Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T00:23:27.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A brief dietary assessment instrument for assessing target foods, nutrients and eating patterns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Marian L Neuhouser ,
Ruth E Patterson ,
Alan R Kristal ,
Alison L Eldridge  and
Nancy C Vizenor
Marian L Neuhouser*
Affiliation:
Cancer Prevention Research Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue N, Seattle, WA 98109–1024, USA
Ruth E Patterson
Affiliation:
Cancer Prevention Research Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue N, Seattle, WA 98109–1024, USA Department of Epidemiology and Program in Nutritional Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Alan R Kristal
Affiliation:
Cancer Prevention Research Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue N, Seattle, WA 98109–1024, USA Department of Epidemiology and Program in Nutritional Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Alison L Eldridge
Affiliation:
Procter and Gamble Co., Cincinnati, OH 45224–1792, USA
Nancy C Vizenor
Affiliation:
Cancer Prevention Research Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue N, Seattle, WA 98109–1024, USA
*
*Corresponding author: Email mneuhous@fhcrc.org
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

To develop and validate a new dietary assessment tool, the focused recall, and to use this to measure co-consumption of carotenoid-containing fruits and vegetables with savory snacks.

Design:

Participants completed a telephone-administered focused recall and a 24-hour recall on the same day. We compared mean estimates of fruit, vegetable, savory snack and carotenoid consumption from both instruments. We also assessed the ability of each method to measure co-consumption of carotenoids with full-fat, reduced/non-fat and olestra-containing savory snacks.

Setting and subjects:

Data are from 245 male and 244 female adult participants in the Olestra Post-Marketing Surveillance Study (OPMSS).

Results:

The mean (± SD) intake of fruit was 1.8 (1.1) servings day−1 from the focused recall and 1.6 (1.4) servings day−1 from the 24-hour recall (r = 0.56). The mean vegetable intake was 2.1 (1.3) and 2.2 (1.7) servings day−1 (r = 0.42), respectively, from each instrument. Estimates of total carotenoid and β-carotene intake were within 5% of each other (r = 0.63 for total carotenoids and r = 0.70 for β-carotene). Both instruments estimated that approximately 14% of total daily carotenoids were co-consumed with savory snacks (r = 0.63).

Conclusions:

The focused recall provides valid information about fruit, vegetable and savory snack consumption and allows researchers to examine associated eating patterns more easily.

Keywords

DietNutrition assessmentCarotenoidsFat substitutesFruitVegetablesQuestionnaires
Type
Research Article
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , February 2001 , pp. 73 - 78
Copyright
Copyright © CABI Publishing 2001

References

1Ziegler, RG. A review of epidemiological evidence that carotenoids reduce the risk of cancer. J. Nutr. 1989; 119: 116–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Verhoeven, DT, Goldbohm, RA, van Poppel, G, Verhagen, H, van den Brandt, PA. Epidemiological studies on brassica vegetables and cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 1996; 5: 733–48.Google ScholarPubMed
3Slattery, ML, Potter, JD, Coates, A, et al. Plant foods and colon cancer: an assessment of specific foods and their related nutrients (United States). Cancer Causes Control 1997; 8: 575–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Klipstein-Grobusch, K, Geleijnse, JM, den Breeijen, JH, et al. Dietary antioxidants and risk of myocardial infarction in the elderly: the Rotterdam Study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1999; 69: 261–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Tucker, KL, Chen, H, Vogel, S, Wilson, PW, Schaefer, EJ, Lammi-Keefe, CJ. Carotenoid intakes, assessed by dietary questionnaire, are associated with plasma carotenoid concentrations in an elderly population. J. Nutr. 1999; 129: 438–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Slattery, ML, Boucher, KM, Caan, BJ, Potter, JD, Ma, KN. Eating patterns and risk of colon cancer. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1998; 148: 4–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Kristal, AR, Patterson, RE, Neuhouser, ML, et al. Olestra Postmarketing Surveillance Study: design and baseline results from the sentinel site. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1998; 98: 1290–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. Food additives permitted for direct addition to food for human consumption: olestra; final rule. In: Federal Register, Part III, 21 CFR Part 172, Vol. 61. US DHHS/FDA, 1996; 3118–73.Google Scholar
9Weststrate, JA, van het Hof, KH. Sucrose polyester and plasma carotenoid concentrations in healthy subjects. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1995; 62: 591–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Daher, GC, Cooper, DA, Peters, JC. Physical or temporal separation of olestra and vitamins A, E, and D intake decreases the effect of olestra on the status of the vitamins in the pig. J. Nutr. 1997; 127: S1566–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Cooper, DA, Webb, DR, Peters, JC. Evaluation of the potential for olestra to affect the availability of dietary phytochemicals. J. Nutr. 1997; 127: S1699–709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Rock, CL, Thornquist, MD, Kristal, AR, et al. Demographic, dietary and lifestyle factors differentially explain variability in serum carotenoids and fat-soluble vitamins: baseline results from the sentinel site of the Olestra Post-Marketing Surveillance Study. J. Nutr. 1999; 129: 855–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Willett, W. Nutritional Epidemiology, 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Mangels, AR, Holden, JM, Beecher, GR, Forman, MR, Lanza, E. Carotenoid content of fruits and vegetables: an evaluation of analytic data. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1993; 93: 284–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Kristal, AR, Patterson, RE, Simmons, NC, Shattuck, AS, Beresford, SAA. Precision and bias of food frequency questionnaire measures of fruit and vegetable intakes. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1998; 52: S46.Google Scholar
16Kristal, AR, Feng, Z, Coates, RJ, Oberman, A, George, V. Associations of race/ethnicity, education, and dietary intervention with the validity and reliability of food frequency questionnaire: the Women's Health Trial feasibility study in minority populations. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1997; 146: 856–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Patterson, RE, Kristal, AR, Carter, RA, Tinker, LF, Bolton, MP, Agurs-Collins, T. Measurement characteristics of the Women's Health Initiative food frequency questionnaire Ann. Epidemiol. 1999; 9: 178–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Nestle, M, Wing, R, Birch, L, et al. Behavioral and social influences on food choice. Nutr. Rev. 1998; 56: S50–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Campbell, DR, Gross, MD, Martini, MC, Grandits, GA, Slavin, JL, Potter, JD. Plasma carotenoids as biomarkers of vegetable and fruit intake. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 1994; 3: 493–500.Google ScholarPubMed
20McEligot, AJ, Rock, CL, Shanks, TG, et al. Comparison of serum carotenoid responses between women consuming vegetable juice and women consuming raw or cooked vegetables. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 1999; 8: 227–31.Google ScholarPubMed
21Thompson, B, Shannon, J, Beresford, SAA, Jacobson, PE, Ewings, JA. Implementation aspects of the Seattle ‘5 a Day’ intervention project: strategies to help employees make dietary changes. Top. Clin. Nutr. 1995; 11: 58–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Neuhouser, ML, Kristal, AR, McLerran, DL, Patterson, RE, Atkinson, J. Validity of short food frequency questionnaires used in cancer chemoprevention trials: results from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 1999; 8: 721–5.Google ScholarPubMed