Skip to main content
Log in

Forecasting for cruise line revenue management

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management Aims and scope

Abstract

In recent years, the cruise line industry has become an exciting growth category in the leisure travel market. Like airlines and hotels, it reports all characteristics of revenue management (RM). Although RM has attracted widespread research interest in airline and hotel contexts, studies of cruise line revenue management are very limited. Using data from a major North American cruise company, we apply a variety of (24) forecasting methods, which are divided into three categories (non-pickup methods, classical pickup (CP) methods and advanced pickup (AP) methods), to generate forecasts of final bookings for the cruises that have not yet departed at a particular reading point. We use a two-stage framework to test alternative forecasting methods and compare their performance. We found the performance of multiplicative methods to be significantly worse. Among the additive methods, we find that classical methods perform the best, followed by AP and non-pickup methods. All CP methods with the exception of exponential smoothing with trend perform fairly well. Among AP methods, Autoregressive integrated moving average, linear regression and moving average (MA) produce the most accurate forecasts. Within non-pickup methods, MA is the most effective method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For confidentiality reasons, we cannot disclose the name of company and related details.

  2. Reading point is certain point of time that is of interest to us. At this point, some cruises have already departed and others are yet to depart.

  3. We use the term time-series method to refer to a method wherein future bookings are computed as a weighted average of past bookings. The time dimension is only captured through separate cruises (each represented by a distinct cruise ID) departing at different weeks.

  4. We use the term causal forecasting method to refer to a method wherein future bookings are expressed as a function of bookings on hand.

References

  • Ahmed, Z.U., Johnson, J.P., Ling, C.P., Fang, T.W. and Hui, A.K. (2002) Country-of-origin and brand effects on consumers’ evaluations of cruise lines. International Marketing Review 19 (2/3): 279–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biehn, N. (2006) A cruise ship is not a floating hotel. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management 5 (2): 135–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box, G.E.P. and Jenkins, G.M. (1970) Time Series Analysis, Forecasting and Control. San Francisco, CA: Holden Day.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. and Kachani, S. (2007) Forecasting and optimisation for hotel revenue management. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management 6 (3): 163–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duman, T. and Mattila, A.S. (2005) The role of affective factors on perceived cruise vacation value. Tourism Management 26: 311–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, L. and Forsyth, P. (1998) Economic significance of cruise tourism. Annals of Tourism Research 25 (2): 393–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorin, T.O. (2000) Airline revenue management: Sell-up and forecasting algorithms. Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Ji, L. and Mazzarella, J. (2007) Application of modified nested and dynamic class allocation models for cruise line revenue management. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management 6 (1): 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimes, S.E. (1989) Yield management: A tool for capacity-considered service firms. Journal of Operations Management 8 (4): 348–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladany, S.P. and Arbel, A. (1991) Optimal cruise-liner passenger cabin pricing policy. European Journal of Operational Research 55 (2): 136–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A.O. (1990) Airline reservations forecasting: Probabilistic and statistical models of the booking process. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Lieberman, W.H. and Dieck, T. (2002) Expanding the revenue management frontier: Optimal air planning in the cruise industry. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management 1 (1): 7–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littlewood, K. (1972) Forecasting and control of passenger bookings. Proceedings of the 12th Annual AGIFORS Symposium; Nathanya, Israel, Vol. 12, pp. 95–117, reprinted in Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 4 (2): 111–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marti, B.E. (2004) Trends in world and extended-length cruising (1985–2002). Marine Policy 28 (3): 199–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGill, J.I. and Van Ryzin, G.J. (1999) Revenue management: Research overview and prospects. Transportation Science 33 (2): 233–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qu, H. and Ping, E.W.Y. (1999) A service performance model of Hong Kong cruise travelers’ motivation factors and satisfaction. Tourism Management 20: 237–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrick, J.F. (2004) Are loyal visitors desired visitors? Tourism Management 25: 463–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrick, J.F. (2005) Segmenting cruise passengers with price sensitivity. Tourism Management 26: 753–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes, M.H. (2006) Hybrid forecasting for airline yield management in semi-restricted fare structures. Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Sa, J. (1987) Reservation forecasting in airline yield management. Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Skwarek, D.K. (1996) Competitive impacts of yield management system components: forecasting and sell-up models. Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Talluri, K. and van Ryzin, J. (2004) The Theory and Practice of Revenue Management. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Teye, V.B. and Leclerc, D. (1998) Product and service delivery satisfaction among North American cruise passengers. Tourism Management 19 (2): 153–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toh, R.S., Rivers, M.J. and Ling, T.W. (2005) Room occupancies: Cruise lines out-do the hotels. International Journal of Hospitality Management 24 (1): 121–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weatherford, L.R. (1998) Forecasting issues in revenue management. In: Presentation at Spring INFORMS Conference, Montreal, Canada.

  • Weatherford, L.R. and Kimes, S.E. (2003) A comparison of forecasting methods for hotel revenue management. International Journal of Forecasting 19 (3): 401–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weatherford, L.R., Kimes, S.E. and Scott, D.A. (2001) Forecasting for hotel revenue management: Testing aggregation against disaggregation. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly 42: 53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickham, R.R. (1995) Evaluation of forecasting techniques for short-term demand of air transportation. Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Wie, B.-W. (2004) Open-loop and closed-loop models of dynamic oligopoly in the cruise line industry. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research 21 (4): 517–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeni, R.H. (2001) Improved forecast accuracy in revenue management by unconstraining demand estimates from censored data. PhD dissertation, ProQuest Information and Learning Company.

  • Zickus, J.S. (1998) Forecasting for airline network revenue management: Revenue and competitive impacts. Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sun, X., Gauri, D. & Webster, S. Forecasting for cruise line revenue management. J Revenue Pricing Manag 10, 306–324 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/rpm.2009.55

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/rpm.2009.55

Keywords

Navigation