Original ArticlesThe effect of femoral prosthesis design on cement strain in cemented total hip arthroplasty*,**
Section snippets
Specimen preparation
Six pairs of fresh frozen human cadaver femora with an average age of 63 years were used for this study (Table 1).Radiographs were taken to exclude specimens with pathologic lesions and to size and template the medullary canals. The cadaver specimens were freed of all soft tissue and muscle by sharp dissection using a scalpel and forceps.
Osteometrics, a precision method of measuring the bone in vitro using a custom-made alignment device 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, was performed on the specimens to
Results
In all 6 pairs of cadaver femora, both types of cemented implants remained stable and well fixed throughout the study. Postimplantation radiographs revealed proper femoral stem and strain gauge location as well as an adequate cement mantle for all the femora. One of the femora sustained a nondisplaced, linear fracture during broaching for a Zimmer Centralign prosthesis. This fracture was treated using 5 doubled 16-gauge Luque wires (Zimmer, Inc) around the proximal femur. The Centralign
Discussion
Concerns remain regarding the durability of cemented total hip arthroplasty despite the relatively new improvements in cement application. With modern techniques to maintain an adequate cement mantle and to reduce cement porosity, femoral prosthesis survival rates have improved substantially 7, 22. Jasty et al [9] have shown in analysis of autopsy-retrieved, well-functioning cemented femoral components that the cement was well tolerated and that the bone—cement interface remained well
Conclusion
Our objective was to perform an in vitro examination of the effect of femoral prosthesis shape on cement strains adjacent to the cemented femoral component. Our results indicate that prosthesis geometry does influence cement strain because we found that the more anatomically shaped SHP prosthesis was associated with a different cement strain profile than the straight tapered design of the Centralign prosthesis. Specifically, the more anatomically shaped prosthesis showed lower cement strains
References (24)
- et al.
Adaptive bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis
J Biomech
(1987) - et al.
Mathematical shape optimization of hip prosthesis design
J Biomech
(1989) - et al.
Abduction forces in the one-legged stance
J Biomech
(1970) - et al.
Factors affecting cement strins near the tip of a cemented femoral component
J Arthroplasty
(1997) Long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention
J Bone Joint Surg Br
(1972)- et al.
The nine and ten year results of the low-friction arthroplasty of the hip
Clin Orthop
(1973) - et al.
A ten-year follow-up study of 170 Charnley total hip arthroplasties
Clin Orthop
(1986) - et al.
Roentgenologic results of total hip arthroplasty: a ten year follow-up study
Clin Orthop
(1983) Ten-year follow-up study of total hip replacement with particular reference to roentgenographic loosening of the components
J Bone Joint Surg Am
(1982)- et al.
A ten-year follow-up of one hundred consecutive Müller curved-stem total hip-replacement arthroplasties
J Bone Joint Surg Am
(1982)
The effect of improved cementing techniques on component loosening in total hip replacement
J Bone Joint Surg Br
The outcome of Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement after a minimum twenty-year follow-up
J Bone Joint Surg Am
Cited by (19)
Characteristic loosening of the distally straight cylindrical femoral stem
2014, Journal of Orthopaedic ScienceA finite element method approach to compare the wear of acetabular cups in polyethylene according to their lateral tilt in relation to the coronal plane
2013, WearCitation Excerpt :Moreover, mechanical simulators are costly and the time needed for performing each trial is very long [13,31]. Based on positive results obtained from numerical simulations using the finite element method (FEM) in applications such as analysis of the factors influencing luxation in total hip joint [32], design of the tip of the femoral head in order to reduce the stress peaks in the acrylic cement [33], biomechanics of arthroplasty of “resurfacing” type [34], and effect of the design of the femoral head on the coating of acrylic cement [35], some attempts to predict wear rates from FEM models have been made. Several authors developed hip joint models that reproduce its kinematics and kinetics [26,36–41].
In vitro analysis of the cement mantle of femoral hip implants: Development and validation of a CT-scan based measurement tool
2005, Journal of Orthopaedic ResearchFatigue Failure of Hip Implants: A Short Review of Biomechanical Testing
2022, Trends in Biomaterials and Artificial OrgansOptimization of a Cemented Femoral Prosthesis Considering Bone Remodeling
2016, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
- *
Benefits and funds were received in partial or total support of the research material described in this article from the Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah School of Medicine; Biomet, Inc; and the Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation.
- **
Reprint requests: Christopher L. Peters, MD, Orthopaedic Bioengineering Research Laboratory, 20 North 2030 East, Room 190, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112.