Initial Clinical Status and Spot Sign Are Associated with Intraoperative Aneurysm Rupture in Patients Undergoing Surgical Clipping for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective To assess clinical and radiographic risk factors for intraoperative aneurysm rupture (ioAR) during surgical clipping after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) and to analyze its influence on patient outcome.

Methods Patient selection was based on a retrospective analysis of our prospective subarachnoid hemorrhage patient database including consecutive patients between January 2008 and August 2012 with aSAH undergoing microsurgical clipping. Demographic data, cardiovascular risk factors, preoperative radiologic aneurysm characteristics, as well as timing of surgery and preoperative severity grades (Hunt and Hess [HH], Fisher, World Federation of Neurological Societies [WFNS]), were collected from hospital charts and surgery videos and compared between patients with and without ioAR.

Results Of 100 patients (38 men, 62 women) with a median age of 57.4 years (range: 23–85 years), ioAR occurred in 34 cases (34%). Univariate analyses showed that severity grades were significantly higher in the ioAR group (Fisher p = 0.012; HH p = 0.002; WFNS p = 0.023). IoAR was significantly associated with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) (23% versus 47%; p = 0.013) and the spot sign as an indicator of active bleeding within the ICH (0% vs 44%; p = 0.007). Multivariate analysis showed that HH was the only significant predictor of ioAR (p = 0.03; odds ratio: 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.1–5.0). With a mean follow-up of 17.6 months ( ± 16.6), Glasgow Outcome Scale score, mortality rate (12% versus 15%; p = 0.82), delayed cerebral ischemia (36% versus 38%; p = 0.51), and shunt dependency (32% versus 44%; p = 0.23) were comparable between the non-ioAR and ioAR group.

Conclusions Initial clinical status and spot sign were associated with ioAR during microsurgical clipping of ruptured aneurysms. However, there was no difference regarding clinical outcome and complications of the two groups.

• References

• 1 Lloyd-Jones D, Adams R, Carnethon M , et al; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2009 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 2009; 119 (3) 480-486
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Feigin VL, Lawes CM, Bennett DA, Anderson CS. Stroke epidemiology: a review of population-based studies of incidence, prevalence, and case-fatality in the late 20th century. Lancet Neurol 2003; 2 (1) 43-53
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Suarez JI, Tarr RW, Selman WR. Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. N Engl J Med 2006; 354 (4) 387-396
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 van Gijn J, Rinkel GJ. Subarachnoid haemorrhage: diagnosis, causes and management. Brain 2001; 124 (Pt 2) 249-278
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Johnston SC, Selvin S, Gress DR. The burden, trends, and demographics of mortality from subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurology 1998; 50 (5) 1413-1418
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Nieuwkamp DJ, Setz LE, Algra A, Linn FH, de Rooij NK, Rinkel GJ. Changes in case fatality of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage over time, according to age, sex, and region: a meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 2009; 8 (7) 635-642
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Larsen CC, Astrup J. Rebleeding after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a literature review. World Neurosurg 2013; 79 (2) 307-312
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Batjer H, Samson D. Intraoperative aneurysmal rupture: incidence, outcome, and suggestions for surgical management. Neurosurgery 1986; 18 (6) 701-707
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Giannotta SL, Oppenheimer JH, Levy ML, Zelman V. Management of intraoperative rupture of aneurysm without hypotension. Neurosurgery 1991; 28 (4) 531-535 ; discussion 535–536
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Hillman J, Säveland H, Jakobsson KE , et al. Overall management outcome of ruptured posterior fossa aneurysms. J Neurosurg 1996; 85 (1) 33-38
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Jomin M, Lesoin F, Lozes G. Prognosis with 500 ruptured and operated intracranial arterial aneurysms. Surg Neurol 1984; 21 (1) 13-18
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Kassell NF, Boarini DJ, Adams Jr HP , et al. Overall management of ruptured aneurysm: comparison of early and late operation. Neurosurgery 1981; 9 (2) 120-128
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Le Roux PD, Elliot JP, Newell DW, Grady MS, Winn HR. The incidence of surgical complications is similar in good and poor grade patients undergoing repair of ruptured anterior circulation aneurysms: a retrospective review of 355 patients. Neurosurgery 1996; 38 (5) 887-893 ; discussion 893–895
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Le Roux PD, Elliott JP, Downey L , et al. Improved outcome after rupture of anterior circulation aneurysms: a retrospective 10-year review of 224 good-grade patients. J Neurosurg 1995; 83 (3) 394-402
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Rinne J, Hernesniemi J, Niskanen M, Vapalahti M. Management outcome for multiple intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 1995; 36 (1) 31-37 ; discussion 37–38
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Samson DS, Hodosh RM, Reid WR, Beyer CW, Clark WK. Risk of intracranial aneurysm surgery in the good grade patient: early versus late operation. Neurosurgery 1979; 5 (4) 422-426
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Schramm J, Cedzich C. Outcome and management of intraoperative aneurysm rupture. Surg Neurol 1993; 40 (1) 26-30
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Leipzig TJ, Morgan J, Horner TG, Payner T, Redelman K, Johnson CS. Analysis of intraoperative rupture in the surgical treatment of 1694 saccular aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2005; 56 (3) 455-468 ; discussion 455–468
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Batjer H, Samson DS. Management of intraoperative aneurysm rupture. Clin Neurosurg 1990; 36: 275-288
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Sandalcioglu IE, Schoch B, Regel JP , et al. Does intraoperative aneurysm rupture influence outcome? Analysis of 169 patients. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2004; 106 (2) 88-92
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Wilson DA, Nakaji P, Abla AA , et al. A simple and quantitative method to predict symptomatic vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage based on computed tomography: beyond the Fisher scale. Neurosurgery 2012; 71 (4) 869-875
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Delgado Almandoz JE, Yoo AJ, Stone MJ , et al. Systematic characterization of the computed tomography angiography spot sign in primary intracerebral hemorrhage identifies patients at highest risk for hematoma expansion: the spot sign score. Stroke 2009; 40 (9) 2994-3000
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Brouwers HB, Backes D, Kimberly WT , et al. Computed tomography angiography spot sign does not predict case fatality in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage with intraparenchymal extension. Stroke 2013; 44 (6) 1590-1594
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Yu LM , et al; International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005; 366 (9488) 809-817
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Delgado Almandoz JE, Kelly HR, Schaefer PW , et al. CT angiography spot sign predicts in-hospital mortality in patients with secondary intracerebral hemorrhage. J Neurointerv Surg 2012; 4 (6) 442-447
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Havsteen I, Ovesen C, Christensen AF, Hansen CK, Nielsen JK, Christensen H. Showing no spot sign is a strong predictor of independent living after intracerebral haemorrhage. Cerebrovasc Dis 2014; 37 (3) 164-170
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Charbel FT, Ausman JI, Diaz FG, Malik GM, Dujovny M, Sanders J. Temporary clipping in aneurysm surgery: technique and results. Surg Neurol 1991; 36 (2) 83-90
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Dhandapani S, Pal SS, Gupta SK, Mohindra S, Chhabra R, Malhotra SK. Does the impact of elective temporary clipping on intraoperative rupture really influence neurological outcome after surgery for ruptured anterior circulation aneurysms?—a prospective multivariate study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2013; 155 (2) 237-246
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Griessenauer CJ, Poston TL, Shoja MM , et al. The impact of temporary artery occlusion during intracranial aneurysm surgery on long-term clinical outcome: part I. Patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. World Neurosurg 2014; 82 (1–2) 140-148
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Woertgen C, Rothoerl RD, Albert R, Schebesch KM, Ullrich OW. Effects of temporary clipping during aneurysm surgery. Neurol Res 2008; 30 (5) 542-546
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 van Lindert EJ, Böcher-Schwarz HG, Perneczky A. The influence of surgical experience on the rate of intraoperative aneurysm rupture and its impact on aneurysm treatment outcome. Surg Neurol 2001; 56 (3) 151-156 ; discussion 156–158
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Guglielmi G, Viñuela F, Duckwiler G , et al. Endovascular treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms by electrothrombosis using electrically detachable coils. J Neurosurg 1992; 77 (4) 515-524
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Elijovich L, Higashida RT, Lawton MT, Duckwiler G, Giannotta S, Johnston SC ; Cerebral Aneurysm Rerupture After Treatment (CARAT) Investigators. Predictors and outcomes of intraprocedural rupture in patients treated for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: the CARAT study. Stroke 2008; 39 (5) 1501-1506
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

• Supplementary Material