Prognostic Factors for IVF Success: Diagnostic Testing and Evidence-Based Interventions

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Numerous tests and interventions have been proposed for optimizing performance in preparation for in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. We critically appraised the available evidence underpinning some of the popular investigations and treatments, including the role of hysteroscopy, laparoscopy, ovarian reserve tests, sperm function tests, as well as the role of lifestyle modifications or surgery for endometriosis, fibroids, and endometrial polyps. We also reviewed the evidence behind novel techniques, such as the use of endometrial injury before IVF. Only a few of the aforementioned modalities are justified based on the available research evidence. Other factors may affect the uptake of a test or intervention before IVF, namely the complexity of the proposed modality, its potential for harm, and its cost-effectiveness.

• References

• 1 Nelson SM, Lawlor DA. Predicting live birth, preterm delivery, and low birth weight in infants born from in vitro fertilisation: a prospective study of 144,018 treatment cycles. PLoS Med 2011; 8 (1) e1000386
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Maheshwari A, Stofberg L, Bhattacharya S. Effect of overweight and obesity on assisted reproductive technology—a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2007; 13 (5) 433-444
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Rittenberg V, Seshadri S, Sunkara SK, Sobaleva S, Oteng-Ntim E, El-Toukhy T. Effect of body mass index on IVF treatment outcome: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 2011; 23 (4) 421-439
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Jungheim ES, Schon SB, Schulte MB, DeUgarte DA, Fowler SA, Tuuli MG. IVF outcomes in obese donor oocyte recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2013; 28 (10) 2720-2727
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Dechanet C, Anahory T, Mathieu Daude JC , et al. Effects of cigarette smoking on reproduction. Hum Reprod Update 2011; 17 (1) 76-95
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Freour T, Dessolle L, Jean M, Masson D, Barriere P. Predictive value of ovarian reserve markers in smoking and non-smoking women undergoing IVF. Reprod Biomed Online 2010; 20 (6) 857-860
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Waylen AL, Metwally M, Jones GL, Wilkinson AJ, Ledger WL. Effects of cigarette smoking upon clinical outcomes of assisted reproduction: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2009; 15 (1) 31-44
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Joesbury KA, Edirisinghe WR, Phillips MR, Yovich JL. Evidence that male smoking affects the likelihood of a pregnancy following IVF treatment: application of the modified cumulative embryo score. Hum Reprod 1998; 13 (6) 1506-1513
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Nicolau P, Miralpeix E, Solà I, Carreras R, Checa MA. Alcohol consumption and in vitro fertilization: a review of the literature. Gynecol Endocrinol 2014; 30 (11) 759-763
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Pundir J, El Toukhy T. Uterine cavity assessment prior to IVF. Womens Health (Lond Engl) 2010; 6 (6) 841-847 , quiz 847–848
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Hendriks DJ, Kwee J, Mol BW, te Velde ER, Broekmans FJ. Ultrasonography as a tool for the prediction of outcome in IVF patients: a comparative meta-analysis of ovarian volume and antral follicle count. Fertil Steril 2007; 87 (4) 764-775
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Broer SL, Dólleman M, Opmeer BC, Fauser BC, Mol BW, Broekmans FJ. AMH and AFC as predictors of excessive response in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2011; 17 (1) 46-54
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Scheffer GJ, Broekmans FJ, Bancsi LF, Habbema JD, Looman CW, Te Velde ER. Quantitative transvaginal two- and three-dimensional sonography of the ovaries: reproducibility of antral follicle counts. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 20 (3) 270-275
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 El-Mazny A, Abou-Salem N, El-Sherbiny W, Saber W. Outpatient hysteroscopy: a routine investigation before assisted reproductive techniques?. Fertil Steril 2011; 95 (1) 272-276
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Taşkın EA, Berker B, Ozmen B, Sönmezer M, Atabekoğlu C. Comparison of hysterosalpingography and hysteroscopy in the evaluation of the uterine cavity in patients undergoing assisted reproductive techniques. Fertil Steril 2011; 96 (2) 349-352.e2
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Elsetohy KA, Askalany AH, Hassan M, Dawood Z. Routine office hysteroscopy prior to ICSI vs. ICSI alone in patients with normal transvaginal ultrasound: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014;
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 El-Toukhy T, Khalaf Y, Coomarasamy A , et al. A multicentre randomised study of pre-IVF outpatient hysteroscopy in women with recurrent IVF-et failure – the trophy trial. Hum Reprod 2014; 17 (1) xx
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Potdar N, Gelbaya T, Nardo LG. Endometrial injury to overcome recurrent embryo implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 2012; 25 (6) 561-571
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Saunders RD, Shwayder JM, Nakajima ST. Current methods of tubal patency assessment. Fertil Steril 2011; 95 (7) 2171-2179
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Valentini AL, Muzii L, Marana R , et al. Improvement of hysterosalpingographic accuracy in the diagnosis of peritubal adhesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175 (4) 1173-1176
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Duffy JM, Arambage K, Correa FJ , et al. Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 4: CD011031
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile female: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2012; 98 (2) 302-307
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Verhoeve HR, Moolenaar LM, Hompes P, van der Veen F, Mol BW. Cost-effectiveness of tubal patency tests. BJOG 2013; 120 (5) 583-593
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Sunkara SK, Rittenberg V, Raine-Fenning N, Bhattacharya S, Zamora J, Coomarasamy A. Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400 135 treatment cycles. Hum Reprod 2011; 26 (7) 1768-1774
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Al-Inany HG, Youssef MA, Aboulghar M , et al. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists for assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; (5) CD001750
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Padilla SL, Dugan K, Maruschak V, Shalika S, Smith RD. Use of the flare-up protocol with high dose human follicle stimulating hormone and human menopausal gonadotropins for in vitro fertilization in poor responders. Fertil Steril 1996; 65 (4) 796-799
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Peñarrubia J, Fábregues F, Manau D , et al. Previous cycle cancellation due to poor follicular development as a predictor of ovarian response in cycles stimulated with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist-gonadotrophin treatment. Hum Reprod 2005; 20 (3) 622-628
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Mutlu MF, Erdem M, Erdem A , et al. Antral follicle count determines poor ovarian response better than anti-Müllerian hormone but age is the only predictor for live birth in in vitro fertilization cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet 2013; 30 (5) 657-665
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Jayaprakasan K, Campbell B, Hopkisson J, Johnson I, Raine-Fenning N. A prospective, comparative analysis of anti-Müllerian hormone, inhibin-B, and three-dimensional ultrasound determinants of ovarian reserve in the prediction of poor response to controlled ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril 2010; 93 (3) 855-864
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 La Marca A, Sunkara SK. Individualization of controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF using ovarian reserve markers: from theory to practice. Hum Reprod Update 2014; 20 (1) 124-140
  Google Scholar
• 31 Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BC, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L ; ESHRE working group on Poor Ovarian Response Definition. ESHRE consensus on the definition of 'poor response' to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod 2011; 26 (7) 1616-1624
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Iliodromiti S, Kelsey TW, Wu O, Anderson RA, Nelson SM. The predictive accuracy of anti-Müllerian hormone for live birth after assisted conception: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Hum Reprod Update 2014; 20 (4) 560-570
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Li HW, Lee VC, Lau EY, Yeung WS, Ho PC, Ng EH. Role of baseline antral follicle count and anti-Mullerian hormone in prediction of cumulative live birth in the first in vitro fertilisation cycle: a retrospective cohort analysis. PLoS ONE 2013; 8 (4) e61095
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Xie BG, Huang YH, Zhu WJ, Jin S. Comparison of the outcome of conventional in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in moderate male infertility from ejaculate. Urol Int 2013;
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Shuai HL, Ye Q, Huang YH, Xie BG. Comparison of conventional in vitro fertilisation and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes in patients with moderate oligoasthenozoospermia. Andrologia 2014;
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Robinson L, Gallos ID, Conner SJ , et al. The effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on miscarriage rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2012; 27 (10) 2908-2917
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Collins JA, Barnhart KT, Schlegel PN. Do sperm DNA integrity tests predict pregnancy with in vitro fertilization?. Fertil Steril 2008; 89 (4) 823-831
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 38 Jiang H, He RB, Wang CL, Zhu J. The relationship of sperm DNA fragmentation index with the outcomes of in-vitro fertilisation-embryo transfer and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Obstet Gynaecol 2011; 31 (7) 636-639
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 Van Assche E, Bonduelle M, Tournaye H , et al. Cytogenetics of infertile men. Hum Reprod 1996; 11 (Suppl. 04) 1-24 , discussion 25–26
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 40 De Braekeleer M, Dao TN. Cytogenetic studies in male infertility: a review. Hum Reprod 1991; 6 (2) 245-250
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 Anguiano A, Oates RD, Amos JA , et al. Congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens. A primarily genital form of cystic fibrosis. JAMA 1992; 267 (13) 1794-1797
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 42 Pryor JL, Kent-First M, Muallem A , et al. Microdeletions in the Y chromosome of infertile men. N Engl J Med 1997; 336 (8) 534-539
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 43 Krausz C, Quintana-Murci L, McElreavey K. Prognostic value of Y deletion analysis: what is the clinical prognostic value of Y chromosome microdeletion analysis?. Hum Reprod 2000; 15 (7) 1431-1434
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 44 Brandell RA, Mielnik A, Liotta D , et al. AZFb deletions predict the absence of spermatozoa with testicular sperm extraction: preliminary report of a prognostic genetic test. Hum Reprod 1998; 13 (1O): 2812-2815
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 45 Kent-First MG, Kol S, Muallem A , et al. The incidence and possible relevance of Y-linked microdeletions in babies born after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and their infertile fathers. Mol Hum Reprod 1996; 2 (12) 943-950
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 46 Jorgez CJ, Weedin JW, Sahin A , et al. Aberrations in pseudoautosomal regions (PARs) found in infertile men with Y-chromosome microdeletions. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011; 96 (4) E674-E679
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 47 Papachatzi E, Dimitriou G, Dimitropoulos K, Vantarakis A. Pre-pregnancy obesity: maternal, neonatal and childhood outcomes. J Neonatal Perinatal Med 2013; 6 (3) 203-216
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 48 Castles A, Adams EK, Melvin CL, Kelsch C, Boulton ML. Effects of smoking during pregnancy. Five meta-analyses. Am J Prev Med 1999; 16 (3) 208-215
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 49 Hackshaw A, Rodeck C, Boniface S. Maternal smoking in pregnancy and birth defects: a systematic review based on 173 687 malformed cases and 11.7 million controls. Hum Reprod Update 2011; 17 (5) 589-604
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 50 Gray R. Low-to-moderate alcohol consumption during pregnancy and child development—moving beyond observational studies. BJOG 2013; 120 (9) 1039-1041
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 51 Anderson K, Norman RJ, Middleton P. Preconception lifestyle advice for people with subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; (4) CD008189
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 52 van Oers AM, Mutsaerts MAQ, Burggraaff JM , et al. The effectiveness of a structured lifestyle program in overweight and obese subfertile women. preliminary data from a randomised controlled trial (LIFEstyle study). Hum Reprod 2014; 29 (Suppl. 01) i75
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 53 Agha M, Agha RA, Sandell J. Interventions to reduce and prevent obesity in pre-conceptual and pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2014; 9 (5) e95132
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 54 Murray DL, Sagoskin AW, Widra EA, Levy MJ. The adverse effect of hydrosalpinges on in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates and the benefit of surgical correction. Fertil Steril 1998; 69 (1) 41-45
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 55 He RH, Gao HJ, Li YQ, Zhu XM. The associated factors to endometrial cavity fluid and the relevant impact on the IVF-ET outcome. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2010; 8: 46
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 56 Savaris RF, Giudice LC. The influence of hydrosalpinx on markers of endometrial receptivity. Semin Reprod Med 2007; 25 (6) 476-482
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 57 Johnson N, van Voorst S, Sowter MC, Strandell A, Mol BW. Surgical treatment for tubal disease in women due to undergo in vitro fertilisation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; (1) CD002125
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 58 Strandell A, Lindhard A, Waldenström U, Thorburn J. Hydrosalpinx and IVF outcome: cumulative results after salpingectomy in a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2001; 16 (11) 2403-2410
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 59 Ni L, Sadiq S, Mao Y, Cui Y, Wang W, Liu J. Influence of various tubal surgeries to serum antimullerian hormone level and outcome of the subsequent IVF-ET treatment. Gynecol Endocrinol 2013; 29 (4) 345-349
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 60 Ye XP, Yang YZ, Sun XX. A retrospective analysis of the effect of salpingectomy on serum antiMüllerian hormone level and ovarian reserve. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212 (1) 53.e1-53.e10
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 61 Arora P, Arora RS, Cahill D. Essure(®) for management of hydrosalpinx prior to in vitro fertilisation—a systematic review and pooled analysis. BJOG 2014; 121 (5) 527-536
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 62 Bosteels J, Weyers S, Mathieu C, Mol BW, D'Hooghe T. The effectiveness of reproductive surgery in the treatment of -female infertility: facts, views and vision. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2010; 2 (4) 232-252
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 63 Hart RJ, Hickey M, Maouris P, Buckett W. Excisional surgery versus ablative surgery for ovarian endometriomata. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; (2) CD004992
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 64 Kuivasaari P, Hippeläinen M, Anttila M, Heinonen S. Effect of endometriosis on IVF/ICSI outcome: stage III/IV endometriosis worsens cumulative pregnancy and live-born rates. Hum Reprod 2005; 20 (11) 3130-3135
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 65 Harb HM, Gallos ID, Chu J, Harb M, Coomarasamy A. The effect of endometriosis on in vitro fertilisation outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2013; 120 (11) 1308-1320
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 66 Opøien HK, Fedorcsak P, Byholm T, Tanbo T. Complete surgical removal of minimal and mild endometriosis improves outcome of subsequent IVF/ICSI treatment. Reprod Biomed Online 2011; 23 (3) 389-395
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 67 Gupta S, Agarwal A, Agarwal R, Loret de Mola JR. Impact of ovarian endometrioma on assisted reproduction outcomes. Reprod Biomed Online 2006; 13 (3) 349-360
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 68 Tsoumpou I, Kyrgiou M, Gelbaya TA, Nardo LG. The effect of surgical treatment for endometrioma on in vitro fertilization outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2009; 92 (1) 75-87
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 69 Tang Y, Chen SL, Chen X , et al. Ovarian damage after laparoscopic endometrioma excision might be related to the size of cyst. Fertil Steril 2013; 100 (2) 464-469
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 70 Dunselman GA, Vermeulen N, Becker C , et al; European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod 2014; 29 (3) 400-412
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 71 Vercellini P, Somigliana E, Viganò P, De Matteis S, Barbara G, Fedele L. The effect of second-line surgery on reproductive performance of women with recurrent endometriosis: a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009; 88 (10) 1074-1082
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 72 Hughes E, Brown J, Collins JJ, Farquhar C, Fedorkow DM, Vandekerckhove P. Ovulation suppression for endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; 3 (3) CD000155
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 73 Sallam HN, Garcia-Velasco JA, Dias S, Arici A. Long-term pituitary down-regulation before in vitro fertilization (IVF) for women with endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; 1 (1) CD004635
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 74 Pritts EA, Parker WH, Olive DL. Fibroids and infertility: an updated systematic review of the evidence. Fertil Steril 2009; 91 (4) 1215-1223
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 75 Sunkara SK, Khairy M, El-Toukhy T, Khalaf Y, Coomarasamy A. The effect of intramural fibroids without uterine cavity involvement on the outcome of IVF treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2010; 25 (2) 418-429
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 76 Bosteels J, Weyers S, Puttemans P , et al. The effectiveness of hysteroscopy in improving pregnancy rates in subfertile women without other gynaecological symptoms: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2010; 16 (1) 1-11
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 77 Bosteels J, Kasius J, Weyers S, Broekmans FJ, Mol BW, D'Hooghe TM. Hysteroscopy for treating subfertility associated with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 1: CD009461
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 78 Surrey ES, Minjarez DA, Stevens JM, Schoolcraft WB. Effect of myomectomy on the outcome of assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril 2005; 83 (5) 1473-1479
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 79 Pérez-Medina T, Bajo-Arenas J, Salazar F , et al. Endometrial polyps and their implication in the pregnancy rates of patients undergoing intrauterine insemination: a prospective, randomized study. Hum Reprod 2005; 20 (6) 1632-1635
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 80 Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Zamora J, Thornton JG, Raine-Fenning N, Coomarasamy A. The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2011; 17 (6) 761-771
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 81 Tomaževič T, Ban-Frangež H, Virant-Klun I, Verdenik I, Požlep B, Vrtačnik-Bokal E. Septate, subseptate and arcuate uterus decrease pregnancy and live birth rates in IVF/ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online 2010; 21 (5) 700-705
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 82 Smit JG, Kasius JC, Eijkemans MJ , et al. The international agreement study on the diagnosis of the septate uterus at office hysteroscopy in infertile patients. Fertil Steril 2013; 99 (7) 2108-13.e2
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 83 Maheshwari A, Gurunath S, Fatima F, Bhattacharya S. Adenomyosis and subfertility: a systematic review of prevalence, diagnosis, treatment and fertility outcomes. Hum Reprod Update 2012; 18 (4) 374-392
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 84 Vercellini P, Consonni D, Dridi D, Bracco B, Frattaruolo MP, Somigliana E. Uterine adenomyosis and in vitro fertilization outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2014; 29 (5) 964-977
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 85 Taran FA, Stewart EA, Brucker S. Adenomyosis: Epidemiology, risk factors, clinical phenotype and surgical and interventional alternatives to hysterectomy. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2013; 73 (9) 924-931
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 86 Siristatidis C, Vrachnis N, Vogiatzi P , et al. Potential pathophysiological mechanisms of the beneficial role of endometrial injury in in vitro fertilization outcome. Reprod Sci 2014; 21 (8) 955-965
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 87 Nastri CO, Gibreel A, Raine-Fenning N , et al. Endometrial injury in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 7: CD009517
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 88 El-Toukhy T, Sunkara S, Khalaf Y. Local endometrial injury and IVF outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 2012; 25 (4) 345-354
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 89 Nastri CO, Ferriani RA, Raine-Fenning N, Martins WP. Endometrial scratching performed in the non-transfer cycle and outcome of assisted reproduction: a randomized controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42 (4) 375-382
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 90 Yeung TW, Chai J, Li RH, Lee VC, Ho PC, Ng EH. The effect of endometrial injury on ongoing pregnancy rate in unselected subfertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2014; 29 (11) 2474-2481
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 91 Dunne C, Taylor B. Does endometrial injury improve implantation of frozen-thawed embryos?. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014; 290 (3) 575-579
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 92 Dain L, Ojha K, Bider D , et al. Effect of local endometrial injury on pregnancy outcomes in ovum donation cycles. Fertil Steril 2014; 102 (4) 1048-1054
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 93 Showell MG, Brown J, Clarke J, Hart RJ. Antioxidants for female subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 8: CD007807
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 94 Manheimer E, van der Windt D, Cheng K , et al. The effects of acupuncture on rates of clinical pregnancy among women undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2013; 19 (6) 696-713
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 95 Cao H, Han M, Ng EH , et al. Can Chinese herbal medicine improve outcomes of in vitro fertilization? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS ONE 2013; 8 (12) e81650
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 96 Showell MG, Brown J, Yazdani A, Stankiewicz MT, Hart RJ. Antioxidants for male subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; (1) CD007411
  PubMedGoogle Scholar