Register      Login
Australian Mammalogy Australian Mammalogy Society
Journal of the Australian Mammal Society
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Search for cryptic Pseudomys shortridgei in suitable habitat in the south-east of South Australia

Nerissa Haby A B C and Darren Herpich A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Regional Conservation South East, Department for Environment and Heritage, GPO Box 1047, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.

B School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Adelaide, North Terrace Campus, University of Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: nerissa.haby@adelaide.edu.au

Australian Mammalogy 32(1) 47-55 https://doi.org/10.1071/AM09022
Submitted: 30 August 2009  Accepted: 12 January 2010   Published: 24 March 2010

Abstract

Pseudomys shortridgei has been recorded from a restricted and fragmented distribution across southern Australia. Fossil deposits represented the species in mainland South Australia. However, the discovery of an extant population of P. shortridgei in the lower south-east of South Australia, and its morphological similarity to the more common Rattus fuscipes and R. lutreolus highlighted the need to verify the current distribution of the species. Existing vegetation community and systematic baseline biological survey data were used in a fast, cost-effective and systematic desktop assessment to identify the distribution of potentially suitable habitat. Attributes within 12 spatial layers were assigned a value of ecological relevance, reclassified and combined using weighted overlay analysis in ESRI ArcGIS 9.1. At ground-truthed sites, randomly assigned to the most suitable habitat within the ‘equal weightings’ output, understorey had been poorly represented by available data and some vegetation community classifications were no longer current. Despite this limitation, potentially suitable habitat was located within three remnants and targeted in a small mammal survey. From 1459 trap-nights, only Antechinus flavipes, R. fuscipes, Isoodon obesulus obesulus, Austrelaps superbus and Mus musculus were captured. It is unlikely that P. shortridgei inhabits the remnants targeted; however, further field surveys targeting smaller remnants or vegetation communities poorly represented by existing data used in the desktop assessment are recommended.


Acknowledgements

This research was funded by a Native Vegetation Council, Native Vegetation Fund Grant, supported by the Department for Environment and Heritage (DEH) and ForestrySA, conducted under Research Permit no. M25578 1 and approved by the Department for Environment and Heritage’s Wildlife Ethics Committee. We are grateful for the contributions made by Troy Horn, Bryan Haywood, Rob Mengler (ForestrySA), Sharn Lucas (PIRSA Forestry), Randall Johnson, Bron Stratman and Pam Catcheside (DEH) during the course of this project and Tim Croft (DEH), Cath Kemper (SA Museum), Anthony C. Robinson and Helen Vonow (DEH) for their valuable critique of the draft manuscript.


References

Aebischer, N. J. , Robertson, P. A. , and Kenward, R. E. (1993). Compositional analysis of habitat use from animal radio-tracking data. Ecology 74, 1313–1325.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Bureau of Rural Sciences (1992). Interpretations of the Digital Atlas of Australian Soils mapping units. [Online] Available at: http://www.brs.gov.au/data/datasets [accessed February 2008]

Bureau of Rural Sciences (1998). Digital Atlas of Australian Soils [Online] Available at: http://www.daff.gov.au/brs/data-tools [accessed February 2008]

Chapman, A. , and Newbey, K. R. (1995). A vertebrate fauna survey and some notes on the vegetation of the Ravensthorpe Range, Western Australia. CALMScience 1, 465–508.
Cockburn A. (1979). The ecology of Pseudomys spp. in south-eastern Australia. Ph.D. Thesis. Monash University, Melbourne.

Cockburn, A. , Braithwaite, R. W. , and Lee, A. K. (1981). The response of the heath rat, Pseudomys shortridgei, to pyric succession: a temporally dynamic life-history strategy. Journal of Animal Ecology 50, 649–666.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Croft T. S. , and Carpenter G. A. (2007). The biological resources of the south east of South Australia (Draft). Department for Environment and Heritage, South Australia.

Eldridge, M. D. , Kinnear, J. E. , Zenger, K. R. , McKenzie, L. M. , and Spencer, P. B. (2004). Genetic diversity in remnant mainland and “pristine” island populations of three endemic Australian macropods (Marsupialia): Macropus eugenii, Lagorchestes hirsutus and Petrogale lateralis. Conservation Genetics 5, 325–338.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | Foulkes J. , and Heard L. (2003). A biological survey of the south east, South Australia, 1991 and 1997. Department for Environment and Heritage, South Australia.

Franklin I. R. (1980). Evolutionary change in small populations. In ‘Conservation Biology: an Evolutionary-Ecological Perspective’. (Eds M. E. Soulé and B. A. Wilcox) pp. 135–150. (Sinauer Associates: New York.)

Haby N. A. (2002). Interim progress report: brush-tailed bettong and plains mouse monitoring programs. Australian Landscape Trust.

Haby N. A. (2003). Brief comparison of southern brown bandicoot surveying techniques within the Mount Lofty Ranges, South Australia. Department for Environment and Heritage, South Australia.

Harris L. D. (1988). Landscape linkages: the dispersal corridor approach to wildlife conservation. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference 53, 595–607.

Heard L. M. , and Channon B. (1997). Guide to a native vegetation survey (Agricultural Region) using the Biological Survey of South Australia methodology. Department for Environment and Heritage, South Australia.

Hobbs R. J. , and Saunders D. A. (1994). Effects of landscape fragmentation in agricultural areas. In ‘Conservation Biology in Australia and Oceania’. (Eds C. Moritz and J. Kikkawa.) pp. 77–95. (Surrey Beatty: Sydney.)

Ims, R. A. , and Andreassen, H. P. (1999). Effects of experimental habitat fragmentation and connectivity on root vole demography. Journal of Animal Ecology 68, 839–852.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Jessop J. P. , and Toelken H. R. (Eds) (1986 a). ‘Flora of South Australia; Part I, Lycopodiaceae – Rosaceae.’ 4th edn. (South Australian Government Printing Division: Adelaide.)

Jessop J. P. , and Toelken H. R. (Eds) (1986 b). ‘Flora of South Australia; Part II, Leguminosae – Rubiaceae.’ 4th edn. (South Australian Government Printing Division: Adelaide.)

Jessop J. P. , and Toelken H. R. (Eds) (1986 c). ‘Flora of South Australia; Part III, Polemoniaceae – Compositae.’ 4th edn. (South Australian Government Printing Division: Adelaide.)

Jessop J. P. , and Toelken H. R. (Eds) (1986 d). ‘Flora of South Australia; Part IV, Alismataceae – Orchidaceae.’ 4th edn. (South Australian Government Printing Division: Adelaide.)

Johnson, D. H. (1980). The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61, 65–71.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Lambeck R. J. , Cale P. , Ive J. , and Leone J. (2000). Nature conservation in agricultural landscapes: an integrated planning approach. In ‘Nature Conservation 5: Conservation in Production Environments: Managing the Matrix’. (Eds J. Craig, N. Mitchell and D. Saunders.) pp. 166–178. (Surrey Beatty: Sydney.)

Lidicker W. Z. , and Koenig W. D. (1996). Responses of terrestrial vertebrates to habitat edges and corridors. In ‘Metapopulations and Wildlife Conservation’. (Ed. D. McCullough.) pp. 85–109. (Island Press: Washington, DC.)

Mabry, K. E. , and Barrett, G. W. (2002). Effects of corridors on home range sizes and interpatch movements of three small mammal species. Landscape Ecology 17, 629–636.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Manly B. F. , McDonald L. L. , Thomas D. L. , McDonald T. L. , and Erickson W. P. (2002). ‘Resource Selection by Animals: Statistical Design and Analysis for Field Studies.’ 2nd edn. (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands.)

Menkhorst, P. W. , and Beardsell, C. M. (1982). Mammals of southwestern Victoria from the little desert to the coast. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria 94, 221–247.
Menkhorst P. W. , Cockburn A. , and Cancilla D. (2008). Heath mouse, Pseudomys shortridgei (Thomas, 1970). In ‘The Mammals of Australia’. (Ed. S. Van Dyck.) pp. 650–652. (Reed New Holland: Sydney.)

Meulman E. P. (1997). The ecology of the heath mouse Pseudomys shortridgei in the Grampians National Park, Victoria. Ph.D. Thesis, Charles Sturt University.

Meulman, E. P. , and Klomp, N. I. (1999). Is the home range of the heath mouse Pseudomys shortridgei an anomaly in the Pseudomys genus? The Victorian Naturalist 116, 196–201.
Mitchell E. (2007). Influence of disturbance on threatened fauna and associated habitat, Victoria. Ph.D. Thesis, Deakin University.

Monamy, V. , and Fox, B. J. (2000). Small mammal succession is determined by vegetation density rather than time elapsed since disturbance. Austral Ecology 25, 580–587.
Muir B.G. (1977). Biological Survey of Western Australia Wheatbelt. Part 2: Vegetation and Habitat of Bendering Reserve. Records of the Western Australian Museum Supplement No. 3. Western Australian Museum, Perth.

Owens H. M. (2000). Guidelines for vertebrates surveys in South Australia using the biological survey of South Australia. Department for Environment and Heritage, South Australia.

Quinlan, K. , Moro, D. , and Lund, M. (2004). Improving trapping success for rare species by targeting habitat types using remotely sensed data: a case study of the heath mouse (Pseudomys shortridgei) in Western Australia. Wildlife Research 31, 219–227.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Watson A. J. , Meulman E. P. , and Seebeck J. H. (2003). Flora and Fauna Guarantee Action Statement: heath mouse, Pseudomys shortridgei. Department of Sustainability and Environment, Victoria.

Whisson, L. (1995). A record of the heath rat, Pseudomys shortridgei and other fauna from Dragon Rocks Nature Reserve. Western Australian Naturalist 20, 49.


Wilson, B. A. , and Friend, G. R. (1999). Responses of Australian mammals to disturbance: a review. Australian Mammalogy 21, 87–105.