Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T01:13:16.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies on the control of iron uptake by rabbit small intestine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2007

T. M. Cox
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Ducane Road, London W12 0HS
M. W. O'Donnell
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Ducane Road, London W12 0HS
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Whole-body retention in vivo and uptake of 59Fe-labelled ascorbate and nitrilotriacetate chelates by intestinal slices in vitro were determined in groups of normal control rabbits and rabbits with experimentally-induced Fe deficiency.

2. Over-all absorption as measured by retention of doses of either chelate was greatly increased in conditions of Fe deficiency.

3. Intestinal Fe uptake in vitro was inhibited up to 77% in the presence of 2,4-dinitrophenol and sodium fluoride. Initial rates showed saturation within the concentration range 18–450 μmol/l, suggesting that uptake was brought about by an active transport process.

4. When studied at chelate concentrations of 450 μmol/l, significant regional differences in uptake rates were observed. Uptake in duodenal slices was increased when compared with slices from jejunum and ileum.

5. Fe uptake from ferric and ferrous chelates was greatly enhanced in Fe deficiency. This was chiefly due to increases in uptake by slices from the duodenum, but uptake into slices of distal intestine was also stimulated.

6. Kinetic analysis of Fe uptake by duodenal slices from animals rendered Fe deficient by diet or repeated bleeding indicated in both groups an increased apparent maximum velocity (Vmax) for influx of Fe without significant changes in apparent affinity for Fe.

7. The experiments provide further insight into the nature and regional distribution of transport of Fe into the intestine and suggest, in the rabbit, that important control of Fe absorption may be exerted by an active process operating at this initial entry step.

Type
Papers of direct reference to Clinical and Human Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1982

References

Acheson, L. S. & Shultz, S. G. (1972). Biochim. biophys. Acta. 255, 479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, T. M. (1979). The regulation of iron absorption by the digestive tract. MD Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Cox, T. M. (1980). N. Engl. J. Med. 302, 695.Google Scholar
Cox, T. M. & O'Donnell, M. W. (1980). Biochem. Int. 1, 466.Google Scholar
Cox, T. M. & Peters, T. J. (1979). J. Physiol., Lond. 289, 469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, T. M. & Peters, T. J. (1980). Br. J. Haemat. 44, 75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drabkin, D. L. & Austin, J. H. (1932). J. Biol. Chem. 98, 719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forth, W., Lichtenberg, H. & Rummel, W. (1965). Arch. Exp. Path. Pharmacol. 250, 234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forth, W. & Rummel, W. (1973). Physiol. Rev. 53, 724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberger, N. J., Balcerzak, S. P. & Ackerman, G. A. (1969). J. Lab. Clin. Med. 73, 711.Google Scholar
Hofstee, B. H. J. (1957). Science, N. Y. 116, 329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hübers, H., Hübers, E., Rummel, W. & Crichton, R. (1976). Eur. J. Biochem. 66, 447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCance, R. A. & Widdowson, E. M. (1937). Lancet 233, 680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, T., Giovaniello, T. J., Apt, L., Ross, J. F. & Trakas, A. P. (1956). J. Lab. Clin. Med. 48, 280.Google Scholar
Sallee, V. L., Wilson, F. A. & Dietschy, J. M. (1972). J. Lipid Res. 13, 184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savin, M. A. & Cook, J. D. (1978). Gastroenterology 75, 688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheehan, R. G. (1976). Am. J. Physiol. 231, 1438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Frank, R. M. (1975). Analyt. Biochem. 65, 552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinfeld, A. (1964). Acta med. Scand. 247, suppl. 13.Google Scholar