Notes
The only emergency deviation was the Fund’s heavily circumscribed agreement with capital controls for handful program countries on a temporary basis.
References
Ban, Cornel. 2015. Austerity versus stimulus? Understanding fiscal policy change at the International Monetary Fund since the great recession. Governance 28 (2): 167–183.
Ban, Cornel. 2016. Ruling ideas: How global neoliberalism goes local. Oxford University Press.
Ban, Cornel. 2018. The professional Politics of the Austerity debate: Comparing the European Central Bank and the International Monetary Fund. In Public Administration (forthcoming).
Ban, Cornel, Leonard Seabrooke, and Sarah Freitas. 2016. Grey matter in shadow banking: international organizations and expert strategies in global financial governance. Review of International Political Economy 23 (6): 1001–1033.
Carstensen, Martin B. 2011. Paradigm man vs. the bricoleur: bricolage as an alternative vision of agency in ideational change. European political science review 3 (1): 147–167.
Gallagher, Kevin P. 2015. Countervailing monetary power: Re-regulating capital flows in Brazil and South Korea. Review of International Political Economy 22.1: 77–102.
Rommerskirchen, C. 2015. Debt and punishment: market discipline in the Eurozone. New Political Economy 20 (5): 752–782.
Thiemann, Matthias. 2018. The Growth of Shadow Banking: A Comparative Institutional Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thompson, Grahame F. 2017. Reform from within? Central banks and the reconfiguration of neoliberal monetary policy. In Alternatives to Neoliberalism: Towards Equality and Democracy, ed. Jones and O’Donnell, 139–158. Bristol: Policy Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ban, C. Ben Clift’s The IMF and the Politics of Austerity. Comp Eur Polit 18, 78–84 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-018-0151-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-018-0151-0