Original Research
Comparison Between Sinus Tarsi Approach and Extensile Lateral Approach for Treatment of Closed Displaced Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures: A Multicenter Prospective Study

https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2015.11.008Get rights and content

Abstract

The purpose of our investigation was to prospectively review and compare the early outcomes of Sanders II and III closed displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACFs) in a group of patients treated by open reduction and internal fixation with plate and screws using the extended lateral approach or the sinus tarsi approach (STA). Thirty-eight patients with DIACFs were prospectively enrolled and operatively treated using either the extended lateral approach or the STA. Patients underwent a careful clinical and radiographic examination and were evaluated according to the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score, visual analog scale, and the Foot Function Index. The results from our study showed similar clinical and radiographic outcomes between the 2 groups. In our series, Sanders II and III DIACFs were sufficiently exposed using the STA to achieve anatomic reduction and stable fixation. The STA group had a lower incidence of wound complications (p ≥ .05), the surgical procedure was faster, and the waiting time to surgery was shorter (p ≤ .05). Despite the limited number of patients and the short follow-up period, our results suggest that the STA is a useful method for the treatment of DIACFs, with a low incidence of complications and results comparable to those for patients treated using the extended lateral approach.

Section snippets

Patients and Methods

We performed a multicenter prospective study of patients affected by DIACFs who had been treated operatively from January 2012 to December 2012. The patients were enrolled in the study consecutively and divided into 2 groups. Group 1 was treated at Ospedale San Camillo-Forlanini di Roma (hospital 1) and had undergone ORIF of the DIACF through the ELA. Group 2 was treated at Ospedale Civile di Bracciano (hospital 2) and had undergone ORIF of the DIACF through the STA. The protocols were

Results

The 2 groups were comparable with regard to the demographic data (i.e., age, male/female ratio, activity level; p > .05; Table 1). The average AOFAS hindfoot score was 81.95 ± 10.89 for the ELA group and 82.17 ± 11.50 for the STA group. In the ELA group, the average FFI score was 17.85 ± 11.03 and was 18.39 ± 12.67 in the STA group. The mean VAS score (considering the mean morning, activity, and end of day VAS score) was 22.75 ± 13.71 in the ELA group and 21.29 ± 15.56 in the STA group. The

Discussion

The purpose of our investigation was to prospectively review and compare the early outcomes of Sanders II and III closed DIACFs in a group of patients treated by ORIF with plate and screws through the ELA or STA. Our hypothesis that no outcome differences would be detected when using the 2 different approaches was only partially confirmed by the results of the present investigation. Our results suggest that the quality of reduction, stability of the internal fixation, and functional outcomes

References (50)

  • C.S. Randay et al.

    Subtalar fusion after displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures: does initial operative treatment matter

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (2009)
  • S.K. Benirshcke et al.

    Extensive intra articular fractures of the foot: surgical management of calcaneal fractures

    Clin Orthop Relat Res

    (1993)
  • N. Gougoulias et al.

    Management of calcaneal fractures: systematic review of randomized trials

    Br Med Bull

    (2009)
  • E. Letournel

    Open treatment of calcaneal fractures

    Clin Orthop Relat Res

    (1993)
  • R. Sanders

    Displaced intra articular fractures of the calcaneus

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (2000)
  • H. Zwipp et al.

    Osteosynthesis of displaced intra articular fractures of the calcaneus: results in 123 cases

    Clin Orthop Relat Res

    (1993)
  • B. Magnan et al.

    External fixation for displaced intra-articular fractures of the calcaneum

    J Bone Joint Surg Br

    (2006)
  • J. Stulik et al.

    A minimally invasive treatment of intra articular fractures of the calcaneum

    J Bone Joint Surg Br

    (2006)
  • J.R. Stephenson

    Surgical treatment of displaced intra articular fractures of the calcaneus: a combined lateral and medial approach

    Clin Orthop Relat Res

    (1993)
  • M. Weber et al.

    Limited open reduction and internal fixation of displaced intra articular fractures of the calcaneum

    J Bone Joint Surg Br

    (2008)
  • T.H. Fu et al.

    Treatment of displaced intra articular calcaneal fractures with combined transarticular external fixation and minimal internal fixation

    Foot Ankle Int

    (2013)
  • A.M. Ali et al.

    Management of calcaneal fractures using the Ilizarov external fixator

    Acta Orthop Belg

    (2009)
  • W.C. McGavery et al.

    Calcaneal fractures: indirect reduction and external fixation

    Foot Ankle Int

    (2006)
  • D. Herscovici et al.

    Operative treatment of calcaneal fractures in elderly patients

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (2005)
  • R.E. Buckley et al.

    Comparison of open versus closed reduction of intra-articular calcaneal fractures: a matched cohort in workmen

    J Orthop Trauma

    (1992)
  • Cited by (70)

    • Modified sinus tarsi approach with a variable-angle locking anterolateral plate for Sanders type II and III calcaneal fractures

      2022, Foot and Ankle Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      Due to the high surgical complication rate and the difficulty in predicting surgical results, conservative treatments were generally favoured by surgeons in the past decades [7]. However, since the 1990s, the increasingly detailed understanding of injury mechanisms and improvements in internal fixation devices have increased the interest in open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), which has gradually gained acceptability for the treatment of DIACFs [2,8–10]. Extensile lateral approach (ELA) is generally considered the gold standard approach for the treatment of DIACFs [11–13], since it provides excellent exposure of the subtalar posterior facet, calcaneocuboid joint, and complete lateral wall [14].

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Financial Disclosure: None reported.

    Conflict of Interest: None reported.

    View full text