Endosc Int Open 2016; 04(07): E820-E827
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-107789
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Bowel preparation in pediatric colonoscopy: results of an open observational study

Thomas Berger
1   Vestische Kinder- und Jugendklinik Datteln, University of Witten-Herdecke, Datteln, Germany
,
Martin Classen
2   Department of Child and Adolescent Medicine, Klinikum Links der Weser, Bremen, Germany
,
Harald Engelhardt
3   Kinderkrankenhaus Sankt Marien, Landshut, Germany
,
Klaus-Michael Keller
4   Division of Child and Adolescent Medicine, Deutsche Klinik für Diagnostik, Wiesbaden, Germany
,
Martin W. Laass
5   Department of Child and Adolescent Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
,
Ralph Melchior
6   Praxis für Kinder und Jugendliche, Kassel, Germany
,
Carsten Posovszky
7   Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany
,
Burkhard Rodeck
8   Christliches Kinderhospital, Osnabrück, Germany
,
Katharina Schaper
9   Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Witten-Herdecke, Witten, Germany
,
Rolf Behrens
10   Department of Newborn, Child and Adolescent Medicine, Klinikum Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted: 08 April 2015

accepted after revision: 25 April 2016

Publication Date:
02 June 2016 (online)

Background and study aims: The goal of this study was to analyze the bowel cleansing methods currently used for pediatric colonoscopy in terms of effectiveness, tolerance and safety.

Patients and methods: Data from 768 colonoscopies reported by 28 centers were registered in an online database for further analysis. Binary logistic regression was used to determine how preparation methods affected the cleaning effect (Aronchick score) and the rate of adverse events (Aes) and complications.

Results: The most frequently reported cleansing agents were sodium picosulphate (54.2 %) and polyethylene-glycol (41.3 %) in various combinations. The cleaning effect was good to excellent in 72.6 % of patients. AEs during the preparation period occurred in 21.5 % of patients. Complications during endoscopy were reported in 12.1 % and were mostly mild. The different agents had no influence on the cleaning effect. In contrast the risk of AEs during preparation was significantly increased when polyethylene-glycol was used (odds ratio (OR) 2.112, P = 0.002) but reduced with the use of sodium picosulphate (OR 0.380, P < 0.001). In particular, the risk of needing a nasogastric tube to complete clean-out was about 10-fold higher when polyethylene-glycol was used.

Conclusions: A large variety of regimens are used for bowel preparation in children. We found a good overall cleaning result independent of the agents used. Cleansing agents, on the other hand, had a significant influence on tolerance and safety.

* academic centers


 
  • References

  • 1 Rex DK, Imperiale TF, Latinovic DR et al. Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 1696-1700
  • 2 Steffen RM, Wyllie R, Sivak MV et al. Colonoscopy in the pediatric patient. J Pediatr 1989; 115: 507-514
  • 3 Abbas MI, Nylund CM, Bruch CJ et al. Prospective evaluation of 1-day polyethylene glycol-3350 bowel preparation regimen in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2013; 56: 220-224
  • 4 Da Silva MM, Briars GL, Patrick MK et al. Colonoscopy preparation in children: safety, efficacy, and tolerance of high- versus low-volume cleansing methods. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1997; 24: 33-37
  • 5 Gremse DA, Sacks AI, Raines S. Comparison of oral sodium phosphate to polyethylene glycol-based solution for bowel preparation for colonoscopy in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1996; 23: 586-590
  • 6 Sondheimer JM, Sokol RJ, Taylor SF et al. Safety, efficacy, and tolerance of intestinal lavage in pediatric patients undergoing diagnostic colonoscopy. J Pediatr 1991; 119: 148-152
  • 7 Terry NA, Chen-Lim ML, Ely E et al. Polyethylene glycol powder solution versus senna for bowel preparation for colonoscopy in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2013; 56: 215-219
  • 8 Walia R, Steffen R, Feinberg L et al. Tolerability, safety, and efficacy of PEG 3350 as a 1-day bowel preparation in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2013; 56: 225-228
  • 9 Hunter A, Mamula P. Bowel preparation for pediatric colonoscopy procedures. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2010; 51: 254-261
  • 10 Jibaly R, LaChance J, Lecea NA et al. The utility of PEG3350 without electrolytes for 2-day colonoscopy preparation in children. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2011; 21: 318-321
  • 11 Kierkus J, Horvath A, Szychta M et al. High- versus low-volume polyethylene glycol plus laxative versus sennosides for colonoscopy preparation in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2013; 57: 230-235
  • 12 Phatak UP, Johnson S, Husain SZ et al. Two-day bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol 3350 and bisacodyl: a new, safe, and effective regimen for colonoscopy in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2011; 53: 71-74
  • 13 Turner D, Levine A, Weiss B et al. Evidence-based recommendations for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy in children: a report from a national working group. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 1063-1070
  • 14 Aronchick C, Lipshutz W, Wright S et al. Validation of an instrument to assess colon cleansing. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94: 2667
  • 15 ASGE Standards of Practice Committee. Saltzman JR, Cash BD, Pasha SF et al. Bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 781-794
  • 16 Kawakami E, Portorreal A, Scuissiatto ML et al. [Bowel preparation for colonoscopy with sodium picosulphate and magnesium citrate in children and adolescents]. Arq Gastroenterol 2004; 41: 33-36
  • 17 Pashankar DS, Uc A, Bishop WP. Polyethylene glycol 3350 without electrolytes: a new safe, effective, and palatable bowel preparation for colonoscopy in children. J Pediatr 2004; 144: 358-362
  • 18 Pinfield A, Stringer MD. Randomised trial of two pharmacological methods of bowel preparation for day case colonoscopy. Arch Dis Child 1999; 80: 181-183
  • 19 Shaoul R, Haloon L. An assessment of bisacodyl-based bowel preparation for colonoscopy in children. J Gastroenterol 2007; 42: 26-28
  • 20 Turner D, Benchimol EI, Dunn H et al. Pico-Salax versus polyethylene glycol for bowel cleanout before colonoscopy in children: a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 1038-1045
  • 21 Di Nardo G, Aloi M, Cucchiara S et al. Bowel preparations for colonoscopy: An RCT. Pediatrics 2014; 134: 249-256
  • 22 Jimenez-Rivera C, Haas D, Boland M et al. Comparison of two common outpatient preparations for colonoscopy in children and youth. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2009; 2009: 518932
  • 23 Safder S, Demintieva Y, Rewalt M et al. Stool consistency and stool frequency are excellent clinical markers for adequate colon preparation after polyethylene glycol 3350 cleansing protocol: a prospective clinical study in children. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68: 1131-1135
  • 24 Hassall E, Lobe TE. Risky business: oral sodium phosphate for precolonoscopy bowel preparation in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2007; 45: 268-269
  • 25 Lawrance IC, Willert RP, Murray K. Bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: prospective randomized assessment of efficacy and of induced mucosal abnormality with three preparation agents. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 412-418
  • 26 Nam SY, Choi IJ, Park KW et al. Risk of hemorrhagic gastropathy associated with colonoscopy bowel preparation using oral sodium phosphate solution. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 109-113