Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A coupled linear programming model with geospatial dynamic trip assignment for global-scale intermodal transportation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Maritime Economics & Logistics Aims and scope

Abstract

We present an ad hoc geospatial origin–destination model that utilizes the rudiments of operations research optimization techniques to estimate feasible multimodal routes that may or may not be geospatially connected. The model is designed to determine and optimize large-scale container flows from US trade partners to inland markets mainly located within the lower 48 states. The dynamic traffic assignment for the freight flow considers several factors such as congestion, volume/capacity (V/C) ratio, throughput and distance-based impedance and the Geographic Information Systems platform provides a visualization environment for all feasible routes. Visual analytics with the resultant geographical distribution maps indicate that maritime containers are concentrated on the West Coast whereas rail shipments are densely concentrated along rail transshipment points such as Chicago, Memphis and Dallas. The highway transportation densities are mainly visible with origins from marine ports to associated market destinations starting from hinterland and radiating further away from these primal areas to other inland intermodal terminals that serve major landlocked metropolitan cities that are not served by railway networks. Our critical finding indicates that some routes, which are not generally considered as prime routes, may actually offer the best alternatives especially when considering global supply chains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 6
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Association of Port Authorities (AAPA). (2011) North American container port traffic in TEUs, http://www.aapa-ports.org/statistics/, accessed 13 November 2011.

  • Fan, L. (2010) Optimization model for container shipment to USA. PhD dissertation, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA.

  • Fan, L., Wilson, W.W. and Tolliver, D. (2010a) Logistical rivalries and port competition for container flows to US markets: Impacts of changes in Canada’s logistics system and expansion of the Panama Canal. Maritime Economics & Logistics 11 (4): 327–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, L., Wilson, W.W. and Tolliver, D. (2010b) Optimal network flows for containerized imports to the United States. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 46 (5): 735–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Insights. (2007) Implications if larger share of imports comes through Mexican and Canadian ports and is transferred to rail/trucks for transport into the United States. Washington DC, USA. Commission Briefing Paper 4B-03 for National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission.

  • Janic, M. (2007) Modeling the full costs of an intermodal and road freight transport network. Transportation Research Part D 12 (1): 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leachman, R.C. (2008) Port and modal allocation of waterborne containerized import from Asia to the United States. Transportation Research Part E 44 (2): 313–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leachman, R.C. (2010) Port and Modal Elasticity Study, Phase II. CA, USA: Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). Final Report.

  • Leachman, R.C., Theodore, P. and Thomas, B.R. (2005) Port and Modal Elasticity Study. California, USA: Southern California Association of Governments.

  • Lee, E. (2011) Spatiotemporal Simulation Model for Global Containerized Freight in North America. PhD dissertation, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA 58103.

  • Lee, E. and Farahmand, K. (2009) Considering Impedance for Intermodal Freight Transportation. In: J.C. Smith and J. Geunes (eds.) Innovations Revealed. Proceedings of the 2009 Institute of Industrial Engineering Research Conference (IERC); 30 May – 3 June, Miami, FL, USA, pp. 1345–1350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E., Oduor, G.P., Farahmand, K. and Tolliver, D. (2011) Heuristic path-enumeration approach for container trip generation and assignment. Journal of Transportation Research Forum 50 (3): 7–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E., Oduor, G.P. and Farahmand, K. (2012) Simplistic geospatial techniques in analyzing transportation dynamics for origin-destination container movement routes in the United States. Journal of Transportation System Engineering and Information Technology 12 (1): 79–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, B., Nozick, L. and Jones, D. (2009a) Estimating an origin-destination table for us imports of waterborne containerized freight. Transportation Research E 45 (4): 611–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, B., Nozick, L. and Jones, D. (2009b) Estimating an origin-destination table for US exports of waterborne containerized freight. Maritime Economics and Logistics 11 (2): 137–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, S.M. and Ammah-Tagoe, F. (2007) How freight moves: Estimating mileage and routes using an innovative GIS tool. Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Department of Transportation: Washington DC, USA, http://www.bts.gov/publications/bts_technical_report/2007_07_13/html/entire.html, accessed 30 November 2009.

  • LINDO. (2007) LINGO User’s Guide: the Modeling Language and Optimization. Chicago, IL: LINDO Systems.

  • Luo, M. (2002) Container transportation service demand simulation model for US coastal container ports. PhD dissertation, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA.

  • Luo, M. and Grigalunas, T.A. (2003) A spatial-economic multimodal transportation simulation model for US coastal container ports. Maritime Economics and Logistics 5 (2): 158–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malchow, M.B. and Kanafani, A. (2004) A disaggregate analysis of port selection. Transportation Research Part E 40 (4): 317–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, W.A. and McGuckin, N.A. (1998) Travel Estimation Technique of Urban Planning. Washington DC, USA. Transportation Research Board, National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 365.

  • Middendorf, P.D. (1998) Intermodal Terminal Database: Concepts, Design, Implementation, and Maintenance. Oak Ridge, TN: Center for Transportation Analysis, Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (2009) SIERRA: System for Import/Export Routing and Recovery Analysis. Albuquerque, NM: National Infrastructure Simulation and Analysis Center, Sandia National Laboratory.

  • NSTPRSC (National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission). (2007) Transportation for Tomorrow. Washington DC: USA. Report of the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission, http://transportationfortomorrow.com/final_report/report_html.htm, accessed 3 April 2011.

  • O’Kelly, E.M. (1986) The location of interacting hub facilities. Transportation Science 20 (2): 92–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). (2004) Railroad Network. Center for Transportation Analysis, http://cta.ornl.gov/transnet/RailRoads.html, accessed 13 March 2009.

  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). (2009) Intermodal Transportation Network. Center for Transportation Analysis: Battelle, TN, http://cta.ornl.gov/transnet, accessed 1 April 2011.

  • Parola, F. and Sciomachen, A. (2005) Intermodal container flows in a port system network: Analysis of possible growths via simulation models. International Journal of Production Economics 97 (1): 75–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Racunica, I. and Wynter, L. (2005) Optimal location of intermodal freight hubs. Transportation Research Part B 39 (5): 453–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigue, J.-P., Comtis, C. and Slack, B. (2009) The Geography of Transport Systems. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southworth, F. and Peterson, E.B. (2000) Intermodal and international freight network modeling. Transportation Research Part C 8 (1–6): 147–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavasszy, L., Minderhoud, M., Perrin, J.-F. and Notteboom, T. (2011) A strategic network choice model for global container flows: Specification, estimation and application. Journal of Transport Geography 19 (6): 1163–1172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tongzon, L.J. (2009) Port choice and freight forwarders. Transportation Research E 45 (1): 86–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Transportation. (2008) Economic Data: Waybill. Washington DC, USA: Surface Transportation Board.

  • U.S. Department of Transportation. (2011) America’s Container Ports: Linking Markets at Home and Abroad. Washington DC, USA: Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Bureau of Transportation Statistics.

  • Villalobos, J.R., Sanchez, O., Maltz, A. and Ahumada, O. (2009) Incentives of an alternative route: Finding the logistics capacity of a multimodal corridor. Industrial Engineer 41 (7): 39–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woudsma, C., Jensen, J.F., Kanaroglou, P. and Maoh, H. (2008) Logistics land use and the city: A spatial-temporal modeling approach. Transportation Research Part E 44 (2): 277–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This manuscript benefited greatly from the careful reviews of two Maritime Economics and Logistics reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute, Fargo, 58108-6050, ND, USA

    EunSu Lee

  2. Department of Geoscience, North Dakota State University, Fargo, 58105, ND, USA

    Peter G Oduor

  3. Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, North Dakota State University, Fargo, 58105, ND, USA

    Kambiz Farahmand

  4. Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute, Fargo, 58102, ND, USA

    Denver Tolliver

Authors
  1. EunSu Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter G Oduor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kambiz Farahmand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Denver Tolliver
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, E., Oduor, P., Farahmand, K. et al. A coupled linear programming model with geospatial dynamic trip assignment for global-scale intermodal transportation. Marit Econ Logist 16, 33–54 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2013.22

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2013.22

Keywords

Search

Navigation