Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating Doctoral Programmes in Africa: Context and Practices

  • Article
  • Published:
Higher Education Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Models of doctoral education in Africa remained similar to those in European universities, well into the 2000s. However, there has been an increasing realisation that such programmes are ill-suited for the African realities. With recent efforts to revitalise higher education in Africa, considerable attention has been placed on the need to explore more effective models of doctoral education, better suited to the African context. Doctoral education is key to this rebuilding as it offers the potential for developing skilled staff for academic and research institutions, and is central to the development of much-needed locally relevant knowledge in Africa. In the last decade, innovative programmes have emerged that make use of partnerships to achieve more than individual institutions could, working alone. This paper examines the constraints, challenges and opportunities in African doctoral education and identifies critical elements of doctoral education that have particular nuances in the African context. We propose a framework for evaluating the suitability of the structure and practices of such programmes. We review two of the more successful collaborative Ph.D. programmes with reference to this framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASSAf (2010) The PhD Study: An Evidence-Based Study on How to Meet the Demands for High-Level Skills in an Emerging Economy, Pretoria: Academy of Science of South Africa (ASSAf).

  • Backhouse, J. (2008) ‘African paths to and from the PhD and the implications for developing academic practice’. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Preparing for Academic Practice: Disciplinary Perspectives; 8–9 April, University of Oxford, UK.

  • Backhouse, J. (2009) ‘Doctoral education in South Africa: Models, pedagogies and student experiences’, Ph.D. thesis, Department of Education, University of the Witwatersrand.

  • Backhouse, J. (2011) ‘Doctoral discourses in South Africa’, Perspectives in Education 29 (3): 30–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleiklie, I. and Høstaker, R. (2004) ‘Modernizing research training-education and science policy between profession, discipline and academic institution’, Higher Education Policy 17 (2): 221–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blume, S. (1995) Problems and Prospects of Research Training in the 1990s. Research Training: Present and Future, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boote, D.N. and Beile, P. (2005) ‘Scholars before researchers: on the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation’, Educational Researcher 34 (6): 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnoy, M. (2000) My Reflections on the South African PhD Consortium Pilot, Cape Town: University of Cape Town.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, M. (2001) ‘Core course(s) for fledgling researchers and their faculty. University of the Witwatersrand response to the RTG pre-conference questionnaire’, Spencer Foundation Research Training Grant Conference; 15–16 March, Los Angeles, California.

  • Cross, M. and Graham, A. (2001) Doctoral Programme in Educational Policy Studies, University of the Witwatersrand, South African Doctoral Consortium (student booklet), Johannesburg.

  • Cross, M. (ed.) (1999) ‘Networks and Net-Works: A Review of Inter-Institutional Linkages in South African University Education’, in No Easy Road: Transforming Higher Education in South Africa, Cape Town: Maskew Miller Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • CSESA (2001) ‘Towards the implementation of a structured doctoral degree in education policy research in South Africa’, report to Spencer Foundation, Consortium of Schools of Education in South Africa (CSESA).

  • DFID (2012) ‘Annual review of the African Economic Research Consortium’, 9 May. Retrieved from http://projects.dfid.gov.uk/iati/Document//3531284, accessed on 22 September 2013.

  • Dietz, A.J., Jansen, J.D. and Wadee, A.A. (2006) Effective PhD Supervision and Mentorship: A Workbook Based on Experiences from South Africa and the Netherlands, Amsterdam: UNISA Press and Rozenberg Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhart, M. and De Haan, R.L. (2005) ‘Doctoral preparation of scientifically based education researchers’, Educational Researcher 34 (4): 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golde, C. and Walker, G. (2006) Envisioning the Future of Doctoral Education: Preparing Stewards of the Discipline, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heen, E.F. (2002) ‘Research priorities and disciplinary cultures: friends or foes? A cross-national study on doctoral research training in economics in France and Norway’, Higher Education Policy 15 (1): 77–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, J.D. (2011) ‘The quality of doctoral education in South Africa: a question of significance’, Perspectives in Education 29 (3): 139–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, M.R. (1990) ‘New process technology, job design, and work organization: a contingency model’, American Sociological Review 55 (2): 191–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyakurwa, W. (2007) ‘The Experience of AERC in Research, Capacity Building, and the Development of Collaborative Training Programs’, in F. Bourguignon, Y. Elkana and B. Pleskovic (eds.) Capacity Building in Economics Education and Research. Washington DC: The World Bank, pp. 135–159.

  • Machel, J.L. (2006) ‘Postgraduate research training: a case of the South African Doctoral Consortium’, Master’s thesis, School of Education, University of the Witwatersrand.

  • Malcolm, C. (2001) ‘Core course(s) for fledgling researchers and their faculty. University of Durban-Westville response to the RTG pre-conference questionnaire’, Spencer Foundation Research Training Grant Conference; 15–16 March, Los Angeles, California.

  • McCarthy, F., Bader, W. and Pleskovic, B. (2003) ‘Creating partnerships for capacity building in developing countries: the experience of the World Bank’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3099. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3099, accessed on 28 February 2014.

  • Mintrop, R. (2000) My Reflections on the South African PhD Consortium Pilot, Cape Town: University of Cape Town.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouton, J. (2001) How to Succeed in Your Master's and Doctoral Studies: A South African Guide and Resource Book, Pretoria: van Schaik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouton, J. (2011) ‘Doctoral production in South Africa: statistics, challenges and responses’, Perspectives in Education 29 (3): 13–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerad, M. (2004) ‘The PhD in the US: criticisms, facts, and remedies’, Higher Education Policy 17 (2): 183–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1967) ‘A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations’, American Sociological Review 32 (2): 194–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuel, M. and Vithal, R. (2011) ‘Emergent frameworks of research teaching and learning in a cohort-based doctoral programme’, Perspectives in Education 29 (3): 76–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyerr, A. (2004) ‘Challenges facing African universities’, African Studies Review 47 (1): 1–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soudien, C. (2003) ‘Report for the consortium’. Paper presented at Spencer Foundation Research Training Grant Retreat; 9–11 January, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.

  • Spencer Foundation (2001) ‘Core course(s) for fledgling researchers and their faculty. Research Training Grant pre-conference questionnaire’, Spencer Foundation Research Training Grant Conference; 15–16 March, Los Angeles, California.

  • Szanton, D.L. and Manyika, S. (2002) PhD Programs in African Universities: Current Status and Future Prospects. Berkeley: The Institute of International Studies and Center for African Studies, University of California, Berkeley.

  • Van’t Land, H. (2011) Changing Nature of Doctoral Studies in sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges and Policy Development Opportunities at Six Universities in sub-Saharan Africa, Paris: International Association of Universities (IAU), http://www.iau-aiu.net/sites/all/files/IAUFinal%20Report_Doctoral%20Programmes.pdf, accessed 21 January 2014.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cross, M., Backhouse, J. Evaluating Doctoral Programmes in Africa: Context and Practices. High Educ Policy 27, 155–174 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2014.1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2014.1

Keywords

Navigation