Para Powerlifting Performance: A Systematic Review

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

This research aimed to conduct a systematic review of para powerlifting strength performance. The searches were conducted in three electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus. Intervention studies related to para powerlifting performance were included. The main information was extracted systematically, based on criteria established by the authors. The data on study design, sample size, participant’s characteristics (e. g. type of disability, sex, age, body weight, and height), training experience, assessment tools, physical performance criteria, and force-related outcomes were extracted and analyzed. The studies (n=9) describe factors related to biomechanics and performance. Outcomes revealed that the one-repetition maximum test is used as load prescription and that para powerlifting should work at high speeds and higher loads. Regarding technique, grip width with 1.5 biacromial distance provides a good lift and partial amplitude training as an alternative to training. There are no differences in total load and movement quality in the lumbar arched technique compared with the flat technique. As a monitoring method, repetitions in reserve scale was used for submaximal loads. Finally, our outcomes and discussion indicated strategies and techniques that can be used by para powerlifting coaches.

Publication History

Received: 24 February 2023

Accepted: 03 August 2023

Article published online:
26 September 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

• References

• 1 Willick SE, Cushman DM, Blauwet CA. et al. The epidemiology of injuries in powerlifting at the London 2012 Paralympic Games: An analysis of 1411 athlete-days. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2016; 26: 1233-1238
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 WPPO. World Para Powerlifting Technical Rules and Regulations. 2022
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 dos Santos MDM, Aidar FJ, de Souza RF. et al. Does the grip width affect the bench press performance of paralympic powerlifters?. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2020; 15: 1252-1259
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Latella C, Teo WP, Spathis J. et al. Long-Term Strength Adaptation: A 15-Year Analysis of Powerlifting Athletes. J Strength Cond Res 2020; 34: 2412-2418
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Androulakis-Korakakis P, Michalopoulos N, Fisher JP. et al. The Minimum Effective Training Dose Required for 1RM Strength in Powerlifters. Front Sports Act Living 2021; 3: 713655
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Neto FR, Dorneles JR, Luna RM. et al. Performance Differences Between the Arched and Flat Bench Press in Beginner and Experienced Paralympic Powerlifters. J Strength Cond Res 2020; 36: 1936-1943
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Buitrago S, Wirtz N, Yue Z. et al. Mechanical load and physiological responses of four different resistance training methods in bench press exercise. J Strength Cond Res 2013; 27: 1091-1100 DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318260ec77.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Wilk M, Stastny P, Golas A. et al. Physiological responses to different neuromuscular movement task during eccentric bench press. Neuroendocrinol Lett 2018; 39: 26-32
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Hamid MSA, Shariff-Ghazali S, Abdul Karim S. Anthropometric characteristics of Malaysian competitive powerlifters with physical disabilities. J Health Transl Med 2019; 22: 49-55
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Scanlan JM, Ballmann KL, Mayhew JL. et al. Anthropometric dimensions to predict 1-RM bench press in untrained females. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 1999; 39: 54-60
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Emanuel A, Har-Nir I. Rozen Smukas II et al. The effect of self-selecting the number of repetitions on motor performance and psychological outcomes. Psychol Res 2020; 1: 3
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Ferland PM, Comtois AS. Classic powerlifting performance: A systematic review. J Strength Cond Res 2019; 33: S194-S201
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. The BMJ 2021; 372: n71
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Kmet LM, Lee RC, Cook LS. Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers. Alta Herit Found Med Res 2004; 13: 1-22
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 da Costa Santos CM, de Mattos Pimenta CA, Nobre MRC. The PICO strategy for the research question construction and evidence search. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 2007; 15: 508-511
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Bartko JJ. The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability. Psychol Rep 1966; 19: 3-11
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159-174
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Loturco I, Pereira LA, Kobal R. et al. Power output in traditional and ballistic bench press in elite athletes: Influence of training background. J Sports Sci 2019; 37: 277-284
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Ramos Dalla Bernardina G, Danillo Matos dos Santos M, Alves Resende R. et al. Asymmetric velocity profiles in Paralympic powerlifters performing at different exercise intensities are detected by functional data analysis. J Biomech 2021; 123: 110523
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Szafraniec R, Kisilewicz A, Kumorek M. et al. Effects of High-Velocity Strength Training on Movement Velocity and Strength Endurance in Experienced Powerlifters with Cerebral Palsy. J Hum Kinet 2020; 73: 235-243
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Mendonça TP, Aidar FJ, Matos DG. et al. Force production and muscle activation during partial vs. full range of motion in Paralympic Powerlifting. PloS One 2021; 16: e0257810
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Neto FR, Dorneles JR, Aidar FJ. et al. Validation of the Repetitions in Reserve Rating Scale in Paralympic Powerlifting Athletes. Int J Sports Med 2022; 43: 366-372
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Aidar FJ, Clemente FM, de Lima LF. et al. Evaluation of Training with Elastic Bands on Strength and Fatigue Indicators in Paralympic Powerlifting. Sports Basel Switz 2021; 9
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 García-Ramos A, Pérez-Castilla A, Villar Macias FJ. et al. Differences in the one-repetition maximum and load-velocity profile between the flat and arched bench press in competitive powerlifters. Sports Biomech 2021; 20: 261-273
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Dos Santos MDM, Aidar FJ, Alejo AA. et al. Analysis of Grip Amplitude on Velocity in Paralympic Powerlifting. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol 2021; 6: 86
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Tungate P. The Bench Press: A Comparison Between Flat-Back and Arched-Back Techniques. Strength Cond J 2019; 41: 86-89
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Green CM, Comfort P. The effect of grip width on bench press performance and risk of injury. Strength Cond J 2007; 29: 10-14
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Fees M, Decker T, Snyder-Mackler L. et al. Upper extremity weight-training modifications for the injured athlete: A clinical perspective. Am J Sports Med 1998; 26: 732-742
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Loturco I, Kobal R, Moraes JE. et al. Predicting the Maximum Dynamic Strength in Bench Press: The High Precision of the Bar Velocity Approach. J Strength Cond Res 2017; 31: 1127-1131
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Loturco I, Pereira LA, Winckler C. et al. Load-velocity relationship in national paralympic powerlifters: A case study. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2019; 14: 531-535
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

• Supplementary Material