Original Investigation
Vascular Access Choice, Complications, and Outcomes in Children on Maintenance Hemodialysis: Findings From the International Pediatric Hemodialysis Network (IPHN) Registry

https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.02.014Get rights and content

Rationale & Objective

Arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) have been recommended as the preferred vascular access for pediatric patients on maintenance hemodialysis (HD), but data comparing AVFs with other access types are scant. We studied vascular access choice, placement, complications, and outcomes in children.

Study Design

Prospective observational cohort study.

Setting & Participants

552 children and adolescents from 27 countries on maintenance HD followed up prospectively by the International Pediatric HD Network (IPHN) Registry between 2012 and 2017.

Predictor

Type of vascular access: AVF, central venous catheter (CVC), or arteriovenous graft.

Outcome

Infectious and noninfectious vascular access complication rates, dialysis performance, biochemical and hematologic parameters, and clinical outcomes.

Analytical Approach

Univariate and multivariable linear mixed models, generalized linear mixed models, and proportional hazards models; cumulative incidence functions.

Results

During 314 cumulative patient-years, 628 CVCs, 225 AVFs, and 17 arteriovenous grafts were placed. One-third of the children with an AVF required a temporary CVC until fistula maturation. Vascular access choice was associated with age and expectations for early transplantation. There was a 3-fold higher living related transplantation rate and lower median time to transplantation of 14 (IQR, 6-23) versus 20 (IQR, 14-36) months with CVCs compared with AVFs. Higher blood flow rates and Kt/Vurea were achieved with AVFs than with CVCs. Infectious complications were reported only with CVCs (1.3/1,000 catheter-days) and required vascular access replacement in 47%. CVC dysfunction rates were 2.5/1,000 catheter-days compared to 1.2/1,000 fistula-days. CVCs required 82% more revisions and almost 3-fold more vascular access replacements to a different site than AVFs (P < 0.001).

Limitations

Clinical rather than population-based data.

Conclusions

CVCs are the predominant vascular access choice in children receiving HD within the IPHN. Age-related anatomical limitations and expected early living related transplantation were associated with CVC use. CVCs were associated with poorer dialysis efficacy, higher complication rates, and more frequent need for vascular access replacement. Such findings call for a re-evaluation of pediatric CVC use and practices.

Section snippets

Data Collection

The IPHN collects detailed prospective information on incident and prevalent maintenance HD patients treated in pediatric dialysis units around the globe. At the time of enrollment, basic patient demographic data and information regarding access placement are captured. All vascular access revisions/replacements are documented on occurrence. The vascular access intervention history for prevalent patients is entered retrospectively. Follow-up data (updates) are collected every 6 months following

Demographics

A total of 552 maintenance HD patients (56% males) treated at 55 pediatric dialysis units in 27 countries were entered into the IPHN database between December 2012 and September 2017. There were 313 patients (57%) followed up from HD initiation, while 249 patients (43%) were prevalent on HD at the time of enrollment. There were 282 patients (51%) from Western Europe, 63 (11%) from Central Europe, 80 (15%) from Asia, 68 (12%) from Turkey, 27 (5%) from North America, 19 (3.5%) from the Middle

Discussion

Data pertaining to vascular access in pediatric HD are limited because of the small number of patients that are cared for in individual sites. Here, we have used the strength of the multicenter nature of the IPHN to provide the largest pediatric HD study to date on vascular access choice, efficacy, and outcome.

Only one-quarter of the 404 children initiating HD received an AVF as initial access, with 73% receiving a CVC, and 1%, an AVG. Although the preference for a CVC in the pediatric

Article Information

Authors’ Full Names and Academic Degrees

Dagmara Borzych-Duzalka, MD, Rukshana Shroff, MD, Gema Ariceta, MD, Yok-Chin Yap, MD, Fabio Paglialonga, MD, Hong Xu, MD, Hee Gyung Kang, MD, Julia Thumfart, MD, Karabay Bayazit Aysun, MD, Constantinos J. Stefanidis, MD, Marc Fila, MD, Lale Sever, MD, Karel Vondrak, MD, Attila J. Szabo, MD, Maria Szczepanska, MD, Bruno Ranchin, MD, Tuula Holtta, MD, Ariane Zaloszyc, MD, Ilmay Bilge, MD, Bradley A. Warady, MD, Franz Schaefer, MD, and Claus Peter Schmitt, MD.

Authors’ Contributions

Research idea and study design: DB-D,

References (34)

  • M.H. Mokrzycki et al.

    Traditional and non-traditional strategies to optimize catheter function: go with more flow

    Kidney Int

    (2010)
  • I.J. Ramage et al.

    Vascular access survival in children and young adults receiving long-term hemodialysis

    Am J Kidney Dis

    (2005)
  • Clinical practice recommendation 8: vascular access in pediatric patients

    Am J Kidney Dis

    (2006)
  • North American Pediatric Renal Trials and Collaborative Studies Annual Dialysis Report

  • M. Fischbach et al.

    on behalf of the European Pediatric Dialysis Working Group. Hemodialysis in children: general practical guidelines

    Pediatr Nephrol

    (2005)
  • A.R. Watson et al.

    European Paediatric Dialysis Working Group. Factors influencing choice of renal replacement therapy in European paediatric nephrology units

    Pediatr Nephrol

    (2013)
  • A. Ma et al.

    A comparison of arteriovenous fistulas and central venous lines for long-term chronic haemodialysis

    Pediatr Nephrol

    (2013)
  • Cited by (43)

    • Clinical profile and outcome of arteriovenous fistulae in children on maintenance hemodialysis from a low-resource setting

      2022, Journal of Vascular Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      AVF is being increasingly used as the modality of choice for maintenance hemodialysis especially in older children. Data from large pediatric registries show that an AVF is chosen as the first access in less than 50% of children being initiated on hemodialysis.5,13 In some cases, especially in younger children, a CVC may be the preferred access.

    • Epidemiology and Risk Factors for Hemodialysis Access–Associated Infections in Children: A Prospective Cohort Study From the SCOPE Collaborative

      2022, American Journal of Kidney Diseases
      Citation Excerpt :

      Similar to prior studies, we found that catheters were more commonly used and were associated with higher rates of infection compared with AV accesses.1,3,15-17 Despite international consensus guidelines supporting the use of AV accesses in children receiving HD, catheters remain the most commonly used form of HD access in children worldwide.4-7,18,19 Reasons for catheter use in children include small vasculature or kidney transplant expected to occur within a short period after dialysis initiation.7,9,20

    • Pediatric hemodialysis access

      2021, Seminars in Pediatric Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      The most common interventions were surgical thrombectomy, followed by balloon angioplasty and surgical revision. The IPHN review of 17 AVGs reported 1.9 malfunctions/1,000 graft days.73 In 1990, Cinat et al reported results of a prospective, multicenter study of 86 AVGs.162

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Complete author and article information provided before references.

    View full text