Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2014; 231(4): 439-441
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1368282
Der interessante Fall
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Bilateral Severe Anterior Uveitis and Acute Angle-Closure Glaucoma Following Topiramate Use for Migraine Crisis

Starke bilaterale Uveitis anterior und Winkelblockglaukom nach Topiramatebehandlung wegen Migränekrisen
J. M. Katsimpris
1   Department of Ophthalmology, General Hospital of Patras “Agios Andreas”, Patras, Greece (Chairman: Dr. G. Vassilopoulos)
,
A. Katsimpris
1   Department of Ophthalmology, General Hospital of Patras “Agios Andreas”, Patras, Greece (Chairman: Dr. G. Vassilopoulos)
,
P. E. Theoulakis
2   Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom (Chairman: S. Althauser)
,
J. Lepidas
1   Department of Ophthalmology, General Hospital of Patras “Agios Andreas”, Patras, Greece (Chairman: Dr. G. Vassilopoulos)
,
I. K. Petropoulos
3   Ophthalmological Center of Rive, Geneva, Switzerland (Chairmen: Dr. P. M. Desmangles, Dr. M. A. Matter)
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
25 April 2014 (online)

Background

Topiramate (TPM) is a sulfamate-substituted monosaccharide that was initially introduced and approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1996 for the treatment of epilepsy [1]. It has been applied as a monotherapy or as an adjunctive drug in controlling seizures [1]. Efficacy, however, was evident in many other neurological and psychiatric conditions except seizures disorders. The use of TPM received approval for migraine prevention in 2004 by the FDA [2]. Thus, a broadening of the spectrum of TPM use was ensued, leading to a widespread use of this drug by many specialists such as neurologists, psychiatrists and primary caregivers [1], [2].

The increasing use of TPM following its first launch in 1996 caused an increase in the number and range of adverse effects of this drug [3], [4]. Systemic, neurological and ophthalmological adverse effects are the most commonly described [3], [4]. Since the first description of a case of acute angle closure glaucoma (AACG) by Banta et al. [5] in 2001, many publications have pointed out the variety and the severity of the ophthalmological side effects [3], [4], [5], [6].

As a consequence, knowledge of these complications and of their clinical presentation is of primary importance to the ophthalmologist.

We report the case of a patient who experienced severe and bilateral AACG associated with anterior uveitis and uveal effusion.

 
  • References

  • 1 Perucca E. A pharmacological and clinical review on topiramate, a new antiepileptic drug. Pharmacol Res 1997; 35: 241-256
  • 2 Ramadan NM, Buchanan TM. New and future migraine therapy. Pharmacol Ther 2006; 112: 199-212
  • 3 Panday VA, Rhee DJ. Review of sulfonamide-induced acute myopia and acute bilateral angle-closure glaucoma. Compr Ophthalmol Update 2007; 8: 271-276
  • 4 Wisniewski M, Lukasik-Glebocka M, Anand JS. Acute topiramate overdose – clinical manifestations. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2009; 47: 317-320
  • 5 Banta JT, Hoffman K, Budenz DL et al. Presumed topiramate-induced bilateral acute angle-closure glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2001; 132: 112-114
  • 6 Rhee DJ, Goldberg MJ, Parrish RK. Bilateral angle-closure glaucoma and ciliary body swelling from topiramate. Arch Ophthalmol 2001; 119: 1721-1723
  • 7 Viet Tran H, Ravinet E, Schnyder C et al. Blood-brain barrier disruption associated with topiramate-induced angle-closure glaucoma of acute onset. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2006; 223: 425-427
  • 8 Lyseng-Williamson KA, Yang LP. Topiramate: a review of its use in the treatment of epilepsy. Drugs 2007; 67: 2231-2256
  • 9 Ozturk BT, Genc E, Tokgoz M et al. Ocular changes associated with topiramate. Curr Eye Res 2011; 36: 47-52
  • 10 Ikeda N, Ikeda T, Nagata M et al. Ciliochoroidal effusion syndrome induced by sulfa derivatives. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120: 1775
  • 11 Van Issum C, Mavrakanas N, Schutz JS et al. Topiramate-induced acute bilateral angle closure and myopia: pathophysiology and treatment controversies. Eur J Ophthalmol 2011; 21: 404-409