Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

militaries’ roles in political regimes: introducing the PRM data set

  • Research
  • Published:
European Political Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Have militaries become tired of interfering in politics? The declining number of military regimes and military coups implies a decrease in the influence of armed forces on political regimes. Yet, case and area studies underline that militaries still exert considerable influence on politics all over the world. This research note addresses this apparent misfit between quantitative data and qualitative studies by introducing a new measurement of armed forces’ roles in political regimes. Based on previous research, we develop a systematic measure to differentiate between two dimensions of military interference in political regimes: the military ruler and the military supporter indices. Our Political Roles of the Military (PRM) Data Set contains information on 120 democratic and autocratic regimes and a total of 138 regime spells for the period 1999–2012. The data set offers a whole range of indicators that will enable scholars to carry out causal-analytical studies on different forms and degrees of military influence on policy outcomes, economic performance, or the likelihood of regimes successfully facing and surviving political crises. Empirically, our data illustrate that militaries remain powerful actors in many regimes but tend to use more discreet and concealed channels to influence politics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barany, Z. (2011) ‘The role of the military’, Journal of Democracy 22(4): 24–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barany, Z. (2012) The Soldier and the Changing State: Building Democratic Armies in Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Basedau, M. and Elischer, S. (2013) ‘Auf Dem Rückzug in die Kasernen? Autoritäre Herrschaft und Militär im Subsaharischen Afrika’, in S. Kailitz and P. Köllner (eds.) Autokratien im Vergleich, Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 354–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, T., Clarke, G., Groff, A., Keefer, P. and Walsh, P. (2001) ‘New tools in comparative political economy: The Database of Political Institutions’ World Bank Economic Review 15(1): 165–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertelsmann Stiftung. (2003–2016) Transformation Index BTI, Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.

  • Born, H., Caprina, M., Haltiner, K. and Kuhlmann J. (2006) Civil-Military Relations in Europe Learning from crisis and international change, New York: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheibub, J.A., Gandhi, J. and Vreeland, J.R. (2010) ‘Democracy and dictatorship revisited’, Public Choice 143(2–1): 67–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coppedge, M. et al. (2016) ‘V-Dem [Country-Year/Country-Date] Dataset v6’, Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.

  • Cook, S.A. (2007) Ruling But Not Governing: The Military and Political Development in Egypt, Algeria, and Turkey, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croissant, A. and Kamerling, J. (2013) ‘Why do military regimes institutionalize? Constitution-making and elections as political survival strategy in Myanmar’, Asian Journal of Political Science 21(2): 105–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croissant, A., Kuehn, D., Chambers, P.W. and Wolf, S.O. (2010) ‘Beyond the fallacy of coup-ism: conceptualizing civilian control of the military in emerging democracies’, Democratization 17(5): 950–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croissant, A. and Kuehn, D. (2015) ‘The military’s role in politics’, in J. Gandhi and R. Ruiz-Rufino (eds.) Routledge Handbook of Comparative Political Institutions, London: Routledge, pp. 258–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croissant, A., Eschenauer, T. and Kamerling, J. (2016) ‘Hidden rulers and cunning supporters: military influence and autocratic crises’ (book chapter).

  • Fischermann, T. (2016) ‘Das Brasília-Komplott’, Die Zeit, 24 May, available at http://www.zeit.de/politik/ausland/2016-05/brasilien-romero-juca-uebergangsregierung-korruption, accessed 10 June 2016.

  • Finer, S.E. (1985) ‘The retreat to the barracks: notes on the practice and the theory of military withdrawal from the seats of power’, Third World Quarterly 7(1): 16–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fluri, F. and Cibotaru, V. (eds.) (2008) Defense Institution Building: Country Profiles and Needs Assessments for Armenia, Azerbaidjan, Georgia and Moldova, Geneva: Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, N.J. (2006) ‘Laos. Timid transition’, in J. Funston (ed.) Government and Politics in Southeast Asia, Singapore: ISEAS, pp. 120–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedom House. (1999–2013) Freedom in the World country reports, Washington, DC.

  • Geddes, B., Wright, J. and Frantz, E. (2014) ‘Autocratic breakdown and regime transitions: A new data set’, Perspectives on Politics 12(2): 313–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harkness, K. (2016) ‘Constitutional coups, autocratic rollback, and liberalization in Africa: The role of the military’, Democratization 23(7).

  • Kuehn, D., Croissant, A., Kamerling, J., Lueders, H., and Strecker, A. (2016) ‘Conditions of civilian control in new democracies: an empirical analysis of 28 “third wave” democracies’, European Political Science Review advance online publication 19 February, doi:10.1017/S1755773916000011.

  • Li, N. (ed.) (2007) Chinese Civil–Military Relations: The Transformation of the People’s Liberation Army, London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, N. (2010) Chinese Civil-Military Relations in the Post-Deng Era, Newport, RI: U.S. Naval War College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magaloni, B., Min, E. and Chu, J. (2013) Autocracies of the World Dataset, 1950–2012 (Version 1.0), Stanford, CA: Stanford University.

  • Marat, E. (2009) ‘Kazakhstan’s military reform and OSCE chairmanship: Regional implications’, Security and Human Rights 20(1): 83–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mares, D. and Martinéz, R. (2014) Debating Civil–Military Relations in Latin America, Eastbourne, UK: Sussex Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkel, W. (2010) Systemtransformation: Eine Einführung in die Theorie und Empirie der Trans-formationsforschung, Wiesbaden, DE: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkel, W., Puhle, H.-J., Croissant, A., Eicher, C. and Thiery, P. (2003) Defekte Demokratie Band 1: Theorie, Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

  • Nepstad, S.E. (2013) ‘Mutiny and nonviolence in the Arab Spring: exploring military defections and loyalty in Egypt, Bahrain, and Syria’, Journal of Peace Research 50(3): 337–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordlinger, E. (1977) Soldiers in Politics: Military Coups and Governments, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouédrago, E. (2014) Advancing military professionalism in Africa, Washington, DC: Africa Center for Strategic Studies.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Liñán, A. and Polga-Hecimovich, J. (2016). ‘Coups, impeachments, and the survival of Latin American democracies’, Democratization 23(7).

  • Perlmutter, A. (1974) Egypt, the Praetorian State, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlmutter, A. (1981) Political Roles and Military Rulers, London, UK: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, J.M., and Thyne, C.L. (2011) ‘Global instances of coups from 1950 to 2010’, Journal of Peace Research 48(2): 249–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinlivan, J. T. (1999) ‘Coup-proofing: Its practice and consequences in the Middle East’, International Security 24(2): 131–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera, D.W. and Rivera, S.W. (2014) ‘Is Russia a militocracy? Conceptual issues and extant findings regarding elite militarization’, Post-Soviet Affairs 30(1): 27–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, B. (2002) The Tragedy of the Middle East, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sehring, J. and Stefes, C. (2010) ‘Die Stabilität von kompetitiv-autoritären Regimen: Armenien, Georgien, Kasachstan und Kirgistan im Vergleich’, in H. Albrecht und R. Frankenberger (eds,) Autoritarismus Reloaded, Neuere Ansaetze und Erkenntnisse der Autokratieforschung, Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 275–294

  • Springborg, R. (2016) ‘A shifting role of the military in Arab politics? Regional perspectives’, in H. Albrecht, A. Croissant and F. Lawson (eds.) Military Engagement in Mobilizing Societies, Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 71–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svolik, M. W. (2012) The Politics of Authoritarian Rule, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • US Department of State (2000-2013) Human Rights Reports, available at: http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/, accessed 10 June 2016.

  • Usborne, D. (2016) ‘Caught on tape discussing Dilma Rousseff, top ally of Brazil’s Michel Temer steps aside’, Independent, 23 May, available at: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/caught-on-tape-discussing-dilma-rouseff-top-ally-of-brazils-michel-temer-steps-aside-a7044241.html, accessed 10 June 2016.

  • Wahman, M., Teorell, J. and Hadenius, A. (2013) ‘Authoritarian regime types revisited: Updated data in comparative perspective’, Contemporary Politics 19(1): 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Political Science, Heidelberg University, Bergheimer Str. 58, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany

    aurel croissant, tanja eschenauer & jil kamerling

Authors
  1. aurel croissant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. tanja eschenauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. jil kamerling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to aurel croissant.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

croissant, a., eschenauer, t. & kamerling, j. militaries’ roles in political regimes: introducing the PRM data set. Eur Polit Sci 16, 400–414 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-016-0083-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-016-0083-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation