Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2022; 16(04): 756-760
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1736331
Original Article

The Durability of Zirconia/Resin Composite Shear Bond Strength using Different Functional Monomer of Universal Adhesives

Awiruth Klaisiri
1   Division of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand
,
Nantawan Krajangta
1   Division of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand
,
Niyom Thamrongananskul
2   Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
› Author Affiliations Funding This study was supported by the Thammasat University Research Fund of Thammasat University, Thailand, Contract No. TUFT 028/2563.
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective This study examined the effectiveness of different functional monomers in universal adhesives on zirconia/resin composite bond strength both before and after thermocycling. Four universal adhesives (G-premio bond universal, GPU; Clearfil Tri-S bond universal, CTB; Optibond Universal, OBU; Tetric N-bond universal; TNU), one adhesive (single bond 2; SB2), and one ceramic primer (Clearfil ceramic primer plus, CCP) were used in this study.

Materials and Methods Zirconia discs were prepared and embedded in acrylic. Specimens were polished and sandblasted with alumina. The specimens were randomly divided into two groups (24 hours and the thermocycled), and each group was divided into six subgroups (n = 10), according to zirconia surfaces treatments: no Tx, CCP + SB2, GPU, CTB, OBU, TNU. An Ultradent mold was located on top of the treated zirconia surface. The resin composite was filled into the mold and then light-cured. A universal testing device was used to determine the shear bond strength.

Statistical Analysis The data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test.

Results After water storage for 24 hours, the shear bond strengths were GPU > CCP + SB2 = CTB = OBU = TNU > no Tx (p < 0.05). After thermocycling, the shear bond strengths were CCP + SB2 = GPU = CTB = TNU > OBU > no Tx (p < 0.05).

Conclusion The universal adhesives containing 10-MDP exhibited the best performance in the shear bond strength of the zirconia/resin composite interface both before and after thermocycling.

Keywords

resin composite - shear bond strength - universal adhesive - zirconia


Publication History

Article published online:
13 December 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Miyazaki T, Nakamura T, Matsumura H, Ban S, Kobayashi T. Current status of zirconia restoration. J Prosthodont Res 2013; 57 (04) 236-261
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Schley JS, Heussen N, Reich S, Fischer J, Haselhuhn K, Wolfart S. Survival probability of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses up to 5 yr: a systematic review of the literature. Eur J Oral Sci 2010; 118 (05) 443-450
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Ozcan M, Valandro LF, Pereira SM, Amaral R, Bottino MA, Pekkan G. Effect of surface conditioning modalities on the repair bond strength of resin composite to the zirconia core / veneering ceramic complex. J Adhes Dent 2013; 15 (03) 207-210
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Han IH, Kang DW, Chung CH, Choe HC, Son MK. Effect of various intraoral repair systems on the shear bond strength of composite resin to zirconia. J Adv Prosthodont 2013; 5 (03) 248-255
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Mesquita AMM, Al-Haj Husain N, Molinero-Mourelle P, Özcan M. An intraoral repair method for chipping fracture of a multi-unit fixed zirconia reconstruction: A direct dental technique. Eur J Dent 2021; 15 (01) 174-178
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Chen L, Suh BI, Brown D, Chen X. Bonding of primed zirconia ceramics: evidence of chemical bonding and improved bond strengths. Am J Dent 2012; 25 (02) 103-108
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Kadoma Y. Surface treatment agent for dental metals using a thiirane monomer and a phosphoric acid monomer. Dent Mater J 2002; 21 (02) 156-169
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Fukegawa D, Hayakawa S, Yoshida Y, Suzuki K, Osaka A, Van Meerbeek B. Chemical interaction of phosphoric acid ester with hydroxyapatite. J Dent Res 2006; 85 (10) 941-944
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Van Landuyt KL, Yoshida Y, Hirata I. et al. Influence of the chemical structure of functional monomers on their adhesive performance. J Dent Res 2008; 87 (08) 757-761
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999; 27 (02) 89-99
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Negreiros WM, Ambrosano GMB, Giannini M. Effect of cleaning agent, primer application and their combination on the bond strength of a resin cement to two yttrium-tetragonal zirconia polycrystal zirconia ceramics. Eur J Dent 2017; 11 (01) 6-11
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Mendes F, Zanini MM, Favarão J. et al. Bonding strength of luting cement to zirconia-based ceramic under different surface treatments. Eur J Dent 2019; 13 (02) 222-228
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Blatz MB, Phark JH, Ozer F. et al. In vitro comparative bond strength of contemporary self-adhesive resin cements to zirconium oxide ceramic with and without air-particle abrasion. Clin Oral Investig 2010; 14 (02) 187-192
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Shin YJ, Shin Y, Yi YA. et al. Evaluation of the shear bond strength of resin cement to Y-TZP ceramic after different surface treatments. Scanning 2014; 36 (05) 479-486
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Quaas AC, Yang B, Kern M. Panavia F 2.0 bonding to contaminated zirconia ceramic after different cleaning procedures. Dent Mater 2007; 23 (04) 506-512
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Zhang S, Kocjan A, Lehmann F, Kosmac T, Kern M. Influence of contamination on resin bond strength to nano-structured alumina-coated zirconia ceramic. Eur J Oral Sci 2010; 118 (04) 396-403
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Zakavi F, Mombeini M, Dibazar S, Gholizadeh S. Evaluation of shear bond strength of zirconia to composite resin using different adhesive systems. J Clin Exp Dent 2019; 11 (03) e257-e263
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Liu X, Jiang X, Xu T, Zhao Q, Zhu S. Investigating the shear bond strength of five resin-based luting agents to zirconia ceramics. J Oral Sci 2020; 62 (01) 84-88
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Seabra B, Arantes-Oliveira S, Portugal J. Influence of multimode universal adhesives and zirconia primer application techniques on zirconia repair. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112 (02) 182-187
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Celik G, Ismatullaev A, Sari T, Usumez A. Comparison of the effectiveness of bonding composite to zirconia as a repair method. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 2016; 13 (02) 405-411
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Feitosa VP, Ogliari FA, Van Meerbeek B. et al. Can the hydrophilicity of functional monomers affect chemical interaction?. J Dent Res 2014; 93 (02) 201-206
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Feitosa VP, Sauro S, Ogliari FA. et al. Impact of hydrophilicity and length of spacer chains on the bonding of functional monomers. Dent Mater 2014; 30 (12) e317-e323
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Yoshida K, Tsuo Y, Atsuta M. Bonding of dual-cured resin cement to zirconia ceramic using phosphate acid ester monomer and zirconate coupler. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2006; 77 (01) 28-33
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Reis A, Leite TM, Matte K. et al. Improving clinical retention of one-step self-etching adhesive systems with an additional hydrophobic adhesive layer. J Am Dent Assoc 2009; 140 (07) 877-885
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar