Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-25T01:28:35.369Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tomato fruit size, maturity and α-tomatine content influence the performance of larvae of potato tuber moth Phthorimaea operculella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

B. Mulatu
Affiliation:
Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization, PO Box 2003, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
S.W. Applebaum
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, PO Box 12, Rehovot, 76100, Israel
Z. Kerem
Affiliation:
Institute of Biochemistry Food Science and Nutrition, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, PO Box 12, Rehovot, 76100, Israel
M. Coll*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, PO Box 12, Rehovot, 76100, Israel
*
*Fax: 972 8 946 6768 E-mail: coll@agri.huji.ac.il

Abstract

Various physical and chemical properties of host plants influence insect larval performance and subsequent adult fitness. Tomato plants are relatively new hosts to the potato tuber moth, Phthorimaea operculella (Zeller), with the fruit being its preferred feeding site. However, it is unclear how the biochemical and physical properties of tomato fruits relate to potato tuber moth performance. Significant amounts of α-tomatine were detected in maturing green and ripening fruits of cherry (cv. Ceres) and processing (cv. Serio) types of tomatoes whereas none was detected in a fresh market variety (cv. Marglobe), at comparable stages. α-Tomatine is negatively and significantly correlated with development rate (head capsule size) of larvae reared in the fruits of the cherry and processing type tomatoes. Generally, survival, growth and development were significantly superior for larvae reared in the ripening fruits of the fresh market cultivar. At this stage, the fruits of this cultivar are also the largest. Based on these results it is concluded that fruit α-tomatine content, as wellas fruit size and maturity, all affect performance of P. operculella larvae in the fruits of cultivated tomatoes.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bloem, K.A., Kelly, K.C., Duffey, S.S. (1989) Differential effect of tomatine and its alleviation by cholesterol on larval growth and efficiency of food utilization in Heliothis zea (Boddie) and Spodoptera exigua. Journal of Chemical Ecology 5, 387398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coll, M. & Yuval, B. (2004) Larval food-plants affect flight and reproduction in an oligophagous insect herbivore. Environmental Entomology 33, 14711476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffey, S.S. & Stout, M.J. (1996) Antinutritive and toxic components of plant defense against insects. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 32, 337.3.0.CO;2-1>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenemore, P.G. (1980) Oviposition of potato tuber moth, Phthorimaea operculella (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae); identification of host-plant factors influencing oviposition response. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 7, 435439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M., Levin, C.E. & McDonald, G.M. (1994) α-Tomatine determination in tomatoes by HPLC using pulsed amperometric detection. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 42, 19591964.Google Scholar
Friedman, M., Kozuzue, N. & Harden, L.A. (1998) Preparation and characterization of acid hydrolysis products of the tomato glycoalkaloid α-tomatine. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 46, 20962101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilboa, S. (1994) Evolution of host range and migration of an oligophagous pest, the potato tuber moth, Phthorimaea operculella (Zeller). PhD thesis, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.Google Scholar
Juvic, J.A., Sterens, M.A. & Rick, C.M. (1982a) Survey of the genus Lycopersicon for the variability in α-tomatine content. HortScience 179, 764766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juvic, J.A., Berlinger, M.J., Ben-David, T. & Rudich, J. (1982b) Resistance among accessions of the genera Lycopersicon and Solanum to four of the main insect pests of tomato in Israel. Phytoparasitica 10, 145156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroschel, J. & Koch, W. (1996) Studies on the use of chemicals, botanicals and Bacillus thuringiensis in the management of the potato tuber moth in potato stores. Crop Protection 15, 197203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonardi, C., Ambrosino, P., Esposito, F. & Fogliano, V. (2000) Antioxidative activity and carotenoid and tomatine contents in different typologies of fresh consumption tomatoes. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 48, 47234727.Google Scholar
Morgan, M.R.A., McNerney, R. & Matthew, J.A. (1983) An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for total glycoalkaloids in potato tubers. Journal of Food Science and Agriculture 34, 593598.Google Scholar
Mulatu, B. (2003) Tritrophic level interactions in Ethiopian tomato systems: effects of plants on potato tuber moth, Phthorimaea operculella (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) and its parasitoids. PhD thesis, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.Google Scholar
Mulatu, B., Applebaum, S.W. & Coll, M. (2004) A recently acquired host plant provides an oligophagous insect herbivore with enemy-free space. Oikos 107, 231238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panda, N. & Khush, G.S. (1995) Host plant resistance to insects. 431 pp. Wallingford, Oxon CAB International.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Saona, R.C. & Trumble, J.H. (1999) Effect of avocadofurans on larval survival, growth, and food preference of the generalist herbivore, Spodoptera exigua. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 90, 131140.Google Scholar
Rothschild, G.H.L. (1986) The potato moth – an adaptable pest of short-term cropping systems. pp. 144162Kitching, R.L. (Ed.) The ecology of exotic animals and plants: some Australian case histories. Brisbane, J. Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
SAS Institute (2001) JMP IN version 4.0.3 Pacific Grove, California Duxbury Press.Google Scholar
Smith, C.M., Khan, Z.R. & Pathak, M.D. (1994) Techniques for evaluating insect resistance in crop plants. 336 pp. London, CRC Press.Google Scholar
Stamp, N.E. & Osier, T.L. (1998) Response of five insect herbivores to multiple allelochemicals under fluctuating temperature. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 88, 8196.Google Scholar
Tikkanen, O.K., Niemela, P. & Keranen, J. (2000) Growth and development of a generalist insect herbivore, Operophtera brumata, on original and alternative host plants. Oecologia 122, 529536.Google Scholar
Valkonen, J.P.T., Kesktalo, M., Vasara, T. & Pietila, L. (1996) Potato glycoalkaloids: a burden or a blessing. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 15, 120.Google Scholar
Van Vuuren, J.J., Bennett, A. & Bennett, A.L. (1998) Oviposition site preference of potato tuber moth, Phthorimaea operculella (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), a pest on tobacco, Nicotiana tabacum L. (Solanaceae). African Entomology 6, 177183.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, I., Kuhr, R.J. & Motoyama, N. (1998) Nicotine: old and new topics. pp. 6169 in Kuhr, R.J. (Ed.) Pesticides and the future: minimizing chronic exposure of humans and the environment. Amsterdam, IOS Press.Google Scholar