Constant curvature surfaces are constructed from the finite action solutions of the supersymmetric ℂPN−1 sigma model. It is shown that there is a unique holomorphic solution which leads to constant curvature surfaces: the generalized Veronese curve. We give a general criterion to construct non-holomorphic solutions of the model. We extend our analysis to general supersymmetric Grassmannian models.
REFERENCES
1.
D. G.
Gross
, T.
Piran
, and S.
Weinberg
, Two Dimensional Quantum Gravity and Random Surfaces
(World Scientific
, Singapore
, 1992
).2.
S.
Safram
, Statistical Thermodynamics of Surfaces Interface and Membranes
(Addison-Wesley
, Massachusetts
, 1994
).3.
4.
R.
Rajaraman
, “ℂPn solitons in quantum Hall systems
,” Eur. Phys. B
28
, 157
–162
(2002
).5.
G.
Landolfi
, “On the Canham-Helfrich membrane model
,” J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.
36
, 4699
(2003
).6.
7.
A. M.
Grundland
and İ.
Yurduşen
, “On analytic descriptions of two-dimensional surfaces associated with the ℂPN−1 models
,” J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.
42
, 172001
(2009
).8.
P. P.
Goldstein
and A. M.
Grundland
, “Invariant recurrence relations for ℂPN−1 models
,” J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.
43
, 265206
(2010
).9.
F.
Hélein
, Constant Mean Curvature Surfaces, Harmonic Maps and Integrable Systems
(Birkhäuser, Basel
, 2001
).10.
N.
Manton
and P.
Sutcliffe
, Topological Solitons
(Cambridge University Press
, NewYork
, 2004
).11.
S.
Post
and A. M.
Grundland
, “Analysis of ℂPN−1 sigma models via projective structures
,” Nonlinearity
25
, 1
–36
(2012
).12.
A. M.
Grundland
, A.
Strasburger
, and W. J.
Zakrzewski
, “Surfaces immersed in su(N + 1) Lie algebras obtained from the ℂPN sigma models
,” J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.
39
, 9187
–9214
(2006
).13.
V.
Hussin
, İ.
Yurduşen
, and W. J.
Zakrzewski
, “Canonical surfaces associated with projectors in Grassmannian sigma models
,” J. Math. Phys.
51
, 103509
(2010
).14.
L.
Delisle
, V.
Hussin
, and W. J.
Zakrzewski
, “Constant curvature solutions of Grassmannian sigma models: (1) Holomorphic solutions
,” J. Geom. Phys.
66
, 24
–36
(2013
).15.
L.
Delisle
, V.
Hussin
, and W. J.
Zakrzewski
, “Constant curvature solutions of Grassmannian sigma models:(2) Non-holomorphic solutions
,” J. Geom. Phys.
71
, 1
–10
(2013
).16.
B.
Konopelchenko
and I.
Taimanov
, “Constant mean curvature surfaces via an integrable dynamical system
,” J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.
29
, 1261
–1265
(1996
).17.
R.
Carroll
and B.
Konopelchenko
, “Generalized Weierstrass-Enneper inducing conformal immersions and gravity
,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A
11
, 1183
–1216
(1996
).18.
B.
Konopelchenko
and G.
Landolfi
, “Generalized Weierstrass representation for surfaces in multi-dimensional Riemannian spaces
,” Stud. Appl. Math.
104
, 129
–169
(1999
).19.
J.
Bolton
, G. R.
Jensen
, M.
Rigoli
, and L. M.
Woodward
, “On conformal minimal immersions of S2 into ℂPn
,” Math. Ann.
279
, 599
–620
(1988
).20.
F. W.
Warner
, Foundations of Differentiable Manifolds and Lie Groups
(Springer-Verlag
, New York
, 1983
).21.
V. I.
Arnold
, Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics
, 2nd ed. (Springer-Verlag
, New York
, 1989
).22.
A.
Gray
, Modern Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces
(CRC Press
, Florida
, 1993
).23.
X. X.
Jiao
and J. G.
Peng
, “Pseudo-holomorphic curves in complex Grassmann manifolds
,” Trans. Am. Math. Soc.
355
, 3715
–3726
(2003
).24.
X. X.
Jiao
and J. G.
Peng
, “Classification of holomorphic two-spheres with constant curvature in the complex Grassmannians G2,5
,” Differ. Geo. Its Appl.
20
, 267
–277
(2004
).25.
A. M.
Grundland
and L.
Snobl
, “Description of surfaces associated with Grassmannian sigma models on Minkowski space
,” J. Math. Phys.
46
, 083508
(2005
).26.
F.
Jie
, J.
Xiaoxiang
, and X.
Xiaowei
, “Construction of homogeneous minimal 2-spheres in complex Grassmannians
,” Acta Math. Sci.
31
, 1889
–1898
(2011
).27.
C.
Peng
and X.
Xu
, “Minimal two-spheres with constant curvature in the complex Grassmannians
,” Israel J. Math.
202
, 1
–20
(2014
).28.
C.
Peng
and X.
Xu
, “Classification of minimal homogeneous two-spheres in the complex Grassmann manifold G(2, n)
,” J. de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées
103
, 374
–399
(2015
).29.
E.
Witten
, “Supersymmetric form of the nonlinear sigma model in two dimensions
,” Phys. Rev. D
16
, 2991
–2994
(1977
).30.
A.
D’Adda
, M.
Luscher
, and P.
Di Vecchia
, “Confinement and chiral symmetry breaking in CPN−1 models with quarks
,” Nucl. Phys. B
152
, 125
–144
(1979
).31.
K.
Fujii
, T.
Koikawa
, and R.
Sasaki
, “Classical solutions for supersymmetric Grassmannian sigma models in two dimensions. I
,” Prog. Theor. Phys.
71
, 388
–394
(1984
).32.
V.
Hussin
and W. J.
Zakrzewski
, “Susy CPN−1 model and surfaces in ℝN2−1
,” J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.
39
, 14231
(2006
).33.
J. F.
Cornwell
, Group Theory in Physics: Supersymmetries and Infinite-Dimensional Algebras
, Techniques of Physics
Vol. 3
(Academic
, New York
, 1989
).34.
A. J.
MacFarlane
, “Generalization of σ-models and CpN models, and instantons
,” Phys. Lett. B
82
, 239
–241
(1979
).35.
A. M.
Din
, J.
Lukierski
, and W. J.
Zakrzewski
, “General classical solutions of a supersymmetric non-linear coupled boson-fermion model in two dimensions
,” Nucl. Phys. B
194
, 157
–171
(1982
).© 2015 AIP Publishing LLC.
2015
AIP Publishing LLC
You do not currently have access to this content.
