Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1719128
Hearing Protection Success: Musicians Have a Favorable Response to Hearing Protection and Listeners Are Unable to Identify Music Produced by Musicians Wearing Hearing Protection
Abstract
Background Musicians are known to be at risk for developing hearing sensitivity and hearing-related problems given their occupational exposure to high-level sound. Among options for hearing conservation, earplugs are an effective and inexpensive choice. Adoption rates for musicians' earplugs remains consistently low, however, given concerns about the impact of hearing protection on their own performance as well as concerns that the resultant music will be a negative experience for listeners. In fact, few studies have (1) examined musicians' attitudes about using hearing protection while performing themselves and (2) determined whether music played by musicians wearing hearing protection sounds different to listeners.
Purpose The purposes of this study were (1) to evaluate how wearing musicians' earplugs affected musicians' perception of their performance while they were playing, and (2) to examine whether listeners can distinguish a difference between music recorded by musicians playing with and without earplugs.
Research Design Experiment 1: student musicians were recorded playing under two conditions (with and without wearing earplugs) and then were surveyed about their experience. Experiment 2: musically experienced and naïve listeners were presented with musical samples played by musicians with and without earplugs in an ABX format. Listeners responded by indicating whether the third stimulus (X) was conditionally identical to the first (A) or second stimulus (B).
Results Experiment 1: while performing, musicians always preferred the no earplugs condition. The majority, however, rated the overall experience of playing with earplugs as generally positive. Experiment 2: listeners were unable to hear a difference between the two recordings.
Discussion In this experiment, musicians rated their experience playing without hearing protection more favorably than their experience playing with hearing protection, but most musicians rated their experience with hearing protection as generally positive. The inability of listeners to distinguish a difference in music played with and without hearing protection suggests that the listening experience may not be adversely impacted by hearing protection worn by the performers.
Conclusion Earplugs are an inexpensive, noninvasive strategy for hearing conservation for musicians, and this study indicates that barriers to wearing hearing protection might be less problematic than previously reported.
Publication History
Received: 05 November 2019
Accepted: 17 April 2020
Article published online:
19 March 2021
© 2021. American Academy of Audiology. This article is published by Thieme.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Hagerman B. Musicians' ability to judge the risk of acquiring noise induced hearing loss. Noise Health 2013; 15 (64) 199-203
- 2 Department of Labor. Occupational Safety and Health Standards, (1981) Subpart G, Standard Number: 1910.95, Occupational Noise Exposure. Accessed September 13, 2020 at: https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.95
- 3 Laitinen H. Factors affecting the use of hearing protectors among classical music players. Noise Health 2005; 7 (26) 21-29
- 4 McBride D, Gill F, Proops D, Harrington M, Gardiner K, Attwell C. Noise and the classical musician. BMJ 1992; 305 (6868): 1561-1563
- 5 Jansen EJ, Helleman HW, Dreschler WA, de Laat JA. Noise induced hearing loss and other hearing complaints among musicians of symphony orchestras. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2009; 82 (02) 153-164
- 6 Phillips SL, Henrich VC, Mace ST. Prevalence of noise-induced hearing loss in student musicians. Int J Audiol 2010; 49 (04) 309-316
- 7 Jin S-H, Nelson PB, Schlauch RS, Carney E. Hearing conservation program for marching band members: a risk for noise-induced hearing loss?. Am J Audiol 2013; 22 (01) 26-39
- 8 Kujawa SG, Liberman MC. Adding insult to injury: cochlear nerve degeneration after “temporary” noise-induced hearing loss. J Neurosci 2009; 29 (45) 14077-14085
- 9 O'Brien I, Driscoll T, Ackermann B. Description and evaluation of a hearing conservation program in use in a professional symphony orchestra. Ann Occup Hyg 2015; 59 (03) 265-276
- 10 Cook-Cunningham SL. The effects of musician's earplugs on acoustic and perceptual measures of choral and solo sound. J Voice 2019; 33 (01) 87-95
- 11 Chesky K, Pair M, Yoshimura E, Landford S. An evaluation of musician earplugs with college music students. Int J Audiol 2009; 48 (09) 661-670
- 12 Huttunen KH, Sivonen VP, Pöykkö VT. Symphony orchestra musicians' use of hearing protection and attenuation of custom-made hearing protectors as measured with two different real-ear attenuation at threshold methods. Noise Health 2011; 13 (51) 176-188
- 13 Laitinen H, Poulsen T. Questionnaire investigation of musicians' use of hearing protectors, self reported hearing disorders, and their experience of their working environment. Int J Audiol 2008; 47 (04) 160-168
- 14 Helena Mendes M, Catalani Morata T, Mendes Marques J. Acceptance of hearing protection aids in members of an instrumental and voice music band. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed) 2007; 73 (06) 785-792
- 15 Diamond D. Romeo and Juliet, Overture and Balcony Scene. New York, NY: Boosey and Hawkes; 1944
- 16 Cook-Cunningham S. The Acclimatization Effects of Earplugs on Acoustic and Perceptual Measures of University Singers' Vocal Performances in Choral and Solo Settings. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Kansas; Lawrence, Kansas: 2013