Abstract
Hierarchy is becoming a central topic in recent International Relations scholarship, and the historical East Asian hierarchy offers an important case study. This article provides a first-cut analysis of the degree variation in regional hierarchy. It distinguishes three levels of Chinese hierarchy in China’s relationships with Korea, Japan and the Mongols in ‘early modern’ East Asia (1368–1800). Regional relations during this period were on the whole more hierarchic than anarchic, but anarchy was also impressive in each of the relationships during certain periods. Theoretically, the analysis suggests questioning the diametrical assumption of hierarchy/anarchy as the organizing principle of international politics. For policy, it notes why a new Chinese hierarchy is unlikely to appear in the foreseeable future.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alagappa, M. (ed.) (1998) International politics in Asia: The historical context. In: Asian Security Practice: Material and Ideational Influences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Barfield, T.J. (1989) The Perilous Frontier: Nomadic Empires and China. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
Batten, B.L. (2003) To the Ends of Japan: Premodern Frontiers, Boundaries, and Interactions. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.
Beckwith, C.I. (2009) Empires of the Silk Road: A History of Central Eurasia from the Bronze Age to the Present. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Blau, P.M. (1963) Critical remarks on Weber’s theory of authority. American Political Science Review 57 (2): 305–316.
Buzan, B. (2004) From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chan, H. (1988) The Chien-wen, Yung-lo, Hung-hsi, and Hsüan-te Reigns. In: F.W. Mote and D. Twitchett (eds.) The Cambridge History of China: Volume 7, The Ming Dynasty, 1368–1644, Part I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cheng, L. (1981) Supplement & Revision of ‘Sino-Japanese Inter-relations in Ming History’. Taipei, Taiwan: The Liberal Arts Press.
Chia, N. (1993) The Lifanyuan and the inner Asian rituals in the early Qing (1644–1795). Late Imperial China 14 (1): 60–92.
Chung, J.H. (2009/10) East Asia responds to the rise of China: Patterns and variations. Pacific Affairs 82 (4): 657–675.
Clark, D.N. (1978) Autonomy, Legitimacy, and Tributary Politics: Sino-Korean Relations in the Fall of Koryŏ and the Founding of the Yi, PhD diss., Harvard University.
Clark, D.N. (1998) Sino-Korean tributary relations under the Ming. In: D. Twitchett and F.W. Mote (eds.) The Cambridge History of China Volume 8: The Ming Dynasty, 1368–1644, Part 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, I. (2009) How hierarchical can international society be? International Relations 23 (3): 464–480.
Clark, I. (2011) Hegemony in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DiCicco, J.M. and Levy, J.S. (2003) The power transition research program: A Lakatosian analysis. In: C. Elman and M.F. Elman (eds.) Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 109–157.
Di Cosmo, N. (1994) Ancient inner Asian nomads: Their economic basis and its significance in Chinese history. Journal of Asian Studies 53 (4): 1092–1126.
Di Cosmo, N. (2002) Ancient China and Its Enemies: The Rise of Nomadic Power in East Asian History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Di Cosmo, N. and Bao, D. (2003) Manchu-Mongol Relations on the Eve of the Qing Conquest: A Documentary History. Leiden: Brill.
Donnelly, J. (2006) Sovereign inequalities and hierarchy in anarchy: American power and international society. European Journal of International Relations 12 (2): 139–170.
Dunne, T. (2003) Society and hierarchy in international relations. International Relations 17 (3): 303–320.
Fairbank, J.K. (1942) Tributary trade and China’s relations with the West. The Far Eastern Quarterly 1 (2): 129–149.
Fairbank, J.K. (ed.) (1968a) The Chinese World Order: Traditional China’s Foreign Relations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fairbank, J.K. (ed.) (1968b) A preliminary framework. In: The Chinese World Order: Traditional China’s Foreign Relations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 1–19.
Fairbank, J.K. and Teng, S.Y. (1941) On the Ch’ing tributary system. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 6 (2): 135–246.
Flathman, R.E. (1995) Legitimacy. In: R.E. Goodin and P. Pettit (eds.) A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.
Goh, E. (2007/08) Great powers and hierarchical order in Southeast Asia: Analyzing regional security strategies. International Security 32 (3): 113–157.
Goh, E. (2008) Hierarchy and the role of the United States in the East Asian security order. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 8 (3): 353–377.
Hall, J.W. (1990) The Muromachi bakufu. In: K. Yamamura (ed.) The Cambridge History of Japan, Volume 3, Medieval Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 175–230.
Hawley, S. (2005) The Imjin War. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Hobson, J.M. and Sharman, J.C. (2005) The enduring place of hierarchy in world politics: Tracing the social logics of hierarchy and political change. European Journal of International Relations 11 (1): 63–98.
Huang, Z. (1994) Dongya de liyi shijie: Zhongguo fengjian wangchao yu chaoxian bandao guanxi xingtai lun [The Ritual World in East Asia: Patterns of Relations between China and the Korean Peninsula]. Beijing: People’s University Press.
Huang, Z. (1995) Chaoxian de ruhua qingjing gouzao: chaoxian wangchao yu manqing wangchao de guanxi xingtai lun [The Construction of Korea’s Confucianization: Patterns of Relations between the Chosŏn Dynasty and the Manchu Qing Dynasty]. Beijing: People’s University Press.
Hurd, I. (1999) Legitimacy and authority in international politics. International Organization 53 (2): 379–408.
Hurd, I. (2007) After Anarchy: Legitimacy and Power in the United Nations Security Council. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ikenberry, G.J. (2001) After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Jagchid, S. and Symons, V.J. (1989) Peace, War, and Trade along the Great Wall: Nomadic-Chinese Interaction through Two Millennia. Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.
Jansen, M.B. (1992) China in the Tokugawa World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Johnston, A.I. (1995) Cultural Realism: Strategic Culture and Grand Strategy in Chinese History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Johnston, A.I. (2013) How new and assertive is China’s new assertiveness? International Security 37 (4): 7–48.
Kang, D.C. (2003) Getting Asia wrong: The need for new analytical frameworks. International Security 27 (4): 57–85.
Kang, D.C. (2007) China Rising: Peace, Power, and Order in East Asia. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kang, D.C. (2010a) East Asian Before the West: Five Centuries of Trade and Tribute. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kang, D.C. (2010b) Hierarchy and legitimacy in international systems: The tribute system in early modern East Asia. Security Studies 19 (4): 591–622.
Kang, D.C. (2010c) Civilization and state formation in the shadow of China. In: P.J. Katzenstein (ed.) Civilizations in World Politics: Plural and Pluralist Perspectives. New York: Routledge, pp. 91–113.
Keene, E. (2007) A case study of the construction of international hierarchy: British treaty-making against the slave trade in the early nineteenth century. International Organization 61 (2): 311–339.
Kelley, L.C. (2005) Beyond the Bronze Pillars: Envoy Poetry and the Sino-Vietnamese Relationship. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.
Khazanov, A.M. (1984) Nomads and the Outside World, Translated by J. Crookenden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lake, D.A. (2007) Escape from the state of nature: Authority and hierarchy in world politics. International Security 32 (1): 47–79.
Lake, D.A. (2009a) Hierarchy in International Relations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Lake, D.A. (2009b) Hobbesian hierarchy: The political economy of political organization. Annual Review of Political Science 12 (1): 263–283.
Lake, D.A. (2010) Rightful rules: Authority, order, and the foundations of global governance. International Studies Quarterly 54 (3): 587–613.
Langlois, Jr J.D. (1988) The Hung-wu reign, 1368–1398. In: F.W. Mote and D. Twitchett (eds.) The Cambridge History of China, Volume 7: The Ming Dynasty, 1368–1644, Part I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Larson, K.W. (2008) Tradition, Treaties, and Trade: Qing Imperialism and Chosŏn Korea, 1850–1910. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center.
LCSL. Wu, H. (ed.) (1980) Chaoxian lichao shiliu zhong de Zhongguo shiliao: Volume 1, 1354–1438 [Materials on China in the Veritable Records of Korea’s Yi Dynasty]. Beijing: Zhonghua Publishing House.
Lebow, R.N. (2008) A Cultural Theory of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ledyard, G. (1983) Yin and Yang in the China-Manchuria-Korea triangle. In: M. Rossabi (ed.) China among Equals: The Middle Kingdom and Its Neighbors, 10th–14th Centuries. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Lee, K. (1984) A New History of Korea, Translated by E.W. Wagner with E.J. Shultz. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Li, Y. (2004) Chaogong zhidu shilun: Zhongguo gudai duiwai guanxi tizhi yanjiu [A History of the Tribute System: China’s Ancient Foreign Relation Institution]. Beijing: Xinhua Publishing House.
Mancall, M. (1984) China at the Center: 300 Years of Foreign Policy. New York: The Free Press.
Medeiros, C., E.S.K., Heginbotham, E., Levin, N.D., Lowell, J.F., Rabasa, A. and Seong, S. (2008) Pacific Currents: The Responses of US Allies and Security Partners in East Asia to China’s Rise. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
Merelman, R.M. (1966) Learning and legitimacy. American Political Science Review 60 (3): 548–561.
Millward, J.A. (2007) Eurasian Crossroads: A History of Xinxiang. New York: Columbia University Press.
Milner, H. (1991) The assumption of anarchy in international relations theory: A critique. Review of International Studies 17 (1): 67–85.
MSL. Zhongyang yanjiuyuan lishi yuyan yanjiusuo [Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica]. (1962–66) Ming shi lu [Veritable Records of the Ming Dynasty]. Nangang: hongyang Yanjiuyuan Lishi Yuyan Yanjiusuo.
MS. Zhang, T. et al (1974) Ming Shi [History of the Ming Dynasty]. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.
Nexon, D.H. (2009) The Struggle for Power in Early Modern Europe: Religious Conflict, Dynastic Empires, and International Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Organski, A.F.K. (1958) World Politics. New York: Knopf.
Organski, A.F.K. and Kugler, J. (1980) The War Ledger. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Perdue, P.C. (2005) China Marches West: The Qing Conquest of Central Eurasia. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Pollack, D. (1986) The Fracture of Meaning: Japan’s Synthesis of China from the Eighth through the Eighteenth Centuries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ross, R.S. (2006) Balance of power politics and the rise of China: Accommodation and balancing in East Asia. Security Studies 15 (3): 355–395.
Rossabi, M. (1975) China and Inner Asia: From 1368 to the Present Day. London: Thames and Hudson.
Ruggie, J.G. (1998) Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization. London: Routledge.
Sansom, G. (1961) A History of Japan, 1334–1615. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Serruys, H. (1955) Sino-Jurchen Relations during the Yong-lo Period (1403–1424). Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
Serruys, H. (1967) Sino-Mongol Relations during the Ming, II: The Tribute System and Diplomatic Missions (1400–1600). Bruxelles, Belgium: Institut Belge Des Hautes Etudes Chinoises.
Shambaugh, D. (ed.) (2005) Power Shift: China and Asia’s New Dynamics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Sharman, J.C. (2013) International hierarchies and contemporary imperial governance: A tale of three kingdoms. European Journal of International Relations 19 (2): 189–207.
Sun, W. (2007) Daming qihao yu xiao zhonghua yishi: Chaoxian wangchao zunzhou siming sixiang yanjiu, 1637–1800 [The Great Ming Flag and the Little China Consciousness: the Chosŏn Dynasty’s Reverence of the Zhou and Remembrance of the Ming, 1637–1800]. Beijing: Shangwu yinshuguang.
Sun, W. (2008) On the Chosŏn dynasty’s idea of admiring China. In: S. Chen (ed.) Confucian Civilization and Traditional Sino-Korean Relations. Shandong, China: Shandong University Press, pp. 48–65.
Swope, K. (2009) A Dragon’s Head and a Serpent’s Tail: Ming China and the First Great East Asian War, 1592–1598. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
Takeo, T. and Sakai, R. (1977) Japan’s relations with the overseas countries. In: J.W. Hall and T. Takeshi (eds.) Japan in the Muromachi Age. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 159–178.
Thompson, W.R. (2006) Systemic leadership, evolutionary processes, and international relations theory: The unipolarity question. International Studies Review 8 (1): 1–22.
Toby, R.P. (1977) Reopening the question of Sakoku: Diplomacy in the legitimation of the Tokugawa Bakufu. Journal of Japanese Studies 3 (2): 323–363.
Toby, R.P. (1984) State and Diplomacy in Early Modern Japan: Asia in the Development of the Tokugawa Bakufu. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Vuving, A.L. (2009) Operated by world views and interfaced by world orders: Traditional and modern Sino-Vietnamese relations. In: A. Reid and Y. Zheng (eds.) Negotiating Asymmetry: China’s Place in Asia. Singapore: NUS Press, pp. 73–92.
Waldron, A. (1990) The Great Wall of China: From History to Myth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walker, H.D. (1971) The Yi-Ming Rapprochement: Sino-Korean Foreign Relations, 1392–1592, PhD diss., University of California, Los Angeles.
Waltz, K. (1979) Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Wang, Y. (1953) Official Relations Between China and Japan, 1368–1549. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wang, Y. (2008) An exploration of Kwanghaegun’s duel-track policy toward the Ming and the late Jin. In: S. Chen (ed.) Confucian Civilization and Traditional Sino-Korean Relations. Shandong, China: Shandong University Press, pp. 209–127.
Wang, Y.K. (2010) Power and Hierarchy in the East Asian Tribute System. Paper prepared for the Roundtable on the Nature of Political and Spiritual Relations among Asian Leaders and Polities from the 14th to the 18th Centuries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Watson, A. (1992) The Evolution of International Society: A Comparative Historical Analysis. New York: Routledge.
Weber, K. (2000) Hierarchy amidst Anarchy: Transaction Costs and Institutional Choice. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Wendt, A. (1999) Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wendt, A. and Friedheim, D. (1995) Hierarchy under anarchy: Informal empire and the East German state. International Organization 49 (4): 689–721.
Wills Jr J.E. (1984) Embassies and Illusions: Dutch and Portuguese Envoys to K’ang-hsi, 1666–1687. Cambridge, MA: Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University.
Wohlforth, W.C. (2008) Realism and foreign policy. In: S. Smith, A. Hadfield and T. Dunne (eds.) Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors, Cases. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 31–48.
Womack, B. (2006) China and Vietnam: The Politics of Asymmetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zhang, F. (2009) Rethinking the ‘tribute system’: Broadening the conceptual horizon of historical East Asian politics. Chinese Journal of International Politics 2 (4): 545–574.
Zhang, S. and Guo, H. (2006) Zhongri guanxi shi: Di yi juan [A History of Sino-Japanese Relations, Volume I ]. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.
Acknowledgements
This article was presented at the roundtable on the nature of political and spiritual relations among Asian leaders and polities from the 14th to the 18th centuries, Institute of Asian Research, University of British Columbia, 19–21 April 2010. I thank Michael van Walt for the invitation, and the roundtable participants, particularly Victoria Hui and Yuan-kang Wang, for their comments. I am also grateful to David Kang, Peter Katzenstein and Richard Ned Lebow for valuable feedback.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, F. How hierarchic was the historical East Asian system?. Int Polit 51, 1–22 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2013.44
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2013.44