[5+3] Cycloaddition
of 3-Oxidopyrylium: A Novel Route to Functionalized Cyclooctanoids
from Furans

Urlam Murali Krishna; Mahendra P. Patil; Raghavan B. Sunoj; Girish K. Trivedi

doi:10.1055/s-0029-1217092

Subscribe to RSS

Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.

https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/en/10.1055-s-00000084.xml

Share / Bookmark

Facebook X Linkedin Weibo

Download PDF

Synthesis 2010(2): 320-328
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1217092

PAPER

[5+3] Cycloaddition of 3-Oxidopyrylium: A Novel Route to Functionalized Cyclooctanoids from Furans

Urlam Murali Krishna*^a,b, Mahendra P. Patil^a, Raghavan B. Sunoj*^a, Girish K. Trivedi^a
^a Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400076, India
^b Department of Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, Emory University, School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
Fax: +1(404)7273660; e-Mail: murlam@emory.edu; e-Mail: sunoj@chem.iitb.ac.in;

Further Information

Publication History

Received 11 August 2009
Publication Date:
03 November 2009 (online)

Abstract
Full Text
References
Supplementary Material

Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Abstract

We report a facile and efficient synthesis of highly functionalized cyclooctanoid derivatives by employing a dimerization reaction of 3-oxidopyrylium ylides. Different substituents are introduced on the dimer and the stereochemical outcome of the resultant cyclooctanoids is unambiguously established by single-crystal X-ray analysis.

Key words

cyclooctanoids - 3-oxidopyrylium ylides - [5+3] cycloadditions - stereoselectivity - density functional calculations

Supporting Information

References

1a Oishi T. Ohtsuks Y. In Studies in Natural Products Synthesis Vol. 3: . Elsevier; Amsterdam: 1989. p.73

Google Scholar
1b Rigby JH. In Studies in Natural Products Synthesis Vol. 12: . Elsevier; Amsterdam: 1993. p.233

Google Scholar
2 Illuminati G. Mandoline L. Acc. Chem. Res. 1981, 14: 95

Crossref Google Scholar
3 Molander GA. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31: 603

Crossref Google Scholar
For reviews on oxidopyrylium cycloadditions, see:
4a Singh V. Krishna UM. . Trivedi GK. Tetrahedron 2008, 64: 3405

Google Scholar
4b Sammes PG. Gazz. Chim. Ital. 1986, 51: 1573

Google Scholar
4c Wender PA. Love JA. In Advances in Cycloaddition Vol. 5: Harmata M. JAI Press; Stamford CT: 1999. p.1

Google Scholar
4d Mascarenas JL. In Advances in Cycloaddition Vol. 6: Harmata M. JAI Press; Stamford CT: 1999. p.1

Google Scholar
5 Krishna UM. Deodhar KD. Trivedi GK. Mobin SM. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69: 967

Crossref Google Scholar
6a Hendrickson JB. Farina JS. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45: 3361

Google Scholar
6b Sammes PG. Street LJ. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1983, 1261

Google Scholar
6c Lee H.-Y. Kim HY. Kim BG. Kee JM. Synthesis 2007, 2360

Google Scholar
For other methods utilizing 3-oxidopyrylium in cyclooctanoid synthesis, see:
7a Magnus P. Booth J. Diorazio L. Donohoe T. Lynch V. Magnus N. Mendoza J. Pye P. Tarrant J. Tetrahedron 1996, 52: 14103

Google Scholar
7b Delgado A. Castedo L. Mascarenas JL. Org. Lett. 2002, 4: 3091

Google Scholar
7c Radhakrishnan KV. Syam Krishnan K. Bhadbhade MM. Bhosekar GV. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46: 4785

Google Scholar
8a Mehta G. Singh V. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99: 881

Google Scholar
8b Petasis NA. Patane MA. Tetrahedron 1992, 48: 5757

Google Scholar
8c Rodriguez J. Michaut A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45: 5740

Google Scholar
8d Deiters A. Martin SF. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104: 2199

Google Scholar
8e McReynolds MD. Dougherty JM. Hanson PR. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104: 2239

Google Scholar
9a Wender PA. Ihle NC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108: 4678

Google Scholar
9b Wender PA. Snapper ML. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28: 2221

Google Scholar
9c Wender PA. Ihle NC. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28: 2451

Google Scholar
9d Wender PA. Ihle NC. Correia CRD. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110: 5904

Google Scholar
9e Wender PA. Tebbe MJ. Synthesis 1991, 1089

Google Scholar
9f Wender PA. Nuss JM. Smith DB. Suarez-Sobrino A. Vagberg J. Decosta D. Bordner J. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62: 4908 ; and references cited therein

Google Scholar
10a Sieburth SM. McGee KF. Al-Tel TH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120: 587

Google Scholar
10b Sieburth SM. Cunard NT. Tetrahedron 1996, 52: 6251

Google Scholar
11a Molander GA. Etter JB. Harring LS. Thorel P.-J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113: 8036

Google Scholar
11b Molander GA. Brown GA. deGracia IS. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67: 3459

Google Scholar
12a Grubbs RH. Chang S. Tetrahedron 1998, 54: 4413

Google Scholar
12b Fu GC. Grubbs RH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114: 5426

Google Scholar
12c Fu GC. Grubbs RH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114: 7324

Google Scholar
12d Fu GC. Nguyen ST. Grubbs RH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115: 9856

Google Scholar
12e Grubbs RH. Miller SJ. Fu GC. Acc. Chem. Res. 1995, 28: 446

Google Scholar
13a Schmalz H.-G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34: 1833

Google Scholar
13b Mar tin SF. Chen H.-J. Courtney AK. Liao Y. Patzel M. Ramser MN. Wagman AS. Tetrahedron 1996, 52: 7251

Google Scholar
13c Schneider MF. Junga H. Blechert S. Tetrahedron 1995, 51: 13003

Google Scholar
13d Furstner A. Muller T. Synlett 1997, 1010

Google Scholar
14a Achamatowicz O. Bukowski P. Szechner B. Swiezchowska Z. Zamojski A. Tetrahedron 1971, 27: 1973

Google Scholar
14b Georgiadis MP. Couladouros EA. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51: 2725

Google Scholar
For recent reports from our group, see:
14c Krishna UM. Srikanth GSC. Trivedi GK. Deodhar KD. Synlett 2003, 2383

Google Scholar
14d Krishna UM. Trivedi GK. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45: 257

Google Scholar
14e Krishna UM. Deodhar KD. Trivedi GK. Tetrahedron 2004, 60: 4829

Google Scholar
14f Krishna UM. Srikanth GSC. Trivedi GK. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44: 8227

Google Scholar
16a Khurana JM. Sharma P. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2004, 77: 549

Google Scholar
16b Ganem B. Osby JO. Chem. Rev. 1986, 86: 763

Google Scholar
17 Sabesan S. Neira S. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56: 5468

Crossref Google Scholar
18 Michaut A. Rodriguez J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45: 5740

Google Scholar
19 Hosokawa T. Murahashi S.-I. Acc. Chem. Res. 1990, 23: 49

Google Scholar
The barriers for intramolecular aldol reactions (catalyzed as well as uncatalyzed processes) are generally found in the range of 5 to 30 kcal/mol. See:
20a Bouillon J.-P. Portella C. Bouquant J. Humbel S. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65: 5823

Google Scholar
20b Bahmanyar S. Houk KN. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123: 12911

Google Scholar
20c Clemente FR. Houk KN. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127: 11294

Google Scholar
20d
The computed trends are found to be the same when solvent single-point energies as well as the free energies in the gas phase are compared.

Google Scholar
Various reports are available on the successful aldol approach for the system that lacks the oxo bridge. See:
22a Yamada K. Iwadare H. Mukaiyama T. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1997, 45: 1898

Google Scholar
22b Mukaiyama T. Shiina I. Kimura K. Akiyama Y. Iwadare H. Chem. Lett. 1995, 229

Google Scholar
23 For an exhaustive review on oxa-bridge openings, see: Chiu P. Lautens M. Top. Curr. Chem. 1997, 190: 1

Google Scholar
24 Frisch MJ. Trucks GW. Schlegel HB. Scuseria GE. Robb MA. Cheeseman JR. Montgomery JA. Vreven T. Kudin KN. Burant JC. Millam JM. Iyengar SS. Tomasi J. Barone V. Mennucci B. Cossi M. Scalmani G. Rega N. Petersson GA. Nakatsuji H. Hada M. Ehara M. Toyota K. Fukuda R. Hasegawa J. Ishida M. Nakajima T. Honda Y. Kitao O. Nakai H. Klene M. Li X. Knox JE. Hratchian HP. Cross JB. Bakken V. Adamo C. Jaramillo J. Gomperts R. Stratmann RE. Yazyev O. Austin AJ. Cammi R. Pomelli C. Ochterski JW. Ayala PY. Morokuma K. Voth GA. Salvador P. Dannenberg JJ. Zakrzewski VG. Dapprich S. Daniels AD. Strain MC. Farkas O. Malick DK. Rabuck AD. Raghavachari K. Foresman JB. Ortiz JV. Cui Q. Baboul AG. Clifford S. Cioslowski J. Stefanov BB. Liu G. Liashenko A. Piskorz P. Komaromi I. Martin RL. Fox DJ. Keith T. Al-Laham MA. Peng CY. Nanayakkara A. Challacombe M. Gill PMW. Johnson B. Chen W. Wong MW. Gonzalez C. Pople JA. Gaussian 03, Revision C.02 Gaussian Inc.; Wallingford (CT): 2004.

Google Scholar
25a Cossi M. Barone V. Cammi R. Tomasi J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996, 255: 327

Google Scholar
25b Cances E. Mennucci B. Tomasi J. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 107: 3032

Google Scholar
26a Gonzalez C. Schlegel HB. J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 90: 2154

Google Scholar
26b Gonzalez C. Schlegel HB. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94: 5523

Google Scholar

15

CCDC 232578 (8), 232579 (11), and 735916 (17) contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.
X-ray crystallographic data for 8: CCDC 232578, empirical formula C₁₂H₁₆O₅, formula weight 240.25, T = 293(2) K, λ = 0.70930 Å, crystal system monoclinic, space group P21/n, unit cell dimensions a = 7.4888(5) Å, α = 90.000˚, b = 15.2345(11) Å, β = 98.888(5)˚, c = 10.0221(5) Å, γ = 90.000˚, V = 1129.67(12) Å^³, Z = 4, D _calcd = 1.413 Mg/m^³, absorption coefficient 0.110 mm^-¹, F(000) = 512, crystal size 0.35 × 0.30 × 0.20 mm, data collection θ range 2.45-25.01˚, index ranges 0 ≤ h ≤ 8, 0 ≤ k ≤ 18, -11 ≤ l ≤ 11, reflections collected 1875, unique 1875 [R(int) = 0.0000], refinement method full-matrix least-squares on F2, data/restraints/parameters 1875/0/220, goodness-of-fit on F ^² 1.134, final R indices [I > 2σ(I)] R1 = 0.0539, wR2 = 0.1481, R indices (all data) R1 = 0.0571, wR2 = 0.1524, largest diff. peak and hole 0.249 and -0.394 e˙Å^-³.
X-ray crystallographic data for 11: CCDC 232579, empirical formula C₁₄H₁₈O₆, formula weight 282.28, T = 293(2) K, λ = 0.70930 Å, crystal system: monoclinic, space group P21/n, unit cell dimensions a = 10.5020(13) Å, b = 10.6560(10) Å, c = 12.9850(18) Å, β = 109.664(10)˚, V = 1368.4(3) Å^³, Z = 4, D _calcd = 1.370 Mg/m^³, absorption coefficient 0.107 mm^-¹, F(000) = 600, crystal size 0.4 × 0.35 × 0.35 mm, data collection θ range 2.17-24.90˚, index ranges 0 ≤ h ≤ 12, 0 ≤ k ≤ 12, -15 ≤ l ≤ 14, reflections collected 1840, unique 1840 [R(int) = 0.0000], refinement method full-matrix least-squares on F2, data/restraints/parameters 1840/0/253, goodness-of-fit on F ^² 1.023, final R indices [I > 2σ(I)] R1 = 0.0711, wR2 = 0.1712, R indices (all data) R1 = 0.0875, wR2 = 0.1823, largest diff. peak and hole 0.339 and -0.283 e˙Å^-³.
X-ray crystallographic data for 17: CCDC 735916, empirical formula C₂₅H₂₈O₄, formula weight 392.47, T = 293(2) K, λ = 0.70930 Å, crystal system monoclinic, space group P21/c, unit cell dimensions a = 7.550(5) Å, b = 24.686(3) Å, c = 11.4950(10) Å, β = 90.116(7)˚, V = 2087.1(3) Å^³, Z = 4, D _calcd = 1.249 Mg/m^³, absorption coefficient 0.083 mm^-¹, F(000) = 840, crystal size 0.4 × 0.4 × 0.35 mm, data collection θ range 1.65-24.92˚, index ranges 0 ≤ h ≤ 8, 0 ≤ k ≤ 29, -13 ≤ l ≤ 13, reflections collected 3074, unique 3074 [R(int) = 0.0000], refinement method full-matrix least-squares on F2, data/restraints/parameters 3074/0/375, goodness-of-fit on F ^² 1.065, final R indices [I > 2σ(I)] R1 = 0.0423, wR2 = 0.0983, R indices (all data) R1 = 0.0620, wR2 = 0.1107, largest diff. peak and hole 0.183 and -0.162 e˙Å^-³.

21

This prediction is in accordance with experimental attempts for the ring closure in which starting material is recovered instead of the desired cyclic product.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information