Paper The following article is Open access

Revisiting turbulence small-scale behavior using velocity gradient triple decomposition

and

Published 15 June 2020 © 2020 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd on behalf of the Institute of Physics and Deutsche Physikalische Gesellschaft
, , Citation Rishita Das and Sharath S Girimaji 2020 New J. Phys. 22 063015 DOI 10.1088/1367-2630/ab8ab2

Download Article PDF
DownloadArticle ePub

You need an eReader or compatible software to experience the benefits of the ePub3 file format.

1367-2630/22/6/063015

Abstract

Turbulence small-scale behavior has been commonly investigated in literature by decomposing the velocity-gradient tensor (Aij) into the symmetric strain-rate (Sij) and anti-symmetric rotation-rate (Wij) tensors. To develop further insight, we revisit some of the key studies using a triple decomposition of the velocity-gradient tensor. The additive triple decomposition formally segregates the contributions of normal-strain-rate (Nij), pure-shear (Hij) and rigid-body-rotation-rate (Rij). The decomposition not only highlights the key role of shear, but it also provides a more accurate account of the influence of normal-strain and pure rotation on important small-scale features. First, the local streamline topology and geometry are described in terms of the three constituent tensors in velocity-gradient invariants' space. Using direct numerical simulation (DNS) data sets of forced isotropic turbulence, the velocity-gradient and pressure field fluctuations are examined at different Reynolds numbers. At all Reynolds numbers, shear contributes the most and rigid-body-rotation the least toward the velocity-gradient magnitude (A2AijAij). Especially, shear contribution is dominant in regions of high values of A2 (intermittency). It is shown that the high-degree of enstrophy intermittency reported in literature is due to the shear contribution toward vorticity rather than that of rigid-body-rotation. The study also provides an explanation for the non-intermittent nature of pressure-Laplacian, despite the strong intermittency of enstrophy and dissipation fields. The study further investigates the alignment of the rotation axis with normal strain-rate and pressure Hessian eigenvectors. Overall, it is demonstrated that triple decomposition offers unique and deeper understanding of velocity-gradient behavior in turbulence.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.

1. Introduction

The velocity gradient dynamics and small-scale behavior of turbulence have largely been investigated in literature by decomposing the velocity gradient tensor (VGT, Aij = ∂ui/∂xj) into symmetric (strain-rate tensor, Sij) and anti-symmetric (rotation-rate or vorticity tensor, Wij) parts:

Equation (1)

This decomposition has led to important insight into small-scale intermittency [13], intense structures in turbulence [47] and local streamline geometry [810]. However, recent studies [1113] have shown that strain-rate and vorticity do not clearly identify the presence of normal-straining and rigid-body-rotation of the fluid. The presence of shear in both strain-rate and vorticity often obscures our understanding of some of the fundamental phenomena in turbulence. The purpose of this work is to revisit some of the prominent results of small-scale turbulence by segregating the role of normal-strain, shear and pure rotation in fluid motions. Reinterpretation of the classical results leads to further clarity and deeper insight into velocity gradient behavior in turbulence.

The triple decomposition in this study partitions the local velocity gradients into three elementary constituent transformations—normal strain, rigid-body-rotation and pure shear (figure 1). The normal strain-rate tensor Nij is a diagonal tensor that represents the compression and extension of the fluid element in different directions in a volume-preserving manner. The rigid-body-rotation tensor Rij is an anti-symmetric tensor that represents pure-rotation of the fluid element by a certain angular velocity. The shear tensor Hij is a lower triangular tensor containing the transverse gradients of velocity components that represent shearing of the fluid element.

Figure 1.

Figure 1. Two-dimensional example of fluid element deformation due to (a) normal-strain-rate tensor, (b) shear tensor, and (c) rigid-body-rotation tensor.

Standard image High-resolution image

Kolář [11] presented a procedure for triple decomposition of the VGT by extracting the pure-shearing motion from the swirling action of vorticity. The method comprises of determination of a so-called basic reference frame among all possible frame rotations, which is computationally very expensive for a three-dimensional flow field. This technique has been used for vortex-structure identification and investigation of internal shear layers in wall-bounded flows [1416]. It has recently been used for investigating regions of strong shearing or rotation and detecting internal shear layer in homogeneous isotropic turbulence at Taylor Reynolds numbers, Reλ = 27 and 140 [13]. Aside from Kolář's method, Gao and Liu [12] formulated a 'Rortex'-based VGT decomposition for locally fluid-rotational points (VGT has complex eigenvalues) in a turbulent flow field. This method [17] of separating the rigid-body-rotation (Rortex) from shear in vorticity is computationally more viable and has been employed in some studies [1821] for investigation of coherent vortex structures in turbulent flows. In another recent study, Keylock [22] presented a decomposition of the VGT into normal and non-normal tensors such that the non-normal counterpart represents the local effects of shear.

The goal of this study is to examine velocity gradient statistics in turbulence using the decomposition of VGT into normal-strain-rate, rigid-body-rotation and pure-shear tensors. We revisit certain important velocity gradient behavior and characterize them in terms of Nij, Rij and Hij. The specific objectives of this study are as follows:

  • (a)  
    Develop a triple decomposition strategy valid for the entire flow field by combining the above-mentioned proposals of Gao and Liu [12] and Keylock [22] and derive important kinematic characteristics of the various constituents.
  • (b)  
    Characterize the local streamline shapes in terms of normal-strain, pure-shear and rigid-body-rotation tensors in the phase space of VGT invariants.
  • (c)  
    Establish the contribution of different velocity gradient constituents in a turbulent flow field as a function of Reynolds number. Recall that the average strain-rate and vorticity contributions are approximately equal in an isotropic flow field.
  • (d)  
    Examine the velocity gradient constituents conditioned on magnitude at high Reynolds numbers to gain insight into intermittency. It is generally believed that vorticity magnitude or enstrophy is more intermittent than strain-rate magnitude or dissipation [2, 3].
  • (e)  
    Analyze the behavior of the pressure field as a function of the velocity gradient constituents.
  • (f)  
    Examine the alignment properties of the local rigid-body-rotation axis.

The triple decomposition presented in the study can further our understanding of several aspects of velocity gradient dynamics in turbulent flows: (i) the local-structure of flow field in regions of intermittency; (ii) clear distinction between solid-body rotation and vorticity; and (iii) relation between pressure and velocity gradient fluctuations. Such understanding is of intrinsic scientific value and can also lead to improved modeling of sub-grid constitutive relations, material element deformation [23, 24] and mixing enhancement [2528].

The next section of this work outlines the procedure for triple decomposition of VGT, followed by a comprehensive description of the properties of its constituents and its implication in local streamline geometry. In the third section, details about the DNS datasets of forced isotropic turbulence are briefly discussed. The results are illustrated in the fourth section—velocity gradient composition of a turbulent flow field is examined in detail along with its Reynolds number dependence, followed by investigation of the pressure field conditioned on velocity gradient constituents and examination of the alignment properties of the rotation axis in high Reynolds number turbulence. Finally, the important findings of this study are summarized in the conclusions section.

2. Triple decomposition of VGT

The additive decomposition of the VGT (A) into normal-strain-rate tensor (N), pure-shear tensor (H) and rigid-body-rotation-rate tensor (R) is given by

Equation (2)

The Nij, Hij and Rij tensors represent normal-straining, pure-shearing and rigid-body-rotation of a fluid element, respectively. These transformations are illustrated with some elementary examples in figure 1 for reference. The decomposition entails considerable level of effort and the technique is different for a fluid element undergoing rigid-body-rotation (R ≠ 0) and one that has no rotation component (R = 0). The former is called local fluid rotational while the latter is referred to as local fluid non-rotational [17] in the rest of this work. In this section, we first outline the decomposition procedure for the two cases. Then we proceed to establish the kinematic properties of the constituent tensors, including the streamline shapes of local fluid motion corresponding to each tensor.

2.1. Decomposition procedure

If A has two complex conjugate eigenvalues (λcr ± iλci) and one real eigenvalue (λr), then it represents locally rotational flow. On the other hand, if A has only real eigenvalues (λ1, λ2, λ3), it implies that the flow is locally non-rotational. Our procedure combines two different proposals in literature for rotational and non-rotational parts of the flow field. The procedure of VGT decomposition for both the cases are now discussed in detail.

2.1.1. Rotational case

For the rotational case, we follow the VGT decomposition procedure outlined by Gao and Liu [12]. This method involves two coordinate-frame rotations to obtain the VGT in the desired lower block triangular form for decomposition. The steps are listed below:

  • (a)  
    First we identify the rotation axis ($\to {\boldsymbol{r}}$), which is the eigenvector of the real eigenvalue of A. Then the coordinate frame is rotated such that the Z-axis of the new frame is aligned with $\to {\boldsymbol{r}}$. The VGT in this new coordinate frame is given by
    Equation (3)
    where, Q is a proper rotation matrix obtained from real Schur decomposition of A as shown by Liu et al [29].
  • (b)  
    Next, the coordinate frame is further rotated about the Z-axis, i.e. in the XY-plane, by an azimuthal angle θ. This angle θ is chosen such that the angular velocity of the fluid is minimum. The VGT in this new coordinate frame (A*) is then given by
    Equation (4)
    is also a proper rotation matrix.

These steps result in the VGT in a rotated coordinate frame such that it is of the form

Equation (5)

The VGT is then decomposed into the following constituent tensors,

Equation (6)

We define N as the normal-strain-rate tensor, which is a diagonal tensor containing the real parts of eigenvalues of VGT. Here, λcr is the real part of the complex conjugate eigenvalues of A and λr is the only real eigenvalue of A. The tensor N represents the normal compression and expansion of the fluid element along different directions. It must be noted that the volume of the fluid element is preserved. Incompressibility imposes the following condition:

Equation (7)

The tensor H represents the pure shearing deformation of the fluid element. The shear tensor is a lower triangular tensor with three elements—s1, s2 and s3—that constitute the transverse gradients of velocity components. The s3 component represents shearing within the plane of rigid-body-rotation and is non-negative by definition [12]. Moreover, the eigenvalues of such a tensor are zero. Finally, the rigid-body-rotation tensor R is an anti-symmetric tensor depending on only one unknown, ϕ. The tensor represents pure-rotation of the fluid element with an angular velocity given by ϕ. The rotational strength is defined as twice the value of this angular velocity of the fluid element ($\tilde {R}\equiv 2\phi $). The rotation axis, $\to {r}$, lies along the axial vector of the rigid-body-rotation tensor. Thus, the Rortex vector is given by [12],

Equation (8)

The rigid-body-rotation tensor has one zero and two purely imaginary eigenvalues (±iϕ). Note that this additive triple decomposition of the VGT is in the principal frame of the normal-strain-rate tensor.

2.1.2. Non-rotational case

In this case, we use Schur decomposition to segregate the normal-strain-rate tensor from the shear tensor, as the rigid-body-rotation is identically zero. In a previous study, Keylock [22] segregated the effect of shear from the VGT by performing complex Schur decomposition, which however results in complex component tensors. In this study, we use real Schur decomposition for locally non-rotational points in the flow. Since A contains only real eigenvalues in this case, it can be transformed into an upper triangular tensor by real Schur decomposition:

Equation (9)

such that A is a real upper triangular tensor which can now be decomposed into a diagonal (normal) tensor and a strictly upper-triangular (non-normal) tensor. Here, Q* is an orthogonal matrix responsible for coordinate transformation of the VGT from A to A. In order to be consistent with the lower triangular form of the shear tensor obtained in the triple decomposition method for the rotational case, we perform real Schur decomposition of the VGT transpose (AT)

Equation (10)

Then, the transpose of the resulting tensor yields

Equation (11)

where A* is the Schur decomposition of A in lower triangular form. Now, the VGT can be decomposed into the following normal and non-normal tensors

Equation (12)

Here, N is the normal tensor, i.e. a diagonal tensor containing the eigenvalues of A. It is therefore referred to as the normal-strain-rate tensor and reflects the compression and expansion that the fluid element undergoes along different directions. In order to ensure that the VGT decomposition is unique, the ordering of diagonal elements of the normal-strain-rate tensor is fixed to λ1λ2λ3. This tensor consists of only two unknowns due to the incompressibility condition,

Equation (13)

The lower triangular tensor H is the non-normal tensor containing information about the eigenvectors of A. This tensor consists of three independent elements representing shearing of the fluid element in three orthogonal planes and is therefore, referred to as the shear tensor.

The VGT decomposition in both rotational and non-rotational cases are considered in the principal frame of N. In the remaining sections of this work, the VGT will be used in this coordinate frame for convenience and will be represented by A. The results presented in this study are frame invariant and do not depend on the coordinate frame of reference.

2.2. Properties of VGT constituents

The shear tensor can be further divided into symmetric (HS) and anti-symmetric (HW) counterparts:

Equation (14)

The symmetric-shear tensor along with normal-strain-rate tensor recovers the strain-rate tensor while the anti-symmetric-shear tensor along with rigid-body-rotation tensor constitutes the rotation-rate or vorticity tensor, i.e.

Equation (15)

It is evident that shear contributes to vorticity as well as strain-rate. In this subsection, we first describe the composition of velocity gradient magnitude based on the VGT decomposition. Next, we characterize the local streamline shape associated with each of these velocity gradient constituents in the phase plane of VGT invariants.

2.2.1. Composition of velocity gradient magnitude

In terms of strain-rate and rotation-rate, velocity gradient magnitude (Frobenius norm squared: A2 = AijAij) can be written as:

Equation (16)

where S2 = SijSij is strain-rate magnitude related to dissipation (νS2) and W2 = WijWij is vorticity magnitude or enstrophy. The triple decomposition of VGT results in the following expression for magnitude:

Equation (17)

which can be restated as

Equation (18)

where N2 = NijNij, H2 = HijHij and R2 = RijRij are defined as the magnitudes (Frobenius norm squared) of normal-strain-rate, shear and rigid-body-rotation tensors, respectively. For locally fluid rotational case (equations (6) and (7)), these are of the form

Equation (19)

and for the fluid non-rotational case (equations (12) and (13)), these constituent magnitudes are of the form

Equation (20)

The term RH = RijHij is defined as the correlation term between the R and H tensors. The other possible correlation terms such as NijHij and NijRij are identically zero since N is a diagonal matrix while both H and R are hollow matrices (all diagonal elements are zero). Using equation (6) it can be shown that the shear-rotation correlation term, which exists only if the flow is locally rotational, is given by,

Equation (21)

Therefore, the shear-rotation correlation term contributing to velocity gradient (VG) magnitude depends only on the rigid-body-rotation strength (2ϕ) and the component of shear that is in the plane of rigid-body-rotation (s3). Since both ϕ and s3 are non-negative [12] by definition, 2RH ⩾ 0.

In order to measure the contribution of each component toward VG magnitude, we normalize these magnitudes by the local VG magnitude

Equation (22)

Then, the normalized normal-strain, shear and rigid-body-rotation magnitudes have the following bounds,

Equation (23)

It can be shown using equation (6) that the normalized correlation term 2rh have more restricted bounds, i.e.

Equation (24)

A detailed proof of the above result is included in appendix A.

As shown previously in equation (15), the shear tensor contributes to both S as well as W in the form of its symmetric (HS) and anti-symmetric (HW) counterparts, respectively. Since the shear tensor is a lower triangular tensor, the symmetric-shear and anti-symmetric-shear tensors are of the form

Equation (25)

The magnitudes of HS and HW are equal since,

Equation (26)

Therefore, the shear-magnitude H2 is divided equally between strain-rate and vorticity magnitudes. From equations (15) and (26), we then obtain

Equation (27)

It may be noted that vorticity has an additional dependence on shear via the shear-rotation correlation term.

The occurrence of extreme values of A2 is critical in the investigation of turbulence intermittency. The primary goal of this study is to examine the contribution of normal-strain-rate, shear and rigid-body-rotation towards the overall VG magnitude and its relation with the pressure field.

2.2.2. Tensor invariants and local streamline geometry

In this subsection, we revisit local streamline topology and geometry using triple decomposition of VGT. The topology of local streamlines in incompressible turbulent flows is defined by the second and third invariants of VGT as proposed by Chong et al [30],

Equation (28)

In the fluid rotational case, the invariants can be expressed in terms of VGT constituents (applying equations (6) and (7)) as follows,

Equation (29)

It is important to note here that the invariants do not depend on the components of shear outside the plane of rigid body rotation, i.e. s1 and s2. Therefore, the topology of locally rotational streamlines can be expressed as a function of normal-strain-rate eigenvalues, rigid-body-rotation strength and the component of shear within the plane of rigid-body-rotation. The invariants of each of the constituent tensor (N, R and H) are given by,

Equation (30)

In the fluid non-rotational case (applying equations (12) and (13)), the VGT invariants are given by

Equation (31)

In this case, both QA and RA are functions of only the normal-strain-rate tensor and do not depend on the shear tensor at all. In fact, invariants of the consituent tensors N and H are given by

Equation (32)

Therefore, the topology of locally non-rotational streamlines depends only on the normal strain-rate tensor.

Topology, however, only provides information about the connectivity of a geometric shape. The complete geometric shape, as shown by Das and Girimaji [31, 32], is better represented in the bounded phase space of normalized VGT invariants given by,

Equation (33)

Note that these normalized invariants depend on all the shear components due to the normalization. Thus, shear might not be as critical in determining the topology of the local flow but it is important in determining its complete geometric shape. We now examine the shape of the local streamline geometry associated with the different velocity gradient tensor components N, H and R in the qr plane.

Degenerate geometries: these are the limiting cases, illustrated in figure 2(a), that represent a point or a line in the qr plane. These degenerate shapes are discussed below:

  • (a)  
    Pure-rotation (A = R; N = H = 0): the top-most point in the plane (r = 0, q = 1/2) represents an anti-symmetric VGT with one zero and two purely imaginary eigenvalues. This results in pure rigid-body-rotation of the fluid element or locally planar circular streamlines.
  • (b)  
    Pure-shear (A = H; N = R = 0): the lower triangular tensor H has zero second and third invariants by its definition. Therefore, the origin of the qr plane represents pure shearing of the fluid element.
  • (c)  
    Normal-straining (A = N; R = H = 0): The q = −1/2 line or bottom-most boundary of the plane constitutes the case when the VGT itself is a normal matrix. This represents pure stretching/compression of the fluid element in three orthogonal directions.
  • (d)  
    Rotation and shear (A = R + H; N = 0): the upper half (q > 0) of the r = 0 line represents VGT with zero normal-strain-rate tensor. The VGT here has one zero and two purely imaginary eigenvalues, resulting in planar closed circulating streamlines that are elliptic in shape due to the presence of shear. In the absence of shear, the streamlines are purely circular (at q = 1/2).
  • (e)  
    Normal-strain and rotation (A = N + R; H = 0): the shear tensor is zero at the left and right boundaries of the plane given by [32]
    Equation (34)
    The left boundary represents rigid-body-rotation about the expansive normal-strain-rate eigenvector while the right boundary represents rigid-body-rotation about the compressive normal-strain-rate eigenvector, both in the absence of any shear. This implies locally stable/unstable spiraling streamlines stretching/compressing perpendicular to its focal plane.
Figure 2.

Figure 2. Local streamline shapes and composition of VGT in different points/regions of the qr plane: (a) degenerate cases (b) non-degenerate cases.

Standard image High-resolution image

Non-degenerate geometries: figure 2(b) illustrates the four non-degenerate geometries covering the area of the qr plane and the corresponding VGT decomposition. These are discussed below:

  • (a)  
    Rotational geometries (A = N + R + H): above the zero discriminant (d = q3 + (27/4)r2 = 0) lines the VGT has complex eigenvalues and the flow is locally rotational. All three constituent tensors are in general non-zero. In the stable-focus-stretching (SFS) topology, the unique eigenvalue of N (λr: real eigenvalue of A) is positive, i.e. λr > 0, representing stretching of the fluid element. The other two equal eigenvalues of N are negative, i.e. λcr < 0, representing convergence of the local streamlines towards a stable focus. Similarly in unstable-focus-compression (UFC) topology, λr < 0 represents compression of the fluid element and λcr > 0 represents diverging streamlines from an unstable focus. The non-zero eigenvalues of tensor R (±iϕ) denote the angular velocity of rigid-body-rotation of the fluid element. The tensor H controls the shearing of the fluid element, resulting in varied orientations of the spiraling with respect to the direction of stretching/compression. The angle of alignment between the vorticity vector ($\to {\boldsymbol{\omega }}\equiv $ dual vector of W) and the eigenvectors of S can take any value. On the contrary, in this decomposition the rotation vector ($\to {\boldsymbol{r}}\equiv $ dual vector of R) is always aligned along the unique eigenvector of N.
  • (b)  
    Non-rotational geometries (A = N + H; R = 0): below the zero discriminant line, VGT has only real eigenvalues. Stable-node-saddle-saddle (SNSS) topology region represents compression in two directions and expansion in one, i.e. λ1 > 0, λ2,3 < 0, while unstable-node-saddle-saddle (UNSS) topology implies λ1,2 > 0, λ3 < 0. However, these directions are in general oblique with respect to each other. The information about the magnitude of stretching/compression is contained in N but the orientation of these directions, designated by the λi-eigenvectors, are contained in H.

In summary, pure shear occurs at the origin of the qr plane while normal-straining and rigid-body-rotation occur at the boundaries of the plane. The entire area inside the plane is populated in a turbulent flow field as a result of the combination of all three constituents. The distribution asymptotes to a nearly universal teardrop-like shape around the origin following the right discriminant line in fully-developed turbulent flows [31].

3. Numerical simulation data

Direct numerical simulation (DNS) data of incompressible forced isotropic turbulence over a range of Taylor Reynolds number (Reλ ∈ 1–588) has been used in this study to further characterize VGT behavior in terms of the new constituent tensors. The Taylor Reynolds number is defined as

Equation (35)

where u' is root-mean-square (rms) velocity, ν is kinematic viscosity, and epsilon = 2νSijSij⟩ is the mean dissipation rate. The turbulence simulations were performed inside a 2π × 2π × 2π periodic box with different grid sizes listed in table 1. The highest resolved wave number (kmax) normalized by the Kolmogorov length scale (η) is also listed in the table for all the DNS datasets used. The derivatives used in this study have been calculated using spectral method. All the DNS datasets belong to Donzis research group at Texas A&M University. The simulation data have been used in previous works for investigating intermittency, anomalous exponents and Reynolds number scaling [3337].

Table 1. Details of forced isotropic incompressible turbulence data used.

ReλGrid pointskmaxηSource
12563105.6Yakhot and Donzis [36]
6256334.8Yakhot and Donzis [36]
9256326.6Yakhot and Donzis [36]
14256319.87Yakhot and Donzis [36]
18256315.59Yakhot and Donzis [36]
25256311.51Yakhot and Donzis [36]
356431.45Yakhot and Donzis [36]
8625632.83Donzis et al [33], Yakhot and Donzis [36]
22551231.34Donzis et al [33], Donzis and Sreenivasan [34]
385102431.41Donzis et al [33], Donzis and Sreenivasan [34]
588204831.39Donzis et al [33], Donzis and Sreenivasan [34]

The work of Yakhot and Donzis [36] demonstrated the existence of a transition Reynolds number at Reλ ∼ 9 for isotropic turbulence forced with random Gaussian forcing. The normalized even-order moments of velocity gradients are Gaussian below this Reynolds number and exhibit the so-called anomalous scaling above this Reynolds number. In addition, a recent study by Das and Girimaji [31] show that certain VGT statistics and dynamical characteristics asymptote towards a universal nature above Reλ ≈ 200. For example, the qr joint probability density function (pdf) is nearly invariant for Reλ > 200. To better understand turbulence velocity gradient behavior as a function of Reλ we investigate VG composition in three ranges:

  • (a)  
    Low Reynolds number (Gaussian regime)—Reλ ∈ (1, 9)
  • (b)  
    Intermediate Reynolds number—Reλ ∈ (9, 200)
  • (c)  
    High Reynolds number (asymptotic regime)—Reλ ∈ (200, 600)

4. Velocity gradients and pressure field characterization

4.1. Composition of VG magnitude

Subject to triple decomposition, the VG magnitude is composed of the following four constituents—normal-strain-rate magnitude (N2), rigid-body-rotation-rate magnitude (R2), shear magnitude (H2) and shear-rotation correlation term (2RH), as given in equation (17). The volume-averages of these constituents normalized by the volume-average of total VG magnitude (A2) is plotted in figure 3 as a function of Reynolds number. It is evident from the figure that shear is the most dominant component at all Reynolds numbers, followed by normal-strain-rate and then rigid-body-rotation. In the low Reynolds number range, mean shear increases with increasing Reλ while mean normal-strain decreases. Similar trend continues in the intermediate range of Reynolds number, where shear increases with Reλ to values higher than 50% of the mean VG magnitude. The mean rigid-body-rotation decreases with Reλ in the low and intermediate ranges of Reynolds numbers. The correlation term 2RH is fairly independent of Reλ and maintains a constant value of ⟨2RH⟩ ≈ 13% of ⟨A2⟩. Finally, the volume averages of all the constituents asymptote to distinct values in the high Reynolds number range. In this asymptotic regime of Reλ, ⟨H2⟩ ≈ 52%, ⟨N2⟩ ≈ 24% and ⟨R2⟩ ≈ 11% of ⟨A2⟩.

For reference, we have also plotted the VG magnitude composition in terms of Sij and Wij. In an isotropic flow field it is well-known that ⟨S2⟩/⟨A2⟩ = ⟨W2⟩/⟨A2⟩ = 0.5. Thus, of the 50% constituted by average enstrophy or ⟨W2⟩, only about 11% is directly from rigid-body-rotation. The remainder of enstrophy is constituted of contributions from shear: $\langle {H}_{\mathrm{W}}^{2}\rangle =26\%,\langle 2RH\rangle =13\%$. Similarly, only half of the average strain-rate magnitude or ⟨S2⟩ is constituted by normal-strain-rate; the other half is from shear.

The probability density function (pdf) of A2 and its composition are of much interest in the discussion of turbulence intermittency. It has been shown in several previous studies that A2 exhibits a heavy-tailed pdf, characteristic of intermittency [38, 39]. It has further been shown that in the conventionally used decomposition, enstrophy exhibits a pdf with a wider tail and is more intermittent than dissipation [2, 3]. The pdfs of VG magnitude and its triple decomposition constituents are plotted in figure 4 for a high Reynolds number case (Reλ = 225). Interestingly, the figure illustrates that shear-magnitude (H2) exhibits a wider tail than all the other components. The pdf-tails of N2, R2 and 2RH span across smaller ranges of values than that of H2. This is observed at all the investigated Reynolds numbers (plots not displayed) and is particularly apparent in the high Reλ cases. Clearly, in this decomposition the shear-magnitude contributes most toward the heavy-tailed pdf of A2. It is further evident that it is the contribution of shear rather than rigid-body-rotation, that renders enstrophy so strongly intermittent.

Figure 3.

Figure 3. Volume average of H2, N2, 2RH and R2 normalized by the volume average of A2 in the three Reλ ranges (marked by different background colors). The dashed line marks the volume average of S2 and W2, normalized by ⟨A2⟩.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 4.

Figure 4. Probability density function (pdf) of A2, H2, N2, R2 and 2RH normalized by volume-averaged VG magnitude ⟨A2⟩ in log-linear scale for Reλ = 225.

Standard image High-resolution image

Now we further investigate the contributions of different velocity gradient constituents at different values of A2. The conditional mean of the normalized constituents—n2, r2, h2 and 2rh (see equation (22)) are plotted as a function of VG magnitude in figure 5 for the high Reynolds number cases. Normal-strain-rate dominates at very low VG magnitudes (${A}^{2}/\langle {A}^{2}\rangle {< }\mathcal{O}\left(0.1\right)$) but it declines steadily with increasing A2. For a major portion of the VG magnitude range, shear is the most dominating component. The rigid-body-rotation magnitude and shear-rotation correlation term have very similar variation of conditional average with respect to A2. Both r2 and 2rh increase steadily with A2, except at the extreme A2 values. There appears to be a critical value of A2/⟨A2⟩ in the extreme range ($\sim \mathcal{O}\left(1{0}^{2}-1{0}^{3}\right)$), above which r2 and 2rh exhibit a sharp decline with A2 while h2 displays a steep increase. The contribution of n2 is small in this range of A2/⟨A2⟩. The critical A2/⟨A2⟩ value ≈60 (Reλ = 225), ≈166 (Reλ = 385) and ≈260 (Reλ = 588), clearly increases with Reλ. The conditional average plots of all the components of VG magnitude below this critical value are nearly invariant with Reλ.

Figure 5.

Figure 5. Conditional average of h2, n2, r2 and 2rh as a function of A2/⟨A2⟩ in the high Reλ range.

Standard image High-resolution image

This subsection demonstrates that on average shear is the dominant contributor to VG magnitude in a turbulent flow field while rigid-body-rotation magnitude contributes the least. It is further shown that shear-magnitude is most responsible for the heavy-tailed pdf of VG magnitude. Moreover, shear-magnitude increases steeply while rigid-body-rotation magnitude decreases at extreme A2 values. It is, therefore, reasonable to infer that shear dominates in regions of high intermittency.

4.2. Dependence of pressure field on VG constituents

Pressure field in an incompressible turbulent flow is governed by the pressure Poisson equation wherein the source term depends on the local velocity gradients:

Equation (36)

Here p' is the pressure fluctuation normalized by density. In terms of strain-rate and vorticity tensors this equation is of the form,

Equation (37)

where, s2 = S2/A2 and w2 = W2/A2 represent the fractions of contribution of strain-rate and vorticity towards A2 (equation (16)). As shown by Yeung et al [40], p' and ∇2p' are negatively correlated in a homogeneous field. Therefore, we expect from equation (37) that high s2 is likely associated with positive p' and high w2 is associated with negative p'. The mean pressure fluctuation (normalized by turbulent kinetic energy 0.5⟨u'2⟩) conditioned on s2 and w2 are plotted in figure 6 for a high Reλ case. The figure displays that when s2 dominates in the flow, mean p' > 0 implying a high pressure region, which is expected in a strain-dominated flow. On the other hand, when vorticity magnitude dominates, the local flow consists of a low pressure center. However, note that when w2 < 1/2 even if the flow has a significant amount of vorticity, the pressure fluctuation is likely to be positive. This reiterates the fact that vorticity does not necessarily indicate the presence of a rotating flow with a low pressure center.

Figure 6.

Figure 6. Conditional average of pressure fluctuation (normalized by turbulent kinetic energy) as a function of s2 and w2 for Reλ = 225.

Standard image High-resolution image

Even though ∇2p' depends on two intermittent quantities (S2 and W2), it has been shown to follow Kolmogorov scaling and is essentially non-intermittent in nature [41]. We now use triple decomposition of VGT to provide a plausible explanation for this. Using equation (2) in the governing equation of pressure (equation (36)) we obtain

Equation (38)

Applying the properties of the tensors from equation (6), we can substitute the following in above equation

Equation (39)

to obtain an alternate expression for source term in Laplace equation for pressure,

Equation (40)

Thus, the Laplacian of pressure does not depend on the shear-magnitude (H2). The contribution of H2 to the magnitudes of strain-rate and vorticity are equal, as shown in equation (26), and they nullify each other in the Laplacian of pressure expression. As shown in section 4.1, shear magnitude is the predominant contributor in attaining extreme VG magnitudes. The absence of this most intermittent VGT constituent H2 renders the Laplacian of pressure significantly less intermittent than A2.

It is evident in equation (40) that the sole effect of shear on pressure is through the shear-rotation correlation term that depends only on shearing in the rigid-body-rotation plane (s3). Now, if the local flow has no rigid-body-rotation at all (non-rotational), the pressure Poisson equation is given by,

Equation (41)

In this case, the Laplacian of pressure solely depends on the magnitude of normal-strain-rate tensor.

Now, we examine the mean normalized p' conditioned on each of the normalized VG constituents, i.e. n2, h2, r2 and 2rh, in figure 7. It is evident that the mean pressure fluctuation is negative whenever rigid-body-rotation is present in the flow. Clearly, rigid-body-rotation is much more strongly correlated with low pressure regions than vorticity (w2 in figure 6). Similarly, normal-strain-rate magnitude is more strongly associated with positive p' or high pressure regions than s2. As r2 increases, ⟨p'|r2⟩ becomes more negative and as n2 increases, ⟨p'|n2⟩ increases. Shear-magnitude is mostly associated with nearly zero conditional mean pressure fluctuations. This is due to the fact that purely shearing motion does not require any pressure gradient to drive the flow and the incompressibility condition is inherently satisfied. The shear-rotation correlation term lies within its bounds 2rh ∈ (0, 0.41) as given in equation (24) and the pressure fluctuations conditioned on 2rh becomes more negative as 2rh increases, similar to r2. The figures in this subsection illustrate the results for Reλ = 225; the other Reλ cases also display similar behavior and have not been presented separately.

Figure 7.

Figure 7. Conditional average of pressure fluctuation (normalized by turbulent kinetic energy) as a function of h2, n2, r2 and 2rh for Reλ = 225.

Standard image High-resolution image

4.3. Alignment properties

An important feature of velocity gradients in a turbulent flow field is the preferential alignment of vorticity along the intermediate eigenvector of strain-rate and pressure Hessian tensors [8, 4245]. In this subsection, we first examine the alignment of vorticity vector ($\to {\omega }$) and rotation axis ($\to {r}$ defined in equation (8)) with the eigenvectors of normal strain-rate tensor, N. Then, the alignment of $\to {r}$ with the eigenvectors of pressure Hessian tensor is investigated.

The eigenvectors of N for its three real eigenvalues are given by ${\to {n}}_{1}$, ${\to {n}}_{2}$ and ${\to {n}}_{3}$. If the flow is locally rotational, ${\to {n}}_{1}$ and ${\to {n}}_{2}$ are eigenvectors corresponding to the two equal eigenvalues (λcr) and ${\to {n}}_{3}$ corresponds to the unique eigenvalue λr. By construction, the rotation axis, $\to {r}$, is aligned with the unique eigenvector ${\to {n}}_{3}$. If the flow is locally non-rotational, eigenvectors—${\to {n}}_{1}$, ${\to {n}}_{2}$, ${\to {n}}_{3}$—correspond to the N-eigenvalues arranged in descending order: λ1λ2λ3. The pdfs of absolute values of cosines of angles between vorticity vector and N-eigenvectors are plotted for locally rotational and non-rotational cases in a high Reλ flow in figure 8. For reference, the pdf of angle cosine between $\to {\omega }$ and intermediate strain-rate eigenvector (${\to {s}}_{2}$) is also plotted. There is a discernible difference in the alignment of $\to {\omega }$ and ${\to {s}}_{2}$ in rotational and non-rotational cases. The probability of $\to {\omega }$-${\to {s}}_{2}$ alignment is higher in locally non-rotational flow than in locally rotational flow.

Figure 8.

Figure 8. Pdfs of absolute values of the cosines of angles between the vorticity vector ($\to {\omega }$) and the N-eigenvectors (${\to {n}}_{1},\;{\to {n}}_{2},\;{\to {n}}_{3}$) for locally (a) rotational, and (b) non-rotational points in Reλ = 225 case. Black dashed line represents the alignment of $\to {\omega }$ with the intermediate strain-rate eigenvector ${\to {s}}_{2}$.

Standard image High-resolution image

In the rotational case (figure 8(a)), vorticity displays a strong preferential alignment with ${\to {n}}_{3}$ and therefore with the rotation axis $\to {r}$. Thus, in a turbulent flow field when the flow is locally rotational, vorticity is most likely aligned with the rotation axis. Note that the perfect alignment of vorticity with rotation axis occurs when shear is zero. It is evident from the figure that this alignment of vorticity with the unique eigenvector of N has a significantly higher probability of occurrence than the alignment of vorticity with intermediate eigenvector of S.

In the non-rotational case (figure 8(b)), vorticity is equally well aligned with both most expansive and intermediate eigenvectors of N. In fact, the pdfs indicate nearly identical distribution of $\to {\omega }$-alignment with ${\to {n}}_{1}$ and ${\to {n}}_{2}$. It may be noted that the probability of each of these two alignments is weaker than the $\to {\omega }$-alignment with ${\to {s}}_{2}$. Vorticity is most likely to be on the plane perpendicular to ${\to {n}}_{3}$—the most compressive eigenvector of N. This behavior is similar to vorticity being on a plane normal to the most compressive eigenvector of S [8].

The pressure Hessian tensor is important as it represents the contribution of non-local effects towards the evolution of velocity gradients. It is given by

Equation (42)

Note that the pressure Laplacian is the trace of this tensor, i.e. ∇2p' = Pii. In this work, ${\to {\pi }}_{1}$, ${\to {\pi }}_{2}$ and ${\to {\pi }}_{3}$ denote the eigenvectors of P corresponding to eigenvalues in a decreasing order: ρ1ρ2ρ3. The pdfs of alignment of the rotation axis ($\to {r}$) with the pressure Hessian eigenvectors in a high Reλ case is illustrated in figure 9. It is evident that the rotation axis shows nearly equal likelihood of alignment with ${\to {\pi }}_{2}$ and ${\to {\pi }}_{3}$ eigenvectors. Further, $\to {r}$ has a high probability of being in a plane perpendicular to the ${\to {\pi }}_{1}$ eigenvector of the pressure Hessian tensor. In contrast, vorticity shows strong alignment with ${\to {\pi }}_{2}$ and only a slight tendency of alignment with ${\to {\pi }}_{3}$ [42, 44, 45].

Figure 9.

Figure 9. Pdfs of absolute values of the cosines of the angles between rotation axis ($\to {r}$) and the eigenvectors of pressure Hessian (${\to {\pi }}_{1}$, ${\to {\pi }}_{2}$, ${\to {\pi }}_{3}$) for Reλ = 225.

Standard image High-resolution image

5. Conclusions

The study proposes using a novel triple decomposition of velocity-gradient tensor (VGT) to revisit key small-scale features of turbulence. The VGT is partitioned into normal-strain-rate, pure-shear and rigid-body-rotation-rate tensors. Each of these tensors signifies an elementary form of deformation of a fluid element and has a specific role to play in the turbulence phenomenon. Specifically, the decomposition permits isolating the effect of rigid-body rotation from vorticity (Wij) and normal-strain-rate from strain-rate (Sij). The key results and findings from this study are:

  • (a)  
    The various local streamline topologies and geometries can be more intuitively understood in terms of normal-strain, rigid-body-rotation and pure-shear tensors.
  • (b)  
    On average, shear is the most dominating constituent in turbulent flow fields at all Reynolds numbers while rigid-body-rotation contributes the least.
  • (c)  
    The average contribution of shear increases while that of normal-strain-rate and rigid-body-rotation-rate decreases with Reynolds number at low and intermediate Reλ (<200). Shear-rotation correlation term does not show any Reλ-dependence. At high Reλ (>200), all the average contributions are fairly invariant with Reynolds number.
  • (d)  
    Shear contribution (H2) is most responsible for the heavy-tailed probability distribution of A2. Shear-magnitude shows a steep increase in contribution at extreme A2 values while rotation-magnitude declines.
  • (e)  
    Further, it is shown that shear, rather than rigid-body-rotation is the main cause of the strong intermittency exhibited by enstrophy.
  • (f)  
    The shear-magnitude, which contributes the most in regions of high intermittency of velocity gradients, is absent in the expression for Laplacian of pressure. Thus, the pressure Laplacian does not exhibit discernible intermittency.
  • (g)  
    Low-pressure regions are strongly associated with rigid-body-rotation and high-pressure regions are prevalent when normal-strain-rate dominates. Shear is associated with nearly zero pressure fluctuations.
  • (h)  
    Vorticity demonstrates a strong preferential alignment with the unique eigenvector of normal strain-rate tensor or the rotation axis in locally rotational flow. This alignment is significantly higher in probability than its alignment with the intermediate strain-rate eigenvector. In the locally non-rotational regions, vorticity shows high probability of alignment with both most expansive and intermediate normal strain-rate eigenvectors.
  • (i)  
    The axis of rigid-body-rotation shows a high probability of alignment with the pressure Hessian eigenvectors of both the intermediate and the smallest eigenvalues.

Overall, the study presents some novel insight into velocity-gradients and, hence, small scales of turbulence. This work specifically highlights the key role of shear in turbulence small-scale dynamics previously attributed to strain-rate and vorticity. The new intuition developed from this triple decomposition of VGT not only leads to deeper understanding of critical turbulence phenomena, but also paves the way for improved modeling of velocity-gradients in turbulence.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Dr Diego Donzis of Texas A&M University for providing the DNS data used in this work. The first author would also like to thank Zonta International for awarding her the Amelia Earhart fellowship for the academic year 2019–2020.

Appendix A.: Upper bound of normalized shear-rotation correlation term

The VG magnitude can be expressed as follows in terms of the elements of normal-strain-rate, shear and rigid-body-rotation-rate tensors when the flow is locally rotational (from equations (6) and (18)),

Equation (A1)

Here, 2ϕs3 is the shear-rotation correlation term which is positive by definition for rotational flow. This term is first normalized by A2 such that

Equation (A2)

The next step is to obtain the maximum value that 2rh can attain. Since the five variables in the above expression are independent and the denominator is a sum of non-negative terms, we can assume that 2rh is maximum when ${\lambda }_{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{r}}^{2}={s}_{1}^{2}={s}_{2}^{2}=0$. Note that this represents planar flow with only pure-rotation and in-plane shear. Then, the normalized correlation term has the following upper bound

Equation (A3)

Dividing the numerator and denominator by 4ϕ2, we obtain

Equation (A4)

The maximum of function f(x) occurs when

Equation (A5)

Therefore, the maximum value of 2rh is given by

Equation (A6)
Please wait… references are loading.
10.1088/1367-2630/ab8ab2