Original Research Papers

Source appointment of nitrogen in PM2.5 based on bulk δ15N signatures and a Bayesian isotope mixing model

Authors:

Abstract

Nitrogen isotope (δ15N) has been employed to differentiate major sources of atmospheric N. However, it remains a challenge to quantify contributions of multiple sources based on δ15N values of the N mixture in atmospheric samples. This study measured δ15N of bulk N in PM2.5 at an urban site of Beijing during a severe haze episode of 22–30 January 2013 and a background site of Qinghai, north-western China from 6 September to 15 October 2013, then applied a Bayesian isotope mixing model (SIAR, Stable Isotope Analysis in R) to analyse the N sources. At Beijing site, δ15N values of PM2.5 (−4.1‰ to +13.5‰, +2.8 ± 6.4‰) were distributed within the range of major anthropogenic sources (including NH3 and NO2 from coal combustion, vehicle exhausts and domestic wastes/sewage). At Menyuan site, δ15N values of PM2.5 (+8.0‰ to +27.9‰, +18.5 ± 5.8‰) were significantly higher than that of potential sources (including NH3 and NO2 from biomass burning, animal wastes, soil N cycle, fertilizer application and dust N). High molar ratios of NH4+ to NO3- and/or SO42- in PM2.5 at the background site suggested that the equilibrium of NH3 ↔ NH4+ caused apparent 15N enrichments in ammonium. Results of the SIAR model showed that 39 and 32% of bulk N in PM2.5 of Beijing site were contributed from N emissions of coal combustion and vehicle exhausts, respectively, whereas N in PM2.5 at Menyuan site was derived mainly from N emissions of biomass burning (46%) and NH3 volatilization (34%). These results revealed that the stoichiometry between NH3 and acidic gases plays an important role in controlling the bulk δ15N signatures of PM2.5 and emissions of reactive N from coal combustion and urban transportation should be strictly controlled to advert the risk of haze episodes in Beijing.

Keywords:

nitrogen isotopeaerosolair pollutionsource apportionmentammonium
  • Year: 2017
  • Volume: 69 Issue: 1
  • Page/Article: 1299672
  • DOI: 10.1080/16000889.2017.1299672
  • Submitted on 20 Jan 2017
  • Accepted on 20 Feb 2017
  • Published on 1 Jan 2017
  • Peer Reviewed