Skip to main content
Log in

Simulation modeling to assist with childhood obesity control: perceptions of Baltimore City policymakers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Public Health Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Computational simulation models have potential to inform childhood obesity prevention efforts. To guide their future use in obesity prevention policies and programs, we assessed Baltimore City policymakers’ perceptions of computational simulation models. Our research team conducted 15 in-depth interviews with stakeholders (policymakers in government and non-profit sectors), then transcribed and coded them for analysis. We learned that informants had limited understanding of computational simulation modeling. Although they did not understand how the model was developed, they perceived the tool to be useful when applying for grants, adding to the evidence base for decision-making, piloting programs and policies, and visualizing data. Their concerns included quality and relevance of data used to support the model. Key recommendations for model design included a visual display with explanations to facilitate understanding and a formal method for gathering feedback during model development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Childhood Obesity Facts. 2015. http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/childhood.html. Accessed 15 Aug 2016.

  2. Bures RM, Mabry PL, Orleans CT, Esposito L. Systems science: a tool for understanding obesity. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(7):1156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gittelsohn J, Mui Y, Adam A, et al. Incorporating systems science principles into the development of obesity prevention interventions: principles, benefits, and challenges. Curr Obes Rep. 2015;4(2):174–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee BY, Bartsch SM, Mui Y, et al. A systems approach to obesity. Nutr Rev. 2017;75(Suppl. 1):94–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hennessy E, Ornstein JT, Economos CD, et al. Designing an agent-based model for childhood obesity interventions: a case study of child obesity180. Prev Chronic Dis. 2016;13:150414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mabry PL, Bures RM. Systems science for obesity-related research questions: an introduction to the theme issue. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(7):1157–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Steeves EA, Martins PA, Gittelsohn J. Changing the food environment for obesity prevention: key gaps and future directions. Curr Obes Rep. 2014;3(4):451–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Luke DA, Stamatakis KA. Systems science methods in public health: dynamics, networks, and agents. Annu Rev Public Health. 2012;33:357–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Macal C, North M. Tutorial on agent-based modelling and simulation. J Simul. 2010;4:151–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Maglio PP, Mabry PL. Agent-based models and systems science approaches to public health. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(3):392–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee BY, Ferguson MC, Hertenstein DL, et al. Simulating the impact of sugar-sweetened beverage warning labels in three cities. Am J Prev Med. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2017.11.003.

  12. Lee BY, Adam A, Zenkov E, et al. Modeling the economic and health impact of increasing children’s physical activity in the United States. Health Aff. 2017;36(5):902–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Powell-Wiley TM, Wong MS, Adu-Brimpong J, et al. Simulating the impact of crime on African American women’s physical activity and obesity. J Obes. 2017;25:2149–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Levy DT, Bauer JE, Lee HR. Simulation modeling and tobacco control: creating more robust public health policies. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(3):494–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Homer J, Wile K, Yarnoff B, et al. Using simulation to compare established and emerging interventions to reduce cardiovascular disease risk in the United States. Prev Chronic Dis. 2014;11:E195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ferencik R, Minyard K. Systems thinking in injury prevention: an innovative model for informing state and local policies. West J Emerg Med. 2011;12(3):273–4.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lee BY, Wong KF, Bartsch SM, et al. The Regional Healthcare Ecosystem Analyst (RHEA): a simulation modeling tool to assist infectious disease control in a health system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20(e1):e139–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee BY, Brown ST, Cooley P, et al. Simulating school closure strategies to mitigate an influenza epidemic. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2010;16(3):252–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Guariguata L, Guell C, Samuels TA, et al. Systems science for caribbean health: the development and piloting of a model for guiding policy on diabetes in the Caribbean. Health Res Policy Syst. 2016;14:79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gauvreau CL, Fitzgerald NR, Memon S, et al. The onco-sim model: development and use for better decision-making in canadian cancer control. Curr Oncol. 2017;24(6):401–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Powell KE, Kibbe DL, Ferencik R, et al. Systems thinking and simulation modeling to inform childhood obesity policy and practice. Public Health Rep. 2017;132(Suppl. 2):33S–8S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gittelsohn J, Mui Y, Lin S, et al. Simulating the impact of an urban farm tax credit policy in a low income urban setting. Harvard Heal Policy Rev. 2015;15(1):30–3.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Brownson RC, Fielding JE, Maylahn CM. Evidence-based decision making to improve public health practice. Front Public Health Serv Syst Res. 2013;2(2).

  24. Lavis JN, Oxman AD, Lewin S, Fretheim A. Support tools for evidence-informed health policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst. 2009;7(Suppl. 1):I1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Li Y, Kong N, Lawley M, et al. Advancing the use of evidence-based decision-making in local health departments with systems science methodologies. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(Suppl. 2):S217–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dodson EA, Geary NA, Brownson RC. State legislators’ sources and use of information: bridging the gap between research and policy. Health Educ Res. 2015;30(6):840–8.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Brownson RC, Royer CR, Ewing R, McBridge TD. Researchers and policymakers: travelers in parallel universes. Am J Prev Med. 2006;30(2):164–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Skinner AC, Foster EM. Systems science and childhood obesity: a systematic review and new directions. J Obes. 2013;2013:129193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Saldaña JM. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage. 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mortier R, Haddadi H, Henderson T, et al. Challenges and opportunities in human-data interaction. In: Proceedings of DE2013: Open Digital—The Fourth Annual Digital Economy All Hands Meeting. 2013. http://www.eecs.qmul.ac.uk/~hamed/papers/hdi2013.pdf.

  31. Tabak RG, Eyler AA, Dodson EA, Brownson RC. Accessing evidence to inform public health policy: a study to enhance advocacy. Public Health. 2015;129(6):698–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Brown AW, Allison DB. Unintended consequences of obesity-targeted health policy. Virtual Mentor. 2013;15(4):339–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Richardson MB, Williams MS, Fontaine KR, Allison DB. The development of scientific evidence for health policies for obesity: why and how? Int J Obes. 2017;41(6):840–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Oxman AD, Lewin S, Lavis JN, Fretheim A. SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health policymaking 15: engaging the public in evidence-informed policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst. 2009;7(Suppl. 1):S15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Atkinson JM, Wells R, Page A, et al. Applications of system dynamics modeling to support health policy. Public Health Res Pract. 2015;25(3):e2531531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge all stakeholders who participated in the Policy Working Group. We also thank the following students, staff, and volunteers: Andrew Seiden, Naomi Rapp, Stacy Nam, Jenny Brooks, Kripa Rajagopalan, and Harmony Farner. This project was supported by Grant Number U54HD070725 from Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development (NICHD). The project was co-funded by NICHD and Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research (OBSSR). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not represent the official views of NICHD or OBSSR. Additional funding was supported by Grant Number U48DP005045 and 1U48DP000040, SIP 14-027 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joel Gittelsohn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seifu, L., Ruggiero, C., Ferguson, M. et al. Simulation modeling to assist with childhood obesity control: perceptions of Baltimore City policymakers. J Public Health Pol 39, 173–188 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-018-0125-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-018-0125-0

Keywords

Navigation