Contouring the Mandible for Aesthetic Enhancement in Asian Patients

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

A prominent mandible that gives a squared face in Asians is considered unattractive as it imparts a coarse and masculine image. Mandibular contouring surgery allows slender oval faces. The purpose of conventional mandible reduction is to make the lower face appear slim in frontal view and to have a smooth contour in lateral view. As shaping the lateral contour of the mandible alone may result in minimal improvement in the frontal view, surgical techniques to reduce the width of the lower face through narrowing genioplasty (i.e., the “V-line” surgery) and sagittal resection of the lateral cortex should be combined. Examination of the shape and symmetry, the relationship between the maxilla and the mandible, understanding overlying soft tissue contribution, and understanding the overall balance of the face are mandatory. An important factor influencing ideal facial shape is patient's personal preference, which is often influenced by his/her ethnic and cultural background. Especially when consulting patients of different nationalities or ethnic backgrounds, careful attention should be paid to the patient's aesthetic sensibility regarding the ideal or desirable facial shape. Narrowing the chin and modification of chin shape can be accomplished by narrowing genioplasty with central strip resection. This midsymphyseal sectioning procedure yields safe and very satisfactory results. This procedure not only augments the narrowing effect by leaving soft tissues attached to the bone but also enables modification of chin shape by altering the shape of resection. The surgeon should customize the surgery based on a comprehensive assessment of the patient's preoperative chin and mandible morphology complemented by an assessment of their aesthetic goals.

Publication History

Article published online:
24 December 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

• References

• 1 Baek SM, Kim SS, Bindiger A. The prominent mandibular angle: preoperative management, operative technique, and results in 42 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989; 83 (02) 272-280
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Yang DB, Park CG. Mandibular contouring surgery for purely aesthetic reasons. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1991; 15 (01) 53-60
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Lee TS, Kim HY, Kim T, Lee JH, Park S. Importance of the chin in achieving a feminine lower face: narrowing the chin by the “mini V-line” surgery. J Craniofac Surg 2014; 25 (06) 2180-2183
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Park CG, Lee ET, Lee JS. Facial form analysis of the lower and middle face in young Korean women. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 96: 7-13
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Whitaker LA, Bartlett SP. Aesthetic surgery of the facial skeleton. Perspect Plast Surg 1988; 1: 23-69
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Whitaker LA. Aesthetic contouring of the facial support system. Clin Plast Surg 1989; 16 (04) 815-823
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Lee TS, Kim HY, Kim TH, Lee JH, Park S. Contouring of the lower face by a novel method of narrowing and lengthening genioplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133 (03) 274e-282e
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Park S, Noh JH. Importance of the chin in lower facial contour: narrowing genioplasty to achieve a feminine and slim lower face. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (01) 261-268
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Lee TS, Park S. Clockwise rotation of the occlusal plane for aesthetic purposes by double jaw surgery without orthodontic treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 144 (06) 1010e-1013e
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Lee TS. Standardization of surgical techniques used in facial bone contouring. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68 (12) 1694-1700
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Gui L, Yu D, Zhang Z, Changsheng LV, Tang X, Zheng Z. Intraoral one-stage curved osteotomy for the prominent mandibular angle: a clinical study of 407 cases. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2005; 29 (06) 552-557
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Deguchi M, Iio Y, Kobayashi K, Shirakabe T. Angle-splitting ostectomy for reducing the width of the lower face. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99 (07) 1831-1839
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Han K, Kim J. Reduction mandibuloplasty: ostectomy of the lateral cortex around the mandibular angle. J Craniofac Surg 2001; 12 (04) 314-325
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Hwang K, Lee DK, Lee WJ, Chung IH, Lee SI. A split ostectomy of mandibular body and angle reduction. J Craniofac Surg 2004; 15 (02) 341-346
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Jin H, Park SH, Kim BH. Sagittal split ramus osteotomy with mandible reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (02) 662-669
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Park S, Lee TS. Strategic considerations for effective sagittal resection of the mandible to achieve a slim and attractive jawline. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (01) 152-155
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Guyuron B, Raszewski RL. A critical comparison of osteoplastic and alloplastic augmentation genioplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1990; 14 (03) 199-206
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Gianni AB, D'Orto O, Biglioli F, Bozzetti A, Brusati R. Neurosensory alterations of the inferior alveolar and mental nerve after genioplasty alone or associated with sagittal osteotomy of the mandibular ramus. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2002; 30 (05) 295-303
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Westermark A, Bystedt H, von Konow L. Inferior alveolar nerve function after mandibular osteotomies. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998; 36 (06) 425-428
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Lo LJ, Wong FH, Chen YR. The position of the inferior alveolar nerve at the mandibular angle: an anatomic consideration for aesthetic mandibular angle reduction. Ann Plast Surg 2004; 53 (01) 50-55
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar