Paper The following article is Open access

Processing of cylindrical hollow parts: piercing vs. extrusion

, , and

Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd
, , Citation R Comăneci et al 2015 IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 95 012032 DOI 10.1088/1757-899X/95/1/012032

1757-899X/95/1/012032

Abstract

As work principle, piercing (P) and backward extrusion (BE) are similar deforming processes. However, working-load, strain and material flow are quiet different depending on real conditions. Since punch diameter d and workpiece diameter D are the defining parameters for both P and BE, there is a critical d/D ratio separating them as distinctive operations. To have a complete description of P and BE in terms of working load and yield pressure as function of d/D ratio, experimental tests and numerical predictions were conducted. Tridimensional finite element analysis (FEA) for different process designs (i.e. different d/D ratios) revealed distinctive evolutions of the material flow establishing the effective limits of P and BE respectively. Experimental and numerical results can be used in practice to provide estimates of working-load, critical yield pressure and tool dimensions for optimal P and BE in processing of cylindrical hollow parts.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.

Please wait… references are loading.