Skip to main content
Log in

Reflecting on Japan’s contributions to management theory

  • Perspectives
  • Published:
Asian Business & Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although Japanese management’s transformative impact on American managerial practice has long been recognized, its contribution to management theory in a range of fields has been less widely acknowledged. This article looks back on the influence of Japanese management on concepts, frameworks, and theories in four management fields: organization behaviour/organization studies, production and operations management, strategy, and international business. The review reveals three ways in which Japanese management had a significant influence on the development of management theory: legitimating and enriching one position in a contested management field; inspiring novel management concepts and frameworks; and providing rich data for testing and refining hypotheses based on established theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This programme can be viewed on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vcG_Pmt_Ny4. I owed my move from a Sociology Department into a business school to this programme. My Ph.D. is in Sociology, with a specialization on organizations and social change in Japan, and in 1980 I was teaching in the Yale Sociology department. The programme created so much interest in Japan that I was asked to teach a course in the Yale School of Management, and this meant that when MIT Sloan School of Management was searching in 1982 for a social scientist who was a Japan specialist and could teach in a business school, my name showed up on a very short list, and I spent the next 25 years teaching at MIT.

  2. When his father died in the mid-1970s, Johnson/Pascale learned that the family name was originally Pascale, and that Johnson was the name adopted when the family moved to the U.S. He decided to return to the original name. One consequence is that the origins of The Art of Japanese Management (Pascale and Athos 1981) in the study with Ouchi were only recognized when Pascale erupted in fury over what he saw as Ouchi’s misrepresentation in Theory Z of the significance of Ouchi’s role in that study, and demanded a reprinting of a revised first section of the book. Pascale also pointed out that Ouchi’s only visit to Japan before the publication of Theory Z was in 1974, for the joint project.

  3. The term ‘lean production’ was coined by John Krafcik, an IMVP research associate who came to MIT Sloan School as a graduate student after working at NUMMI (Krafcik 1988). Krafcik went on to a position in Ford, then become CEO of Hyundai’s American manufacturing unit, and in mid-2017 become the CEO of Google’s new enterprise to manufacture a self-driving car.

  4. Shige Makino pointed out to me that his was not the first publication to use these data: Hennart (1991) was the first and only researcher to use these data before the development of the data-base at Ivey.

References

  • Abegglen, J. C. (1958). The Japanese factory. Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abo, T. (Ed.). (1994). Hybrid factory: The Japanese production system in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, P. S. (1999). Hybridization: Human resource management at two Toyota transplants. In J. K. Liker, W. M. Fruin, & P. Adler (Eds.), Remade in America: Transplanting and transforming Japanese management systems (pp. 75–116). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barley, S., & Kunda, G. (1992). Design and devotion: Surges of rational and normative ideologies of control in managerial discourse. Administrative Science Quarterly,37(3), 363–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (2004). An interview with William Ouchi. Academy of Management Perspectives,18(4), 108–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (1989). Manging across borders: The transnational solution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. W., & Iwao, I. (1963). Paternalism in the Japanese economy: Anthropological studies of oyabun-kobun patterns. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J. (2001). Strategy and management in MNE subsidiaries. In A. M. Rugman & T. L. Brewer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international business (pp. 380–401). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, W. (1981). Lessons from behind the kimono. Fortune,103, 247–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. (1979). The Japanese company. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, K. B., & Fujimoto, T. (1991). Product development performance: Strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, R. E. (1971). Japanese blue collar: The changing tradition. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, R. E. (1979). Work, mobility, and participation: A comparative study of American and Japanese industry. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, R. E. (1980). Learning from the Japanese: Prospects and pitfalls. Management Review,69(9), 22–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, R. E. (1999). Managing quality fads: How American business learned to play the quality game. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, R. E., & Scott, W. R. (Eds.). (2000). The quality movement & organization theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska, B., & Joerges, B. (1996). Travels of ideas. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevón (Eds.), Translating organizational change (pp. 1–17). Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. L. (2004). Theory Z: Opening the corporate door for participative management. Academy of Management Perspectives,18(4), 117–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dore, R. P. (1973). British factory: Japanese factory. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edman, J. (2016). Reconciling the advantages and liabilities of foreignness: Towards an identity-based framework. Journal of International Business Studies,47(6), 674–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endo, T., Delbridge, R., & Morris, J. (2015). Does Japan still matter? Past tendencies and future opportunities in the study of Japanese firms. International Journal of Management Reviews,17(1), 101–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujimoto, T. (1999). The evolution of a manufacturing system at toyota. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujimoto, T. (2007). Architecture-based comparative advantage: A design information view of manufacturing. Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review,4(1), 55–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. R. (2000). Designing the global corporation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstner, L. V., Jr. (2002). Who says elephants can’t dance? Inside IBM’s historic turnaround. New York: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S. (1987). Global strategy: An organizing framework. Strategic Management Journal,8(5), 425–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1985). Do you really have a global strategy? Harvard Business Review,63(4), 139–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1989). Strategic intent. Harvard Business Review,67(3), 63–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review,68(3), 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, R. H., & Abernathy, W. J. (1980). Managing our way to economic decline. Harvard Business review,58(4), 67–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J. F. (1991). The transaction costs theory of joint ventures: An empirical study of Japanese subsidiaries in the United States. Management Science,37(4), 483–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindle, T. (2008). The economist guide to management ideas and gurus. London: Profile Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hout, T., Porter, M. E., & Rudden, E. (1982). How global companies win out. Harvard Business Review,60(5), 98–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imai, K., Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, T. (1985). Managing the new product development process: How Japanese companies learn and unlearn. In K. Clark, R. H. Hayes, & C. Lorenz (Eds.), The uneasy alliance: Managing the productivity-technology dilemma (pp. 337–375). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkeles, A., & Smith, D. H. (1974). Becoming modern: Individual change in six developing countries. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Itami, H., & Roehl, T. (1987). Mobilizing invisible assets. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. T., & Ouchi, W. G. (1974). Made in America (under Japanese management). Harvard Business Review,52(5), 61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagono, T., Nonaka, I., Sakakibara, K., & Okumura, A. (1985). Strategic vs. evolutionary management: A U.S.-Japan comparison of strategy and organization. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, M., & Florida, R. L. (1993). Beyond mass production: The Japanese system and its transfer to the U.S.. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khurana, R. (2007). From higher aims to hired hands: The social transformation of American business schools and the unfulfilled promise of management as a profession. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kipping, M., Engwall, L., & Űsdiken, B. (2009). The transfer of management knowledge to peripheral countries. International Studies of Management and Organization,38(4), 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krafcik, J. F. (1988). Triumph of the lean production system. Sloan Management Review,30, 41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenfle, S. & Baldwin, C. Y. (2007). From manufacturing to design: An essay on the work of Kim B. Clark. Working Paper 07-057, Division of Research, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.

  • Levine, S. B. (1958). Industrial relations in postwar Japan. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liker, J. K., Fruin, W. M., & Adler, P. S. (Eds.). (1999). Remade in America: Transplanting and transforming Japanese management systems. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makino, S., & Beamish, P. W. (1998). Performance and survival of joint ventures with non-conventional ownership structures. Journal of international business studies,29(4), 797–818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadler, L. (1984). What Japan learned from the United States: That we forgot to remember. California Management Review,26(4), 46–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1988). Toward middle-up-down management: Accelerating information creation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 29(3), 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of knowledge creation. Organization Science,5(1), 14–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The concept of “Ba”: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 40–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W. G. (1980). Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly,25, 129–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W. G. (1981). Theory Z: How American business can meet the Japanese challenge. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozawa, T. (1979). Multinationalism Japanese style: The political economy of outward dependency. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascale, R. T., & Athos, A. G. (1981). The art of Japanese management: Applications for American executives. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T., & Waterman, R. (1982). In Search of excellence: Lessons from America’s best run companies. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (Ed.). (1986). Competition in global industries. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review,74(6), 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., Takeuchi, H., & Sakakibara, M. (2000). Can Japan compete?. Houndsmill: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohlen, T. (1974). For harmony and strength. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlin-Andersson, K., & Engwall, L. (2002). The expansion of management knowledge: Carriers, flows and sources. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartor, M. A. (2013). Organizing and executing a longitudinally based research program. In M. E. Hassett & E. Paavilainen-Mäntymäki (Eds.), Handbook of longitudinal research methods in organisation and business studies (pp. 318–350). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schonberger, R. J. (1982). Japanese manufacturing techniques: Nine hidden lessons in simplicity. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stopford, J. M., & Wells, L. T., Jr. (1972). Managing the multinational enterprise: Organization of the firm and ownership of subsidiaries. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taira, K. (1970). Economic development & the labor market in Japan. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsurumi, Y. (1976). The Japanese are coming: A multinational interaction of firms and politics. Cambridge: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsutsui, W. M. W. (1996). Edwards Deming and the origins of quality control in Japan. Journal of Japanese Studies,22(2), 295–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, E. F. (Ed.). (1976). Modern Japanese organization and decision-making. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, E. F. (1987). The impact of Japan in a changing world. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheelwright, S. (1981). Japan: Where operations really are strategic. Harvard Business Review,59(4), 67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehill, A., & Takezawa, S. (1968). The other worker. Honolulu: East-West Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Womack, J. T., Jones, D., & Roos, D. (1990). The machine that changed the world: Based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-million dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile. New York: Rawson Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshino, M. (1976). Japan’s multinational enterprises. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eleanor Westney.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Westney, E. Reflecting on Japan’s contributions to management theory. Asian Bus Manage 19, 8–24 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-019-00079-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-019-00079-x

Keywords

Navigation