Predictors for the Early Termination of a Psychological Intervention During Treatment with Assisted Reproductive Technologies

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction Assisted reproductive technologies are typically perceived by couples as being an emotional burden. The objective of the study “Positive Ausrichtung bei unerfülltem Kinderwunsch” [Positive adjustment in infertility] (PACI) is to examine the efficacy and acceptance of a smartphone-supported psychosocial intervention during infertility treatment. In this investigation, the early drop-out of study subjects from the study is of primary interest. The objective of the investigation was to find predictors for ending a psychological intervention prematurely.

Materials and Methods There are data available from an eight-month randomised, controlled study in which 141 patients and their partners participated. Sociodemographic and fertility-related data were collected at the start of the study. The couples received the ScreenIVF questionnaire at two points in time. As part of a post-evaluation, a survey was conducted on the efficacy of the psychological online intervention. To analyse the data, a dyadic data structure was used in order to determine connections within the study subject couples between the selected stress indicators and the drop-out. In addition, a “risk score” as a possible predictor for the drop-out was tested.

Results The descriptive observation of the sample indicates in this interim assessment that the study subjects recruited are less stressed patient couples. Actor–partner interdependence models indicate statistically significant connections between the stress indicators of anxiety, little social support and helplessness and an early drop-out.

Conclusions The statistically significant effects found in this study with regard to the stress indicators in connection with drop-outs from psychosocial intervention studies indicate that it is advisable to continue to seek measures for people undergoing stressful medical treatments in order to motivate and support them and thus optimally utilise the opportunities of a medical treatment. The number of patients who endure their ART treatment may also increase as a result, which could lead in turn to increased patient satisfaction over the long term (and thus possibly to higher pregnancy rates).

• References/Literatur

• 1 Verhaak CM, Smeenk JM, van Minnen A. et al. A longitudinal, prospective study on emotional adjustment before, during and after consecutive fertility treatment cycles. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 2253-2260
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Lancastle D, Boivin J. A feasibility study of a brief coping intervention (PRCI) for the waiting period before a pregnancy test during fertility treatment. Hum Reprod 2008; 23: 2299-2307
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Boivin J, Lancastle D. Medical waiting periods: imminence, emotions and coping. Womens Health (Lond) 2010; 6: 59-69
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Wischmann T, Stammer H, Scherg H. et al. Psychosocial characteristics of infertile couples: a study by the ‘Heidelberg Fertility Consultation Service’. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 1753-1761
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Domar AD, Gross J, Rooney K. et al. Exploratory randomized trial on the effect of a brief psychological intervention on emotions, quality of life, discontinuation, and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization patients. Fertil Steril 2015; 104: 440-451
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Gameiro S, Boivin J, Peronace L. et al. Why do patients discontinue fertility treatment? A systematic review of reasons and predictors of discontinuation in fertility treatment. Hum Reprod Update 2012; 18: 652-669
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Olivius C, Friden B, Borg G. et al. Why do couples discontinue in vitro fertilization treatment? A cohort study. Fertil Steril 2004; 81: 258-261
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Rajkhowa M, Mcconnell A, Thomas GE. Reasons for discontinuation of IVF treatment: a questionnaire study. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 358-363
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Brandes M, van der Steen JO, Bokdam SB. et al. When and why do subfertile couples discontinue their fertility care? A longitudinal cohort study in a secondary care subfertility population. Hum Reprod 2009; 24: 3127-3135
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Domar AD, Smith K, Conboy L. et al. A prospective investigation into the reason why insured United States patients drop out of in vitro fertilization treatment. Fertil Steril 2010; 94: 1457-1459
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Gameiro S, Verhaak CM, Kremer J. et al. Why we should talk about compliance with assisted reproductive technologies (ART): a systematic review and meta-analysis of ART compliance rates. Hum Reprod Update 2013; 19: 124-135
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Olivius C, Friden B, Borg G. et al. Psychological aspects of discontinuation of in vitro fertilization treatment. Fertil Steril 2004; 81: 276
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Schröder AK, Katalinic A, Diedrich K. et al. Cumulative pregnancy rates and drop-out rates in a German IVF programme: 4102 cycles in 2130 patients. RBM Online 2004; 8: 600-606
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Verberg MFG, Eijkemans MJC, Heijnen EMEQ. et al. Why do couples drop-out from IVF treatment? A prospective cohort study. Hum Reprod 2008; 23: 2050-2055
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Verhagen TEM, Dumoulin JCM, Evers JLH. et al. What is the most accurate estimate of pregnancy rates in IVF drop outs?. Hum Reprod 2008; 23: 1793-1799
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Boivin J, Domar A, Shapiro D. et al. Tackling burden in ART: an integrated approach for medical staff. Hum Reprod 2012; 27: 941-950
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Gameiro S, Boivin J, Domar A. Optimal IVF in 2020 should reduce treatment burden and enhance care delivery for patients and staff. Fertil Steril 2013; 100: 302-394
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Verhaak CM, Lintsen AME, Evers AWM. et al. Who is at risk of emotional problems and how do you know? Screening of women going for IVF treatment. Hum Reprod 2010; 25: 1234-1240
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Folkman S, Lazarus RS. The relationship between coping and emotion: implications for theory and research. Soc Sci Med 1988; 26: 309-317
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Ockhuijsen HDL, van den Hoogen A, Eijkemans MJC. et al. Clarifying the benefits of the positive reappraisal coping intervention for women waiting for the outcome of IVF. Human Reprod 2014; 29: 2712-2718
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 De Klerk C, Hunfeld JAM, Duivenvoorden HJ. et al. Effectiveness of a psychosocial counselling intervention for first-time IVF couples: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 1333-1338
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Domar AD, Clapp D, Slawsby EA. et al. Impact of group psychological interventions on pregnancy rates in infertile women. Fertil Steril 2000; 73: 805-811
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Verhaak CM, Smeenk JM, Evers AW. et al. Predicting emotional response to unsuccessful fertility treatment: a prospective study. J Behav Med 2005; 28: 181-190
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Volmer L, Rösner S, Toth B. et al. Infertile partnersʼ coping strategies are interrelated – Implications for targeted psychological counseling. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2017; 77: 52-58
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Spielberger CD. Manual for the State-trait Anxiety Scale. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1983
  Google Scholar
• 26 Beck AT, Guth D, Steer RA. et al. Screening for major depression disorders in medical inpatients with the Beck Depression Inventory for primary care. Behav Res Ther 1997; 35: 785-791
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Evers AW, Kraaimaat FW, van Lankveld W. et al. Beyond unfavorable thinking: The illness cognition questionnaire for chronic diseases. J Consult. Clin Psychol 2001; 69: 1026-1036
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Van Dam-Baggen R, Kraaimaat FW. The Inventarisation inventory to measure sociale integration: a self report inventory to assess social support. Gedragstherapie 1992; 25: 27-45
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Schick M, Roesner S, Germeyer A. et al. Smartphone-supported Positive Adjustment Coping Intervention (PACI) for couples undergoing fertility treatment: a randomised controlled trial protocol. BMJ Open 2019; 0: e025288
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Kenny DA, Judd CM. A general procedure for the estimation of interdependence. Psychol Bull 1996; 119: 138-148
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL. Dyadic Data Analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 2006
  Google Scholar
• 32 R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Wien: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2018. Online: http://www.R-project.org/ last access: 15.08.2018
  Google Scholar
• 33 Rosseel Y. lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. J Stat Softw 2012; DOI: 10.18637/jss.v048.i02.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Junghans C, Feder G, Hemingway H. et al. Recruiting patients to medical research: double blind randomised trial of “opt-in” versus “opt-out” strategies. BMJ 2005; 331: 940
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Treweek S, Pitkethly M, Cook J. et al. Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; (04) MR000013
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Wippermann C. Kinderlose Frauen und Männer: Ungewollte oder gewollte Kinderlosigkeit im Lebenslauf und Nutzung von Unterstützungsangeboten. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend; 2014
  Google Scholar
• 37 Datta J, Palmer MJ, Tanton C. et al. Prevalence of infertility and help seeking among 15 000 women and men. Hum Reprod 2016; 31: 2108-2118
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 38 Berlin-Institut für Bevölkerung und Entwicklung. Ungewollt kinderlos. Was kann die moderne Medizin gegen den Kindermangel in Deutschland tun? (Juni 2007). Online: https://www.berlin-institut.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Studien/Ungewollt_kinderlos_Webversion.pdf last access: 13.09.2018
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 Terävä AN, Gissler M, Hemminki E. et al. Infertility and the use of infertility treatments in Finland: prevalence and socio-demographic determinants 1992–2004. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008; 136: 61-66
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 40 Wischmann T. ‘Your count is zero’–counselling the infertile man. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2013; 16: 35-39
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 Wright J, Duchesne C, Sabourin S. et al. Psychological distress and infertility: men and women respond differently. Fertil Steril 1991; 55: 100-108
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 42 Carmeli YS, Birbaum-Carmeli D. The predicament of masculinity: towards understanding the male experience of infertility treatments. Sex Roles 1994; 30: 663-677
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 43 OʼDonnell E. Making room for men in infertility counseling. Sexuality, Reproduction and Menopause 2007; 5: 28-32
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 44 Folkman S, Moskowitz JT. Positive affect and the other side of coping. Am Psychol 2000; 55: 647-654
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 45 Folkman S. Positive psychological states and coping with severe stress. Soc Sci Med 1997; 45: 1207-1221
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 46 Park CL, Folkman S. The role of meaning in the context of stress and coping. Gen Rev Psychol 1997; 2: 115-144
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 47 Folkman S, Greer S. Promoting psychological well-being in the face of serious illness: when theory, research and practice inform each other. Psychooncology 2000; 9: 11-19
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 48 Kentenich H, Brähler E, Kowalcek I, Strauß B, Thorn P, Weblus AJ, Wischmann T, Stöbel-Richter Y. Hrsg. Leitlinie psychosomatisch orientierte Diagnostik und Therapie bei Fertilitätsstörungen. Gießen: Psychosozial-Verlag; 2014
  Google Scholar
• 49 Kreuzer VK, Kimmel M, Schiffner J. et al. Mögliche Gründe für einen Therapieabbruch: eine Analyse von 571 071 Behandlungszyklen aus dem Deutschen IVF-Register. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2018; 78: 984-990
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar