Articles

A MAGELLAN MIKE AND SPITZER MIPS STUDY OF 1.5–1.0 M STARS IN SCORPIUS-CENTAURUS

, , , , , and

Published 2011 August 18 © 2011. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
, , Citation Christine H. Chen et al 2011 ApJ 738 122 DOI 10.1088/0004-637X/738/2/122

0004-637X/738/2/122

ABSTRACT

We obtained Spitzer Space Telescope Multiband Imaging Photometer for Spitzer (MIPS) 24 μm and 70 μm observations of 182 nearby, Hipparcos F- and G-type common proper motion single and binary systems in the nearest OB association, Scorpius-Centaurus. We also obtained Magellan/MIKE R ∼ 50,000 visual spectra at 3500–10500 Å for 181 candidate ScoCen stars in single and binary systems. Combining our MIPS observations with those of other ScoCen stars in the literature, we estimate 24 μm F+G-type disk fractions of 9/27 (33% ± 11%), 21/67 (31% ± 7%), and 25/71 (35% ± 7%) for Upper Scorpius (∼10 Myr), Upper Centaurus Lupus (∼15 Myr), and Lower Centaurus Crux (∼17 Myr), respectively. We confirm previous IRAS and MIPS excess detections and present new discoveries of 41 protoplanetary and debris disk systems, with fractional infrared luminosities ranging from LIR/L* = 10−5 to 10−2 and grain temperatures ranging from Tgr = 40–300 K. We searched for an increase in 24 μm excess at an age of 15–20 Myr, consistent with the onset of debris production predicted by coagulation N-body simulations of outer planetary systems. We found such an increase around 1.5 M stars but discovered a decrease in the 24 μm excess around 1.0 M stars. We additionally discovered that the 24 μm excess around 1.0 M stars is larger than predicted by self-stirred models. Finally, we found a weak anti-correlation between fractional infrared luminosity (LIR/L*) and chromospheric activity (R'HK), that may be the result of differences in stellar properties, such as mass, luminosity, and/or winds.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

1. INTRODUCTION

Planets are believed to form in circumstellar disks of gas and dust. Recent high contrast imaging has revealed the presence of a 9 ± 3 MJup planet in the dusty, debris disk around β Pic at 8–13 AU from the central star, suggesting that giant planets may form at ages as young as ∼12 Myr (Lagrange et al. 2010). Although planets have not been widely detected in young debris disks (with ages 5–100 Myr), coronagraphic imaging has revealed the presence of structures, such as brightness peaks, asymmetries, and warps, that indicate that planets may have formed or may be forming (Wyatt 2008). Since debris disks are expected to be common around stars with ages ∼10–20 Myr, many Spitzer Multiband Imaging Photometer for Spitzer (MIPS) photometric surveys (e.g., Rebull et al. 2008; Low et al. 2005) have been carried out to search for infrared excess around stars in nearby (<75 pc from the Sun) moving groups with ages <100 Myr (e.g., the ∼10 Myr old TW Hya association, ∼12 Myr old β Pic moving group, etc.). Observations of stars in nearby, star-forming regions are needed to improve statistics.

Numerical coagulation N-body models have been developed to describe the formation of oligarchs (1000 km radius planetary embryos) in outer planetary systems and the destruction of planetesimals by collisions in circumstellar disks (e.g., Kenyon & Bromley 2005, 2008). These models assume that disks initially possess (1) planetesimals (with radii between 1 m and 1 km) at 30–150 AU from the central star and (2) gas that maintains circular orbits and low relative velocities between small bodies, leading to constructive collisions that build successively larger planetesimals. They predict that large bodies continue to grow until they reach a radius of ∼1000 km (at an age of ∼104 years) and are massive enough to gravitationally perturb smaller objects (with radii 0.1–10 km) into crossing orbits, generating debris dust that can be detected via thermal emission. The models are able to reproduce the general amplitude and evolution of 24 μm excess around A-type stars at ages >20 Myr (Su et al. 2006); however, they may or may not correctly describe the production of debris dust at younger ages. In particular, the Kenyon & Bromley (2005, 2008) models predict a peak in 24 μm excess at an age of ∼10–20 Myr.

The Scorpius-Centaurus OB association (ScoCen), with typical stellar distances of ∼100–200 pc, is the closest OB association to the Sun and contains three subgroups: Upper Scorpius (US), Upper Centaurus Lupus (UCL), and Lower Centaurus Crux (LCC), with estimated ages of ∼10 Myr (Pecaut et al. 2011), ∼15 Myr, and ∼17 Myr (Mamajek et al. 2002), respectively. The close proximity of ScoCen and the age of its constituent stars make this association an excellent laboratory for studying the formation and evolution of planetary systems. Several hundred candidate members have been identified to date; although, the association probably contains thousands of low-mass members. Member stars with spectral type F and earlier have been identified using moving group analysis of Hipparcos positions, parallaxes, and proper motions (de Zeeuw et al. 1999), while later type members have been identified using youth indicators (i.e., high coronal X-ray activity and large lithium abundance; Preibisch & Mamajek 2008; Slesnick et al. 2006). Demographic studies of infrared excess in ScoCen, combined with demographic studies of other young clusters, is expected to provide constraints on debris production in young debris disk systems and input into self-stirred disk models.

We report the results of a Spitzer MIPS 24 μm and 70 μm survey of 182 F- and G-type Hipparcos common proper motion members of ScoCen, building on our initial results (Chen et al. 2005). Our previous study included preliminary MIPS 24 and 70 μm photometry of 41 candidate ScoCen single and binary systems. The current study has been expanded to include (1) Magellan/Magellan Inamori Kyocera Echelle (MIKE) stellar radial and rotational velocity, lithium equivalent width, and Ca ii activity measurements for 181 candidate ScoCen members, (2) membership analysis for the F- and G-type candidate ScoCen members in the de Zeeuw et al. (1999) sample, and (3) new MIPS 24 μm and 70 μm observations of 142 candidate ScoCen single and binary systems. We re-examine membership using Li abundance to determine stellar youth and convergent point analysis to determine whether stellar luminosity, radial velocity, and proper motion are consistent with ScoCen membership. Refinements in the calibration of the MIPS data have allowed us to improve the accuracy of the measured fluxes; therefore, we rereduce and reanalyze the complete sample. We list the targets for the full sample, along with their spectral types, distances, and subgroup memberships in Table 1.

Table 1. Stellar Properties

HIP Spectral Distance Av Li L* RV PM Final Subgroup vrad ROSAT Fx EW(Li) vsin i log R'HK
  Type (pc) (mag)             (km s−1) (counts s−1) (erg s−1 cm−1) (mÅ) (km s−1)  
55334 F2V (4) 86+4−4 0.11 ± 0.01 Y Y Y? Y? Y? LCC 21.3 ± 0.9 0.092 6.4 × 106 18 ± 4 106 ± 6 −4.54
56227 F0III (4) 118+8−7 0.00 ± 0.04 Y Y Y? Y? Y? LCC 7.8 ± 0.7 ... <5.6 × 106 70 ± 4 79 ± 6 −4.64
56420 Gwl (12) 176+213−62 ... N Y Y Y N ... 12.6 ± 0.3 ... <3.2 × 107 101 ± 6 10 ± 1 −5.43
56673** F5IV (4) 94+5−4 0.12 ± 0.04 Y Y Y? Y? Y? LCC 19.7 ± 0.6 0.492 7.4 × 106 114 ± 3 152 ± 11 −4.16
56814 K2/3IIICNII (5) 144+17−14 0.61 ± 0.32 N N Y Y N ... −17.4 ± 0.3 ... <1.3 × 105 45 ± 5 10 ± 1 −5.57
57524, ** F9IV (8) 92+12−10 0.13 ± 0.04 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 12.0 ± 0.3 0.535 4.7 × 107 171 ± 4 31 ± 2 −4.01
57595 F5V (4) 283+370−102 0.00 ± 0.03 Y? Y Y Y Y? LCC 8.3 ± 0.1 ... <9.0 × 106 <13 19 ± 2 −4.78
57950 F2IV/V (4) 98+8−7 0.00 ± 0.02 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 14.2 ± 0.3 0.07 6.8 × 106 51 ± 3 57 ± 4 −4.54
58075 F2V (11) 182+48−31 0.12 ± 0.03 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 16.5 ± 0.1 ... <7.6 × 106 75 ± 6 13 ± 1 −4.43
58146 F2IV V (4) 117+7−6 0.00 ± 0.04 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 6.8 ± 0.8 ... <2.7 × 106 134 ± 4 126 ± 8 −4.53
58167 F3IV (4) 93+9−7 0.08 ± 0.02 Y? Y Y? Y? Y? LCC 21.3 ± 2.0 0.04 4.1 × 106 <14 180 ± 10 −4.45
58220 F3V (4) 99+9−8 0.00 ± 0.06 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 15.4 ± 0.3 ... <4.3 × 106 62 ± 5 66 ± 6 −4.61
58528 F5V (4) 110+13−11 0.00 ± 0.06 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 13.5 ± 0.3 0.041 2.5 × 106 70 ± 5 36 ± 2 −4.74
58899 F3V (5) 116+16−13 0.01 ± 0.02 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 13.6 ± 0.3 ... <4.4 × 106 93 ± 3 18 ± 2 −4.87
58921** M2III (4) 210+17−14 0.33 ± 0.18 Y N Y? Y? N ... 1.0 ± 0.2 ... <4.1 × 103 69 ± 7 10 ± 1 −5.49
58996** G2IV (13) 110+14−11 0.08 ± 0.05 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 12.5 ± 0.3 0.219 2.0 × 107 213 ± 7 35 ± 2 −4.11
59084 F0V (4) 140+18−14 0.00 ± 0.22 Y Y Y? Y? Y? LCC −10.8 ± 0.9 ... <6.6 × 106 25 ± 3 98 ± 9 −4.58
59481** F3V (5) 113+14−11 0.00 ± 0.04 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 12.2 ± 1.2 ... <4.7 × 106 54 ± 3 93 ± 5 −4.6
59603 F2V (4) 104+12−10 0.00 ± 0.02 Y Y Y? Y? Y? LCC 19.3 ± 0.7 0.03 4.6 × 106 45 ± 3 137 ± 9 −4.4
59693 F6IV (5) 137+30−21 0.10 ± 0.04 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 15.3 ± 0.3 ... <9.8 × 106 80 ± 5 10 ± 1 −4.80
59716 F5V (4) 97+14−11 0.03 ± 0.02 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 15.5 ± 1.1 0.565 5.2 × 107 107 ± 6 96 ± 8 −4.36
59764 G1V (13) 129+13−11 0.21 ± 0.06 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 14.0 ± 0.4 0.385 2.6 × 107 176 ± 9 83 ± 8 −4.09
59781 F7V (13) 82+9−8 0.04 ± 0.04 ... Y Y Y Y LCC ... 0.065 7.0 × 106 ... ... ...
59854, ** G1IV (8) 108+20−14 0.24 ± 0.10 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 14.4 ± 0.3 0.362 4.4 × 107 181 ± 5 27 ± 2 −4.07
59960 F5V (4) 92+6−6 0.00 ± 0.02 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 15.1 ± 0.3 ... <2.1 × 106 84 ± 3 55 ± 4 −4.64
60205 F7V (10) 170+84−42 0.00 ± 0.02 Y Y Y Y? Y? LCC 15.4 ± 0.4 0.029 9.5 × 106 99 ± 4 29 ± 2 −4.57
60245 F2V (5) 141+22−17 0.09 ± 0.02 Y? Y Y? Y Y? LCC −3.0 ± 0.3 0.046 <7.8 × 106 <9 35 ± 3 −4.71
60348** F5V (5) 94+18−13 0.00 ± 0.06 ... Y Y Y Y LCC 12.5 ± 0.4 0.041 6.0 × 106 ... 72 ± 4 −4.5
60513 F3V (4) 100+9−8 0.00 ± 0.01 Y? Y Y? Y? Y? LCC 22.6 ± 0.5 ... <4.5 × 106 <11 133 ± 10 −4.49
60567 F6/7V (5) 503+−256 0.03 ± 0.04 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 7.7 ± 0.6 0.057 1.5 × 107 139 ± 6 67 ± 5 −4.25
60885** G0IV (8) 135+22−17 0.14 ± 0.04 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 14.2 ± 0.4 0.168 1.4 × 107 154 ± 4 56 ± 4 −4.21
60913** G4.5IV (8) 99+10−9 0.34 ± 0.11 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 14.0 ± 0.4 0.042 2.4 × 106 184 ± 6 15 ± 2 −4.49
61049 F7V (4) 97+10−8 0.08 ± 0.13 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 5.0 ± 0.1 ... <3.4 × 106 112 ± 7 8 ± 1 −4.92
61086 F1V (10) 164+125−49 0.14 ± 0.09 Y Y Y Y Y LCC −1.6 ± 0.2 ... <3.5 × 107 41 ± 4 38 ± 3 −4.68
61087 F6V (4) 97+7−6 0.04 ± 0.01 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 17.8 ± 0.6 ... <2.3 × 106 109 ± 6 64 ± 5 −4.46
61241 G0 (11) 137+57−31 0.17 ± 0.09 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 13.1 ± 0.3 ... <1.1 × 107 160 ± 5 17 ± 1 −4.29
61248 G8III (5) 212+44−31 0.59 ± 0.12 N N Y? Y N ... 4.2 ± 0.2 ... <3.8 × 105 30 ± 3 10 ± 1 −5.02
62032 F0V (5) 141+34−23 0.11 ± 0.02 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 12.7 ± 1.2 ... <8.0 × 106 20 ± 3 73 ± 5 −4.65
62056 F6V (10) 167+105−46 0.11 ± 0.03 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 16.6 ± 0.2 ... <2.1 × 107 45 ± 4 10 ± 1 −5.04
62134 F2V (5) 116+16−13 0.03 ± 0.06 Y Y Y? Y? Y? LCC 23.8 ± 0.7 ... <5.8 × 106 60 ± 3 140 ± 9 −4.5
62171 F3V (4) 114+20−15 0.09 ± 0.03 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 13.6 ± 0.3 0.026 3.7 × 106 95 ± 7 40 ± 2 −4.8
62427 F8 (2) 143+30−21 0.00 ± 0.03 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 13.7 ± 0.3 0.145 2.6 × 107 85 ± 8 34 ± 3 −4.66
62428 F0III (4) 124+9−8 0.16 ± 0.02 Y N? Y Y N? ... 11.4 ± 0.3 ... <1.9 × 106 43 ± 5 16 ± 1 −4.6
62431 F0 (2) 132+21−16 0.13 ± 0.06 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 15.9 ± 0.3 0.145 1.1 × 107 60 ± 3 34 ± 3 −4.65
62657 F5/6V (5) 109+14−11 0.05 ± 0.05 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 10.9 ± 0.3 0.042 5.0 × 106 76 ± 5 42 ± 3 −4.6
62674 F3V (10) 262+228−83 0.00 ± 0.03 Y? Y Y Y Y? LCC −9.1 ± 0.4 ... <2.5 × 107 <12 57 ± 4 −4.61
62677 F0/2V: (4) 186+150−57 0.17 ± 0.04 Y Y Y? Y Y? LCC −17.4 ± 0.5 ... <7.5 × 106 80 ± 7 66 ± 6 −4.53
63022 F0V (5) 194+74−42 0.19 ± 0.05 Y Y Y Y Y LCC −8.2 ± 0.2 ... <1.7 × 107 40 ± 4 18 ± 2 −4.65
63041 F0V (4) 103+9−8 0.07 ± 0.01 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 28.9 ± 3.1 ... <3.6 × 106 46 ± 4 83 ± 5 −4.49
63272 F3IV/V (5) 105+11−9 0.04 ± 0.05 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 11.4 ± 0.4 0.027 3.5 × 106 37 ± 8 59 ± 6 −4.67
63435 F5V (5) 151+33−23 0.01 ± 0.04 Y? Y Y Y Y? LCC −1.5 ± 0.1 ... <7.1 × 106 <11 10 ± 1 −4.68
63439 F3/5IV/V (5) 143+26−19 0.00 ± 0.02 Y Y Y? Y? Y? LCC 15.7 ± 0.6 ... <7.9 × 106 28 ± 4 82 ± 5 −4.72
63527 F0/2V (5) 157+22−17 0.06 ± 0.04 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 14.4 ± 0.7 ... <2.9 × 106 <11 190 ± 14 −4.59
63797 G3.5IV (8) 93+9−7 0.23 ± 0.06 N Y Y? Y? N ... 39.8 ± 0.3 ... <2.0 × 106 13 ± 4 10 ± 1 −5.28
63836 F6/8 (5) 107+15−11 0.00 ± 0.04 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 9.0 ± 0.6 ... <5.9 × 106 97 ± 7 101 ± 8 −4.37
63847 G3IV (8) 120+18−14 0.22 ± 0.09 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 11.8 ± 0.3 ... <3.7 × 106 241 ± 8 33 ± 3 −3.97
63886 F2V (4) 107+13−10 0.00 ± 0.04 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 12.3 ± 0.3 ... <3.5 × 106 56 ± 5 49 ± 3 −4.77
63962 G0V (4) 236+105−55 0.12 ± 0.05 N Y Y Y N ... 12.6 ± 0.2 ... <5.7 × 106 <9 16 ± 1 −5.02
63975A F3/5V (5) 123+17−13 0.04 ± 0.04 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 5.2 ± 0.4 0.034 9.2 × 105 25 ± 4 83 ± 6 −4.62
63975B F6V (14) ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 13.2 ± 1.0 ... ... 72 ± 5 93 ± 7 −4.57
64044 F5V (5) 112+17−13 0.10 ± 0.02 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 12.6 ± 0.7 0.126 1.5 × 107 132 ± 4 93 ± 7 −4.23
64184 F3V (4) 85+6−5 0.00 ± 0.07 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 10.2 ± 0.3 ... <3.3 × 106 84 ± 4 43 ± 3 −4.72
64216 K0III (5) 202+43−30 0.59 ± 0.14 N N Y Y N ... −11.4 ± 0.1 ... <3.7 × 105 44 ± 3 11 ± 1 −5.32
64316 F3V (10) 188+112−51 0.18 ± 0.04 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 6.1 ± 0.3 0.011 1.6 × 106 76 ± 5 49 ± 4 −4.63
64322 F0/2IV/V (4) 100+10−8 0.13 ± 0.04 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 5.2 ± 0.5 ... <3.7 × 106 31 ± 5 67 ± 6 −4.6
64877 F5V (4) 125+18−14 0.02 ± 0.06 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 13.3 ± 0.7 ... <4.2 × 106 95 ± 6 74 ± 5 −4.55
64995 F2IV/V (4) 110+1210 0.00 ± 0.04 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 12.3 ± 0.3 ... <3.7 × 106 38 ± 7 61 ± 6 −4.68
65136 F0V (5) 161+31−22 0.16 ± 0.06 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 7.2 ± 1.1 ... <1.1 × 107 27 ± 4 81 ± 4 −4.63
65423** G0V (8) 124+34−22 0.10 ± 0.05 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 17.4 ± 0.3 0.122 2.4 × 107 165 ± 5 38 ± 2 −4.23
65517** G1.5IV (8) 111+22−16 0.11 ± 0.15 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 11.7 ± 0.3 0.237 4.5 × 107 185 ± 6 37 ± 3 −4.03
65617 F7/G0V (4) 146+40−26 0.07 ± 0.06 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 31.0 ± 1.2 ... <9.6 × 106 126 ± 5 126 ± 9 −4.19
65875 F6V (4) 110+14−11 0.00 ± 0.03 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 9.7 ± 0.3 ... <2.5 × 106 100 ± 6 40 ± 2 −4.78
65891 K0III (4) 136+12−10 0.34 ± 0.13 N N Y? Y? N ... 1.8 ± 0.3 ... <2.1 × 105 25 ± 4 10 ± 1 −5.44
66285A F7/8V (4) 83+14−11 0.04 ± 0.02 N Y Y? Y? N ... 33.3 ± 0.3 ... <2.9 × 106 32 ± 5 13 ± 1 −5.5
66285B G0V (14) 83+14−11 ... N Y Y? Y? N ... 29.0 ± 0.3 ... ... 24 ± 3 11 ± 2 ...
66782 K0III (5) 124+9−7 0.43 ± 0.11 N N Y? Y? N ... 1.0 ± 0.3 ... <1.9 × 105 37 ± 3 10 ± 1 −5.39
66941** G0.5IV (8) 123+13−11 0.42 ± 0.06 Y Y Y? Y? Y? LCC 5.0 ± 0.9 0.844 1.9 × 107 306 ± 7 145 ± 9 −4.3
67003 K0III/IVCNII/(5) 222+48−33 0.77 ± 0.13 N N Y Y N ... −3.1 ± 0.2 ... <3.4 × 105 <11 10 ± 1 −5.25
67068 F3V (5) 92+9−7 0.00 ± 0.01 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 11.2 ± 0.8 ... <4.7 × 106 101 ± 4 124 ± 9 −4.62
67230 F5V (4) 131+17−13 0.01 ± 0.02 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 13.6 ± 1.0 ... <2.5 × 106 134 ± 6 98 ± 7 −4.56
67428 F5V (4) 127+21−16 0.05 ± 0.01 Y Y Y Y Y LCC 10.4 ± 0.3 ... <5.2 × 106 117 ± 3 37 ± 3 −4.61
67497 F0V (5) 107+10−9 0.00 ± 0.04 Y Y Y Y Y UCL 12.1 ± 0.6 ... <4.8 × 106 20 ± 4 70 ± 5 −4.65
67522 G0.5IV (8) 148+40−26 0.19 ± 0.03 Y Y Y? Y? Y? UCL −2.3 ± 0.4 0.154 2.8 × 107 195 ± 5 57 ± 3 −4.08
67957 F8V (5) 114+18−14 0.10 ± 0.06 Y Y Y? Y? Y? UCL 17.5 ± 0.3 ... <5.6 × 106 161 ± 7 14 ± 2 −4.50
67970 F3V (5) 119+21−16 0.02 ± 0.02 Y Y Y Y Y UCL 9.6 ± 0.3 ... <5.8 × 106 70 ± 6 50 ± 3 −4.52
68328** G0 (11) 120+28−19 0.53 ± 0.18 Y Y Y Y Y UCL 9.1 ± 0.3 ... <5.7 × 106 252 ± 4 10 ± 1 −3.94
68335 F5V (5) 121+14−11 0.05 ± 0.03 Y Y Y Y Y UCL 6.9 ± 0.9 ... <3.6 × 106 75 ± 3 184 ± 12 −4.31
68534 F2V (10) 96+28−18 0.01 ± 0.37 ... Y Y Y Y LCC ... ... <1.1 × 107 ... ... ...
68726 G0.5III (8) 163+18−15 0.44 ± 0.14 N N Y Y N ... 7.3 ± 0.1 ... <5.2 × 105 <8 12 ± 1 −4.63
69291 F2V (6) 132+20−16 0.00 ± 0.04 Y Y Y? Y? Y? UCL 8.7 ± 0.4 ... <5.3 × 106 66 ± 7 71 ± 5 −4.81
69327 F0IV (4) 136+21−16 0.00 ± 0.01 Y Y Y? Y? Y? UCL −4.7 ± 0.3 ... <6.0 × 106 37 ± 4 48 ± 4 −4.73
69395 K2II (5) 152+56−32 0.84 ± 0.17 N Y Y Y N ... 29.2 ± 0.1 ... <5.9 × 105 35 ± 6 10 ± 1 −5.35
69720 F0V (4) 13320−16 0.00 ± 0.01 Y Y Y Y Y UCL 9.9 ± 0.5 ... <6.4 × 106 60 ± 5 115 ± 10 −4.66
70350 F7V (5) 118+14−12 0.12 ± 0.05 Y Y Y Y Y UCL 6.0 ± 0.3 0.412 2.3 × 107 160 ± 7 23 ± 2 −4.37
70376A F7V (5) 133+46−27 0.16 ± 0.06 Y Y Y Y Y UCL 67.6 ± 0.3 0.181 2.1 × 107 182 ± 6 17 ± 1 −4.34
70376B G0V (14) 133+46−27 ... Y Y Y Y Y UCL 21.5 ± 1.0 ... ... 185 ± 8 92 ± 5 −4.17
70558 F2V (5) 136+24−18 0.11 ± 0.02 Y Y Y Y Y UCL 9.6 ± 0.6 ... <8.9 × 106 52 ± 7 100 ± 7 −4.73
70689 F2V (5) 91+8−7 0.01 ± 0.03 Y Y Y Y Y UCL 6.8 ± 0.3 0.043 5.2 × 106 60 ± 3 19 ± 2 −4.73
70833A F3V (5) 121+22−16 0.00 ± 0.01 N Y Y Y N ... −35.2 ± 0.4 ... <6.5 × 106 69 ± 4 97 ± 5 −4.87
70833B K3IV (14) ... ... N ... Y ... N ... 6.6 ± 0.3 ... ... 13 ± 3 10 ± 1 ...
70919 G8III (5) 179+53−33 0.85 ± 0.22 N N Y Y N ... −15.0 ± 0.2 0.135 4.5 × 106 <12 13 ± 1 −4.34
71023 F0V (5) 202+48−32 0.02 ± 0.04 Y Y Y Y Y UCL 8.3 ± 0.2 0.108 1.9 × 107 63 ± 5 38 ± 3 −4.61
71178** G8IVe (8) 97+17−13 0.13 ± 0.07 Y Y Y Y Y UCL 2.7 ± 0.3 ... <7.1 × 106 316 ± 8 10 ± 1 −3.80
71767 F3V (5) 225+106−55 0.16 ± 0.05 Y Y Y Y Y UCL 5.6 ± 1.1 0.085 1.4 × 107 88 ± 5 97 ± 6 −4.29
72033A F7IV/V (5) 156+42−27 0.28 ± 0.05 Y Y Y Y Y UCL 3.8 ± 1.2 0.094 1.4 × 107 18 ± 3 196 ± 13 −4.27
72033Ba K8IV (14) ... ... Y ... Y ... Y? UCL 10.6 ± 1.4 ... ... 386 ± 9 ... ...
72070 G1V (8) 133+36−23 0.05 ± 0.02 Y Y Y Y Y UCL −13.9 ± 0.1 ... <5.6 × 106 91 ± 4 32 ± 2 −4.25
72099 F6V (6) 158+55−32 0.09 ± 0.03 Y Y Y Y Y UCL 4.3 ± 0.2 ... <1.0 × 107 135 ± 6 38 ± 3 −4.36
72164 F2III/IV (6) 188+74−41 0.00 ± 0.13 Y Y Y Y Y UCL −10.3 ± 0.2 ... <7.4 × 106 30 ± 4 33 ± 2 −4.66
73666 F3IV (6) 152+20−16 0.31 ± 0.03 Y Y Y? Y? Y? UCL −21.4 ± 0.9 ... <2.2 × 106 48 ± 4 145 ± 11 −4.75
73667 F3V (5) 164+56−33 0.09 ± 0.04 Y? Y Y Y Y? UCL 20.3 ± 0.1 ... <5.4 × 106 <11 18 ± 2 −4.62
73742 F8V (5) 166+30−22 0.01 ± 0.02 Y? Y Y Y Y? UCL −10.6 ± 0.1 ... <3.4 × 106 <14 8 ± 1 −4.67
73783 M0III (6) 233+69−43 0.38 ± 0.36 ... N Y Y N ... 19.9 ± 0.1 ... <1.2 × 105 ... 10 ± 1 −5.41
74177 K0III (4) 142+22−17 0.90 ± 0.11 N N Y Y N ... 1.5 ± 0.1 ... <4.0 × 105 23 ± 4 11 ± 1 −5.37
74224 G6III (6) 131+8−7 0.41 ± 0.09 N N Y? Y? N ... −35.2 ± 0.3 ... <1.5 × 105 12 ± 4 10 ± 1 −5.25
74499 F3/5V (6) 90+9−8 0.05 ± 0.05 Y Y Y Y Y UCL 0.9 ± 0.3 ... <5.4 × 106 81 ± 3 37 ± 3 −4.89
74501 G1.5III (8) 206+34−25 0.56 ± 0.17 N N Y Y N ... −29.6 ± 0.1 0.2 3.0 × 106 23 ± 5 15 ± 2 −4.53
74688 K2III (4) 223+67−42 0.99 ± 0.23 N N Y Y N ... −7.0 ± 0.1 ... <3.4 × 105 26 ± 3 9 ± 1 −5.55
74772 F3V (14) 310+259−97 0.09 ± 0.05 Y Y Y Y Y UCL −37.9 ± 0.1 ... <1.5 × 107 17 ± 3 10 ± 1 −4.47
74865 F3V (6) 115+19−14 0.06 ± 0.15 Y Y Y Y Y UCL 2.1 ± 0.3 ... <5.9 × 106 85 ± 6 85 ± 6 −4.65
74959 F5V (6) 133+29−20 0.00 ± 0.05 Y Y Y Y Y UCL 2.2 ± 0.1 ... <8.3 × 106 125 ± 7 33 ± 2 −4.29
75367 F9V (14) 124+31−21 0.00 ± 0.23 Y Y Y Y Y UCL 0.6 ± 0.3 ... <1.6 × 107 73 ± 5 10 ± 1 −4.55
75459 F3V (6) 126+26−19 0.06 ± 0.10 Y Y Y? Y? Y? UCL 7.7 ± 0.3 ... <4.6 × 106 35 ± 5 25 ± 2 −4.98
75480 F0V (6) 115+13−11 0.04 ± 0.04 Y Y Y Y Y UCL 0.1 ± 0.3 ... <4.4 × 106 63 ± 3 29 ± 2 −4.67
75491 F3V (6) 169+31−23 0.10 ± 0.02 Y Y Y Y Y UCL 19.2 ± 0.4 ... <4.6 × 106 69 ± 4 55 ± 5 −4.54
75683 F3 (3) 137+65−34 0.00 ± 0.03 Y Y Y Y Y UCL 3.5 ± 0.3 ... <9.1 × 106 78 ± 3 39 ± 3 −4.66
75824 F3V (6) 162+41−27 0.08 ± 0.05 N? Y Y Y N? ... −23.1 ± 0.2 ... <6.0 × 106 <8 28 ± 2 −4.53
75891 F2V (5) 132+20−16 0.04 ± 0.01 Y Y Y Y Y UCL 5.5 ± 0.6 0.04 5.2 × 106 70 ± 6 61 ± 4 −4.48
75916 F9V (9) 168+87−43 0.00 ± 0.05 N Y Y? Y N ... −31.3 ± 0.3 ... <7.6 × 106 69 ± 7 10 ± 1 −5.53
75924A** G2.5IV (8) 102+24−16 0.21 ± 0.20 Y Y Y Y Y UCL 6.3 ± 0.3 0.609 4.1 × 107 239 ± 5 45 ± 3 −3.94
75924B** G8IV (14) 102+24−16 ... Y Y Y Y Y UCL −8.5 ± 0.3 ... ... 283 ± 7 39 ± 4 −3.91
75933 F3V (6) 181+38−27 0.18 ± 0.02 Y Y Y? Y Y? UCL −31.1 ± 0.3 ... <6.0 × 106 65 ± 5 36 ± 3 −4.52
76084 F2V (6) 143+25−19 0.28 ± 0.02 Y Y Y Y Y UCL −1.4 ± 0.3 0.025 3.5 × 106 64 ± 4 43 ± 3 −4.66
76197 G5/8III+F (5) 177+29−22 0.44 ± 0.15 N N Y? Y? N ... −2.2 ± 0.3 ... <1.2 × 106 24 ± 4 10 ± 1 −4.76
76457 F2V (6) 120+15−12 0.00 ± 0.02 Y Y Y? Y? Y? UCL −25.4 ± 0.3 ... <3.6 × 106 40 ± 7 49 ± 4 −4.82
76472 G1IV (8) 116+26−18 0.43 ± 0.09 Y Y Y Y Y UCL −17.0 ± 0.8 0.307 3.1 × 107 246 ± 6 97 ± 7 −3.96
76501 F2V (6) 168+42−28 0.15 ± 0.07 Y Y Y Y Y UCL −20.4 ± 1.8 ... <4.7 × 106 23 ± 4 112 ± 8 −4.51
76875 F2V (6) 91+10−8 0.03 ± 0.03 Y Y Y Y Y UCL −4.6 ± 1.1 ... <4.6 × 106 70 ± 6 128 ± 11 −4.67
77015 G0.5V (8) 91+14−11 0.00 ± 0.03 N Y Y? Y? N ... −31.0 ± 0.3 ... <8.3 × 106 60 ± 4 10 ± 1 −5.41
77038 F3V (6) 137+32−22 0.05 ± 0.02 Y Y Y Y Y UCL 2.6 ± 0.3 ... <6.9 × 106 97 ± 5 46 ± 3 −4.71
77135A G4IV (8) 107+37−22 0.36 ± 0.08 Y Y Y Y Y UCL 1.9 ± 0.3 0.115 2.1 × 107 245 ± 4 13 ± 1 −4.22
77135B K2IV (14) 107+37−22 ... Y Y Y Y Y UCL −15.6 ± 0.5 ... ... 360 ± 7 ... ...
77144 G0IV (8) 140+31−21 0.07 ± 0.12 Y Y Y Y Y UCL −8.9 ± 0.8 0.251 3.4 × 107 194 ± 7 73 ± 5 −3.97
77157 K3Ve (10) 141+52−30 1.35 ± 0.38 Y Y Y? Y? Y? UCL ... 0.137 6.6 × 106 ... ... ...
77432 F5V (5) 96+14−11 0.00 ± 0.01 Y Y Y Y Y UCL 2.4 ± 0.6 ... <6.0 × 106 100 ± 6 83 ± 5 −4.62
77502 F3V (6) 198+46−32 0.00 ± 0.08 Y Y Y Y Y UCL −23.5 ± 0.2 ... <6.3 × 106 64 ± 4 40 ± 3 −4.43
77520A F3V (6) 101+17−13 0.08 ± 0.05 Y Y Y Y Y UCL 2.7 ± 0.3 ... <8.2 × 106 105 ± 4 30 ± 3 −4.88
77520Bb K8IV (14) ... ... ... ... ... ... ... UCL 2.8 ± 0.3 ... ... 361 ± 6 ... ...
77713 F5V (6) 178+49−31 0.00 ± 0.07 Y? Y Y? Y? Y? UCL −8.8 ± 0.3 ... <8.0 × 106 <12 48 ± 4 −4.73
77780 F7/8V (5) 172+49−31 0.03 ± 0.12 Y? Y Y Y Y? UCL −27.8 ± 0.1 ... <6.1 × 106 <10 13 ± 1 −4.35
77813 F8V (7) 105+17−13 0.50 ± 0.09 Y Y Y Y Y US −5.4 ± 0.4 0.119 1.4 × 107 137 ± 4 81 ± 7 −4.38
78043 F3V (6) 144+32−22 0.01 ± 0.11 Y Y Y Y Y UCL 1.6 ± 0.3 ... <6.7 × 106 91 ± 3 66 ± 5 −4.41
78133 G3V (13) 211+172−65 0.00 ± 0.03 Y Y Y Y Y UCL ... 0.106 2.3 × 107 ... ... ...
78432 G5III (5) 155+40−26 2.08 ± 0.29 ... N Y? Y? N ... ... ... <4.2 × 105 ... ... ...
78555 F0V (6) 106+12−10 0.07 ± 0.02 Y Y Y Y Y UCL 1.2 ± 0.5 ... <6.2 × 106 59 ± 5 73 ± 5 −4.64
78581 G1V (6) 91+11−9 0.00 ± 0.10 Y Y Y? Y? Y? US −0.3 ± 0.3 0.154 2.1 × 107 153 ± 3 27 ± 2 −4.22
78663 F5V (6) 144+29−21 0.00 ± 0.01 Y Y Y? Y? Y? US −11.3 ± 0.3 ... <5.4 × 106 92 ± 3 10 ± 1 −4.73
78684 G9.5IV (8) 166+95−44 0.34 ± 0.11 Y Y Y Y Y UCL 3.0 ± 0.3 0.409 3.2 × 107 405 ± 10 71 ± 4 −3.99
78881 F3V (6) 110+12−10 0.19 ± 0.08 Y Y Y? Y? Y? UCL −6.7 ± 2.1 0.32 1.7 × 107 86 ± 6 189 ± 12 −4.38
78977 F7V (13) 117+18−14 0.30 ± 0.07 Y Y Y Y Y US 14.8 ± 0.3 0.11 1.1 × 107 164 ± 7 85 ± 7 −4.31
79054 F0V (7) 139+23−17 0.28 ± 0.05 Y Y Y Y Y US −4.1 ± 0.7 0.031 6.9 × 106 65 ± 5 72 ± 5 −4.79
79252 G7IV(e) (13) 126+48−27 0.65 ± 0.23 Y Y Y Y Y US −3.8 ± 0.3 0.25 2.9 × 107 223 ± 5 48 ± 3 −3.99
79258 F3V (6) 114+17−13 0.07 ± 0.06 Y? Y Y Y Y? ... −18.0 ± 0.3 ... <8.7 × 106 <8 10 ± 1 −5.38
79288 F0V (7) 150+26−20 0.20 ± 0.05 Y? Y Y Y Y? US −2.9 ± 0.3 ... <6.8 × 106 <15 40 ± 3 −4.6
79369 F0V (7) 122+26−18 0.53 ± 0.12 Y Y Y Y Y US −6.7 ± 0.3 ... <5.6 × 106 46 ± 4 57 ± 4 −4.75
79516 F5V (5) 134+24−18 0.00 ± 0.02 Y Y Y Y Y UCL 2.8 ± 0.3 0.054 8.4 × 106 99 ± 3 43 ± 3 −4.52
79610A G0.5V (8) 88+16−12 0.00 ± 0.16 N Y Y Y N ... 19.0 ± 0.3 ... <5.7 × 106 24 ± 4 ... −5.17
79610B G1V (14) 88+16−12 ... N Y Y Y N ... 12.5 ± 0.3 ... ... 35 ± 6 10 ± 1 −5.19
79673 F2V (5) 117+17−13 0.00 ± 0.04 Y Y Y Y Y UCL 2.9 ± 0.4 0.041 5.1 × 106 69 ± 4 113 ± 7 −4.55
79710 F0V (5) 127+20−15 0.00 ± 0.02 Y Y Y Y Y UCL 4.6 ± 0.5 ... <5.4 × 106 47 ± 4 61 ± 5 −4.61
79742 F6V (10) 146+42−27 0.00 ± 0.05 Y Y Y Y Y UCL 1.2 ± 0.3 ... <6.9 × 106 69 ± 6 30 ± 3 −4.53
79908 F9IV (8) 99+14−11 0.08 ± 0.06 Y Y Y Y Y UCL −2.8 ± 0.3 0.162 1.6 × 107 113 ± 5 44 ± 3 −4.16
79910 F3V (7) 149+43−27 0.40 ± 0.03 Y Y Y Y Y US −6.6 ± 0.7 ... <4.8 × 106 38 ± 5 158 ± 9 −4.4
79977 F2/3V (7) 123+18−14 0.26 ± 0.06 Y Y Y Y Y US −2.8 ± 0.3 ... <6.6 × 106 66 ± 7 57 ± 4 −4.6
80320 G3IV (13) 142+28−20 0.05 ± 0.06 Y Y Y Y Y US 1.7 ± 0.3 0.116 1.7 × 107 181 ± 8 33 ± 2 −4.17
80535** G0V (6) 120+20−15 0.00 ± 0.04 Y Y Y Y Y US −4.0 ± 0.3 0.257 2.3 × 107 125 ± 6 58 ± 3 −4.27
80586 F5V (6) 120+18−14 0.00 ± 0.10 Y? Y Y? Y Y? US −40.3 ± 0.3 ... <3.0 × 106 <11 10 ± 1 −4.58
80636** G0.5IV (8) 111+21−15 0.29 ± 0.07 Y Y Y Y Y UCL −2.0 ± 0.6 0.34 3.6 × 107 236 ± 6 76 ± 6 −4.10
80663 F1V (10) 306+758−127 0.60 ± 0.12 ... Y Y Y Y UCL ... ... <1.6 × 107 ... ... ...
80921 F2IV (10) 111+34−21 0.54 ± 0.21 ... Y Y Y Y UCL ... ... <1.7 × 107 ... ... ...
81136 A7/8+G (6) 285+76−50 1.73 ± 0.25 ... Y Y Y Y UCL ... 0.057 <6.6 × 105 ... ... ...
81380 G0IV (8) 202+156−61 0.34 ± 0.11 Y Y Y Y Y UCL −3.6 ± 0.3 0.054 1.3 × 107 200 ± 7 50 ± 3 −4.29
81447 G0.5IV (8) 184+48−31 0.00 ± 0.14 Y Y Y Y Y UCL ... 0.033 3.6 × 106 ... ... ...
81455 F3V (6) 105+18−13 0.00 ± 0.03 Y Y Y Y Y US −3.2 ± 0.5 0.067 1.5 × 107 75 ± 3 89 ± 8 −4.45
81775 G1IV (8) 148+35−24 0.00 ± 0.03 N Y Y Y N ... ... ... <6.5 × 106 ... ... ...
81851 F2V (6) 129+27−19 0.00 ± 0.03 Y Y Y? Y? Y? US −51.7 ± 0.4 ... <4.6 × 106 24 ± 3 57 ± 4 −4.7
82135 K0III (6) 88+3−3 0.32 ± 0.11 ... N Y? Y? N ... ... ... <6.6 × 104 ... ... ...
82218 F2/3V (7) 136+24−17 0.22 ± 0.03 Y Y Y Y Y US −6.7 ± 0.3 ... <6.6 × 106 85 ± 4 37 ± 2 −4.7
82534 F0V (6) 127+15−12 0.00 ± 0.02 Y? Y Y Y Y? US −39.8 ± 0.5 ... <4.0 × 106 <13 83 ± 7 −4.63
82569 F3V (6) 183+48−31 0.12 ± 0.05 Y Y Y Y Y UCL −2.6 ± 0.4 0.113 1.5 × 107 106 ± 5 81 ± 5 −4.35
82747** F5V (6) 103+27−18 1.08 ± 0.39 ... Y Y Y Y UCL −30.0 ± 0.3 ... <2.8 × 106 ... ... −4.43
83159 F5V (6) 147+42−27 0.00 ± 0.09 Y Y Y Y Y UCL 4.2 ± 0.4 0.049 4.9 × 106 94 ± 6 68 ± 4 −4.48

Notes. Lower Centaurus Crux (LCC), Upper Centaurus Lupus (UCL), Upper Scorpius (US). Binary system. Ca ii H and K core emission. *Visual variable: ΔV < 0.06 mag. **Visual variable: 0.06 mag <ΔV < 0.6 mag. aAt the time our Magellan observations were made (2009 April 15), HIP 72033B possessed an angular separation 2farcs6 and a position angle 106° E from N from the primary. bAt the time our Magellan observations were made (2007 March 10), HIP 77520B possessed an angular separation 2farcs7 and a position angle −128fdg9 E from N from the primary. References. (1) Cannon & Pickering 1919; (2) Cannon & Pickering 1920; (3) Glaspey 1972; (4) Houk & Cowley 1975; (5) Houk 1978; (6) Houk 1982; (7) Houk & Smith-Moore 1988; (8) Mamajek et al. 2002; (9) E. E. Mamajek & M. Pecaut 2010, private communication; (10) Pecaut et al. 2010; (11) Spencer-Jones & Jackson 1939; (12) Stock & Wroblewski 1972; (13) Torres et al. 2006; (14) this work.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2 3 4

Finally, our ScoCen sample is sufficiently large that it can be used to search for signatures of mass-dependent disk evolution. The physical properties of central stars are expected to shape the evolution of circumstellar disks. For example, Spitzer photometric measurements of 204 stars in Upper Sco indicate that disk properties depend on spectral type. At ∼10 Myr, M-type stars possess optically thick, accreting disks; F- and G-type stars do not apparently possess disks; and B- and A-type stars posses optically thin, debris disks, suggesting that disk evolution is most advanced around intermediate-mass stars (Carpenter et al. 2006). During the debris disk phase, (1) infrared excess is expected to be dependent on the luminosity of the central star with more luminous stars warming larger surface areas within their circumstellar disks, producing larger infrared excesses and (2) the timescale for disk evolution is expected to be dependent on the orbital timescale with disks evolving more rapidly around higher mass stars. Therefore, we also search for disk trends as a function of stellar properties to determine how stellar properties impact the production and removal of debris dust around main-sequence stars.

2. OBSERVATIONS

The Hipparcos satellite enabled high-precision measurements of stellar position, parallax, and proper motion for stars with V-band magnitudes, mV < 9, providing the ability to identify candidate members of nearby OB associations with spectral types later than B for the first time. De Zeeuw et al. (1999, hereafter dZ99) analyzed the Hipparcos measurements of stars in a dozen nearby OB associations using de Bruijne's refurbished convergent point method and Hoogerwerf & Aguilar's "Spaghetti method" to determine the average position and space motions of each association, including the US, UCL, and LCC subgroups of ScoCen. By cross correlating the Hipparcos measurements of individual stars with mean subgroup properties, dZ99 carried out a detailed census of high- and intermediate-mass stars in ScoCen. In particular, they identified almost 200 probable new solar-like members of US (22 F-type, 9 G-type, 4 K-type, and 2 M-type stars), UCL (55 F-type, 25 G-type, 6 K-type, and 1 M-type stars), and LCC (61 F-type, 15 G-type, 6 K-type, and 1 M-type stars). However, they cautioned that up to ∼30% of their candidate members may be interlopers because the stellar radial velocities were not measured.

We sought to obtain MIPS 24 μm and 70 μm photometry of all of the solar-like ScoCen members identified by dZ99. In fact, we obtained MIPS observations of 13 F-type and 4 G-type stars in US. Carpenter et al. (2009b) observed eight F-type and two G-type dZ99 US candidates as part of a detailed study focusing on US. We obtained MIPS observations of 54 F-type, 25 G-type, 6 K-type, and 1 M-type star in UCL. The remaining one F-type star (HIP 73777) was observed by F. Low as part of a GTO program search for MIPS excess around nearby, young stars (Spitzer PID 72). Smith et al. (2006) published the excess sources discovered in this survey; HIP 73777 did not apparently possess a MIPS excess. We obtained MIPS observations of 61 F-type, 13 G-type, 6 K-type, and 1 M-type star in LCC. The remaining two G-type stars (HIP 62445 and HIP 66001) were observed by the formation and evolution of planetary systems (FEPS) legacy team led by M. Meyer. Carpenter et al. (2009a) published the MIPS results from this study; neither HIP 62445 and HIP 66001 apparently possess MIPS excess.

Similarly, we sought to obtain Magellan/MIKE spectra of all of the solar-like ScoCen members identified by dZ99. The higher angular resolution of the 6.5 m Magellan Clay Telescope at visual wavelengths additionally afforded us the opportunity to obtain spectra of primary and secondary stars in ScoCen binary systems that could not be resolved by Spitzer at mid-infrared wavelengths. Therefore, we collected MIKE spectra of individual components whenever possible. We obtained Magellan/MIKE observations of the majority of candidate solar-like ScoCen members that we observed with MIPS including the primary and secondary components of nine binary systems (HIP 63975, HIP 66285, HIP 70376, HIP 70833, HIP 72033, HIP 75924, HIP 77135, HIP 77520, and HIP 79610). We were not able to obtain Magellan/MIKE observations for three F-type (HIP 80663, HIP 80921, and HIP 81136), four G-type (HIP 78133, HIP 78432, HIP 81447, and HIP 81775), and two K-type (HIP 77157 and HIP 82135) stars in UCL; and two F-type stars in LCC (HIP 59781 and HIP 68534).

2.1. MIPS Observations

We obtained Spitzer (Werner et al. 2004) MIPS (Rieke et al. 2004) observations of 183 candidate ScoCen single and binary systems in photometry mode at 24 μm and 70 μm (default scale). Each system was observed once between 2004 February and 2008 March, using 1 cycle of 3 s integrations at 24 μm and 1–6 cycle(s) of 10 s integrations at 70 μm, corresponding to on-source intergation times of 24.1 s and 125.8 s–754.8 s at 24 μm and 70 μm, respectively. All data were processed using the MIPS instrument team Data Analysis Tool (Gordon et al. 2005) for basic reduction (dark subtraction, flat-fielding/illumination correction). A series of additional steps designed to provide homogeneous reduction for MIPS data was applied as part of a Spitzer legacy catalog (Su et al. 2010). In short, a second flat field constructed from the 24 μm data itself was applied to all the 24 μm data to remove scattered-light gradient and dark latency to improve sensitivity (e.g., Engelbracht et al. 2007) except for observations that possess complex background. The known transient behaviors associated with the MIPS 70 μm array were removed by masking out bright sources in the field of view and time filtering the data (for details see Gordon et al. 2007). The processed data were then combined using the World Coordinate System information to produce final mosaics with pixels half the size of the physical pixel scale. For 70 μm data, an additional outlier rejection was performed using the spatial redundancy of each processed data frame to further remove hot pixels in the data. This extra process can improve the data quality, especially for observations where sources are not detected (K. Y. L. Su et al., in preparation).

Since the majority of the sources in the sample are not resolved, we extract the photometry using point-spread function (PSF) fitting. The input PSFs were constructed using observed calibration stars and smoothed STinyTim model PSFs, and have been tested to ensure that photometric results are consistent with the MIPS calibration (Engelbracht et al. 2007; Gordon et al. 2007). The systematic errors were estimated based on the pixel-to-pixel variation on the source-free (PSF-subtracted) images. We also performed aperture photometry (using the multiple aperture setting in Su et al. 2006). The aperture photometry measurements were used as a reference to screen targets that might be contaminated by nearby sources, background nebulosity, or source extension. We list our measurements in Table 2; stars with 24 μm contamination are noted with a dagger. All of the targets were detected at 24 μm. Each target position was refined using two-dimensional Gaussian fitting and then compared to the SIMBAD stellar position to ensure the correct source extraction. For the sources that were not detected at 70 μm, the PSF was fixed at the position of 24 μm source position to extract PSF fitting photometry using the minimum χ2 technique. We quote 3σ upper limit for systems that were not detected. The total photometric uncertainty is the sum in quadrature of (1) the source photon counting uncertainty, (2) the detector repeatability uncertainty (0.4% and 4.5% of the total flux at 24 and 70 μm, respectively), and (3) the absolute calibration uncertainty (2% and 5% of the total flux at 24 and 70 μm, respectively).

Table 2. MIPS 24 μm and 70 μm Fluxes (Not Color-corrected)

      Measured Measured Predicted   Measured Measured Predicted  
HIP Name AOR Fν(24 μm) σF24 Fν(24 μm) χ24 Fν(70 μm) σF70 Fν(70 μm) χ70
    ID (mJy) (mJy) (mJy)   (mJy) (mJy) (mJy)  
55334 HD 98660 4778752 11.4 0.1 10.6 1.9 <36.1 ... 1.2 ...
56227 HD 100282 4779008 7.1 0.1 6.4 2.6 <28.6 ... 0.7 ...
56420 CD-47 6947 4779264 0.8 0.1 ... ... <20.7 ... ... ...
56673 HD 101088 4779520 72.8 0.1 54.3 8.4 <34.8 ... 6.0 ...
56814 HD 101247 22771200 159.4 0.1 162.4 −0.5 <16.9 ... 18.0 ...
57524 HD 102458 4779776 11.4 0.1 7.3 11.8 <22.4 ... 0.8 ...
57595 HD 102597 22772224 3.71 0.06 3.77 −0.5 <14.6 ... 0.4 ...
57950 HD 103234 4780032 17.4 0.1 8.9 18.4 <30.5 ... 1.0 ...
58075 HD 103441 22773248 6.06 0.07 4.90 5.6 <46.8 ... 0.5 ...
58146 HD 103589 22773504 14.4 0.3 13.3 1.8 <59.8 ... 1.5 ...
58167 HD 103599 4780544 9.9 0.1 8.8 3.1 <31.9 ... 1.0 ...
58220 HD 103703 4780800 25.5 0.2 8.0 29.4 <39.4 ... 0.9 ...
58528 HD 104231 4781056 16.0 0.2 7.8 17.5 <39.8 ... 0.9 ...
58899 HD 104897 4781312 8.0 0.1 8.3 −1.0 <31.1 ... 0.9 ...
58921 HD 104933 22775552 2294.0 0.3 2798.1 −5.2 220 20 310 −3.1
58996 HD 105070 4781568 9.3 0.1 8.8 1.6 <28.4 ... 1.0 ...
59084 HD 105233 4781824 5.9 0.4 5.9 0.2 <63.9 ... 0.6 ...
59481 HD 105994 4782080 8.6 0.2 7.1 4.6 <32.2 ... 0.8 ...
59603 HD 106218 4782336 8.1 0.1 7.7 1.1 <25.9 ... 0.8 ...
59693 HD 106389 4782592 7.5 0.1 3.5 17.3 <23.3 ... 0.4 ...
59716 HD 106444 4782848 10.4 0.1 8.9 4.1 <25.5 ... 1.0 ...
59764 HD 106506 22777856 15.0 0.6 13.3 2.1 <166.4 ... 1.5 ...
59781 HD 106538 22778112 9 2 7 0.5 <1010 ... 0.8 ...
59854 HD 106725 4783616 7.2 0.1 6.8 1.5 <24.3 ... 0.7 ...
59960 HD 106906 4783872 103.1 0.2 15.3 40.7 281 9 1.7 13.3
60205 CD-51 6597 4784128 2.9 0.1 2.1 4.9 <42.7 ... 0.2 ...
60245 HD 107437 4784384 4.9 0.1 4.5 1.9 <35.9 ... 0.5 ...
60348 HD 107649 4784640 12.2 0.1 6.2 17.8 <32.0 ... 0.7 ...
60513 HD 107920 4784896 7.5 0.1 7.5 −0.2 <37.5 ... 0.8 ...
60567 HD 108016 22780416 3.81 0.07 3.24 4.0 <15.1 ... 0.4 ...
60885 HD 108568 4785152 9.4 0.1 9.0 1.3 <36.8 ... 1.0 ...
60913 HD 108611 4785408 11.4 0.2 10.6 1.8 <55.4 ... 1.2 ...
61049 HD 108857 22781440 40.3 0.2 10.9 32.6 <30.8 ... 1.2 ...
61086 CD-51 6746 22781696 1.02 0.03 1.00 0.0 <17.5 ... 0.1 ...
61087 HD 108904 22781952 109.9 0.5 14.6 40.8 <113.0 ... 1.6 ...
61241 CD-50 7070 4785920 2.9 0.1 2.6 1.6 <22.4 ... 0.3 ...
61248 HD 109173 22782208 74.3 0.1 76.7 −0.9 <13.9 ... 8.4 ...
62032 HD 110484 22784512 5.94 0.07 4.99 4.7 <15.9 ... 0.5 ...
62056 CD-49 7315 22784768 1.55 0.05 1.62 −1.6 <13.0 ... 0.2 ...
62134 HD 110634 4786176 8.6 0.1 5.9 9.5 <23.9 ... 0.6 ...
62171 HD 110697 4786432 6.3 0.1 5.8 2.1 <25.5 ... 0.6 ...
62427 HD 111103 4786688 11.0 0.2 4.1 23.1 <36.9 ... 0.4 ...
62428 HD 111102 4786944 21.9 0.5 21.6 0.4 <87.5 ... 2.4 ...
62431 HD 111104 4787200 11.7 0.2 11.7 0.0 <46.0 ... 1.3 ...
62657 HD 111520 4787456 41.0 0.1 5.9 40.5 214 8 0.7 13.0
62674 CD-46 8204 22786304 1.53 0.04 1.38 1.8 <12.7 ... 0.2 ...
62677 HD 111466 22786560 4.66 0.07 4.31 2.2 <17.2 ... 0.5 ...
63022 HD 112146 22787840 2.11 0.05 2.09 0.1 <13.5 ... 0.2 ...
63041 HD 112109 22788096 10 4 10 0.0 <5170 ... 1.1 ...
63272 HD 112509 4787968 8.4 0.1 7.5 2.9 <37.5 ... 0.8 ...
63435 HD 112794 22789120 4.90 0.07 4.67 1.3 <13.5 ... 0.5 ...
63439 HD 112810 4788224 10.3 0.1 4.4 20.8 90 10 0.5 7.9
63527 HD 112951 4788480 13.1 0.1 13.0 0.2 <27.1 ... 1.4 ...
63797 HD 113376 4788736 15.1 0.2 15.6 −0.8 <42.7 ... 1.7 ...
63836 HD 113524 4788992 8.2 0.1 5.2 11.5 <37.1 ... 0.6 ...
63847 HD 113466 22789632 9.4 0.4 8.6 1.7 <182.7 ... 0.9 ...
63886 HD 113556 4789504 19.4 0.2 9.3 19.8 160 20 1.0 8.3
63962 HD 113706 22789888 5.59 0.08 5.58 0.0 <25.3 ... 0.6 ...
63975 HD 113766 4789760 1459.0 0.2 18.3 48.4 390 11 2.0 13.6
64044 HD 113901 4790528 9.0 0.1 7.3 5.4 <30.1 ... 0.8 ...
64184 HD 114082 4790784 216.5 0.2 9.9 46.6 350 30 1.1 9.7
64216 HD 114196 22790400 66.6 0.2 71.3 −1.9 <38.2 ... 7.9 ...
64316 CD-51 7328 22790656 1.93 0.05 1.83 1.2 <13.1 ... 0.2 ...
64322 HD 114319 22791168 10 1 10 0.3 <183.6 ... 1.1 ...
64877 HD 115361 22792192 19.8 0.9 7.9 11.8 <176.5 ... 0.9 ...
64995 HD 115600 4791552 113.8 0.2 8.3 45.0 180 20 0.9 7.4
65136 HD 115875 22793984 3.37 0.07 3.38 −0.1 <13.8 ... 0.4 ...
65423 HD 116402 4791808 6.9 0.2 4.3 10.5 <40.4 ... 0.5 ...
65517 HD 116650 4792064 4.9 0.1 4.3 2.7 <34.4 ... 0.5 ...
65617 HD 116794 22795520 3.6 0.2 3.3 1.2 <36.5 ... 0.4 ...
65875 HD 117214 4792320 188.7 0.2 12.6 45.5 330 20 1.4 11.0
65891 HD 117253 4792576 125.3 0.2 127.8 −0.6 <53.3 ... 14.1 ...
66285 HD 117945 4792832 11.1 0.2 11.1 −0.1 <63.2 ... 1.2 ...
66782 HD 118962 4793088 143.1 0.1 145.1 −0.4 44 7 16.0 3.7
66941 HD 119022 4793344 39.1 0.1 37.4 1.2 <28.3 ... 4.1 ...
67003 HD 119341 22797312 75.7 0.2 81.7 −2.1 <17.1 ... 9.0 ...
67068 HD 119511 4793600 9.9 0.1 7.3 7.8 <35.0 ... 0.8 ...
67230 HD 119718 22798080 42.1 0.9 12.7 22.2 <160.9 ... 1.4 ...
67428 HD 120178 4794112 11.8 0.2 6.5 15.3 <32.6 ... 0.7 ...
67497 HD 120326 4794368 87.5 0.2 7.1 44.6 162 8 0.8 12.1
67522 HD 120411 4794624 4.6 0.1 4.0 2.8 <24.0 ... 0.4 ...
67957 HD 121176 4794880 7.0 0.1 6.4 2.0 <29.7 ... 0.7 ...
67970 HD 121189 22757376 26.88 0.08 6.15 35.5 <25.2 ... 0.7 ...
68328 CD-51 7878 4795136 6.8 0.2 6.4 1.3 <40.4 ... 0.7 ...
68335 HD 121835 4795392 9.9 0.1 9.5 1.3 <33.5 ... 1.0 ...
68534 CPD-60 5147 22798848 8 5 3.9 0.8 <4670 ... 0.4 ...
68726 HD 122683 22767104 62.6 0.2 67.0 −1.8 <20.8 ... 7.4 ...
69291 HD 123889 4795904 7.5 0.2 6.2 4.6 <21.1 ... 0.7 ...
69327 HD 123800 4796160 7.3 0.1 5.9 4.8 <35.3 ... 0.7 ...
69395 HD 124092 22757632 33.5 0.2 37.5 −3.0 <12.4 ... 4.2 ...
69720 HD 124619 4796416 9.2 0.2 5.2 13.5 <39.4 ... 0.6 ...
70350 HD 125912 4796672 16.4 0.1 15.7 1.2 <32.8 ... 1.7 ...
70376 HD 125896 4796928 6.9 0.2 6.5 1.4 <42.6 ... 0.7 ...
70558 HD 126318 4797184 4.3 0.2 4.0 1.2 <26.7 ... 0.4 ...
70689 HD 126488 4797440 7.3 0.1 7.1 0.5 <28.6 ... 0.8 ...
70833 HD 126838 4797696 5.4 0.2 5.5 −0.7 <25.6 ... 0.6 ...
70919 HD 126996 22757888 26.9 0.2 28.0 −1.1 <15.0 ... 3.1 ...
71023 HD 127236 22758144 6.21 0.08 4.70 7.4 <12.2 ... 0.5 ...
71178 HD 127648 4797952 5.8 0.2 5.1 2.8 <25.1 ... 0.6 ...
71767 HD 128893 22758400 6.21 0.08 5.76 2.0 <15.5 ... 0.6 ...
72033 HD 129490 4798208 7.4 0.2 7.0 1.5 <31.8 ... 0.8 ...
72070 HD 129590 22758656 88.39 0.08 5.55 45.7 394 5 0.6 14.6
72099 HD 129683 22758912 8.53 0.06 3.20 25.6 <12.1 ... 0.4 ...
72164 HD 129766 22759168 4.72 0.08 4.57 0.8 <12.7 ... 0.5 ...
73666 HD 133075 4798720 18.5 0.2 16.5 3.2 <117.2 ... 1.8 ...
73667 HD 133022 22759424 6.14 0.08 6.25 −0.5 <13.4 ... 0.7 ...
73742 HD 133117 22759680 9.6 0.2 9.5 0.2 <13.8 ... 1.0 ...
73783 HD 133336 22759936 163.2 0.2 165.4 −0.4 <19.1 ... 18.5 ...
74177 HD 133904 22742272 64.2 0.8 68.7 −1.8 <127.6 ... 7.6 ...
74224 HD 134255 4799488 195.5 0.2 199.7 −0.5 <54.8 ... 22.0 ...
74499 HD 134888 4799744 20.3 0.2 6.3 28.5 120 10 0.7 9.1
74501 HD 134672 22760448 54.3 0.3 56.4 −1.0 <73.1 ... 6.2 ...
74688 HD 135095 22760704 65.2 0.6 73.3 −3.1 <109.0 ... 8.1 ...
74772 CD-49 9474 22760960 2.69 0.07 2.44 2.2 <30.7 ... 0.3 ...
74865 HD 135778 4800256 5.8 0.2 5.5 1.0 <29.9 ... 0.6 ...
74959 HD 135953 22761216 6.70 0.08 3.99 13.6 68 5 0.4 10.4
75367 CD-40 9577 4800512 2.4 0.2 2.1 1.1 <34.8 ... 0.2 ...
75459 HD 136991 4800768 7.3 0.2 7.6 −1.1 <32.1 ... 0.8 ...
75480 HD 137130 4801024 8.1 0.2 8.2 −0.2 <32.5 ... 0.9 ...
75491 HD 137057 22761472 26.50 0.09 7.69 31.6 <28.0 ... 0.8 ...
75683 HD 137499 4801280 8.0 0.2 3.3 18.1 <48.9 ... 0.4 ...
75824 HD 137786 22761728 5.88 0.08 5.68 0.9 <32.5 ... 0.6 ...
75891 HD 137888 22761984 7.16 0.08 6.84 1.2 <15.5 ... 0.7 ...
75916 BD-20 4244 4801792 4.2 0.2 3.8 1.5 <36.3 ... 0.4 ...
75924 HD 138009 4801536 13.9 0.2 13.0 1.8 <28.2 ... 1.4 ...
75933 HD 137991 22762240 6.2 0.1 6.0 0.8 <22.2 ... 0.7 ...
76084 HD 138296 4802048 7.3 0.2 7.3 0.2 <35.6 ... 0.8 ...
76197 HD 138398 4802304 28.2 0.2 29.7 −1.5 <60.4 ... 3.3 ...
76457 HD 138994 4802560 9.4 0.2 9.2 0.7 <29.5 ... 1.0 ...
76472 HD 138995 22762496 7.87 0.08 7.44 1.5 <13.8 ... 0.8 ...
76501 HD 139124 22762752 8.0 0.1 7.2 2.5 <15.6 ... 0.8 ...
76875 HD 139883 4802816 7.9 0.2 7.8 0.3 <29.2 ... 0.9 ...
77015 HD 140129 4803072 3.2 0.2 3.5 −1.6 <26.9 ... 0.4 ...
77038 HD 140241 4803328 5.2 0.2 5.0 0.8 <29.5 ... 0.5 ...
77135 HD 140463 4803584 2.9 0.2 4.1 −5.5 <38.7 ... 0.5 ...
77144 HD 140421 22763008 5.9 0.1 5.2 3.0 <16.3 ... 0.6 ...
77157 HT Lup 22763264 3650.0 0.4 22.0 48.7 3050 30 2.4 14.7
77432 HD 141011 4803840 10.2 0.2 5.1 16.6 <28.3 ... 0.6 ...
77502 HD 141313 22763520 5.96 0.09 5.12 3.9 <15.2 ... 0.6 ...
77520 HD 141254 4804096 6.5 0.2 4.6 7.2 <29.6 ... 0.5 ...
77713 HD 141759 4804352 4.1 0.2 4.1 −0.1 <29.6 ... 0.5 ...
77780 HD 141803 22763776 5.1 0.1 5.0 0.8 <38.2 ... 0.5 ...
77813 HD 142113 4804608 10.1 0.2 9.3 2.0 <32.2 ... 1.0 ...
78043 HD 142446 22764032 13.0 0.1 4.8 25.6 75 5 0.5 10.4
78133 CD-41 10454 22764288 2.5 0.1 2.4 0.2 <25.0 ... 0.3 ...
78432 HD 143138 22764544 75.6 0.2 87.7 −4.0 <31.2 ... 9.7 ...
78555 HD 143538 4804864 6.8 0.2 5.8 3.3 <61.7 ... 0.6 ...
78581 HD 143637 4805120 7.0 0.2 6.9 0.4 <36.4 ... 0.8 ...
78663 HD 143811 4805376 8.4 0.2 6.1 7.8 <32.0 ... 0.7 ...
78684 HD 143677 4805632 10.2 0.2 9.2 2.7 <50.8 ... 1.0 ...
78881 HD 144225 4806888 14.6 0.2 14.2 0.6 <42.6 ... 1.6 ...
78977 HD 144548 4806144 15.4 0.2 11.4 8.0 <33.8 ... 1.3 ...
79054 HD 144729 4806400 8.2 0.2 5.6 8.3 <32.6 ... 0.6 ...
79252 HD 145208 4806656 11.0 0.2 10.0 2.4 <32.0 ... 1.1 ...
79258 HD 145132 4806912 3.8 0.2 3.8 −0.3 <63.8 ... 0.4 ...
79288 HD 145263 4807168 425.9 0.2 5.2 48.4 150 10 0.6 9.8
79369 HD 145467 4807424 7.6 0.2 7.2 1.2 <31.6 ... 0.8 ...
79516 HD 145560 4807680 49.1 0.3 5.5 41.3 320 20 0.6 10.7
79610 HD 145839 4807936 5.2 0.2 5.7 −1.9 <38.7 ... 0.6 ...
79673 HD 145984 22764800 8.1 0.1 5.3 10.4 <28.7 ... 0.6 ...
79710 HD 145972 22765056 19.9 0.9 6.5 13.5 <175.9 ... 0.7 ...
79742 HD 146181 4808704 29.4 0.2 4.3 39.3 170 10 0.5 9.5
79908 HD 146610 4808960 6.6 0.2 6.1 1.5 <41.6 ... 0.7 ...
79910 HD 146743 4809216 7.7 0.2 7.3 1.2 <32.6 ... 0.8 ...
79977 HD 146897 4809472 146.8 0.2 5.6 47.0 530 10 0.6 14.0
80320 HD 147594 4809728 10.0 0.2 6.4 11.2 <34.0 ... 0.7 ...
80535 HD 148040 4809984 11.0 0.2 9.4 3.7 <74.9 ... 1.0 ...
80586 HD 148153 4810240 9.9 0.2 9.6 0.7 <102.4 ... 1.1 ...
80636 HD 148187 4810496 7.5 0.2 6.7 2.7 <37.3 ... 0.7 ...
80663 HD 330719 22765312 2.1 0.5 2.4 −0.7 <118.7 ... 0.3 ...
80921 HD 328333 22765568 12.1 0.3 2.4 25.1 <54.1 ... 0.3 ...
81136 HD 149090 22754048 64.9 0.2 73.0 −3.2 <29.3 ... 8.0 ...
81380 HD 149551 4811008 5.2 0.2 4.7 1.6 <56.5 ... 0.5 ...
81447 HD 149735 22765824 11.0 0.1 6.9 12.5 <28.2 ... 0.8 ...
81455 HD 149790 4811264 4.4 0.2 4.5 −0.3 <31.3 ... 0.5 ...
81775 HD 150418 22766080 4.4 0.1 4.6 −0.6 <16.9 ... 0.5 ...
81851 HD 150589 4811520 7.3 0.2 7.1 0.7 <35.9 ... 0.8 ...
82135 HD 151078 22767360 377.6 0.6 397.2 −1.4 <141.3 ... 43.8 ...
82218 HD 151376 4811776 12.3 0.2 5.6 18.7 <28.8 ... 0.6 ...
82534 HD 152057 4812032 8.2 0.2 8.2 0.1 <38.8 ... 0.9 ...
82569 HD 152041 22766336 7.0 0.5 7.0 0.0 <75.3 ... 0.8 ...
82747 AK Sco 4812544 3343.0 0.3 20.3 48.7 3150 20 2.2 14.8
83159 HD 153232 4812800 8.1 0.4 4.9 6.9 <94.7 ... 0.5 ...

Notes. Source suffers some contamination at 24 μm. σF24 and σF70 are the statistical uncertainties in the 24 and 70 μm photometry. The total uncertainty can be calculated by adding the systematic, repeatability, and calibration uncertainties in quadrature (see Section 2.1).

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2 3 4

The photometry reported here supercedes previously published photometry because (1) the absolute calibrations for the 24 μm and 70 μm detectors and (2) the optimal technique for measuring the brightness of point sources have been refined since Chen et al. (2005). They used preliminary calibrations for 24 μm and 70 μm photometry (1.042 μJy (DN s−1)−1 and 15.8 mJy (DN s−1)−1 at 24 μm and 70 μm, respectively) and aperture photometry to measure the brightness of point sources. They used a large aperture (with radii 15'' and 29farcs5 at 24 μm and 70 μm, respectively) and a large background annulus (with inner radii of 30'' and 40'' and outer radii of 43'' and 80'' at 24 μm and 70 μm, respectively) that was sensitive to confusion from nearby sources and diffuse background emission. Engelbracht et al. (2007) reported the final calibration for the 24 μm detector (1.067 μJy (DN s−1)−1) and determined that PSF fitting is the most reliable technique for measuring the flux of point sources. The use of PSF fitting for the photometry reported here is especially important for ScoCen sources because these sources are often located in regions with moderate diffuse emission.

2.2. MIKE Observations

We obtained visual spectra for a subsample of 181 candidate ScoCen members in single and binary systems using the MIKE spectrograph (Bernstein et al. 2003) on the 6.5 m Magellan Clay Telescope at Las Campanas Observatory on 2007 March 11 and 2009 April 15 and 16 (UT). We used the 0farcs35 × 5'' slit which gave a resolution of ∼55,000 over the wavelength range of 3200–10000 Å. We used the MIKE pipeline written by D. Kelson (Kelson 2003) to produce flat-fielded, extracted, and wavelength-calibrated spectra.

We measured heliocentric radial velocities from 44 different spectral orders using the RVCORRECT and FXCOR packages in IRAF. For each star, we list the average radial velocity and the standard error of the mean in Table 1. We fit synthetic spectra to our data to determine the projected rotational velocity (v sin i). To avoid telluric contamination, we restrict the fitting region to 4000–7000 Å. We used Richard Gray's spectral synthesis program, SPECTRUM5 along with Kurucz model atmospheres of solar metallicity to create synthetic spectra that were subsequently broadened using the rotational profile given in Gray (1992). We performed a χ2 minimization fitting to each spectrum to find the best value for v sin i.

We quantified the stellar activity by estimating the calcium H and K activity index, following the prescription outlined in Duncan et al. (1991) and White et al. (2007). First, we computed the index of core emission as defined in White et al. (2007). Then, we calculated the chromospheric emission ratio, R'HK using the Noyes et al. (1984) prescription. This conversion requires the stellar BV color which we obtained from the Tycho-2 catalog (Høg et al. 2000) and translated to Johnson BV colors. We did not observe any calcium standards at the time that our observations were made; therefore, our values are not calibrated and are systematically offset from those obtained by Duncan et al. (1991) and White et al. (2007). For example, we estimate that HIP 66941/HD 119022 possesses an R'HK = −4.3, somewhat lower than the values calibrated in the Mt. Wilson system (Mamajek & Hillenbrand 2008; −4.03 and −4.06). Since our R'HK values are not calibrated, we annotate objects with core Ca ii H and K emission in Table 1.

3. STELLAR MEMBERSHIP

Since the dZ99 analysis was published, we have obtained stellar radial velocities for the majority of the candidate ScoCen members and van Leeuwen (2007) have rereduced the Hipparcos data and re-derived the parallaxes for all of the stars in the Hipparcos catalog. Therefore, we re-examine ScoCen membership for the targets in our MIPS sample using (1) new and previously published lithium abundance measurements, (2) previously published stellar spectral types and new stellar luminosity estimates (based on the updated van Leeuwen 2007 distances), (3) our new radial velocity measurements, and (4) previously published Hipparcos proper motions (see Table 1). We list our best estimates for stellar spectral type (drawn from the literature) and updated distances (drawn from van Leeuwen 2007) for the single and binary target systems in our MIPS sample in Table 1. No published spectral types existed for the secondary stars in the binary systems we observed; therefore, we determined their spectral types by convolving our MIKE spectra to a lower resolution (R ∼ 1000) and comparing them with SMARTS 1.5 m spectral standards. We calculated the reddening implied by our spectral types and found that it was consistent with that estimated for other stars in our sample (AV ∼ 0.1). We estimated that the uncertainty for these spectral types is two subtypes.

The presence of strong lithium absorption in the spectra of late-type stars has long been used as a diagnostic of stellar youth (e.g., Herbig 1965). Mamajek et al. (2002) measured Li 6707 Å equivalent widths toward 30 G- through K-type dZ99 candidate UCL and LCC members to determine whether the lithium observed toward these stars was consistent with youth and therefore membership in ScoCen. By plotting the lithium equivalent width for these stars as a function of spectral type and comparing their observations with those of other young clusters (e.g., IC 2602 at 30 Myr, the Pleiades at 70–125 Myr, and M34 at 250 Myr), Mamajek et al. (2002) concluded that the lithium abundances toward HIP 63797, HIP 68726, HIP 74501, HIP 77015, HIP 79610, and HIP 81775 were too small to be consistent with ScoCen membership. More recent spectroscopic observations of HIP 56420, HIP 65891, HIP 66285, HIP 66782, HIP 70833, HIP 75916, and HIP 76197 suggest that the lithium abundances for these sources or their cooler companions (HIP 70833B and HIP 66285B) are also too small to be consistent with ScoCen membership (M. Pecaut 2010, private communication). We measured lithium equivalent widths from our Magellan/MIKE spectra and plotted their values as a function of stellar effective temperature (see Figure 1). Stars with Teff < 6000 K and EQ(Li) <60 mÅ are inconsistent with ScoCen membership and possess lithium membership flags (Li) set to "N" in Table 1. Stars with 6000 K < Teff < 6600 K and EQ(Li) <40 mÅ or 6600 K < Teff < 7200 K and EQ(Li) <20 mÅ are not lithium-rich and possess lithium membership flags (Li) set to "Y?" in Table 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1. Measured Magellan/MIKE Li i λ6707 EWs. Stars above the line are considered lithium-rich. Stars with Teff < 6000 K and EW(Li) < 60 mÅ are excluded as members ("N") in the "Li" column of Table 1. Stars with 6000 K < Teff < 6600 K and EW(Li) < 40 mÅ or 6600 K < Teff < 7200 K and EW(Li) < 20 mÅ are marked as possible members ("Y?") in the "Li" column of Table 1.

Standard image High-resolution image

We examined the measured spectral types, distances, and stellar luminosities to determine whether measured stellar properties are consistent with ScoCen membership. Stars with spectral types and luminosities consistent with ScoCen membership possess stellar luminosity membership flags (L*) set to "Y" in Table 1. Giant stars with luminosity class III are expected to be significantly older than the mean ScoCen subgroup ages and therefore to be interlopers. We plot the Hertzsprung–Russell diagram (HRD) positions for all of the giant stars in our sample (see Figure 2). We estimate stellar effective temperatures from stellar spectral types using the Kenyon & Hartmann (1995) conversion. We calculate stellar luminosities from extinction-corrected V-band magnitudes, Hipparcos distances, and Flower (1996) bolometric corrections. The HRD positions for the majority of giant stars are consistent with an older age; however, three F-type giants have HRD positions that are inconsistent with their luminosity class: HIP 56227, HIP 62428, and HIP 72164. HIP 56227 is a F0III star (Houk & Cowley 1975); however, its HRD position is clearly near the zero-age main-sequence (ZAMS) therefore we have set its luminosity membership flag to "Y" in Table 1. HIP 62428 is a F0III star (Houk & Cowley 1975); its HRD position is consistent with the DM97 1 Myr isochrone, significantly above the other ScoCen F-stars. Since this star does not appear to have an age of 1 Myr—it is not embedded and does not possess an infrared excess, we set its L* flag to "N." HIP 72164 is a F2III/IV star (Houk 1982); however, its HRD position (with large errors) is consistent with the ZAMS therefore we have set its L* flag to "Y."

Figure 2.

Figure 2. Hertzsprung–Russell diagram showing the estimated stellar luminosities and effective temperatures for all of the giant stars in our sample (open circles), marked with "N" or "N?" in the "L*" column of Table 1. Overlaid are D'Antona & Mazzitelli (1997) pre-main-sequence tracks for 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.4, and 2.0 M stars (dotted lines) and isochrones (solid lines) and Girardi et al. (2002) evolved star tracks (dashed lines).

Standard image High-resolution image

We calculated updated UVW velocities for the subgroup members of de Zeeuw et al. (1999), using their updated Hipparcos positions, parallaxes, and proper motions (van Leeuwen 2007), previously published radial velocities (Gontcharov 2006), and the new radial velocity measurements described here. With these revised UVW velocities, we calculated new mean subgroup velocities using an iterative clip to remove obvious outliers. The new subgroup velocities are listed in Table 3, and represent the most precise modern values ever calculated, taking into account the best available astrometry and radial velocities. We also compared the projected and radial motions of the stars to that for an "ideal" member following the convergent point techniques discussed in Mamajek (2005). In our calculations, we assumed that the intrinsic one-dimensional velocity dispersion of each subgroup is 1.3 km s−1, based on the results of de Bruijne (1999) and Madsen et al. (2002). We flagged any star with a radial velocity more than 3σ away from its predicted radial velocity, based on the star's position and subgroup membership, with a "Y?" in the RV Membership column of Table 1. We could not exclude stars with inconsistent radial velocities as non-members because we obtained only one epoch of MIKE data for each star; stars with inconsistent measured radial velocities may be members of binary or multiple systems. A second epoch of measured radial velocities is needed for stars with discrepant radial velocities to determine whether they are members of multiple systems or interlopers. Similarly, we flagged any star with a proper motion more than 2σ away from its predicted proper motion with a "Y?" in the PM Membership column of Table 1. In our analysis, we defined proper motion as the velocity in the plane of the sky that is perpendicular to the velocity toward the convergent point. One system (HIP 62677) possesses a 3σ discrepant proper motion; however, we do not reject this system because it is a member of a wide binary system with measured orbital motion during the past century.

Table 3. Updated Velocities for ScoCen Subgroups

Group U V W S
 ⋅⋅⋅  (km s−1) (km s−1) (km s−1) (km s−1)
US −6.4 ± 0.5 −15.9 ± 0.7 −7.4 ± 0.2 18.7 ± 0.6
UCL −5.1 ± 0.6 −19.7 ± 0.4 −4.6 ± 0.3 20.9 ± 0.5
LCC −7.8 ± 0.5 −20.7 ± 0.6 −6.0 ± 0.3 22.9 ± 0.5

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

Based on lithium, stellar luminosity, radial velocity, and proper motion membership flags, we made a summary assessment of the likelihood of ScoCen membership for all of the stars in our sample. Stars with any membership flag set to "N" possess a final membership flag of "N." We find that 0/17 Upper Sco, 18/86 UCL, and 13/81 LCC candidate single and binary systems in our sample are excluded as members. Combining all of the ScoCen MIPS observations together, our final sample is composed of 27 members of Upper Sco (including 21 F-type and 6 G-type members), 69 members of UCL (including 56 F-type, 12 G-type, and 2 K-type members), and 71 members of LCC (including 59 F- and 11 G-type members).

4. DISK FRACTIONS

We estimate the stellar photospheric fluxes for our sample based on Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS; Cutri et al. 2003) Ks-band magnitudes and intrinsic main-sequence colors calculated by E. Mamajek.6 First, we assembled the Hipparcos B- and V-band photometry, Cousins I-band photometry (where available), and 2MASS J-, H-, and Ks-band photometry and constructed measured BV, VIc, VJ, VH, and VKs colors for each star. Second, we calculated the extinction in each color assuming that the stars possess intrinsic main-sequence colors. Third, we calculated an average visual extinction, AV, and its uncertainty based on the standard deviation of the extinction measurements. Fourth, we extrapolated the average AV to the Ks band assuming that AK = 0.116 AV, consistent with RV = 3.1 and a Cardelli et al. (1989) extinction law. Fifth, we corrected the measured 2MASS Ks-band magnitudes for extinction. Finally, we used Kurucz models to estimate the predicted 24 μm and 70 μm fluxes based on the extinction-corrected Ks-band magnitudes and stellar spectral types, assuming the Kenyon & Hartmann (1995) conversion between spectral type and effective temperature. For example, a star with Teff = 7200 K, is expected to possess Fν(Ks)/Fν(24 μm) = 93.9 and Fν(Ks)/Fν(70 μm) = 857.7.

For comparison with our measured (but not color-corrected) fluxes, we list the predicted photospheric 24 and 70 μm fluxes integrated over the MIPS bandpasses, Fν, in Table 2. We calculate the excess significance of each detected source, χ = (measured flux−predicted flux)/uncertainty, where the uncertainty includes absolute calibration uncertainty (2%), repeatability uncertainty (0.4%), the photospheric model uncertainty (∼3%), and statistical uncertainty of the 24 μm photometry summed in quadrature. We list excess objects with χ ⩾ 7 at 24 and/or 70 μm in Table 4. We verify our stellar atmosphere model fits by examining the Ks−[24] colors of our sources. All of our excess sources possess Ks−[24] > 0.3 mag. We plot the Ks−[24] color as a function of JH color (as a proxy for spectral type) for all of the sources in our study in Figure 3. We show the distribution of significance of the 24 μm excesses (χ24 = (measured Fν(24 μm)−predicted Fν(24 μm))/measured σF24) in Figure 4. Our Ks−[24] selection criteria robustly identified sources with large excesses but may not identify sources with weaker excesses.

Figure 3.

Figure 3. Ks − [24] color plotted as a function of JH color for each subgroup of the Scorpius-Centaurus OB association: Upper Scorpius (US), Upper Centaurus Lupus (UCL), and Lower Centaurus Crux (LCC). Our sample of 125 F- and G-type members is shown with solid circles; the Su et al. (2006) sample of A-type members is shown with open circles; the Carpenter et al. (2009a) sample of F- and G-type members is shown with open stars; and the Carpenter et al. (2009b) US sample is shown with circled crosses. The solid line shows the expected colors of main-sequence stars, extrapolated from Nextgen models with solar metallicity and log g = 4.0. The dotted lines show a 3σ deviation in Ks − [24] color from the main sequence (0.15 mag). Note: AK Sco (UCL) and PDS 66 (LCC), which possess primordial disks, are not shown.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 4.

Figure 4. Histogram of the significances (χ = (Fν(24 μm)−F*(24 μm))/σF24) of observed 24 μm excesses. The histogram includes all sources in our study regardless of the membership in ScoCen. Sources with χ ⩾ 7 also possess Ks − [24] > 0.30 mag and were identified as having significant excesses.

Standard image High-resolution image

Table 4. Single-temperature Blackbody Model Parameters

HIP Name Teff L* M*a tage Tgr LIR/L* amin D Mdust MPB
    (K) (L) (M) (Myr) (K)   (μm) (AU) (Mmoon) (Mmoon)
Upper Scorpius
78663 HD 143811 6440 4.9+2.0−1.4 1.5 10 >68 3.8 × 10−5 1.4 <90 0.013 >0.01
78977 HD 144548 6280 5.0+1.6−1.2 1.5 10 >75 4.2 × 10−5 1.4 <67 0.0082 >0.02
79054 HD 144729 7200 5.5+1.9−1.4 1.5 10 >69 3.5 × 10−5 1.5 <84 0.011 >0.01
79288b HD 145263 7200 6.4+2.3−1.7 1.6 10 230 1.0 × 10−3 1.6 3 0.0042 >5
79977 HD 146897 6815 3.7+1.1−1.1 2.1c 10 89 5.9 × 10−3 0.9 40 0.27 >2
80320 HD 147594 5830 3.4+1.4−1.0 1.4 10 >73 8.2 × 10−5 1.0 <74 0.014 >0.02
82218 HD 151376 6815 4.5+1.6−1.2 1.5 10 >86 1.1 × 10−4 1.5 <38 0.0072 >0.04
Upper Centaurus Lupus
67497 HD 120326 7200 4.4+0.9−0.8 1.6c 15 105 1.5 × 10−3 1.1 25 0.031 >0.7
67970 HD 121189 6740 3.8+1.2−0.9 1.5c 15 >120 3.0 × 10−4 1.0 <16 0.0024 >0.1
69720 HD 124619 7200 5.0+1.6−1.2 1.6c 15 >72 5.3 × 10−5 1.3 <78 0.013 >0.03
71023 HD 127236 7200 10.1+4.8−3.2 1.9 15 >75 2.3 × 10−5 2.0 <70 0.0071 >0.03
72070 HD 129590 5945 2.8+1.5−1.0 1.3 15 84 6.3 × 10−3 0.9 47 0.40 >2
72099 HD 129683 6360 3.0+2.0−1.2 1.4 15 >100 1.7 × 10−4 0.9 <27 0.0035 >0.06
74499 HD 134888 6590 2.1+0.5−0.4 1.5c 15 75 9.8 × 10−4 0.6 100 0.018 >0.2
74959 HD 135953 6440 2.7+1.1−0.8 1.3 15 62 8.1 × 10−4 0.9 120 0.33 >0.2
75491 HD 137057 6740 9.6+3.6−2.6 1.9 15 >110 2.1 × 10−4 1.9 <21 0.0057 >0.2
75683 HD 137499 6740 2.8+2.5−1.3 1.5c 15 >72 1.2 × 10−4 0.8 <85 0.022 >0.04
77157 CD-33 10685 4730 5.0+6.1−2.8 1.1 15 140 6.8 × 10−2 2.0 9 0.35 >40
77432 HD 141011 6440 1.9+0.6−0.4 1.4c 15 >81 9.5 × 10−5 0.6 <55 0.00054 >0.02
77520 HD 141254 6740 1.9+0.6−0.5 1.5 15 >67 3.8 × 10−5 0.6 <28 0.000055 >0.008
78043 HD 142446 6740 4.7+2.2−1.5 1.5 15 74 6.9 × 10−4 1.3 67 0.13 >0.4
79516 HD 145560 6440 3.8+1.4−1.0 1.4 15 77 3.4 × 10−3 1.1 64 0.47 >1
79673 HD 145984 6890 3.3+1.0−0.8 1.5c 15 >72 4.4 × 10−5 0.7 <97 0.0095 >0.02
79710 HD 145972 7200 5.8+1.9−1.4 1.6 15 >69 1.4 × 10−4 1.5 <89 0.053 >0.09
79742 HD 146181 6360 3.7+2.1−1.3 1.4 15 78 2.3 × 10−3 1.1 60 0.28 >0.9
80921 HD 328333 6890 1.2+0.8−0.5 1.5c 15 >81 3.8 × 10−4 0.5 <50 0.014 >0.05
81447 HD 149735 5988 6.5+3.5−2.3 1.7 15 >78 8.1 × 10−5 1.6 <60 0.015 >0.06
82747b AK Sco 6440 4.7+3.4−2.0 1.5 15 135 4.0 × 10−2 1.3 12 0.24 >20
Lower Centaurus Crux
56673 HD 101088 6440 17.7+2.11.9 2.2 17 >110 3.5 × 10−5 2.9 <27 0.0023 >0.08
57524 HD 102458 6115 1.9+0.5−0.4 1.2 17 >82 7.0 × 10−5 0.7 <49 0.0038 >0.02
57950 HD 103234 6890 3.9+0.7−0.6 1.5c 17 >90 8.0 × 10−5 1.1 <39 0.0042 >0.04
58220 HD 103703 6740 3.3+0.7−0.6 1.5c 17 >100 2.0 × 10−4 0.9 <29 0.0047 >0.08
58528 HD 104231 6440 3.7+1.0−0.8 1.4 17 >84 1.0 × 10−4 1.1 <48 0.0080 >0.05
59693 HD 106389 6360 2.3+1.0−0.7 1.3 17 >81 1.2 × 10−4 0.8 <54 0.0089 >0.04
59960 HD 106906 6440 5.1+0.7−0.7 1.5 17 93 1.3 × 10−3 1.4 34 0.067 >0.8
60348 HD 107649 6440 2.1+0.9−0.6 1.4c 17 >82 9.6 × 10−5 0.7 <51 0.0057 >0.03
61049 HD 108857 6280 3.1+0.7−0.6 1.4 17 >130 3.4 × 10−4 1.0 <13 0.0019 >0.1
61087 HD 108904 6360 5.0+0.7−0.7 1.5 17 >120 6.9 × 10−4 1.4 <15 0.0067 >0.4
62134 HD 110634 6890 3.7+1.1−0.9 1.5c 17 >74 3.8 × 10−5 1.0 <74 0.0066 >0.02
62427 HD 111103 6200 3.2+1.3−0.9 1.4 17 >82 1.6 × 10−4 1.0 <50 0.013 >0.07
62657 HD 111520 6400 2.6+0.7−0.5 1.3 17 81 2.2 × 10−3 1.0 48 2.0 >0.8
63439 HD 112810 6590 3.5+1.3−0.9 1.4 17 67 1.0 × 10−3 1.0 100 0.33 >0.5
63836 HD 113524 6280 2.3+0.6−0.5 1.3 17 >70 5.8 × 10−5 0.8 <85 0.010 >0.02
63886 HD 113556 6890 4.9+1.2−1.0 1.5 17 66 7.6 × 10−4 1.4 97 0.31 >0.5
63975b HD 113766 6590 12+4−2 1.9 17 290 1.7 × 10−2 2.3 3 0.011 >30
64184 HD 114082 6740 3.2+0.6−0.5 1.5c 17 110 3.0 × 10−3 0.9 21 0.038 >1
64877 HD 115361 6440 5.0+1.5−1.1 1.5 17 >67 1.4 × 10−5 1.4 <94 0.055 >0.09
64995 HD 115600 6890 4.8+1.1−0.9 1.5 17 110 1.7 × 10−3 1.3 21 0.032 >1
65423 HD 116402 6030 2.0+1.1−0.7 1.2 17 >67 7.5 × 10−5 0.7 <96 0.016 >0.02
65875 HD 117214 6360 5.6+1.4−1.1 1.6 17 110 2.5 × 10−3 1.5 22 0.057 >2
67068 HD 119511 6740 2.7+0.6−0.5 1.5c 17 >68 3.1 × 10−5 0.8 <99 0.0074 >0.01
67230 HD 119718 6440 8.7+2.2−1.8 1.8 17 >82 2.2 × 10−4 1.8 <54 0.0037 >0.2
67428 HD 120178 6440 4.0+1.3−1.0 1.5 17 >80 8.2 × 10−5 1.1 <59 0.0097 >0.04

Notes. aMasses estimated using HR diagram fitting with D'Antona & Mazzitelli (1997) isochrones may be systematically underestimated by 25% (Hillenbrand & White 2004). bSilicate emission features. cMass estimated using assumed age (tage) rather than isochrone fitting.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2

Nineteen of our fifty-three 24 μm excess sources are also detected at 70 μm. Since our 70 μm integration times were short, all of the objects detected at 70 μm possess strong 70 μm excesses. Two additional sources were detected at 70 μm that apparently do not possess a 24 μm excesses (HIP 62657 and HIP 66782). HIP 67782 is probably not a member of ScoCen because it is a class III giant. We plot the Ks−[70] color as a function of JH color for all of the sources in our study in Figure 5. In general, our results are consistent with those reported earlier (Chen et al. 2005). All of the 24 μm excess sources identified in the preliminary survey are reidentified here as excess sources with the exception of HIP 62428 (HD 111102) and HIP 73666 (HD 133075). Improvements in data processing have allowed us to revise the 24 μm fluxes for these objects downward by 36% and 20%, respectively. Improvements in photosphere modeling have allowed us to revise the 24 μm photosphere estimates upward 18% and 4%, respectively. All of the 70 μm excess sources identified in the preliminary survey are reidentified here as excess sources.

Figure 5.

Figure 5. Ks − [70] color plotted as a function of JH color for each subgroup of ScoCen. The symbols have the same meaning as in Figure 4. All objects that were not detected are represented by upper limit symbols. Note: AK Sco (UCL) and PDS 66 (LCC), which possess optically thick, primordial disks are not shown.

Standard image High-resolution image

Recent Spitzer Infrared Spectrograph spectra have revealed a lack of 10 and 20 μm silicate features around debris disks, suggesting that the grains in these systems have diameters larger than 10 μm (Jura et al. 2004; Chen et al. 2006) and the infrared excesses can be fit using single-temperature blackbodies if the grains are located in rings around their parent stars. For each 24 μm plus 70 μm excess source, we fit the MIPS 24 μm and 70 μm excess fluxes with a single-temperature blackbody, Tgr (see Table 4), and infer color temperatures Tgr = <40–290 K and fractional infrared luminosities LIR/L* = 7 × 10−4 to 3 × 10−3. For each 24 μm excess only source, we cannot constrain the color temperatures without additional infrared excess detections at other wavelengths; however, we estimate grain temperature lower limits. Our 70 μm flux upper limits suggest that the color temperatures for these sources are consistent with those typically measured toward debris disks. For these sources, we infer infrared dust luminosities assuming that FIR ∼ νFν(24 μm).

We measure F+G-type 24 μm disk fractions for each of the ScoCen subgroups, excluding non-members: 7/17 (41% ± 16%) for US (∼10 Myr), 21/66 (32% ± 7%) for UCL (∼15 Myr), and 25/69 (36% ± 7%) for LCC (∼17 Myr). We combine our dZ99 US F+G sample with that of Carpenter et al. (2009b) to determine a complete dZ99 US F+G disk fraction. Since the dZ99 Hipparcos study, additional F+G ScoCen members have been identified via X-ray activity searches; however, we do not include these systems in our statistics because X-ray selection may impact the presence or absence of infrared excess (Chen et al. 2005). We discovered 24 μm excesses around 6/13 F- and 1/4 G-type dZ99 US stars; Carpenter et al. (2009b) discovered 24 μm excesses around 1/8 F- and 1/2 G-type dZ99 US stars, suggesting a combined dZ99 US F+G 24 μm excess fraction: 9/27 (33% ± 11%). Similarly, we combine our UCL F+G statistics with those of Carpenter et al. (2009a) to determine a complete dZ99 UCL F+G disk fraction; they do not detect excess around the one dZ99 UCL star they searched, suggesting a combined dZ99 UCL F+G disk fraction: 21/67 (31% ± 7%). We also combine our dZ99 LCC F+G statistics with those of Carpenter et al. (2009a) to determine a complete dZ99 LCC F+G disk fraction; they do not detect excess around the two dZ99 LCC stars they searched, suggesting a combined dZ99 LCC F+G disk fraction: 25/71 (35% ± 7%). Our updated measurements of the disk fractions are consistent with those presented in our previous work, inferred from smaller stellar samples. In Chen et al. (2005), we estimated disk fractions of 20% in US, 9% in UCL, and 46% in LCC based on data from the first 40 targets observed. Despite our best efforts to remove interlopers, our ScoCen sample may still be contaminated; therefore, our disk fractions may still be lower limits. The majority of the stars in our sample are apparently not accreting. We only detect broad Hα profiles toward AK Sco and HD 101088 (Bitner et al. 2010) although we did not obtain visual spectra of HT Lup, a classical T Tauri star that is a known accretor (Cieza et al. 2007). The Hα emission profile toward AK Sco has been well studied (e.g., Alencar et al. 2003).

To quantify disk evolution, studies typically search for trends in infrared excess as a function of time. To determine whether evolution is consistent across stars of differing stellar mass, they typically divide a sample by spectral type to determine whether the evolution of A-type stars is similar to that of F- and G-type stars. Comparing stars of the same spectral type as a function of age is challenging because younger stars are more luminous and more massive for a given spectral type. In particular, high and intermediate-mass stars evolve substantially on the HRD at ages between 5 and 20 Myr. D'Antona & Mazzitelli (1997) stellar evolution models suggest that a 1.5 M star is expected to possess a spectral type K0 at 5 Myr, and a spectral type F3 once it reaches the main sequence (at an age of ∼10 Myr) and that a 1.0 M star is expected to possess a spectral type K3 at 5 Myr, a spectral type K1 at 15 Myr, and a spectral type G4 once it reaches the main sequence (at an age of ∼50 Myr). Therefore, we propose to search for trends in disk evolution by comparing stars of a similar mass (rather than spectral type) as a function of age. This approach has the advantage that its results can be compared directly with the result of N-body/coagulation codes that model debris disk evolution as a function of stellar mass; for stars of a given mass, these models include changes in stellar luminosity as a function of age.

The majority of F- and G-type ScoCen members in our sample correspond to stars with stellar masses 1.0–1.5 M. Therefore, we searched for trends in the disk fraction around 1.0–1.5 M as a function of time. We expect that 1.5 M stars will appear as F0 through K1 members of US and as A7 through F9 members of UCL and LCC and that 1.0 M stars will appear as K2 through K6 members of US and as G7 through K6 members of UCL and LCC (Table 5). For US, we infer a disk fraction of 11/53 (21+7−5%) for 1.5 M stars and 6/15 (40+13−11%) for 1.0 M stars from this survey and the Carpenter et al. (2009a, 2009b) MIPS 24 μm surveys that included 31 early to mid K-type members of US. We note that five of the excess systems around K-type stars, discovered by Carpenter et al. (2009b), are classified as "primordial" based on the presence of 16 μm excess emission. Follow-up visual spectra of these targets suggest that two are classical T Tauri stars and the remaining three are weak-line T Tauri stars (Dahm & Carpenter 2009; see Table 6). The evolutionary status of WTTS at the end of the protoplanetary phase and the beginning of the debris phase may not be straightforward. Although the three WTTS are classified by Dahm & Carpenter (2009) as primordial disks, the lack of accretion and small IRAC excesses associated with at least one of these objects may suggest that they are debris disks rather than primordial disks. We measured 1.5 M disk fractions of 17/55 (31+7−6%) and 20/50 (40+7−6%) in UCL and LCC, respectively, including one accreting, primordial disk in UCL (AK Sco). We measured 1.0 M disk fractions of 3/21 (14+10−4%) and 4/16 (25+13−8%) in UCL and LCC, respectively, including one accreting, primordial disk in UCL (HT Lup) and another in LCC (PDS 66). Since the US disk fractions are similar to the UCL and LCC disk fractions, we do not believe that there is strong evidence for a change in the disk fraction between ages ∼10 Myr and ∼15–20 Myr for 1.0–1.5 M stars.

Table 5. Spitzer Intermediate-age Disk Surveys

    Avg   1.5 M 1.0 M  
Region Age Distance Selection Nstars Range Nstars Range References
  (Myr) (pc) Criteria          
Upper Sco 10 ∼146 SpTa 1 K2 ... ... 1
      SpT 36 F0–K1 15 K2–K6 2
      SpT 16 F0–G9 ... ... 10
β Pic MG 12 ≲60 SpT 8 A7–G7 3 K0–K6 6
UCL 15 ∼142 SpTa 1 A7–F9 18 G7–K6 1
      SpT 54 A7–F9 3 G7–K6 10
LCC 17 ∼118 SpTa ... ... 12 G2–K6 1
      SpT 50 A7–F6 4 G2–K6 10
Tuc-Hor 30 ≲60 SpT 3 A7–F6 1 F9–K3 6
      SpT ... ... 2 F9–K3 9
IC 2391 50 ∼150 SpT 7 A7–F5 7 F8–K1 7
Pleiades 130 ∼130 SpTb 7 A7–F5 17 F8–K1 3
      SpT 11 A7–F5 26 F8–K1 8
Field 16–200 11–180 SpTa 4 A7–F5 150 F8–K1 1
  30 40–60 SpT 3 A7–F6 1 F9–K3 4
  15–200 10–60 SpT 6 A7–F5 35 F8–K1 5

Notes. aSpectral types drawn from Meyer et al. (2006). bPhotosphere estimates made based on Spitzer IRAC photometry published in Stauffer et al. (2005). References. (1) Carpenter et al. 2009a; (2) Carpenter et al. 2009b; (3) Gorlova et al. 2006; (4) Moor et al. 2009; (5) Plavchan et al. 2009; (6) Rebull et al. 2008; (7) Siegler et al. 2007; (8) Sierchio et al. 2010; (9) Smith et al. 2006; (10) this work.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

Table 6. Observations of 1–1.5 M Stars in Upper Sco

Name SpT Fν(24 μm)/F*(24 μm) Type Notes
1.5 M Stars
HD 142361 G3V 1.02 ± 0.07 No excess (2)  
HD 142987 G4 0.99 ± 0.07 No excess (2)  
HD 146516 G0IV 0.99 ± 0.07 No excess (2)  
HD 147810 G1 1.00 ± 0.07 No excess (2)  
HD 149598 G0 1.13 ± 0.07 No excess (2)  
HIP 78233 F2/3IV/V 0.95 ± 0.07 No excess (2)  
HIP 78483 G0V 0.98 ± 0.07 No excess (2)  
HIP 78581 G1V 1.01 ± 0.04 No excess (4)  
HIP 78663 F5V 1.38 ± 0.05 Debris (4)  
HIP 78977 F7V 1.35 ± 0.04 Debris (4)  
HIP 79054 F0V 1.46 ± 0.06 Debris (4)  
HIP 79083 F3V 1.03 ± 0.07 No excess (2)  
HIP 79097 F3V 1.00 ± 0.07 No excess (2)  
HIP 79252 G7IVe 1.10 ± 0.04 No excess (4)  
HIP 79288 F0V 81.9 ± 1.7 Debris (4)  
HIP 79369 F0V 1.06 ± 0.05 No excess (4)  
HIP 79462 G2V 1.51 ± 0.07 Debris (2)  
HIP 79606 F6 0.96 ± 0.07 No excess (2)  
HIP 79643 F2 1.85 ± 0.07 Debris (2)  
HIP 79644 F5 0.93 ± 0.07 No excess (2)  
HIP 79910 F3V 1.05 ± 0.05 No excess (4)  
HIP 79977 F3/F3V 26.2 ± 0.5 Debris (4)  
HIP 80320 G3IV 1.56 ± 0.05 Debris (4)  
HIP 80535 G0V 1.17 ± 0.05 No excess (4)  
HIP 80586 F5V 1.03 ± 0.04 No excess (4)  
HIP 80896 F3V 0.97 ± 0.07 No excess (2)  
HIP 81455 F3V 0.98 ± 0.07 No excess (4)  
HIP 81851 F2V 1.03 ± 0.04 No excess (4)  
HIP 82218 F2/3V 2.20 ± 0.06 Debris (4)  
HIP 82319 F3V 1.00 ± 0.07 No excess (2)  
HIP 82534 F0V 1.00 ± 0.06 No excess (4)  
PPM 732705 G6 1.00 ± 0.07 No excess (2)  
PPM 747651 G3 1.05 ± 0.07 No excess (2)  
PPM 747978 G3 0.94 ± 0.07 No excess (2)  
[PZ99] J155812.7-232835 G2 2.72 ± 0.07 Debris (2)  
[PZ99] J160000.7-250941 G0 1.09 ± 0.07 No excess (2)  
[PZ99] J161318.6-221248 G9 0.98 ± 0.07 No excess (2)  
[PZ99] J161329.3-231106 K1 1.03 ± 0.07 No excess (2)  
[PZ99] J161402.1-230101 G4 1.08 ± 0.07 No excess (2)  
[PZ99] J161411.0-230536 K0 18.02 ± 0.07 Primordial (2) WTTS (3)
[PZ99] J161459.2-275023 G5 1.57 ± 0.07 Debris (2)  
[PZ99] J161618.0-233947 G7 1.11 ± 0.07 No excess (2)  
[PZ99] J161933.9-222828 K0 1.03 ± 0.07 No excess (2)  
RX J1541.1-2656 G7 1.03 ± 0.07 No excess (2)  
RX J1548.0-2908 G9 1.05 ± 0.07 No excess (2)  
RX J1550.9-2534 F9 0.91 ± 0.07 No excess (2)  
RX J1600.6-2159 G9 1.11 ± 0.07 No excess (2)  
RX J1602.8-2401A K0 0.99 ± 0.07 No excess (2)  
RX J1603.6-2245 G9 1.00 ± 0.07 No excess (2)  
SAO 183706 G8e 1.04 ± 0.07 No excess (2)  
ScoPMS 21 K1IV 0.98 ± 0.07 No excess (2)  
ScoPMS 52 K0IV 0.92 ± 0.07 No excess (2)  
ScoPMS 214 K0IV 1.17 ± 0.03 Debris (1)  
1.0 M Stars
[PBB2002] USco J160643.8-190805 K6 5.29 ± 0.07 Primordial (2) WTTS (3)
[PBB2002] USco J161420.2-190648 K5 40.07 ± 0.07 Primordial (2) CTTS (3)
[PZ99] J153557.8-232405 K3: 0.90 ± 0.07 No excess (2)  
[PZ99] J155847.8-175800 K3 1.41 ± 0.07 Debris (2)  
[PZ99] J160251.2-240156 K4 1.22 ± 0.07 No excess (2)  
[PZ99] J160357.6-203105 K5 33.16 ± 0.07 Primordial (2) CTTS (3)
[PZ99] J160421.7-213028 K2 58.15 ± 0.07 Primordial (2) WTTS (3)
[PZ99] J160612.5-203647 K5 0.98 ± 0.07 No excess (2)  
[PZ99] J160814.7-190833 K2 0.97 ± 0.07 No excess (2)  
[PZ99] J160856.7-203346 K5 0.97 ± 0.07 No excess (2)  
[PZ99] J161302.7-225744 K4 1.00 ± 0.07 No excess (2)  
RX J1558.1-2405A K4 0.90 ± 0.07 No excess (2)  
ScoPMS 23 K5IV 0.92 ± 0.07 No excess (2)  
ScoPMS 27 K2IV 0.94 ± 0.07 No excess (2)  
ScoPMS 45 K5IV 1.44 ± 0.07 Debris (2)  

References. (1) Carpenter et al. 2009a; (2) Carpenter et al. 2009b; (3) Dahm & Carpenter 2009; (4) this work.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2

Table 7. Observations of 1–1.5 M Stars in UCL

HIP Name SpT Fν(24 μm)/F*(24 μm) Type Notes
1.5 M Stars
67497 HD 120326 F0V 12.3 ± 0.3 Debris (4)  
  HD 120812 F8/G0V 1.00 ± 0.05 No excess (2)  
67957 HD 121176 F8V 1.09 ± 0.1 No excess (4)  
67970 HD 121189 F3V 4.37 ± 0.1 Debris (4)  
68335 HD 121835 F5V 1.05 ± 0.04 No excess (4)  
69291 HD 123889 F2V 1.21 ± 0.05 No excess (4)  
69327 HD 123800 F0IV 1.22 ± 0.05 No excess (4)  
69720 HD 124619 F0V 1.75 ± 0.06 Debris (4)  
70350 HD 125912 F7V 1.04 ± 0.04 No excess (4)  
70376 HD 125896 F7V 1.06 ± 0.04 No excess (4)  
70558 HD 126318 F2V 1.07 ± 0.05 No excess (4)  
70689 HD 126488 F2V 1.02 ± 0.04 No excess (4)  
71023 HD 127236 F0V 1.32 ± 0.04 Debris (4)  
71767 HD 128893 F3V 1.08 ± 0.04 No excess (4)  
72033 HD 129490 F7IV/V 1.06 ± 0.04 No excess (4)  
72099 HD 129683 F6V 2.66 ± 0.06 Debris (4)  
72164 HD 129766 F2III/IV 1.03 ± 0.04 No excess (4)  
73666 HD 133075 F3IV 1.12 ± 0.04 No excess (4)  
73667 HD 133022 F3V 0.98 ± 0.04 No excess (4)  
73742 HD 133117 F8V 1.00 ± 0.04 No excess (4)  
74499 HD 134888 F3/5V 3.22 ± 0.08 Debris (4)  
74772 CD-49 9474 F3V 1.10 ± 0.05 No excess (4)  
74865 HD 135778 F3V 1.05 ± 0.05 No excess (4)  
74959 HD 135953 F5V 1.68 ± 0.05 Debris (4)  
75367 CD-40 9577 F9V 1.10 ± 0.08 No excess (4)  
75459 HD 136991 F3V 0.95 ± 0.04 No excess (4)  
75480 HD 137130 F0V 0.99 ± 0.04 No excess (4)  
75491 HD 137057 F3V 3.45 ± 0.08 Debris (4)  
75683 HD 137499 F3 2.45 ± 0.08 Debris (4)  
75891 HD 137888 F2V 1.05 ± 0.04 No excess (4)  
75933 HD 137991 F3V 1.04 ± 0.04 No excess (4)  
76084 HD 138296 F2V 1.01 ± 0.05 No excess (4)  
76457 HD 138994 F2V 1.03 ± 0.04 No excess (4)  
76501 HD 139124 F2V 1.10 ± 0.04 No excess (4)  
76875 HD 139883 F2V 1.01 ± 0.04 No excess (4)  
77038 HD 140241 F3V 1.04 ± 0.05 No excess (4)  
77432 HD 141011 F5V 1.99 ± 0.06 Debris (4)  
77502 HD 141313 F3V 1.16 ± 0.04 No excess (4)  
77520 HD 141254 F3V 1.39 ± 0.05 No excess (4)  
77713 HD 141759 F5V 1.00 ± 0.06 No excess (4)  
77780 HD 141803 F7/8V 1.03 ± 0.04 No excess (4)  
78043 HD 142446 F3V 2.68 ± 0.07 Debris (4)  
78555 HD 143538 F0V 1.16 ± 0.05 No excess (4)  
78881 HD 144225 F3V 1.02 ± 0.04 No excess (4)  
79516 HD 145560 F5V 8.9 ± 0.2 Debris (4)  
79673 HD 145984 F2V 1.53 ± 0.05 Debris (4)  
79710 HD 145972 F0V 3.1 ± 0.2 Debris (4)  
79742 HD 146181 F6V 6.8 ± 0.1 Debris (4)  
79908 HD 146610 F9IV 1.07 ± 0.05 No excess (4)  
80663 HD 330719 F1V 1.04 ± 0.2 No excess (4)  
80921 HD 328333 F2IV 5.1 ± 0.2 Debris (4)  
81136 HD 149090 A7/8+G 0.89 ± 0.04 No excess (4)  
82569 HD 152041 F3V 1.00 ± 0.08 No excess (4)  
82747 AK Sco F5V 164 ± 3 Primordial (4) CTTS (1)
83159 HD 153232 F5V 1.64 ± 0.09 No excess (4)  
1.0 M Stars
  MML 36 K0 IV 1.49 ± 0.03 Debris (2)  
  MML 38 G8 IVe 1.04 ± 0.03 No excess (2)  
  MML 40 G9 IV 1.00 ± 0.03 No excess (2)  
  MML 43 G7 IV 1.12 ± 0.03 Debris (2)  
  HD 126670 G6/8 III/IV 1.05 ± 0.03 No excess (2)  
71178 HD 127648 G8IVe 1.14 ± 0.05 No excess (4)  
  RX J1450.4-3507 K1 (IV) 0.98 ± 0.03 No excess (2)  
  MML 51 K1IVe 1.00 ± 0.03 No excess (2)  
  RX J1458.6-3541 K3 (IV) 0.99 ± 0.03 No excess (2)  
  RX J1500.8-4331 K1 (IV) 0.99 ± 0.03 No excess (2)  
  RX J1507.2-3505 K0 1.06 ± 0.03 No excess (2)  
  HD 133938 G6/8 III/IV 0.97 ± 0.03 No excess (2)  
  RX J1518.4-3738 K1 1.02 ± 0.03 No excess (2)  
76477 MML 67 G9 1.01 ± 0.03 No excess (2)  
  HD 139498 G8 (V) 1.01 ± 0.03 No excess (2)  
  RX J1544.0-3311 K1 1.04 ± 0.03 No excess (2)  
  HD 140374 G8 V 0.95 ± 0.03 No excess (2)  
77157 HT Lup K3Ve 166 ± 3 Primordial (4) CTTS (3)
  RX J1545.9-4222 K1 1.01 ± 0.03 No excess (2)  
  HD 141521 G8 V 1.01 ± 0.03 No excess (2)  
78684 HD 143677 G9.5IV 1.11 ± 0.04 No excess (4)  

References. (1) Alencar et al. 2003; (2) Carpenter et al. 2009a; (3) Cieza et al. 2007; (4) this work.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2

Alternately, one could argue that evolutionary trends are only expected to be observed among the debris disk population. In this case, the accreting systems should be excluded to ensure that only debris disks are selected. Removing all primordial systems (both CTTS and WTTS) from the 1.5 M demographics yields debris disk fractions of 10/52 (19+6−4%) for US, 16/54 (30+7−6%) for UCL, and 20/50 (40+7−6%) for LCC. Removing all primordial systems (both CTTS and WTTS) from the 1.0 M demographics yields debris disk fractions of 2/11 (18+16−7%) for US, 2/20 (10+10−3%) for UCL, and 3/15 (20+14−7%) for LCC. In this case, the debris disk fractions for US are still consistent with UCL and LCC. In general, it may not be possible to divide disks into purely primordial or debris categories. The origin of circumstellar material in older, accreting, primordial disks (that are transitioning to debris disks) may be complex. Grady et al. (2009) and Eisner et al. (2006) have suggested that the disks around the Herbig Ae star HD 135344B and the T Tauri star TW Hya may be undergoing multiple phases of evolution simultaneously, with collisionally generated debris located at some radii.

5. DISK EVOLUTION

The Kenyon & Bromley (2004, 2005, 2008) coagulation-N-body simulations have been developed to model the period of oligarchic to chaotic growth in young solar systems that are rapidly dissipating circumstellar gas, beginning with meter to kilometer-sized planetesimals. The models sketch out the production of debris as a function of age in young disks, neglecting the presence of small, primordial grains. Therefore, before planetary embryos form (1000–3000 km objects), the models predict initially small excess emission. Once embryos form, they predict that collisions between nearby, leftover planetesimals produce micron-sized dust grains that can be detected as thermal infrared emission. Spitzer disk surveys have searched for an increase in the infrared excess at ages of ∼10–20 Myr that might indicate the formation of oligarchs at 30–150 AU in intermediate-aged disks. MIPS 24 μm observations of B- and A-type stars in λ Orionis (∼5 Myr), Orion OB1b (∼5 Myr) and OB1a (∼10 Myr), and h and χ Per (∼14 Myr), compared with data from other young clusters, suggest that the magnitude of the 24 μm excess around intermediate-mass stars peaks at an age of 10–15 Myr (Hernandez et al. 2006, 2009; Currie et al. 2008). Carpenter et al. (2009b) have recently analyzed the MIPS 24 μm measurements for young clusters and have been unable to find a peak in debris production at ∼10–15 Myr for B7–A9 type or G0–K5 type stars. However, they find a possible peak in 24 μm excess for F0–F9 stars at ∼10–15 Myr, at the 2.6σ level, based primarily on the detections of bright debris disks from our initial study (Paper I).

Since Kenyon & Bromley (2008, hereafter KB08) calculate the evolution of dust around stars with fixed stellar masses, including changes in stellar luminosity with age, MIPS 24 μm and 70 μm photometry of 1.0 ± 0.2 M and 1.5 ± 0.2 M stars can simply be compared with the KB08 models as a function of time. D'Antona & Mazzitelli (1997) tracks predict that the 24 μm fluxes for 1.0–1.5 M stars are approximately constant to slightly increasing between ages ∼10 and 30 Myr; therefore, whether stellar photospheres can be detected primarily depends on stellar distances. In general, MIPS 24 μm observations of 1.0–1.5 M stars at distances <200 pc are sensitive enough to detect stellar photospheres with good signal:noise while observations of more distant stars are not. Since detections of excess sources in clusters too distant to detect stellar photospheres may bias our analysis, we plot the MIPS 24 μm and 70 μm excesses of nearby stars (see Table 5) with 1.0 ± 0.2 M and 1.5 ± 0.2 M as a function of age (Figures 6 and 7). We overplot the KB08 models for stars with disks that are 1/3, 1, and 3 times as massive as the Minimum Mass Solar Nebula.

Figure 6.

Figure 6. 24 μm flux ratio (Fν(24 μm)/F*(24 μm)) as a function of stellar age. Our observations of ScoCen are plotted along with data from several young clusters and moving groups in the published literature (see Table 5). Objects with near-infrared (e.g., IRAC) and MIPS 24 μm excesses are plotted using red asterisks; objects with only MIPS 24 μm excesses are plotted using solid red circles. The solid line shows the evolution of thermal emission from dust generated via collisional cascade at distances 30–150 AU from the central star (Kenyon & Bromley 2008) from a typical disk; for 1 M stars, the model corresponds to a Minimum Mass Solar Nebula. The dashed lines show models for disks with masses that are a factor of three higher and lower. Objects with near- and mid-infrared excesses may be accreting, primordial disks (e.g., AK Sco). Black squares and error bars show mean and standard deviation of ScoCen sample while blue squares and error bars show mean and standard deviation of ScoCen sample if primordial disks are removed.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 7.

Figure 7. Same as Figure 6 for the 70 μm flux ratio, Fν(70 μm)/F*(70 μm). Objects that are not detected with MIPS at 70 μm are plotted as upper limit symbols. The solid line shows the evolution of 70 μm emission from material generated via collisional cascade at distance 30–150 AU from the central star (Kenyon & Bromley 2008).

Standard image High-resolution image

As in our disk fraction analysis, one may argue that the evolutionary trends predicted in KB08 are expected to be present in debris disk demographics only, in which case primordial systems should be excluded from the comparison sample. We reiterate that the KB08 models include gas dissipation in disks but not primordial grains. Since KB08 models include bulk gas that dissipates with time, the presence or absence of accretion can not be used to identify which systems can be compared with the models. Since there is no simple way to remove the effect of primordial grains in observations of primordial disks to reveal whether there is an underlying distribution of collisionally produced dust, we plot all of the systems observed in Figures 6 and 7. We note classical and weak-lined T Tauri systems with an asterisk (rather than a solid circle). We list the disk type and accretion properties of 1.5 and 1.0 M ScoCen stars in Tables 68. We find that (1) stars possess MIPS 24 μm excesses that vary by as much as a factor of 100 at a given age, (2) the observed 24 μm excesses are approximately consistent with the KB08 models for 1.5 M stars but are an order of magnitude higher than predicted for 1.0 M stars, and (3) the upper envelope of MIPS 24 μm excess does not obviously peak at an age of 10–15 Myr for 1.0 M stars.

Table 8. Observations of 1–1.5 M Stars in LCC

HIP Name SpT Fν(24 μm)/F*(24 μm) Type Notes
1.5 M Stars
55334 HD 98660 F2V 1.07 ± 0.04 No excess (3)  
56227 HD 100282 F0III 1.11 ± 0.04 No excess (3)  
56673 HD 101088 F5IV 1.34 ± 0.04 Debris (3)  
57595 HD 102597 F5V 0.98 ± 0.04 No excess (3)  
57950 HD 103234 F2IV/V 1.97 ± 0.05 Debris (3)  
58075 HD 103441 F2V 1.24 ± 0.04 No excess (3)  
58146 HD 103589 F2IV/V 1.08 ± 0.05 No excess (3)  
58167 HD 103599 F3IV 1.13 ± 0.04 No excess (3)  
58220 HD 103703 F3V 3.17 ± 0.07 Debris (3)  
58528 HD 104231 F5V 2.06 ± 0.06 Debris (3)  
58899 HD 104897 F3V 0.96 ± 0.04 No excess (3)  
59084 HD 105233 F0V 1.01 ± 0.07 No excess (3)  
59481 HD 105994 F3V 1.21 ± 0.04 No excess (3)  
59603 HD 106218 F2V 1.05 ± 0.04 No excess (3)  
59693 HD 106389 F6IV 2.13 ± 0.07 Debris (3)  
59716 HD 106444 F5V 1.17 ± 0.04 No excess (3)  
59960 HD 106906 F5V 6.7 ± 0.1 Debris (3)  
60245 HD 107437 F2V 1.09 ± 0.05 No excess (3)  
60348 HD 107649 F5V 1.97 ± 0.05 Debris (3)  
60513 HD 107920 F3V 0.99 ± 0.04 No excess (3)  
60567 HD 108016 F6/7V 1.17 ± 0.04 No excess (3)  
61086 CD-51 6746 F1V 1.00 ± 0.05 No excess (3)  
61087 HD 108904 F6V 7.5 ± 0.2 Debris (3)  
62032 HD 110484 F0V 1.19 ± 0.04 No excess (3)  
62056 CD-49 7315 F6V 0.93 ± 0.05 No excess (3)  
62134 HD 110634 F2V 1.46 ± 0.05 Excess (3)  
62171 HD 110697 F3V 1.00 ± 0.04 No excess (3)  
62431 HD 111104 F0 1.00 ± 0.04 No excess (3)  
62657 HD 111520 F5/6V 6.9 ± 0.1 Excess (3)  
62674 CD-46 8204 F3V 1.09 ± 0.05 No excess (3)  
62677 HD 111466 F0/2V: 1.09 ± 0.04 No excess (3)  
63022 HD 112146 F0V 1.00 ± 0.04 No excess (3)  
63041 HD 112109 F0V 1.0 ± 0.4 No excess (3)  
63272 HD 112509 F3IV/V 1.12 ± 0.04 No excess (3)  
63435 HD 112794 F5V 1.05 ± 0.04 No excess (3)  
63439 HD 112810 F3/5IV/V 2.35 ± 0.06 Debris (3)  
63527 HD 112951 F0/2V 1.01 ± 0.04 No excess (3)  
63886 HD 113556 F2V 2.09 ± 0.06 Debris (3)  
63975 HD 113766 F3/5V 80 ± 2 Debris (3)  
64044 HD 113901 F5V 1.24 ± 0.04 No excess (3)  
64184 HD 114082 F3V 21.9 ± 0.4 Debris (3)  
64316 CD-51 7328 F3V 1.06 ± 0.05 No excess (3)  
64322 HD 114319 F0/2IV/V 1.0 ± 0.1 No excess (3)  
64877 HD 115361 F5V 2.5 ± 0.1 Debris (3)  
64995 HD 115600 F2IV/V 13.7 ± 0.3 Debris (3)  
65136 HD 115875 F0V 1.00 ± 0.04 No excess (3)  
65875 HD 117214 F6V 15.0 ± 0.3 Debris (3)  
67068 HD 119511 F3V 1.35 ± 0.04 Debris (3)  
67230 HD 119718 F5V 3.3 ± 0.1 Debris (3)  
67428 HD 120178 F5V 1.81 ± 0.05 Debris (3)  
68534 CPD-60 5147 F2V 2 ± 1 No excess (3)  
1.0 M Stars
  MML 1 K1 IV 1.07 ± 0.03 No excess (1)  
58996 HD 105070 G2IV 1.06 ± 0.04 No excess (3)  
  MML 8 K0 IV 1.68 ± 0.03 Debris (1)  
  MML 9 G9 IV 1.05 ± 0.03 No excess (1)  
  HD 107441 G1.5 IV 1.05 ± 0.03 No excess (1)  
  MML 18 K0 IV 0.97 ± 0.03 No excess (1)  
60913 HD 108611 G4.5IV 1.07 ± 0.04 No excess (3)  
  HD 111170 G8/K0 V 1.01 ± 0.03 No excess (1)  
  MML 26 G5 IV 0.98 ± 0.03 No excess (1)  
  MML 28 K2 IV 1.39 ± 0.03 Debris (1)  
63847 HD 113466 G3IV 1.10 ± 0.06 No excess (3)  
  HD 116099 G0/3 1.15 ± 0.03 Debris (1)  
  PDS 66 K1 IVe 32.70 ± 0.02 Primordial (1) CTTS (2)
65517 HD 116650 G1.5IV 1.13 ± 0.05 No excess (3)  
  HD 117524 G2.5 IV 0.99 ± 0.03 No excess (1)  
  HD 119269 G3/5 V 1.02 ± 0.03 No excess (1)  

References. (1) Carpenter et al. 2009a; (2) Mamajek et al. 2002; (3) this work.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2

We observe a factor of 100 dispersion in the 24 μm excess of our solar-like ScoCen stars (see Figure 6). Whether this dispersion is the result of a dispersion in initial disk conditions or stochastic collisions is not known. Andrews & Williams (2007) observe a factor of 100 dispersion in the submillimeter photometry of young stellar objects in ρ Ophiuchi; since submillimeter photometry is sensitive to the total disk mass, they suggest that the variation may be the result of dispersion in initial disk mass. However, some very bright infrared sources may be either primordial disks or debris disks that have experienced recent collisions. For example, AK Sco in UCL (Fν(24 μm)/F*(24 μm) ∼ 180) possesses pristine silicate grains and is still actively accreting material from its circumstellar disk (Alencar et al. 2003). HD 113766 in LCC (Fν(24 μm)/F*(24 μm) ∼ 90) may be a debris disk that recently experienced a massive collision (Lisse et al. 2008; Chen et al. 2006). High-resolution IRS spectroscopy has revealed the presence of submicron-sized, crystalline grains around HD 113766 whose emission is well modeled using laboratory-measured emissivities of crushed forsterite, suggesting the presence of sub-blow out-sized grains that are not gravitationally bound and are expected to be radiatively driven from the system on a timescale much shorter than the age of the system.

KB08 conclude that the debris disks around higher mass stars should produce more thermal infrared excess than those around lower mass stars because higher mass stars are more luminous and possess more massive disks. Figure 6 shows that the measured 24 μm excess ratios (Fν(excess)/Fν(*)) for 1.5 M and 1.0 M stars can be an order of magnitude brighter than that expected based on models. The smaller excess predicted by the models may be the result of artificial boundary conditions imposed on the location of dust. The models assume that parent bodies and subsequent planetesimals are located at distances of 30–150 AU from the central star. Dust grains located at these distances (around a 1 M) star are expected to possess grain temperatures, Tgr = 51–23 K, if the grains are large, corresponding to a peak in the thermally emitted radiation at λ = 100–225 μm. The presence of bright 24 μm excess around 1 M stars probably indicates that revised models incorporating parent bodies at distances <30 AU are needed to reproduce the observations.

The KB08 models predict a peak in the upper envelope of the 24 μm excess around 1.0 and 1.5 M stars at an age of 10–20 Myr due to the formation of planetary embryos in a self-stirred disk. We plot the cumulative disk fractions for 1.0 and 1.5 M stars in US, UCL, and LCC as a function of Fν(24 μm)/F*(24 μm) (Figure 8). Currie et al. (2008) searched for statistical trends in similar measurements of B-, A-, and F-type stars in Orion OB1b (∼5 Myr), Orion OB1a (∼10 Myr), and ScoCen (∼16 Myr). They performed a Wilcoxon rank sum analysis on measurements of [24] − [24]* in Orion OB1a and ScoCen compared to Orion OB1b. For two samples, the Wilcoxon rank sum test determines the equality or inequality of two distributions by computing the mean rank of one distribution in a combined sample of both distributions. Currie et al. (2008) compute negative Z parameters and small probabilities, indicating that the mean 24 μm excess for stars measured in Orion OB1a and ScoCen were statistically smaller than that of Orion OB1b. We performed the Wilcoxon rank sum test on our expanded sample of ScoCen Fν(24 μm)/F*(24 μm) measurements, comparing each subgroup with US and UCL for 1.0 and 1.5 M stars both including and excluding primordial disks (see Table 9). We exclude measurements of Orion OB1b and OB1a from our analysis because these subgroups are more distant, making observations of these stars less sensitive to stellar photospheres. For 1.5 M stars, we similarly find that the Wilcoxon rank sum test yields negative Z parameter with small probabilities when comparing US to UCL and LCC, indicating that the excesses around UCL and LCC stars are larger than around US stars. For 1.0 M stars, we find that the Wilcoxon rank sum test yields negative Z parameter with large probabilities when comparing US to UCL and LCC, indicating that the ranks of the mean 24 μm excess values are not substantially different for US, UCL, and LCC.

Figure 8.

Figure 8. (a) The cumulative distribution functions of Fν(24 μm)/F*(24 μm) for 1.5 and 1.0 M stars in US (dashed line), UCL (dotted line), and LCC (solid line) including both "primordial" and "debris" disks. (b) Same as (a) with "primordial" disks removed.

Standard image High-resolution image

Table 9. Fν(24 μm)/F*(24 μm) Statistics for ScoCen Evolutionary Sample

Group Age Mean Std Dev Third Q Median First Q RS Z RS Prob
  (Myr)              
1.5 M Stars—All                
US 10 3.5 11.7 0.99 1.03 1.17 0 (2.6) 1 (0.004)
UCL 15 4.9 22.0 1.03 1.09 1.75 −2.6 (0) 0.004 (1)
LCC 17 4.2 11.5 1.04 1.17 2.10 −3.1 (−0.9) 0.0009 (0.2)
1.5 M Stars—Primordial removed                
US 10 3.2 11.8 0.99 1.03 1.17 0 (2.8) 1 (0.002)
UCL 15 1.9 2.1 1.03 1.09 1.68 −2.8 (0) 0.002 (1)
LCC 17 4.2 11.5 1.04 1.17 2.10 −3.4 (−1.0) 0.0004 (0.2)
1.0 M Stars—All                
US 10 9.9 18.2 0.94 1.00 5.29 0 (0.3) 1 (0.4)
UCL 15 8.9 36.0 1.00 1.01 1.11 −0.3 (0) 0.4 (1)
LCC 17 3.1 7.9 1.02 1.07 1.15 −0.5 (−1.6) 0.3 (0.06)
1.0 M Stars—Primordial removed                
US 10 1.06 0.20 0.92 0.97 1.22 0 (1.7) 1 (0.04)
UCL 15 1.05 0.12 1.00 1.01 1.06 −1.7 (0) 0.04 (1)
LCC 17 1.12 0.19 1.01 1.06 1.13 −1.9 (−1.7) 0.03 (0.05)

Notes. Statistics comparing the populations of US, UCL, and LCC. We calculate the mean Fν(24 μm)/F*(24 μm) for each subgroup (including and excluding "primordial disks"), the standard deviation (σ), the 1st quartile, the median, the 3rd quartile, and the Wilcoxon rank sum probability, and Z parameter. For the Wilcoxon rank sum test parameters, the first (second) entry in the rank sum test statistics compares each population to US (UCL). A positive Z parameter means that the sample has a larger median value than US (first entry) and UCL (second entry). A low-rank sum probability means that the median Fν(24 μm)/F*(24 μm) of the populations are very different.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

To better understand the Fν(24 μm)/F*(24 μm) distributions, we calculated the first quartile, median, and third quartile Fν(24 μm)/F*(24 μm) for 1.5 and 1.0 M stars in US, UCL, and LCC (see Table 9). Typical measurement uncertainties for Fν(24 μm)/F*(24 μm) in US, UCL, and LCC are 0.07, 0.05, and 0.05, respectively, suggesting that the median Fν(24 μm)/F*(24 μm) for each subgroup is consistent with a bare photosphere. We calculate the mean and standard deviation of Fν(24 μm)/F*(24 μm) (see Table 9) and overlay these values in our diagram showing excess trends as a function of age (Figure 6). For both 1.5 and 1.0 M stars, the Fν(24 μm)/F*(24 μm) standard deviation is very large, making it difficult to determine whether any robust evolutionary trend exists from the mean or the median alone. However, the first quartile values probe the strength of the 24 μm excess systems and indicate increased 24 μm excess for 1.5 M stars and decreased 24 μm excess for 1.0 M stars regardless of whether all disks are included or primordial disks are excluded from the analysis.

Our 70 μm photometry is sensitive to cooler material that is located at larger distances from the central star. The KB08 self-stirred disk models predict that debris disks should be bright there; however, our survey is shallow at 70 μm and only sensitive to excesses an order of magnitude brighter than the central star. In Figure 7, we plot the 70 μm flux ratios (Fν(70 μm)/F*(70 μm)) for all of the stars in our ScoCen study along with Spitzer MIPS 70 μm data obtained for other nearby moving groups (see Table 5). We detect only ∼10% of our objects at 70 μm. The detected objects possess excesses that are consistent with the expectations from KB08; however, the majority of the systems possess 3σ flux upper limits that while consistent with the models do not discriminate among them.

6. GRAIN PROPERTIES

We compare the grain properties for detected ScoCen debris disks with those measured for debris disks in mature planetary systems. We estimate typical measured fractional infrared luminosities (1 × 10−5 < LIR/L* < 7 × 10−2) and MIPS 24 and 70 μm blackbody color temperatures (40 K < Tgr < 300 K) around F- and G-type stars at ∼10–20 Myr. The FEPS team estimates typical fractional infrared luminosities (1 × 10−5 < LIR/L* < 1 × 10−3) and color temperatures (Tgr < 100 K) for debris disks around 3 Myr to 3 Gyr F5–K5-type stars (Carpenter et al. 2009a). Our sample contains nine disks with somewhat higher fractional infrared luminosities (LIR/L* > 1 × 10−3) and warm terrestrial temperature debris (Tgr > 200 K), consistent with the younger ages of these systems.

We estimate the minimum grain sizes, amin, assuming that the smallest grains are removed by radiation pressure if β (=Frad/Fgrav) > 0.5.

Equation (1)

(Artymowicz 1988), where L* and M* are the stellar luminosity and mass, 〈Qpr(a)〉(= (∫Fλdλ)−1Qpr(a, λ)Fλdλ) is the radiation pressure coupling coefficient, and ρs is the density of an individual grain. We estimate the stellar mass by fitting D'Antona & Mazzitelli (1997) isochrones to our estimated stellar luminosities and effective temperatures (see Table 4). We use D'Antona & Mazzitelli (1997) isochrones because, in general, (1) the Siess et al. (1997) tracks estimate ages that are significantly older than those estimated from the other models, (2) the Palla & Stahler (2001) tracks are too sparsely populated in the F-star regime, and (3) the Baraffe et al. (1998) tracks do not extend to >1.4 M and therefore yield incomplete coverage for the ScoCen F-stars. For systems in which isochrones could not be fit, we estimated stellar mass using the stellar spectral type, assuming that US and UCL/LCC have estimated ages of ∼10 and 15 Myr, respectively. Infrared spectroscopy of T Tauri disks suggest that the bulk of the dust in these systems is probably amorphous olivine (Watson et al. 2008); therefore, we use optical constants measured for amorphous olivine (ρs = 3.71 g cm−3; Dorschner et al. 1995) to estimate the radiation pressure coupling coefficient; for simplicity, we assume that the grains are spherical. In general, the estimated minimum grain sizes are too small for the grains to behave as simple blackbodies (Qabs ∝ constant) and too large for the grain to behave in the small grain approximation (2πa ≪ λ).

We estimate the grain distance from grain temperature, Tgr, assuming that the dust particles are in radiative equilibrium, and possess an average grain size, 〈a〉 = 5/3amin, expected if the grains are in collisional equilibrium. Dust grains in radiative equilibrium with a stellar source are located a distance, D, from the central star

Equation (2)

where Qabs is the absorption coefficient for the dust grains. We estimate dust distances using optical constants measured for amorphous olivine and calculate absorption coefficients assuming that the grains are spherical, with radius, 〈a〉. Our data are consistent with the presence of dust located in rings at Kuiper-Belt-like distances, suggesting that the average ScoCen debris disk is a massive analog to our Kuiper Belt at an age <20 Myr.

We estimate the minimum mass of infrared-emitting dust grains, assuming that the grains have a radius, 〈a〉; if the grains are larger, then our estimate is a lower bound. If we assume a thin shell of dust at distance, D, from the central star, and if the grains are spheres of radius, 〈a〉, and if the cross section of the grains is equal to their geometric cross section, then the mass of dust is

Equation (3)

where LIR is the luminosity of the dust. The bulk of the dust mass is expected to be located in larger grains.

We estimate the minimum mass in parent bodies assuming that the disk is Poynting–Robertson (PR) drag dominated and in steady state. We hypothesize that each system possesses at least as much mass in parent bodies today as that which would have been destroyed if the system were in steady state during the lifetime of the star. If MPB denotes the mass in parent bodies, then we may write

Equation (4)

(Chen & Jura 2001). If the disk is dominated by collisions, as is probably the case, then this estimate will be a lower bound.

7. THE STAR–DISK CONNECTION

Stars with spectral types later than mid-F are expected be chromospherically active; therefore, they are expected to drive stellar winds that effectively remove dust from their circumstellar environments. Stars with earlier spectral types are expected to be chromospherically inactive and more luminous; therefore, they heat circumstellar dust more effectively, producing larger infrared excesses. We examine the relationships between infrared excess and stellar properties (e.g., luminosity and activity) to determine whether the observed dust properties are dependent on stellar properties.

7.1. Stellar Luminosity

We searched for differences in the 24 μm excess ratios as a function of stellar luminosity in UCL and LCC using stellar mass and spectral type as a proxies. Our K−[24] versus JH and K−[70] versus JH color–color diagrams (Figures 2 and 4) indicate that early F-type stars possess larger infrared excesses than K-type stars; however, we note that few K-type stars in UCL and LCC have been identified and surveyed using MIPS. Therefore, the lack of bright excess around late-type stars may be a reflection of poor statistics. In Figure 9(a), we plotted Fex(24 μm)/F*(24 μm) as a function of stellar spectral type. To quantify whether disk properties are dependent on stellar luminosity, we also plotted the cumulative distributions of Fex(24 μm)/F*(24 μm) for early- and late-type stars (see Figure 9(b)), using the spectral type bins for 1.5 M and 1.0 M* stars in UCL and LCC given in Table 5. We exclude US from this analysis because US is believed to be significantly younger than UCL and LCC; US stars of a similar spectral type may be systematically more massive than those in UCL and LCC. Our cumulative distribution plot shows that early-type stars generally possess larger 24 μm excesses than their later spectral type counterparts. Using survival analysis, we estimate a 4.19% Kaplan Meier Estimator (KME) two sample test probability that the cumulative fractional infrared excess distributions for early- and late-type stars are drawn from the same parent population.

Figure 9.

Figure 9. (a) The 24 μm flux ratio (Fν(24)/F*(24)) plotted as a function of stellar spectral type for all solar-like stars observed using MIPS in UCL and LCC. Sources shown in green and black are members of UCL and LCC, respectively. (b) The cumulative distribution functions of early-type (solid line) and late-type (dotted line) stars in UCL and LCC plotted as a function of Fν(24 μm)/F*(24 μm), suggesting that early-type stars possess somewhat larger infrared excesses than their later-type counterparts.

Standard image High-resolution image

N-body coagulation models (KB08) suggest that higher mass stars should possess larger 24 μm excesses because they possess higher stellar luminosities that more effectively warm circumstellar dust. For ages similar to UCL and LCC, KB08 predict that 1.5 M stars should possess a 70% excess while 1.0 M stars should possess no detectable excess at 24 μm (<9%). The 90th percentile 1.0 M system possess a 60% 24 μm excess while the 90th percentile 1.5 M system possess a 400% 24 μm excess. The larger 24 μm excess associated with 1.5 M stars compared with 1.0 M stars is consistent with the overall KB08 model; however, the contrast between the 90 percentile disks is somewhat smaller that predicted, suggesting that the disks around late-type stars possess more infrared excess than expected. The KB08 contrast between disks was estimated assuming that the disk surface is linearly proportional to stellar mass; therefore, our data may suggest that the disk surface density depends more weakly on stellar mass than previously assumed.

7.2. Stellar Wind Drag

Corpuscular stellar winds may contribute to grain removal around young solar-like stars and M-dwarfs in a manner analogous to the PR effect (Chen et al. 2005; Plavchan et al. 2005). In this case, large particles orbiting the star are subject to a drag force produced when dust grains collide with protons in the stellar wind. These collisions decrease the velocities of orbiting dust grains and therefore their angular momentum, causing them to spiral in toward their orbit center. At an age of 20 Myr, our Sun may have possessed a stellar mass-loss rate, $\dot{M}_{{\rm wind}}$, one thousand times larger than is currently observed today, $\dot{M}_{\odot } = 2\times 10^{12}$ g s−1. Since the increase in the inward drift velocity is 1 + $\dot{M}_{{\rm wind}} c^{2}/L_{*}$, compared to that produced by the PR effect alone, corpuscular stellar wind drag may have produced inward drift velocities (1 + $\dot{M}_{{\rm wind}} c^{2}/L_{*}$) ∼ 460 times larger than PR drag and may have been an important grain removal mechanism in the environment around the young Sun.

Preliminary analysis of the first 40 ScoCen objects observed in our sample revealed a possible anti-correlation between fractional infrared excess, LIR/L*, and fractional X-ray luminosity, Lx/L*. In Chen et al. (2005), we proposed that the observed anti-correlation may be explained by the presence of strong stellar winds around X-ray active stars that efficiently remove their circumstellar dust grains. We plot LIR/L*, measured from our MIPS 24 μm observations, as a function of Lx/L*, measured from the ROSAT All-Sky Bright Source Catalogue (Voges et al. 1999), for all sources with a 24 μm excess and/or ROSAT X-ray flux (Figure 10(a)). We use the conversion 1 ROSAT count = (8.31 + 5.30 HR1) × 10−12 erg cm−2, where HR1 is the hardness ratio between the 0.1–0.4 and the 0.5–2.0 keV bands (Fleming et al. 1995). Our preliminary detection of an anti-correlation between LIR/L* and Lx/L* was based largely on four sources with both 24 μm excess and ROSAT detections: HD 103234, HD 104231, HD 113766, and HD 148040. Our current analysis includes 10 sources with 24 μm excess and ROSAT detections. We divided our objects into two categories based on whether they were detected using ROSAT to search for an anti-correlation between dust mass and stellar wind and plotted the cumulative distributions of their 24 μm fractional infrared luminosities in Figure 10(b). In general, the ROSAT-detected stars possess disks with LIR/L* < 10−4 while the undetected stars possess LIR/L* as high as 10−2. Using survival analysis, we estimate the KME two sample test probability that the two populations are drawn from the same parent population is fairly low (2.6%), suggesting that the two populations may be different.

Figure 10.

Figure 10. (a) The fractional infrared luminosity (LIR/L*), extrapolated from measurements of infrared excess at 24 μm, plotted as a function of fractional X-ray luminosity (Lx/L*) for all stars in our ScoCen sample with 24 μm excess and/or measured ROSAT flux. Sources shown in blue, green, and black are members of US, UCL, and LCC, respectively. Sources shown with solid circles possess both 24 μm excesses and measured ROSAT fluxes; sources shown with leftward pointing arrows possess measured 24 μm excesses but are not detected with ROSAT; sources shown as downward pointing arrows possess measured ROSAT fluxes but apparently no 24 μm excess. (b) The cumulative distribution functions for stars detected using ROSAT (dotted line) and not detected using ROSAT (solid line) plotted as a function of LIR/L*, estimated from 24 μm fluxes alone, indicating that stars detected using ROSAT possess disks with apparently smaller LIR/L*.

Standard image High-resolution image

In our preliminary study (Chen et al. 2005), we estimate $\dot{M}_{{\rm wind}}$ from the X-ray activity of the central star using ${\dot{M}_{{\rm wind}}}/A \propto F_{x}^{1.15\pm 0.2}$ where A is the stellar surface area and Fx is the X-ray flux per stellar area (Wood et al. 2002). Since that study was published, Wood et al. (2005) better quantify the relationship between stellar mass-loss rate and surface X-ray flux, finding a better fit with the power-law function, ${\dot{M}_{{\rm wind}}}/A \propto F_{x}^{1.34\pm 0.18}$. In addition, they also find that the stellar mass-loss rate power-law dependence on X-ray flux per stellar area apparently saturates at Fx = 8 × 105 erg cm−2 s−1. They suggest that the saturation may be caused by changes in the field structure because more magnetically active stars possess more polar spots. ScoCen is sufficiently distant from the Sun that every object with a measured ROSAT flux, possesses an X-ray surface flux, FX > 8 × 105 erg cm−2 s−1 (see Table 1); therefore, the conversion between X-ray flux and stellar wind mass-loss rate is somewhat uncertain.

For stars with spectral type later than F7V, the Ca ii R'HK index has been used as a metric for stellar activity with the relationship between stellar age and R'HK breaking down at young ages (<100 Myr) when stars are especially active (R'HK ∼ −4.2; Mamajek & Hillenbrand 2008). For ScoCen, the R'HK index possesses several advantages compared to ROSAT Lx/Lbol: (1) ROSAT possesses a large beam making it difficult to determine definitively the X-ray source. For example, HD 113766 is a binary system with a high ROSAT flux; however, the spatial resolution of ROSAT is insufficient to determine whether the dusty primary or naked secondary is the X-ray emitter, (2) ROSAT surveys possess limited sensitivity, making the majority of our stars challenging to detect; however, all of the stars are visually bright, making R'HK measurements straightforward. We plot LIR/L* versus R'HK for all of the stars that we observed with Magellan/MIKE in Figure 11(a) and observe a possible anti-correlation between the two. We divide our sample into stars with and without Ca ii H and K core emission to search for an anti-correlation between infrared excess and chromospheric activity. We plot the cumulative distributions of their 24 μm fractional infrared luminosities in Figure 11(b). In general, the chromospherically active stars possess disks with LIR/L* < 10−4 while the chromospherically quiet stars possess LIR/L* as high as 10−2. Using survival analysis, we estimate the KME two sample test probability that cumulative distributions of LIR/L* for stars with and without core Ca ii emission are fairly low (1.4%), suggesting that the two populations may be different.

Figure 11.

Figure 11. (a) The fractional infrared luminosity (LIR/L*), extrapolated from measurements of infrared excess at 24 μm, plotted as a function of the calcium activity index, R'HK. Sources shown in blue, green, and black are members of US, UCL, and LCC, respectively. Sources shown with open stars possess Ca ii H and K core emission and 24 μm excess while those shown with solid circles possess no Ca ii H and K core emission but 24 μm excesses; all sources without statistically significant excesses are shown with upper limit symbols. (b) The cumulative distribution function for stars with Ca ii H and K core emission (dotted line) and without Ca ii H and K core emission (solid line) plotted as a function of LIR/L*, estimated from 24 μm fluxes alone, indicating that chromospherically active stars possess disks with apparently smaller LIR/L*.

Standard image High-resolution image

To try to understand how R'HK, stellar spectral type, and vsin i are related to one another, we plot R'HK as a function of spectral type (Figure 12(a)) and vsin i (Figure 12(b)). As expected, Ca ii core emission in our sample is characteristic of stars with spectral type later than F7V; however, Ca ii core emission is not related to vsin i in a simple way. The early F-type stars in our sample possess a large rotational velocity dispersion with vsin i as high as 200 km s−1, consistent with young stars just reaching the main sequence viewed from random orientations, and low R'HK activity. The later F-, G-, and K-type stars possess smaller average vsin i and R'HK values. Although our R'HK values are not calibrated; they are consistent with observations of young main-sequence stars that suggest that R'HK is saturated at vsin i > 30 km s−1 (White et al. 2007). Since both stellar surface X-ray flux and R'HK are saturated, we cannot determine whether the anti-correlations observed between fractional infrared luminosity and fractional X-ray luminosity and R'HK are generated by differences in stellar activity or luminosity.

Figure 12.

Figure 12. Ca ii R'HK activity indicator plotted as a function of (a) stellar spectral type and (b) stellar rotational velocity, vsin i. Objects with core emission in the Ca ii R and K lines are shown with open stars while those without are shown with solid circles.

Standard image High-resolution image

7.3. Disk Locking

Circumstellar disks are believed to mediate angular momentum in T Tauri systems. As disks dissipate, central stars become "unlocked" from their disks, allowing them to spin up. Rebull et al. (2006) have shown that infrared excess and stellar periods are correlated in a Spitzer IRAC study of ∼900 young stars in Orion. They show that stars with periods >1.8 days are more likely to possess [3.6]−[8.0] excess and that the K-S test probability that the two populations are drawn from the same parent population is 0.0001%. We plot fractional infrared luminosity as a function of projected stellar rotational velocity (Figure 13(a)), searching for a relationship between infrared excess and period, and observe a weak anti-correlation between the two. We plot the cumulative infrared excess distributions of stars with vsin i larger and smaller than 70 km s−1 (Figure 13(b)) and calculate a 20.2% KME two sample test probability using survival analysis that the two distributions are drawn from the same sample, suggesting that the disks around fast and slow rotators are not statistically different. Since the ScoCen is significantly older than Orion, the evolutionary status of the disks is expected to be very different. While the disks in Orion are optically thick, gas-rich disks, the disks in ScoCen are optically thin, gas-poor disks that do not couple to their central stars via a stellar magnetic field.

Figure 13.

Figure 13. (a) The fractional infrared luminosity (LIR/L*), extrapolated from measurements of infrared excess at 24 μm, plotted as a function of stellar rotational velocity, vsin i, for all stars in our ScoCen sample. (b) The cumulative distribution functions of slow rotators (solid line, vsin i < 70 km s−1) and rapid rotators (dotted line, vsin i > 70 km s−1) plotted as a function of LIR/L*, estimated from 24 μm fluxes alone, suggesting that rapidly rotating stars possess disks with apparently smaller LIR/L*.

Standard image High-resolution image

8. DISCUSSION

IRAS and Spitzer observations of nearby (<100 pc), intermediate-age (∼10–30 Myr) stars in moving groups have discovered debris disks with high fractional infrared luminosities and cold dust color temperatures (e.g., Rebull et al. 2008; Low et al. 2005). Subsequent high-resolution scattered-light imaging has revealed systems with dust sculpted into narrow rings located at D > 50 AU, possibly indicating the presence of giant planets. The discovery of such structures led Mustill & Wyatt (2009) to suggest that these young debris disks may be stirred by already-formed giant planets on eccentric orbits rather than by in situ forming Plutos on regular orbits. A subsequent reanalysis of the MIPS 24 μm and 70 μm photometry for debris disks around A-type stars suggested that the average infrared-emitting regions are narrow with widths, ΔD = D/2, consistent with the presence of 0.5 MJup planets with e = 0.1 that are located at D/3; disks with fixed ∼150 AU outer radii and fixed or variable inner radii produce large 70 μm excesses that are inconsistent with the observations (Kennedy & Wyatt 2010).

While the TW Hya association, β Pic moving group, and Tucana-Horologium are very close and provide the premier opportunity to characterize 10–30 Myr old debris disks, these moving groups lack large numbers of stars to quantify the demographics of debris disks at these ages. Our ScoCen MIPS 24 μm and 70 μm study is the first sensitive search for infrared excess around a statistically significant sample of close (typically 100–250 pc away), intermediate-aged (10–20 Myr old) solar-like stars. Since our 70 μm observations were shallow (with the majority of our 24 μm excess systems not detected), additional high-resolution images or photometric measurements are required to constrain the extent of the disks and determine whether the disks are sculpted or self-stirred. High-resolution images are a particularly powerful diagnostic because they may also reveal asymmetric dust distributions that can only be explained by the presence of giant planets. Since radial velocity planet searches have typically focused on old main-sequence stars, follow-up debris disk imaging studies may help to identify giant planets in the youngest planetary systems and directly constrain their formation mechanism.

9. CONCLUSIONS

We have obtained Spitzer MIPS 24 and 70 μm photometry of 182 candidate F- and G-type members of Scorpius-Centaurus and MIKE high-resolution spectroscopy of 181 candidate F- and G-type members of Scorpius-Centaurus. We conclude the following.

  • 1.  
    The ScoCen subgroups US, UCL, and LCC possess F+G 24 μm excess fractions of 33 ± 11%, 31 ± 7%, and 35 ± 7%, consistent with observations of similarly aged young clusters and moving groups.
  • 2.  
    The detected disk 24 μm and 70 μm excesses are approximately consistent with KB08 models; however, the 24 μm excesses observed around 1.0 M stars are larger than predicted. Updated models with parent bodies interior to 30 AU are probably needed to reproduce the observations with higher fidelity.
  • 3.  
    For 1.5 M stars, the disk fraction does not appear to change statistically between 10 Myr and 15–20 Myr; however, the first quartile of the MIPS Fν(24 μm)/F*(24 μm) increases as expected from collisions between oligarchs at 30–150 AU in self-stirred disks. For 1.0 M stars, the disk fraction does not appear to change statistically between 10 Myr and 15–20 Myr; however, the first quartile of the MIPS Fν(24 μm)/F*(24 μm) decreases, contrary to the expectation of self-stirred disk models.
  • 4.  
    The disk fractional infrared luminosity is weakly anti-correlated with $R^{^{\prime }}_{{\rm HK}}$ and weakly anti-correlated with fractional X-ray luminosity. This anti-correlation indicates that disk fractional luminosity is dependent on stellar properties, such as mass, luminosity, and wind mass-loss rate. Since the surface X-ray flux, FX, and $R^{^{\prime }}_{{\rm HK}}$ are saturated, we cannot determine whether the anti-correlation is the result of stellar luminosity and/or activity effects.

We thank M. Jura, M. Meyer, J. Najita, P. Plavchan, J. Pringle, M. Wyatt, and our referee T. Currie for their helpful comments and suggestions. Support for this work was provided by NASA through the Spitzer Space Telescope Fellowship Program, through a contract issued by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology under a contract with NASA.

Footnotes

Please wait… references are loading.
10.1088/0004-637X/738/2/122