Register      Login
Invertebrate Systematics Invertebrate Systematics Society
Systematics, phylogeny and biogeography
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Systematics and natural history of the Australian genus Metoligotoma Davis (Embioptera : Australembiidae)

Kelly B. Miller A C and Janice S. Edgerly B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Biology and Museum of Southwestern Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001, USA.

B Department of Biology, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA 95053, USA.

C Corresponding author. Email: kbmiller@unm.edu

Invertebrate Systematics 22(3) 329-344 https://doi.org/10.1071/IS07018
Submitted: 10 May 2007  Accepted: 28 February 2008   Published: 18 June 2008

Abstract

Members of the order Embioptera (webspinners) are among the least known groups of insects, but have a relatively well-developed, phylogenetically unique, and biologically interesting fauna in portions of Australia. The genus Metoligotoma Davis (Australembiidae) is a well-defined group occurring in south-eastern Australia where species are especially distinctive in that they occupy extremely small endemic areas. Additionally, both males and females are wingless, thereby severely limiting opportunities for dispersal. Hypotheses of relationships among these species are not available in a modern phylogenetic context and little is known of their natural history and biogeography. A new species of Embioptera, Metoligotoma rooksi Miller & Edgerly, sp. nov. is described from a male specimen from near Bombala, New South Wales, Australia. A phylogenetic analysis of the genus (including 10 of the 16 known species of Metoligotoma) was conducted using morphological and molecular data from 16S, 28S, COI+COII and H3. The new species is most closely related to M. begae, from which it is geographically separated by the high coastal mountains. The natural history of the genus is reviewed, including descriptions of the silk galleries, habitats and eggs. The biogeography of the genus is examined in light of the phylogeny. No obvious vicariance model supports the current distribution and small endemic areas exhibited by members of the genus. Instead, it is speculated that periodic, rare dispersal events from north to south, and inland over the coastal mountains, resulted in the current distribution of the species. This is the first modern phylogenetic analysis of the Australembiidae, and the first extensive analysis of any group of Embioptera to include molecular data.


Acknowledgements

Special thanks to E. Rooks and E. Bybee for help in the field and M. F. Whiting for laboratory assistance. Thanks to S. Cameron, and G. Svenson and one of the two anonymous reviewers for useful and insightful comments on the project. Support in Australia was provided by A. Slipinski. Financial research support came in part from National Science Foundation (USA) grants #DEB–0329115, #DEB–0738179, and #DEB–0515865.


References


Allsopp P. G. (1995) Biogeography of the Australian Dynastinae, Rutelinae, Scarabaeinae, Melolonthini, Scitalini and Geotropidae (Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea). Journal of Biogeography 22, 31–48.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Avise J. C. (2000). ‘Phylogeography. The History and Formation of Species.’ (Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.)

Baker R. H., DeSalle R. (1997) Multiple sources of character information and the phylogeny of Hawaiian drosophilids. Systematic Biology 46, 654–673.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Bremer K. (1994) Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10, 295–304.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Cognato A. I. (2006) Standard percent DNA sequence difference for insects does not predict species boundaries. Journal of Economic Entomology 99, 1037–1045.
PubMed |
open url image1

Colgan D. J., McLauchlan A., Wilson G. D. F., Livingston S. P., Edgecombe G. D., Macaranas J., Cassis G., Gray M. R. (1998) Histone H3 and U2 snRNA DNA sequences and arthropod molecular evolution. Australian Journal of Zoology 46, 419–437.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Davis C. (1936) Studies in Australian Embioptera. Part I. Systematics. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 61, 230–253. open url image1

Davis C. (1938) Studies in Australian Embioptera. Part III. Revision of the genus Metoligotoma, with descriptions of new species, and other notes on the family Oligotomidae. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 63, 226–272. open url image1

Davis C. (1940a) Family classification of the order Embioptera. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 33, 677–682. open url image1

Davis C. (1940b) Taxonomic notes on the order Embioptera. XX. The distribution and comparative morphology of the order Embioptera. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 65, 533–542. open url image1

Davis C. (1942) Studies in Australian Embioptera. Part V. Geographical variation in Metoligotoma reducta Davis. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 67, 331–334. open url image1

Davis C. (1943) Studies in Australian Embioptera. Part VI. Records of the genus Metoligotoma from Victoria. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 68, 65–66. open url image1

Edgar R. C. (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32, 1792–1797.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Edgerly J. S., Szumik C. A., McCreedy C. N. (2007) On new characters of the eggs of Embioptera with the description of a new species of Saussurembia (Anisembiidae). Systematic Entomology 32, 387–395.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Engel M. S., Grimaldi D. A. (2006) The earliest webspinners (Insecta : Embiodea). American Museum Novitates 3514, 1–15.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Genecodes (1999). ‘Sequencher. Version 3.1.1.’ (Genecodes: Ann Arbor, MI, USA.)

Goloboff P. (1995). ‘NONA. Version 2.0.’ (Author: Tucumán, Argentina.)

Hebert P. D. N., Penton E. H., Burns J. M., Janzen D. H., Hallwachs W. (2004) Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101, 14812–14817.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Huelsenbeck J. P., Ronquist F. (2001) MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17, 754–755.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Kumar S., Tamura K., Jakobsen I. B., Nei M. (2001) MEGA2: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software. Bioinformatics 17, 1244–1245.
Crossref | PubMed |
open url image1

Lambeck K., Chappell J. (2001) Sea level change through the last glacial cycle. Science 292, 679–686.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Lewis P. O. (2001) A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Systematic Biology 50, 913–925.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Miller K. B., Alarie Y., Wolfe G. W., Whiting M. F. (2005) Association of insect life stages using DNA sequences: the larvae of Philodytes umbrinus (Motschulsky) (Coleoptera : Dytiscidae). Systematic Entomology 30, 499–509.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Nixon K. C. (2002). ‘WinClada. Version 1.00.08.’ (Author: Ithaca, NY, USA.)

Posada D., Crandall K. A. (1998) ModelTest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14, 817–818.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Read I. G. (1994). ‘The Bush: A Guide to the Vegetated Landscapes of Australia.’ (University of New South Wales Press: Sydney.)

Ronquist F., Huelsenbeck J. P. (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19, 1572–1574.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Ross E. S. (1963) The families of Australian Embioptera, with descriptions of a new family, genus, and species. Wasmann Journal of Biology 21, 121–136. open url image1

Ross E. S. (2000). Embia: Contributions to the biosystematics of the insect order Embiidina. Part 1, Origin, relationships and integumental anatomy of the insect order Embiidina. Part 2. A review of the biology of Embiidina. Occasional Papers of the California Academy of Sciences 149, 1–53, 1–36.

Simon C., Frati F., Beckenbach A., Crespi B., Liu H., Flook P. (1994) Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 87, 651–701. open url image1

Sorenson M. D. (1999). ‘TreeRot. Version 2.’ (Boston University: Boston, MA, USA.)

Svenson G. J., Whiting M. F. (2004) Phylogeny of Mantodea based on molecular data: evolution of a charismatic predator. Systematic Entomology 29, 359–370.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Swofford D. L. (2000). ‘PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0b2.’ (Sinauer: Sunderland, MA, USA.)

Szumik C. A. (1996) The higher classification of the order Embioptera: a cladistic analysis. Cladistics 12, 41–64.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Whiting M. F. (2002) Mecoptera is paraphyletic: multiple genes and phylogeny of Mecoptera and Siphonaptera. Zoologica Scripta 31, 93–104.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1










Appendix 1.  Previously unpublished records of Metoligotoma species from Australia
NSW = New South Wales, ACT = Australia Capital Territory. Collector: Miller et al.; codes are collection locality codes (University of New Mexico)
Click to zoom