3 Probability of chance superposition
Using the L5 ± 2 spectral type for ζ Del B and estimates for the surface density of mid-L dwarfs, an estimate of the probability of a chance superposition between ζ Del A and a unassociated foreground or background brown dwarf can be calculated. The surface density of L3–L7 brown dwarfs within a simulated magnitude-limited (K < 16) survey, assuming a lognormal mass distribution (Chabrier 2002), was estimated to be 1.42 × 10−2 deg−2 (Burgasser 2007). Assuming brown dwarfs are isotropically distributed throughout the sky, this surface density would correspond to a probability of detecting a brown dwarf of spectral type between L3 and L7 within a radius of 13.5 arcsec from a random location on the sky of P ≈ 2 × 10−3. This is an upper limit to the true probability as the surface density includes contributions from all L3 to L7 brown dwarfs along the line of sight until the magnitude limit of K < 16 is reached at D ≈ 100 pc. As the spectral type of ζ Del B provides a reasonable limit on its distance (25 ≲ D[pc] ≲ 110), the object can be constrained to a volume of space defined by a truncated cone with an inner and outer radii of 1.6 × 10−3 and 7.2 × 10−3 pc, respectively, and a height of 85 pc. Combining this volume with the number density of L3–L7 brown dwarfs, 3.87 × 10−3 pc−3 (Burgasser 2007), yields a probability of detecting an object like ζ Del B within a radius of 13.5 arcsec from a random location on the sky of P ≈ 2 × 10−5.
5.4 Semimajor axis and orbital period
The angular separation of 13.51 ± 0.08 arcsec between ζ Del A and B measured within the 2008 Gemini/NIRI data set was converted to a projected separation of aproj = 912 ± 15 au using the Hipparcos parallax for ζ Del A (π = 14.82 ± 0.23 mas; van Leeuwen 2007). Due to the large number of orbital orientations and viewing geometries, the conversion between projected separation as seen on the sky into a semimajor axis (a) is non-trivial. Using the probability density function calculated for a/aproj by Dupuy & Liu (2011), in the case of a flat eccentricity distribution with no discovery bias, the most probable semimajor axis of ζ Del B was estimated via a Monte Carlo method as |$907^{+723}_{-236}$| au. An order-of-magnitude estimate of the orbital period of ∼104 yr was made using the most probable semimajor axis, assuming a face-on circular orbit, and the masses of each component given in Table 2.
5.5 Comparison with known substellar companions
The position of ζ Del B on an MK versus J− KS CMD, shown in Fig. 9, was compared to known intermediate-age (100–1000 Myr) substellar companions, Hyades brown dwarfs (Reid 1993; Bouvier et al. 2008; Hogan et al. 2008), and older field brown dwarfs (Dupuy & Liu 2012). The intermediate-age comparison sample of 100–1000 Myr substellar companions was drawn from the compilation of Zuckerman & Song (2009), complemented with the recent discovery of the ∼100 Myr L4 dwarf CD-35 2722 B (Wahhaj et al. 2011). Several of the included objects do not have a parallax measurement within the literature – for G 196-3 a photometric distance of 11 ± 4 pc was used (Shkolnik et al. 2012), and for the Hyades brown dwarfs without distance estimates a value of 47.5 ± 3.6 pc was used (McArthur et al. 2011). For the three objects without stated photometric uncertainties, a value of σm = 0.2 mag was assumed. ζ Del B is at a similar location on the CMD to each of the components of the binary brown dwarfs Gl 417 BC (80–300 Myr, L4.5+L6; Zuckerman & Song 2009) and HD 130948 BC (800 Myr, L4+L4; Dupuy et al. 2009), and has a similar colour to the recently discovered companion to CD-35 2722 (100 Myr, L4; Wahhaj et al. 2011). The position of ζ Del B on the CMD is also consistent with the predicted location of an ∼50 MJup object at 500 Myr within the ames-dusty model grid, intermediate to the two mass estimates for ζ Del B given in Table 2.
The spectrum of ζ Del B is compared in Fig. 10 with the most analogous objects for which similar-resolution spectra were available: CD-35 2722 B (Wahhaj et al. 2011), 2MASS J22244381-0158521 (2MASS J2224-0158; Cushing et al. 2005), and the blended spectrum of the brown dwarf binary Gl 417 BC (Bonnefoy et al. 2014b). While a good match is seen between these three objects and ζ Del B when each bandpass is fitted independently, ζ Del B appears redder than CD-35 2722 B and bluer than 2MASS J2224-0158 when the full flux-calibrated JHK spectra are compared, consistent with their relative positions on the CMD (Fig. 9).
6 WIDE SUBSTELLAR COMPANION FORMATION
ζ Del B is among the most widely separated and lowest mass ratio companions resolved around a main-sequence star to date, as shown in Fig. 11. Significant uncertainty exists in the formation history of such objects. Intermediate to the lowest mass stars and massive directly imaged planetary-mass companions, a number of formation theories have been suggested for these objects, ranging from formation in a large circumstellar disc, or through the fragmentation of a pre-stellar core, to the gravitational capture by the massive primary within a dynamical star-forming environment. While disc fragmentation models predict the formation of substellar companions around A-type primaries (e.g. Kratter, Murray-Clay & Youdin 2010), the formation of ζ Del B in situ would require an unusually massive circumstellar disc for sufficient mass to be available at such separations. The time-scale for formation through core accretion is also prohibitively long at large separations (e.g. Pollack et al. 1996), requiring the core to form before the gas disc dissipates. These formation scenarios cannot be excluded; however, as ζ Del B may have migrated outward prior to the dissipation of the disc (e.g. Vorobyov 2013), or dynamical interaction with unseen interior companion may have dynamically scattered it (e.g. Jiang, Laughlin & Lin 2004; Stamatellos & Whitworth 2009) on to a potentially unstable orbit (e.g. Veras, Crepp & Ford 2009).
Formation through the fragmentation of a pre-stellar core is predicted to form companions with separations of the order of 103 au (Bate, Bonnell & Price 1995), with mass ratios ranging from the stellar to substellar regimes (Bonnell & Bastien 1992). Large-scale simulations of star formation within clusters are able to produce low-mass ratio companions at wide separations, although such models are limited in terms of the overall size of the cluster and, by extension, the number of high-mass stars produced (Bate 2009, 2012). An alternative scenario is that ζ Del B formed independent of ζ Del A, and was dynamically captured, either through a three-body interaction in which a natal companion was ejected (e.g. Bonnell 2001), or through disc-assisted capture where the angular momentum of the substellar impactor was dissipated by a large circumstellar disc (e.g. Moeckel & Bally 2007). However, given the predicted low efficiency of binary formation through capture (Clarke & Pringle 1991), this scenario is unlikely.
7 SUMMARY
We have presented the discovery of a wide substellar companion to the A3V star ζ Delphini, augmenting the small number of examples of such companions to early-type stars currently reported within the literature. Based on our AO images obtained in 2008, ζ Del B is at a projected separation of aproj = 912 ± 15 au from ζ Del A, with a most probable semimajor axis of |$a=907^{+723}_{-236}$| au, assuming a flat eccentricity distribution (Dupuy & Liu 2011). Based on the position of ζ Del A on the temperature–surface gravity and CMDs, we estimate a system age of 525 ± 125 Myr. Comparing ζ Del B with evolutionary models, we estimate a mass of 55 ± 10 MJup using bolometric luminosity estimated from the KS magnitude, and |$40_{-5}^{+15}$| MJup using the adopted spectral type and empirical spectral type–temperature relations, corresponding to a companion mass ratio of q = 0.02 ± 0.01. Future spectroscopic measurements of the C/O ratio of ζ Del B, and other wide substellar companions, may provide an observational diagnostic of their formation mechanism (e.g. Konopacky et al. 2013). The continuation of large-scale surveys for such objects (e.g. Faherty et al. 2010; Deacon et al. 2014; Naud et al. 2014) is essential to develop empirical comparisons for theoretical formation models. The frequency and properties of such objects at wide separations (∼103 au) will also provide important context for the expected yield of substellar companions resolved in upcoming extreme-AO systems such as GPI (Macintosh et al. 2014) and SPHERE (Beuzit et al. 2008) at separations of between 1and100 au to nearby main-sequence stars.
The authors wish to express their gratitude for the constructive comments received from the referee. The authors gratefully acknowledge several sources of funding. RJDR acknowledges financial support from the Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/H002707/1). KWD is supported by an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship (DGE-1311230). Portions of this work were performed under the auspices of the US Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in part under Contract W-7405-Eng-48 and in part under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344, and also supported in part by the NSF Science and Technology CfAO, managed by the UC Santa Cruz under cooperative agreement AST 98-76783. This work was supported, through JRG, in part by University of California Lab Research Programme 09-LR-118057-GRAJ and NSF grant AST-0909188. Based on observations obtained at the CFHT which is operated by the National Research Council of Canada, the Institut National des Sciences de l'Univers of the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique of France, and the University of Hawaii. Based on observations obtained at the Gemini Observatory, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under a cooperative agreement with the NSF on behalf of the Gemini partnership: the National Science Foundation (United States), the Science and Technology Facilities Council (United Kingdom), the National Research Council (Canada), CONICYT (Chile), the Australian Research Council (Australia), Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia (Brazil) and Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Productiva (Argentina). This research has made use of the SIMBAD data base and the VizieR catalogue access tool, operated at CDS, Strasbourg, France. This research has benefited from the SpeX Prism Spectral Libraries, maintained by Adam Burgasser at http://www.browndwarfs.org/spexprism. This publication makes use of data products from the Two Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint project of the University of Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center/California Institute of Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National Science Foundation. This publication makes use of data products from the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer, which is a joint project of the University of California, Los Angeles, and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. This research used the facilities of the Canadian Astronomy Data Centre operated by the National Research Council of Canada with the support of the Canadian Space Agency.
Based on observations obtained at the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope (CFHT) under programme ID 2009BC06, observations obtained at the Gemini Observatory under programme IDs GN-2008B-Q-119, GN-2010A-Q-75, GN-2013A-Q-96 and GN-2013B-DD-4, and observations obtained at the MMT Observatory, a joint facility of the University of Arizona and the Smithsonian Institution.