Communicating with Inpatients with Memory Impairments

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Many patients with acquired brain injury have acute impairments in declarative memory, the memory system responsible for learning facts and remembering events, whereas implicit memory for skills, habits, and emotional associations remains intact. The combination of impaired declarative memory and preserved implicit memory has implications for communicating with patients in inpatient rehabilitation, not only in therapy sessions but also in nontherapy interactions with rehabilitation staff. The aim of this study was to describe communication patterns among inpatients with declarative memory impairments and rehabilitation staff members during the early stage postinjury. Participants were five adults with acquired brain injury and declarative memory impairments. Each participant was observed for a full inpatient rehabilitation day. Results showed that staff and visitors frequently asked participants declarative questions to which answers were not verifiable (e.g., questions about preinjury events). Answers that could be verified often were incorrect but were accepted by staff as correct. Results suggest that acute rehabilitation staff may need training in communicating with patients with declarative memory impairments. We suggest strategies to create a more supportive communication environment for inpatients with memory impairment.

• References

• 1 Cohen NJ, Eichenbaum H, Deacedo BS, Corkin S. Different memory systems underlying acquisition of procedural and declarative knowledge. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1985; 444: 54-71
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Vidoni ED, Boyd LA. Achieving enlightenment: what do we know about the implicit learning system and its interaction with explicit knowledge?. J Neurol Phys Ther 2007; 31 (3) 145-154
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 McMillan TM, Jongen EL, Greenwood RJ. Assessment of post-traumatic amnesia after severe closed head injury: retrospective or prospective?. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1996; 60 (4) 422-427
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Nabors N, Seacat J, Rosenthal M. Predictors of caregiver burden following traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 2002; 16 (12) 1039-1050
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Ewert J, Levin HS, Watson MG, Kalisky Z. Procedural memory during posttraumatic amnesia in survivors of severe closed head injury. Implications for rehabilitation. Arch Neurol 1989; 46 (8) 911-916
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Schacter DL. Implicit knowledge: new perspectives on unconscious processes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992; 89 (23) 11113-11117
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Myers CE, Hopkins RO, DeLuca J , et al. Learning and generalization deficits in patients with memory impairments due to anterior communicating artery aneurysm rupture or hypoxic brain injury. Neuropsychology 2008; 22 (5) 681-686
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Mecklinger A, von Cramon DY, Matthes-von Cramon G. Event-related potential evidence for a specific recognition memory deficit in adult survivors of cerebral hypoxia. Brain 1998; 121 (Pt 10) 1919-1935
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Brush JA, Camp CJ. A Therapy Technique for Improving Memory: Spaced Retrieval. Beachwood, OH: Menorah Park Center for the Aging; 1998
  Google Scholar
• 10 Novak T. The Orientation Log. The Center for Outcome Measurement in Brain Injury 2000. Available at: http://tbims.org/combi/olog/index.html . Accessed March 14, 2013
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Randolph C. Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status. First ed. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 2001
  Google Scholar
• 12 Turkstra LS. Inpatient cognitive rehabilitation: is it time for a change?. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2013; 28 (4) 332-336
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Sohlberg MM, Turkstra LS. Optimizing Instructional Methods for Effective Cognitive Rehabilitation. New York, NY: Guilford Publications, Inc.; 2011
  Google Scholar