Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Coverage of cancer in local television news

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background. The news media provide significant health information to the American public. Although the public turns to and trusts local television news, news about cancer has not been systematically examined. Methods. In this content analysis, we examined 40,112 news stories aired in the 3rd, 25th, 87th, and 150th sized market in the country, all located in the Midwest. Results. In total, 386 stories focused on cancer. News stories about cancer were short and occurred less than once for every 30 minutes of news. The amount of news coverage of specific cancer sites was not consistent with cancer incidence rates. Similarly, the demography of cancer patients featured in the news differed from that in real life. Few stories provided follow-up information. The average story required a 10th-grade education to be understood. Differences across markets were not systematically related to market size. Conclusions. Cancer coverage was scattered and abbreviated. For both cancer practitioners as well as the general public, local television news cannot be counted on as a primary vehicle for cancer information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rees CE, Bath PA. Mass media sources for breast cancer information: their advantages and disadvantages for women with the disease. J Documentation. 2000;56:235–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Schofield PE, Cockburn J, Hill DJ, Reading D. Encouraging attendance at a screening mammography program: determinants of response to different recruitment strategies. J Med Screening. 1994;1:144–149.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McCaul KD, Jacobson D, Martinson B. The effects of state-wide media campaign on mammography screening. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1998;28:504–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson JD. Cancer-Related Information Seeking. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Freimuth VS, Stein JA, Kean TJ. Searching for Health Information: The Cancer Information Service Model. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Atkin C. Instrumental utilities and information seeking. In: Clarke P, ed. New Models for Mass Communication Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1973:205–242.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brashers DE, Goldsmith DJ, Hsieh E. Information seeking and avoiding in health contexts. Hum Commun Res. 2002;28:258–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mills ME, Sullivan K. The importance of information giving for patients newly diagnosed with cancer: a review of the literature. J Clin Nurs. 1999;8:631–642.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Leydon GM, Boulton M, Moynihan C, et al. Faith, hope, and charity: an in-depth interview study of cancer patients’ information needs and information-seeking behavior. West J Med. 2000;173:26–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Leydon GM, Boulton M, Moynihan C, et al. Cancer patients’ information needs and information seeking behaviour: in depth interview study. BMJ. 2000;320:909–913.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Matthews AK, Sellergren SA, Manfredi CMW. Factors influencing medical information seeking among African American cancer patients. J Health Commun. 2002;7:205–219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Berger CR. Strategic and nonstrategic information acquisition. Hum Commun Res. 2002;28:287–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gantz W, Fitzmanrice M, Fink E. Assessing the active component of information seeking. Journalism Q. 1991;68:630–637.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chen XG, Gruz TB, Schuster DV, Unger JB, Johnson CA. Receptivity to protobacco media and its impact on cigarette smoking among ethnic minority youth in California. J Health Commun. 2002;7:95–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Evans N, Farkas A. Influence of tobacco marketing and exposure to smokers on adolescent susceptibility to smoking. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87:1538.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gilpin EA, Pierce JP. Trends in adolescent smoking initiation in the United States: is tobacco marketing an influence? Tob Control. 1997;6:122–127.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. McFerrin KM. Incidental learning in a higher education asynchronous online distance education course. Paper presented at Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education Conference in association with the Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education; March 1999; San Antonio, TX.

  18. Mealman CA. Incidental learning by adults in nontraditional degree programs. Paper presented at The 12th Annual Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference; October 1993; Columbus, OH.

  19. Ross-Gordon JM, Dowling WD. Adult learning in the context of African-American women’s voluntary organizations. Int J Lifelong Education. 1995;14:306–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Paul B. Using multimedia: a descriptive investigation of incidental language learning. Comput Assist Lang Learn. 1998;11:179–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tewksbury D, Weaver AJ, Maddex BD. Accidentally informed: incidental news exposure on the World Wide Web. Journalism Mass Commun Q. 2001;78:533–555.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Greenberg RH, Freimuth VS, Bratic E. A content analytic study of daily newspaper coverage of cancer. In: Nimmo D, ed. Communication Yearbook. Vol 3. Somerset, NJ: Transaction Books; 1979:645–654.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schwartz LM, Woloshin S. News media coverage of screening mammography of women in their 40s and tamoxifen for primary preventing of breast cancer. JAMA. 2002;287:3136–3142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Corbett JB, Mori M. Medicine, media, and celebrities: News coverage of breast cancer, 1960–1995. Journalism Mass Commun Q. Summer 1999;76:229–249.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Corbett JB, Mori M. Gender-specific cancers, gender-specific reporters? Sci Commun. 1999;20:395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Andsager JL, Powers A. Social or economic concerns: How news and women’s magazines framed breast cancer in the 1990s. Journalism & Mass Commun Q. Autumn 1999;76:531–550.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Clarke JN. Cancer, heart disease, and AIDS: what do the media tell us about these diseases? Health Commun. 1992;4:105–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hertog JK, Finnegan JR, Kahn E. Media coverage of AIDS, cancer, and sexually transmitted diseases: a test of the public arenas model. Journalism Q. 1994;71:291–304.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gantz W, Schwartz N. Public Service Advertising in a New Media Age: A Report on Television Content. Menlo Park, CA: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Keenan DP, AbuSabha R, Robinson NG. Content analysis of media coverage of the 1995 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. J Extension [serial online]. 2001;39(5).

  31. Althaus SL, Edy JA, Phalen PF. Using the Vanderbilt Television Abstracts to track broadcast news content: possibilities and pitfalls. J Broadcasting Electronic Media. 2002;46:473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Radio-Television News Directors Association. Americans rely on local television news, rate it highly, and consider it fair. Available at: https://www.rtndf.org/research/judg.html. Accessed December 15, 2006.

  33. Radio-Television News Directors Association. The future of news. Available at: http://www.rtnda.org/resources/future/index.shtml. Accessed December 15, 2006.

  34. Kaiser Family Foundation, The Center for Media and Public Affair. Health news index poll. Available at: http://www.kaisernetwork.org. Accessed December 15, 2006.

  35. Pribble JM, Goldstein KM, Fowler EF, Greenberg MD, Neol SK, Howell JD. Medical news for the public to use? what’s on local TV news. Am J Manag Care. 2006;12:170–176.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang Z, Gantz W. Health content in local television news. Health Commun. 2007;21:213–221.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Nielsen Media Research. Nielsen Media Research Local Universe Estimates, Chicago, IL: Nielsen Media Research; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  38. McLaughlin GH. SMOG grading: a new readability formula. J Reading. 1969;12:639–646.

    Google Scholar 

  39. National Cancer Institute. Readability Testing in Cancer Communications: Methods, Examples, and Resources for Improving the Readability of Cancer Message and Materials. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Potter W, Levine-Donnerstein D. Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. J Appl Commun Res. 1999;27:258–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. American Cancer Association. Cancer Facts and Figures 2006. Available at: http://www.cancer.org/downloads/STT/CAFF2006PWSecured.pdf. Accessed March 17, 2007.

  42. Project for Excellence in Journalism. The state of the news media 2004: An annual report on American journalism 2004. Available at: http://www.stateofthenewsmedia.com/2004/. Accessed May 19, 2005.

  43. Schwitzer G. Ten troublesome trends in TV health news. BMJ. 2004;329:1352–1352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Freimuth VS, Greenberg RH, DeWitt J, Romano RM. Covering cancer: newspapers and the pubic interest. J Commun. 1984; 34:62–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Chapman S, McLeod K, Wakefield M, Holding S. Impact of news of celebrity illness on breast cancer screening: Kylie Minogue’s breast cancer diagnosis. Med J Aust. 2005;183:247–250.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Telecommunications, Institute for Communication Research, Indiana University, 1229 East 7th Street, 47405-5501, Bloomington, IN

    Walter Gantz PHD

  2. Ohio State University, Columbus, OH

    Zheng Wang PHD

Authors
  1. Walter Gantz PHD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zheng Wang PHD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Walter Gantz PHD.

Additional information

Supported by National Cancer Institute research grant RO1 CA 108487-01.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gantz, W., Wang, Z. Coverage of cancer in local television news. J Canc Educ 24, 65–72 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/08858190802664727

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08858190802664727

Keywords

Search

Navigation