J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2018; 79(S 01): S1-S188
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1633475
Oral Presentations
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Skull Base 3D Modeling and Rapid Prototyping of Rigid Buttress for Gasket-Seal Closure Using Operative Endoscopic Imaging: Cadaveric Feasibility

James Shin
1   Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United States
,
Jonathan Forbes
2   NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, United States
,
Kurt Lehner
3   Hofstra-Northwell Health School of Medicine, Hempstead, New York, United States
,
Hilarie Tomasiewicz
2   NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, United States
,
Theodore Schwartz
1   Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United States
,
C. Douglas Phillips
1   Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
02 February 2018 (online)

 

Background Skull base reconstruction following endonasal transsphenoidal tumor resection is a focus of active technical development that has seen steady evolution of multiple approaches to surgical defect closure over the past decade. A primary consideration during sellar reconstruction is the adequacy of seal around the defect, which may be implicated in rates of postoperative CSF leak. At our institution, the gasket-seal method is the preferred closure technique following expanded endonasal approach (EEA) transsphenoidal tumor resection; however, this technique requires intraoperative preparation of a semirigid buttress (MedPor or autograft), manually prepared by subjective visual assessment of the surgical defect on endoscopic images. This work details our experience establishing an image post-processing pipeline to provide accurate 3D surface reconstructions of the visible skull base using operative endoscopic imaging, to facilitate design and fabrication of a custom rigid sellar buttress.

Methods A sellar floor defect was prepared on a cadaveric subject in standard fashion. A calibration object was placed adjacent to the defect endonasally. High-definition video was recorded using a standard endonasal telescope (Karl Storz GmbH & Co. KG). Video clips were separated into individual frames and processed into a 3D surface mesh using structure-from-motion (SFM) software (VisualSFM). The resulting skull base mesh was scaled so the calibration object–matched known dimensions. A planar buttress was designed and modeled based on the mesh. CT images of the prepared cadaveric head were also acquired, and a standard 3D bone model was generated from CT data for comparison. Visible skull base surface landmarks were used to coregister the endoscopic 3D surface mesh to the CT bone model, and subjectively examined for global anisotropy.

Results A 35-second endoscopic video clip yielded a total of 1,063 frames. Still images were captured at a reduced 12 frames per second to facilitate post-processing, and examined for exposure consistency and motion. A total of 388 images were processed into a 3D surface mesh, requiring ∼90 minutes of unmonitored machine processing. Endoscopic images and screenshots taken at each post-processing step are provided. A 3D printed model of the skull base and rigid buttress for sellar reconstruction is available for presentation.

Discussion Subjective assessment of the scaled, coregistered endoscopic 3D surface mesh revealed dimensional consistency with rigid landmarks identified on the CT bone model, within expected differences implicit with inclusion of overlying soft tissue. Given substantial overlap between sequential images as processed, required post-processing time is likely amenable to additional time optimizations without undue compromise to mesh accuracy.

Conclusion Operative endoscopic image data acquired during endonasal transsphenoidal resection can be used to directly 3D model visible skull base anatomy using structure-from-motion software. The resulting surface mesh is of sufficient dimensional accuracy to facilitate design and fabrication of a custom rigid buttress for gasket-seal closure of a surgical defect. Subsequent validation studies directly examining the adequacy of the resulting gasket-seal, post-processing time optimizations and best practices, and quality assurance metrics are currently underway in advance of a clinical feasibility study.