Letter The following article is Open access

Climate-induced landsliding within the larch dominant permafrost zone of central Siberia

, , and

Published 13 April 2016 © 2016 IOP Publishing Ltd
, , Focus on Northern Eurasia in the Global Earth System: Changes and Interactions Citation Viacheslav I Kharuk et al 2016 Environ. Res. Lett. 11 045004 DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/045004

1748-9326/11/4/045004

Abstract

Climate impact on landslide occurrence and spatial patterns were analyzed within the larch-dominant communities associated with continuous permafrost areas of central Siberia. We used high resolution satellite imagery (i.e. QuickBird, WorldView) to identify landslide scars over an area of 62 000 km2. Landslide occurrence was analyzed with respect to climate variables (air temperature, precipitation, drought index SPEI), and Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment satellite derived equivalent of water thickness anomalies (EWTA). Landslides were found only on southward facing slopes, and the occurrence of landslides increased exponentially with increasing slope steepness. Lengths of landslides correlated positively with slope steepness. The observed upper elevation limit of landslides tended to coincide with the tree line. Observations revealed landslides occurrence was also found to be strongly correlated with August precipitation (r = 0.81) and drought index (r = 0.7), with June–July–August soil water anomalies (i.e., EWTA, r = 0.68–0.7), and number of thawing days (i.e., a number of days with tmax > 0 °C; r = 0.67). A significant increase in the variance of soil water anomalies was observed, indicating that occurrence of landslides may increase even with a stable mean precipitation level. The key-findings of this study are (1) landslides occurrence increased within the permafrost zone of central Siberia in the beginning of the 21st century; (2) the main cause of increased landslides occurrence are extremes in precipitation and soil water anomalies; and (3) landslides occurrence are strongly dependent on relief features such as southward facing steep slopes.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.

1. Introduction

Landslides are a widespread phenomenon within Eurasian and North American permafrost areas (Gorshkov et al 2003, Wieczorek et al 2007, Wang et al 2009, Jones et al 2010). As with other processes initiated by freeze–thaw cycles (e.g., Sturm et al 2005), landslides are enhanced by the considerable volumetric changes of water in the soil (Jones et al 2010). Studies have shown that in recent years warming in permafrost areas has resulted in an increase of landslide incidents, with landslides expected to be more frequent with continued warming temperature and an increase in precipitation (Montrasio and Valentino 2008, Blunden and Arndt 2011, Shan et al 2015).

Substantial reduction in the range of the geographical limits of permafrost has been observed since 1975 in Russia (IPCC 2013). During the last four decades, an increase of permafrost temperatures of 0.3 °C–2.0 °C has also been observed in Siberia (Romanovsky et al 2010). Temperature increases of 2 °C or greater may impact local industrial infrastructure, including the gas and oil industries (Anisimov and Reneva 2011).

The region of interest for understanding landslides on permafrost is large, remote and well suited for satellite scenes analysis and GIS techniques (Huscroft et al 2003, Chau et al 2004, Lyle et al 2004, Booth et al 2009). Remote sensing of landslides in forested areas is based on change-detection using vegetation indices (e.g., EVI, NDVI), or detection of the denudation of landslide beds (Chau et al 2004, Booth et al 2009). Starting from 2002, Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite mission has provided estimates of the Earth's gravitational field anomalies resulting, in particular, from change of water mass. GRACE data have been analyzed for water mass changes in the Arctic and Antarctic (Chen et al 2006, Gardner et al 2011, Barletta et al 2013, Groh et al 2014). GRACE data were also used in analysis of water mass changes in permafrost areas of Siberia and Alaska (Muskett and Romanovsky 2011a, 2011b, Steffen et al 2012, Velicogna et al 2012). GRACE measurements could be applied for landslide studies because landslides are strongly connected with soil water content changes (Jones et al 2010).

The goal of the work reported herein was to (i) estimate spatial pattern of landslides and their dependence on terrain elevation and slope azimuth and steepness, (ii) discover if there is a dependence of landslide occurrence on climate variables (air temperature, precipitation and drought index) and gravimetric soil moisture as estimated from GRACE data.

2. Methods

2.1. Study area

The study area is located within the northern part of central Siberia and includes the watershed of the Kochechum River including the Tembenchi and Embenchime tributaries. The area lies to the north and west of the small town of Tura and encompasses about 62 000 km2 (figures 1 and 2). This site is with a portion of the Siberian Traps, a vast basaltic plateau dissected by many rivers. This is a hilly area with elevations ranging from 100 to 1100 m a.s.l. and permafrost thickness about 200–400 m. Active layer thickness is about 0.5–1.5 m within sediments and about 5 m within bedrocks (Ershov 1989). Sediments are composed of sandy and clay loams and contain about 10%–30% of fragmented debris. Ground ice content within sediments on the slopes reached 10%–15%. Kurums (rock fields) were found at the upper parts of the slopes. Solifluction processes are widespread within the area and observed mainly within the middle and lower part of slopes. Regularly, solifluction rates are low (about 1 mm yr−1) (Ershov 1989). Trees within the solifluction zone deviate from the vertical direction and form so called 'drunken forest'.

Figure 1.

Figure 1. The study area covers about 62 000 km2 near Tura, Russia in northern Siberia as shown by the box. Insets: on-ground photo (above) and high-resolution satellite scene of a typical landslide.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 2.

Figure 2. Study area shown by rectangle. Boxes within the study area indicate high spatial resolution image data coverage.

Standard image High-resolution image

The mean permafrost temperature was about −2 °C to −4 °C on the middle and lower part of valleys, reaching −5 °C to −7 °C at the highest elevations locations (Ershov 1989). Forests are formed by larch (Larix gmelinii Rupr.) with rare birch (Betula pendula Roth) admixture. The mean crown closure for larch stands was about 0.2. Mean height, diameter at breast height and age were 8.5 m, 12.5 cm and 250 years, respectively, based on sample plot measurements acquired in 2007 and 2012. Ground cover was composed of small shrubs (Betula nana, Salix sp, Ribes sp, Rosa sp., Juniperus sp, Vaccinium sp), lichen and moss. Soils are cryogenic brown soils (Ershov 1998).

2.2. Climate

Climate within the study area is strongly continental with long cold winters and short warm summers (table 1, figure 3). Recorded maximum July temperatures have reached +39 °C. Snow melting is observed regularly during the month of May. Stable snow cover is formed beginning in early October. Mean snow depth is about 40–50 cm.

Table 1.  Mean climate data (averaged for the period 1950–2013) for the study area.

Variable Annual June–August August
Mean temperature, °C −16.6 ± 0.3a 8.4 ± 0.2 7.5 ± 0.7
Mean sum of precipitation, mm 415.5 ± 17 185.0 ± 13 70.0 ± 3

aConfidence level p > 0.05.

Figure 3.

Figure 3. Climate variable anomalies within the study area (referenced to years 1950 to 2012): (a) temperature (1, 2—annual and summer); (b) precipitation (1, 2—annual and August), and (c) SPEI (1, 2—annual and August). 3, 4—trends (p < 0.05). Note: SPEI decrease indicates drought increase, and vice verse.

Standard image High-resolution image

We used daily, monthly, summer and annual air temperature, and also sum of positive temperatures in June–July–August (JJA), May–June–July–August (MJJA) and May–June–July–August–September (MJJAS), mean summer temperatures, and the number of thawing days Nt>0 (i.e., number of days with positive temperatures: tmax > 0). Precipitation was analyzed as monthly and summer (i.e., JJA) values. In addition, a correlation of landslide occurrence with drought index SPEI was analyzed. The Standardized Precipitation–Evapotranspiration Index (the SPEI) can measure drought severity according to its intensity and duration (Vicente-Serrano et al 2010). The SPEI uses the monthly difference (Di) between precipitation and potential evapotranspiration (PET): Di = Pi − PETi.

PET (mm) is obtained by:

where T is the monthly mean temperature in °C; I is a heat index, which is calculated as the sum of 12 monthly index values, m is a coefficient depending on I, and K is a correction coefficient computed as a function of the latitude and month which takes into account number of sun hours in a day. SPEI data were obtained from (http://sac.csic.es/spei/database.html) and averaged for a cell size 0.5° × 0.5° (∼33 × 56 km2 at the study location).

Data (monthly and daily air temperature and precipitation) from the weather station at the nearby town of Tura (coordinates: 64.27 N. 100.23 E.) were used in the analysis (http://aisori.meteo.ru/ClimateR).

Within the study area positive annual temperature trends were observed since the 1980s (figure 3(a)). An increase of August precipitation was observed since the 1990s, whereas annual precipitation decreased (figure 3(b)). A positive August drought index SPEI trend (i.e., drought decrease) has been observed since the 1990s (figure 3(c)).

2.3. Satellite data

WorldView-1, -2 and QuickBird-2 high-resolution (pixel size 0.5–0.6 m) scenes (Neigh et al 2013), Landsat-5, -7 panchromatic band (pixel size 15 m), and gravimetric measurements (GRACE; http://www.csr.utexas.edu/grace) were used in this study. A time series of WorldView, QuickBird and Landsat scenes were compiled for landslide detection. High-resolution data (N = 110 summer-acquired scenes) covered the period 2004–2012. Each scene was corrected (i.e. geometry and radiometry corrections) and covered an area of 320 km2 (with total analyzed area about 17 500 km2). These scenes (both black/white and spectral format) were used for landslide detection by manual photointerpretation. Landslides were identified based on texture and spectral characteristics and contextual information. The high quality of the WorldView-1, -2 and QuickBird-2 scenes used allowed very accurate detection of landslides (e.g., insert on figure 1, and figures A1A5 in appendix). A digitizing tablet was used to measure length width and area of landslides. There were no misclassification with separating landslides from burned areas and other disturbances. On the other hand, precise dating of landslides was complicated by lack of high-resolution data for the period 2005–2008. That problem was solved by using Landsat scenes for the analysis, since for each year we have at least three Landsat scenes. Summer acquired, good quality Landsat scenes (N = 50) covered the period 1989–2012. For the period 1989–1999 only two scenes were available with the other 48 covering the period 2000–2012. Landsat scenes were obtained from USGS GloVis (http://glovis.usgs.gov).

GRACE data were used for soil water content estimation. We used annual and summer minimum and maximum gravimetric values, and equivalent of water thickness anomalies (EWTA, measured in cm). EWTA accuracy was approximately 10–30 mm month−1 (Riegger et al 2012, Long et al 2014). GRACE-derived EWTA values are caused by both water anomalies in the soil and in rivers and ponds. Because we used a watershed approach in this study, there was no incoming water flow from outside of the watershed. Because of that, EWTA is proportional to the soil water content anomalies. GRACE data are available since launch and activation in 2003 (http://grace.jpl.nasa.gov; Swenson and Wahr 2006, Landerer and Swenson 2012). GRACE spatial resolution was 1° × 1° degree (∼112 × 44 km2 at latitude 66°). The data were processed using ERDAS Imagine software (http://geospatial.intergraph.com) and ESRI ArcGIS software (http://www.esri.com).

2.4. GIS analysis

The distribution of landslides with respect to relief features (elevation, azimuth, slope steepness) was analyzed based on the ASTER global digital elevation model (DEM; http://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/). The ASTER DEM horizontal and vertical accuracy were ±20 m and ±30 m, respectively (https://www.jspacesystems.or.jp/ersdac/GDEM/E/index.html). The elevation range was quantized to 50 m strata. Aspect and slope steepness data were calculated using DEM and ArcGIS tools. The aspect data were quantized to sixteen directions (i.e., by 22.5° referenced clockwise from north). Because the distribution of relief features within the analyzed area was uneven, it could lead to bias. To avoid this, the data were normalized by the following procedure. The analyzed area with a given azimuth, slope steepness and elevation (shown by boxes on figure 2) was referenced to the total study area (rectangle on figure 2) with similar parameters:

Equation (1)

where Kc(i) is the coefficient of normalization, c(i) is ith category of landscape feature c, Ac(i)f is the area of the given on-ground class within the ith category of the topographic feature c, and Ac(i)I is the area of the ith category of topography feature c over the entire analyzed territory.

Statistical analysis of the data was carried out with Microsoft Excel and Statsoft Statistica (http://statsoft.ru) software. We used linear regression and Pearson correlation (r) analysis and Akaike information criterion (Akaike 1974) to determine significant relationships between landslides occurrence and climate variables and soil water anomalies (EWTA).

3. Results

3.1. Landslides statistics

Analysis of satellite imagery found that a total 145 landslides occurred during the time period from 2000 to 2012 within our study area. All of the observed landslides were used in the spatial analysis of landslides occurrence. Out of the total, 31 landslides were excluded from the temporal analysis because they could not be dated with one-year precision.

Figure 4(a) indicates that the number of landslides increased since 2006 with 80% occurring after 2006. The majority (60%) of landslides had lengths within the range of 75–225 m (figure 4(b)). The landslide statistics including slope azimuth (aspect) and slope steepness are presented in table 2.

Figure 4.

Figure 4. Landslide temporal dynamics (a) and length distribution (b).

Standard image High-resolution image

Table 2.  Landslide statistics.

  Landslide upper point elevation (m a.s.l.) Azimuth, degrees from North Slope steepness (degrees) Landslide width (m) Landslide length (m)
Minimum value 150 67 2 15 10
Maximum value 600 293 40 60 400
Mean ± σ 340 ± 110 225 ± 40 22 ± 10 36 ± 15 170 ± 95

3.2. Landslides and relief features

The spatial distribution of landslides is strongly uneven with respect to azimuth as seen in figure 6(a). The majority of landslides occurred at slopes with southern and south-western exposures (figure 5(a)). With respect to elevation, most landslides had an upper limit mainly within the range of 200–300 m a.s.l. Occurrence of landslides declined exponentially as elevation increased (figure 5(c)). The maximal elevation of landslide initiation was found near the upper tree line, at about 650 m a.s.l. Landslides also exponentially increased with an increase in slope steepness (figure 5(b)). In figure 5(d) slope steepness is presented as sin(α), where α is the maximum slope angle along the extent of the landslide scar. There is a weak (but significant) positive correlation between landslide length and sin(α) (figure 5(d)).

Figure 5.

Figure 5. Relationship of landslides with relief features: (a) aspect (data were normalized based on equation (1), (b) slope steepness, (c) maximum elevation of landslides, and (d) landslides length dependence on sin(a) (a—maximum slope steepness along landslide track; trend is significant at p < 0.05).

Standard image High-resolution image

3.3. Landslides and soil water content anomalies

Temporal dynamics of EWTA coincided with landslide occurrence (figure 6(a)). A significant (r2 = 0.48) correlation between landslides occurrence and June-August EWTA was observed (table 3, figure 6(b)). Note that a significant temporal increase of EWTA dispersion (i.e., soil water anomalies variation) extremes is observed (figure 6(a)). Drought index SPEI and soil water anomalies EWTA are correlated (figure 6(c)).

Figure 6.

Figure 6. (a) Time series of August EWTA data are shown as solid black line (1). Trend of August EWTA minimum values shown by gray solid line (p < 0.02). Gray bars show landslides occurrence from figure 4(a). (b) Landslide dependence on August EWTA (trend significant at p-level < 0.02). (c) SPEI versus August EWTA data (trend significant at p-level < 0.03). Note: SPEI decrease indicates drought increase, and vice verse.

Standard image High-resolution image

Table 3.  Correlations of landslide occurrence with climate variables and EWTA.

  Pearson correlations (rp)
  Annual May June July August MJJA
Precipitation 0.37 0.13 0.02 0.39 0.81a 0.58a
SPEI 0.37 −0.40 0.08 0.48b 0.70a 0.27
EWTA 0.54a 0.39 0.68b 0.70a 0.69a  
Temperature 0.37 51b 0.01 0.13 0.21 0.23
Nt>0 (thawing period) 0.67a 0.55b −0.05 −0.36 0.02 0.67a
∑ (t °C > 0) 0.20 0.52b 0.01 −0.38 0.05 0.21

aSignificant at p < 0.05 and bp < 0.1, respectively.

3.4. Landslides and climate variables

Table 3 lists the correlation coefficients of climate variables and landslide occurrence. Landslide occurrence was found to be significantly correlated with annual mean temperatures (r = 0.51), but not annual precipitation. A higher correlation was observed with the Nt>0, duration of thawing period (i.e., number of days with tmax > 0 °C) (r = 0.67). The highest correlation was observed with August precipitation (r = 0.81). When averaged over the MJJA time period the correlation with precipitation was lower (r = 0.58). Correlations between SPEI drought index and landside occurrence were significant for July and August (table 3). Figures 7(a) and (b) shows observed positive linear relationships for August precipitation (r2 = 0.66) and SPEI (r2 = 0.48), respectively.

Figure 7.

Figure 7. Relationship of landslide occurrence (%) with August precipitation (a) SPEI (b).

Standard image High-resolution image

4. Discussion

4.1. Landslides and relief features

The spatial pattern of landslides is uneven with respect to azimuth as all landslides occurred on slopes with the highest insolation and warmest temperatures, i.e. south and south-west facing slopes. Not a single landslide was found on the shadowed northern exposures. That effect is likely related to permafrost active layer depth. The latter varies from several cm to ≥1.0 m depending on exposure (Kharuk et al 2008). Landslide occurrence is also strongly dependent on slope steepness. The number of landslides increased exponentially with increases in slope steepness (figure 5(c)). Landslide lengths varied within a wide range—from short (≤50 m) to very long (>400 m) with a mean value about 170 m. The majority of landslides began at elevations between 200 and 250 m, with number decreasing exponentially with elevation increase (figure 4(b)). The maximum elevation of landslide headscarps approximates that of the upper tree line (which within the study area is about 650 m a.s.l.).

The presence of trees may promote landslide activation, because (1) the weight of trees provides a downslope driving force, and (2) tree roots help bind together the active layer. It is known that larch roots exist partly within the frozen soil horizon even during summer (Abaimov et al 2002). This occurs because (1) in anomalously warm years roots penetrate to deeper soil horizons and then are frozen in cold years, and (2) the active layer decreases from the moment of tree establishment. The latter is caused due to moss and lichen ground cover that acts as a thermal insulator (Kharuk et al 2008). Warming causes the active layer to increase, which releases the roots from the frozen soil. These, together with increased soil water content leads to the soil layer sliding over the permafrost while precipitation increases. The estimated landslide hazard area is about 30% of total area.

4.2. Landslides, climate variables and soil water anomalies

Landslides are significantly and positively correlated with July–August drought index and June–August soil water anomalies; thus, the probability of landslides increases as soil water anomalies increase (figure 6(b)). Globally, landslides were reported most frequently from July to September (Kirschbaum et al 2015), which coincided with our data with the exception of September. Meanwhile, there is a trend of increased variance of soil water anomalies (figure 6(a)). The latter indicates that the probability of a landslide occurring will increase even given a stable mean precipitation level. Landslides occurrence are significantly correlated with August precipitation (table 3, figure 6(a)). Notably, August precipitation increased during the last decade whereas the annual precipitation decreased (figure 3(b)). Moreover, precipitation itself increased active layer thickness due to high heat capacity of water (about four times in comparison with air). Along with precipitation, active layer thickness is significant for landslide occurrence. The active layer captures rainfall, and when pore water pressure is sufficient to reduce normal friction to a critical level, landslides can occur. The deeper active layer provides a higher rainfall trapping, increasing active layer weight over permafrost. The increasing probability of landslides triggering obeys Newton's Second Law (Iverson 2000). It is known that due to shallow active layer and no underlying permafrost permeability the majority of rainfall goes directly to the rivers. Along with rainfall, water seepage from thawing permafrost also increases the landslide probability. Significantly, landslides occurrence correlated positively not only with precipitation, but also with SPEI drought index (figure 7(b)). Thus, with a decrease in drought conditions landslides occurrence also increased.

No correlation was found between landslides occurrence and summer air temperatures. Meanwhile, landslides occurrence was significantly correlated (r2 = 0.67) with the number of days with tmax > 0 °C (Nt>0) during the May–August period. Thus, the annual period of warming is a significant determinant of landslides occurrence. The main variability of Nt>0 was observed in May (r2 = 0.55) table 3, i.e. Nt>0 increase or decrease occurred during May depending on the year. Similarly, landslides occurrence was correlated with the sum of positive temperatures during May (r2 = 0.52). This coincides with the general trend of climate warming, i.e. earlier snow melting.

A weak (and significant) correlation was observed with annual temperatures (table 3). That correlation may be a consequence of 'permafrost warming'. When permafrost temperature is increasing there is a decrease in shear and normal stresses of frozen ground due to less ice-bonding (there is particularly strong decrease from −3 °C to 0 °C (Streletskiy et al 2012). Although there are no data on the permafrost temperature increase within the study area, Romanovsky et al (2010) showed an increase of permafrost temperatures of 0.3 °C–2 °C in Siberia during the last four decades.

Thus, the main cause of observed increase in landslide occurrence is an increase of precipitation and soil water anomalies. Climate scenarios forecast an increase of air temperature in the Arctic from 7 °C to 11 °C by the end of the 21st century (Sillmann et al 2013, Vaks et al 2013). This warming may lead to increases in the permafrost active layer thickness and ultimately more landslides. The data obtained supports the hypothesis that landslides occurrence will be more frequent with warming and an increase in precipitation (Montrasio and Valentino 2008).

Along with heavy rainfall and permafrost thawing, forest fires can trigger landslides too. There is evidence of warming—induced higher fire frequency within the Siberian permafrost zone (Kharuk et al 2011). According to predictions, a future increase of forest fires within the boreal zone is expected (e.g., Flannigan et al 1998), which in combination with permafrost thawing should increase the occurrence of landslides.

4.3. Post-landslides vegetation growth

Landslides create patches of disturbed soil that are the initiation of succession of forest species, including potential establishment of new species into the larch habitat. This problem has been addressed in only a few papers (e.g, Abaimov et al 2002). In particular, landslides scars present opportunities for establishment of less cold-tolerant species into larch-dominated forests. There is evidence of Siberian pine (Pinus sibirica) and fir (Abies sibirica) migration into larch-dominated communities (Kharuk et al 2005). In general post-landslide vegetation growth in permafrost is poorly understood and needs more investigation.

5. Conclusion

Based on the analysis of high-resolution satellite images and climate data for the period from 2000 to 2012, landslides have increased within the study area, an area of continuous permafrost in central Siberia. This phenomenon correlates with August precipitation, drought decrease, and soil water anomalies. The main cause of the observed landslide occurrence increase is an increase of precipitation and soil water anomaly extremes. Landslide occurrence is strongly dependent on relief features and were found in the study to be located on southward facing slopes only on steeper slopes. The area studied represents the vast larch forests of the central Siberian Plateau. We will expand our analysis to other parts of the Arctic forest and tundra to more fully understand the impacts of landslide dynamics on Arctic ecosystems and carbon balance.

Acknowledgments

Russian Science Foundation (grant #14-24-00112) primarily supported this research. Additional support for K J Ranson by NASA's Terrestrial Ecology program. GRACE land data were preprocessed by Sean Swenson, supported by the NASA MEaSUREs Program, and are available at http://grace.jpl.nasa.gov. DigitalGlobe data were provided by NASA's NGA Commercial Archive Data (cad4nasa.gsfc.nasa.gov) under the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency's NextView license agreement.

Appendix

A.1. Landslides statistic

Table A1.  Landslides data.

No. Length (m) Year Landslides headscarp (m a.s.l.) Slope steepness (°) (max) Aspect (°) (mean) Center point coordinates of the landslide  
Longitude Altitude
1 136 n/a 311 3 198 96° 2' 25'' E 65° 53' 38'' N
2 118 2001 170 15 127 100° 7' 27'' E 64° 41' 1'' N
3 141 2010 177 13 119 100° 7' 22'' E 64° 40' 59'' N
4 134 2011 178 13 131 100° 7' 20'' E 64° 40' 59'' N
5 106 2011 178 27 180 100° 10' 53'' E 64° 41' 23'' N
6 121 2011 183 28 188 100° 10' 57'' E 64° 41' 23'' N
7 139 2011 191 29 186 97° 29' 32'' E 66° 12' 49'' N
8 111 2011 185 27 188 100° 11' 20'' E 64° 41' 21'' N
9 112 2011 191 27 191 100° 11' 23'' E 64° 41' 20'' N
10 142 2011 198 30 190 100° 11' 28'' E 64° 41' 20'' N
11 135 2011 203 31 191 100° 11' 31'' E 64° 41' 20'' N
12 153 2011 218 30 202 97° 24' 40'' E 66° 14' 10'' N
13 54 2011 151 11 201 100° 13' 8'' E 64° 40' 59'' N
14 60 2002 158 15 175 100° 16' 9'' E 64° 40' 10'' N
15 53 2004 160 17 181 96° 50' 33'' E 65° 32' 38'' N
16 64 2004 161 18 181 100° 16' 24'' E 64° 40' 8'' N
17 58 2004 158 20 208 100° 16' 14'' E 64° 40' 9'' N
18 200 2002 199 21 143 100° 21' 42'' E 64° 43' 3'' N
19 297 2011 210 28 238 100° 13' 37'' E 64° 35' 9'' N
20 374 n/a 260 25 147 97° 28' 22'' E 66° 13' 2'' N
21 317 n/a 280 24 170 100° 10' 43'' E 64° 36' 11'' N
22 197 n/a 203 25 208 97° 39' 56'' E 66° 9' 6'' N
23 123 2012 217 31 236 100° 13' 3'' E 64° 35' 43'' N
24 150 2012 170 31 235 100° 12' 57'' E 64° 35' 40'' N
25 155 2012 193 33 230 100° 13' 4'' E 64° 35' 36'' N
26 216 2012 246 35 241 100° 13' 16'' E 64° 35' 33'' N
27 161 2012 255 35 235 100° 13' 23'' E 64° 35' 32'' N
28 355 2007 226 17 153 97° 36' 0'' E 66° 9' 49'' N
29 80 2011 158 2 184 100° 17' 30'' E 64° 40' 7'' N
30 66 2011 201 32 94 100° 18' 60'' E 64° 41' 31'' N
31 20 n/a 236 10 198 97° 31' 46'' E 65° 26' 35'' N
32 31 n/a 232 10 182 97° 32' 7'' E 65° 26' 30'' N
33 13 n/a 241 13 200 97° 31' 9'' E 65° 26' 44'' N
34 12 n/a 239 16 207 97° 30' 50'' E 65° 26' 49'' N
35 10 n/a 246 18 208 97° 30' 39'' E 65° 26' 51'' N
36 99 n/a 287 17 154 96° 51' 9'' E 65° 34' 35'' N
37 80 2011 278 21 180 98° 41' 28'' E 65° 47' 56'' N
38 35 n/a 266 22 207 98° 49' 25'' E 65° 47' 8'' N
39 44 2008 253 4 250 96° 50' 35'' E 65° 32' 36'' N
40 70 2008 261 10 279 96° 50' 47'' E 65° 32' 27'' N
41 285 2011 455 20 251 97° 32' 35'' E 66° 11' 16'' N
42 136 2011 452 22 242 97° 32' 48'' E 66° 11' 9'' N
43 211 2011 467 24 225 97° 32' 57'' E 66° 11' 5'' N
44 101 2011 448 25 217 97° 33' 1'' E 66° 11' 4'' N
45 202 2011 466 33 218 97° 33' 2'' E 66° 11' 2'' N
46 250 2011 454 33 218 97° 33' 3'' E 66° 10' 59'' N
47 120 2011 447 29 230 97° 33' 9'' E 66° 10' 60'' N
48 101 2011 432 23 226 97° 33' 13'' E 66° 10' 58'' N
49 229 2011 466 25 231 97° 33' 14'' E 66° 10' 57'' N
50 277 2011 451 27 225 97° 33' 15'' E 66° 10' 56'' N
51 103 2011 449 28 219 97° 33' 23'' E 66° 10' 55'' N
52 91 2011 449 36 225 97° 33' 33'' E 66° 10' 51'' N
53 99 2011 444 27 219 97° 33' 25'' E 66° 10' 54'' N
54 450 2008 572 31 209 97° 35' 59'' E 66° 9' 57'' N
55 295 2008 509 33 224 97° 35' 49'' E 66° 9' 59'' N
56 219 2008 515 34 222 97° 35' 49'' E 66° 10' 3'' N
57 150 2008 501 33 258 97° 35' 38'' E 66° 10' 9'' N
58 87 2008 481 36 247 97° 35' 36'' E 66° 10' 10'' N
59 267 2008 464 28 227 97° 35' 58'' E 66° 9' 52'' N
60 153 2008 452 31 228 100° 11' 43'' E 64° 41' 18'' N
61 254 2008 461 34 205 97° 36' 45'' E 66° 9' 38'' N
62 207 2008 471 34 204 100° 10' 12'' E 64° 41' 27'' N
63 248 2002 471 43 222 97° 36' 23'' E 66° 9' 44'' N
64 355 2008 464 26 231 100° 7' 37'' E 64° 35' 31'' N
65 157 2008 410 23 218 97° 36' 10'' E 66° 9' 45'' N
66 222 2007 484 25 183 97° 41' 28'' E 66° 8' 51'' N
67 164 2007 452 26 182 97° 41' 37'' E 66° 8' 48'' N
68 174 2007 423 24 168 97° 41' 56'' E 66° 8' 47'' N
69 163 2007 428 25 168 97° 41' 54'' E 66° 8' 47'' N
70 205 2007 456 27 194 97° 41' 15'' E 66° 8' 49'' N
71 115 2008 451 25 196 97° 41' 13'' E 66° 8' 51'' N
72 196 n/a 444 21 229 98° 59' 53'' E 64° 54' 34'' N
73 151 n/a 437 21 219 97° 40' 10'' E 66° 9' 1'' N
74 329 2008 468 28 215 97° 24' 4'' E 66° 14' 17'' N
75 375 2008 457 22 224 97° 23' 54'' E 66° 14' 19'' N
76 169 2008 444 18 245 97° 23' 46'' E 66° 14' 27'' N
77 185 2008 454 18 211 97° 24' 16'' E 66° 14' 16'' N
78 159 2008 452 17 238 97° 24' 21'' E 66° 14' 16'' N
79 110 2009 456 18 198 97° 24' 36'' E 66° 14' 13'' N
80 153 2009 438 19 208 97° 35' 58'' E 66° 9' 54'' N
81 322 2009 449 22 195 97° 24' 51'' E 66° 14' 6'' N
82 106 2009 444 18 195 97° 24' 50'' E 66° 14' 9'' N
83 382 2008 462 24 217 97° 29' 7'' E 66° 12' 51'' N
84 139 2008 460 28 211 100° 11' 6'' E 64° 41' 23'' N
85 197 2008 473 22 229 100° 11' 23'' E 64° 36' 10'' N
86 191 2008 472 24 207 97° 28' 49'' E 66° 12' 59'' N
87 147 2008 445 17 216 100° 41' 24'' E 65° 9' 30'' N
88 374 2008 443 18 204 100° 11' 4'' E 64° 36' 12'' N
89 94 2010 276 15 184 100° 35' 49'' E 65° 45' 51'' N
90 96 2001 282 20 149 100° 37' 11'' E 65° 9' 48'' N
91 87 2001 278 22 133 99° 56' 1'' E 65° 52' 38'' N
92 68 2001 272 22 152 100° 39' 55'' E 65° 34' 51'' N
93 78 2001 215 11 186 100° 19' 22'' E 65° 25' 57'' N
94 173 n/a 239 15 165 100° 32' 7'' E 65° 21' 27'' N
95 183 n/a 241 15 181 100° 32' 5'' E 65° 21' 27'' N
96 196 n/a 246 16 171 100° 31' 59'' E 65° 21' 28'' N
97 344 2007 403 14 71 100° 23' 28'' E 65° 13' 59'' N
98 231 2007 363 13 87 100° 23' 31'' E 65° 14' 12'' N
99 263 2007 366 17 71 100° 23' 30'' E 65° 14' 17'' N
100 257 2007 372 18 67 100° 23' 29'' E 65° 14' 18'' N
101 234 2007 375 18 72 100° 23' 25'' E 65° 14' 21'' N
102 235 2007 373 15 55 100° 23' 18'' E 65° 14' 29'' N
103 96 n/a 331 16 190 100° 39' 50'' E 65° 34' 50'' N
104 147 2001 310 18 191 97° 28' 32'' E 66° 13' 3'' N
105 104 2001 251 6 271 99° 17' 55'' E 65° 34' 39'' N
106 47 n/a 326 8 255 98° 59' 27'' E 64° 54' 37'' N
107 59 n/a 325 11 248 99° 48' 25'' E 65° 55' 20'' N
108 101 n/a 334 5 291 99° 56' 2'' E 65° 52' 45'' N
109 77 n/a 335 10 316 99° 55' 53'' E 65° 52' 17'' N
110 87 n/a 342 11 221 100° 39' 38'' E 65° 34' 47'' N
111 77 n/a 197 55 279 99° 56' 2'' E 65° 52' 40'' N
112 39 2010 224 13 229 99° 59' 11'' E 65° 33' 10'' N
113 22 2010 221 10 235 99° 59' 12'' E 65° 33' 9'' N
114 106 n/a 352 2 250 100° 2' 35'' E 65° 15' 54'' N
115 181 n/a 241 32 133 101° 18' 7'' E 64° 45' 27'' N
116 107 n/a 182 8 132 101° 18' 48'' E 64° 45' 37'' N
117 405 2010 332 27 206 100° 43' 1'' E 65° 23' 11'' N
118 221 2001 280 38 227 98° 27' 30'' E 65° 6' 55'' N
119 53 2010 252 3 260 100° 16' 21'' E 64° 40' 9'' N
120 52 n/a 230 3 221 99° 48' 23'' E 65° 55' 21'' N
121 391 n/a 277 35 147 100° 8' 47'' E 64° 15' 23'' N
122 146 2011 195 20 134 100° 9' 30'' E 64° 41' 25'' N
123 207 2011 220 24 176 97° 36' 35'' E 66° 9' 42'' N
124 179 2011 219 30 179 100° 10' 34'' E 64° 41' 26'' N
125 69 2010 265 14 220 96° 51' 6'' E 65° 32' 18'' N
126 42 n/a 233 11 221 100° 40' 36'' E 65° 32' 54'' N
127 170 2010 459 17 202 97° 24' 32'' E 66° 14' 13'' N
128 171 2010 464 19 216 97° 24' 29'' E 66° 14' 15'' N
129 262 2001 473 26 202 97° 28' 55'' E 66° 12' 57'' N
130 265 2001 380 18 226 100° 3' 19'' E 65° 32' 45'' N
131 187 2001 458 23 231 97° 32' 53'' E 66° 11' 6'' N
132 103 2011 446 27 218 97° 33' 21'' E 66° 10' 55'' N
133 75 2011 439 28 219 97° 33' 20'' E 66° 10' 57'' N
134 138 2011 468 29 223 97° 33' 15'' E 66° 11' 0'' N
135 133 2010 510 34 215 97° 36' 1'' E 66° 9' 59'' N
136 389 2010 462 26 224 97° 36' 2'' E 66° 9' 50'' N
137 199 2008 449 26 199 97° 28' 41'' E 66° 13' 3'' N
138 141 2011 383 21 189 98° 40' 19'' E 65° 48' 11'' N
139 240 n/a 369 16 196 99° 42' 48'' E 65° 32' 33'' N
140 305 n/a 406 22 186 100° 11' 50'' E 65° 30' 14'' N
141 400 2001 424 23 194 99° 42' 21'' E 65° 32' 37'' N
142 284 2001 420 21 215 99° 41' 53'' E 65° 32' 48'' N
143 305 2001 439 19 198 99° 42' 37'' E 65° 32' 36'' N
144 63 2010 252 7 245 96° 50' 31'' E 65° 32' 39'' N
145 81 2010 254 10 170 96° 50' 30'' E 65° 32' 40'' N

A.2. Samples of zoomed high-resolution scenes of landslieds (figures A1–A5)

Figure A1.

Figure A1. (No. 2 in table A1).

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure A2.

Figure A2. (No.18 in table A1).

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure A3.

Figure A3. (No. 25 in table A1).

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure A4.

Figure A4. (No. 64 in table A1).

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure A5.

Figure A5. (No. 122 in table A1).

Standard image High-resolution image
Please wait… references are loading.
10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/045004