Skip to main content
  • Original Article
  • Published:

Light-dependent development of two competitive species (Rubus idaeus, Cytisus scoparius) colonizing gaps in temperate forest

Croissance de deux espèces compétitrices (Rubus idaeus, Cytisus scoparius) colonisatrices des trouées en forêt tempérée selon la disponibilité en lumière

Abstract

Forest regeneration can be inhibited by competition for environmental resources (water, nutrients, light) between tree seedlings and some competitive species that are generally light-demanding species developing in gaps. The study’s aim was to quantify the development of two competitive species (Rubus idaeus and Cytisus scoparius) present in the chaîne des Puys, France, relatively to light in gaps inside Picea abies stands. On 29 transects linking the stand to the gap centre (223 points), light intensity was measured (0–80% of relative light) and floristic measurements (cover and height of the different species) were done. Development of both competitive species is positively connected to light, with a bell-shaped curve with a maximum of 40–50% for R. idaeus and a quite constant increase to 80% (maximum of light recorded in the experimentation) for C. scoparius. These results are discussed relatively to understorey vegetation management in order to favour forest regeneration.

Résumé

En forêt, la compétition pour la captation des ressources (eau, nutriments, lumière) entre certaines plantes très colonisatrices et les jeunes arbres peut mettre en péril la régénération forestière. Ces espèces sont généralement héliophiles et se développent donc dans les trouées, environnements également favorables aux semis. Le but de l’étude était de quantifier le développement de deux espèces colonisatrices (Rubus idaeus et Cytisus scoparius) de la chaîne des Puys (France) en fonction de l’intensité lumineuse dans des trouées situées en forêt d’épicéas. Des mesures de lumière ont été réalisées sur 29 transects reliant l’intérieur du peuplement au centre d’une trouée (223 points au total, 0–80 % d’éclairement relatif) en parallèle à des mesures floristiques (taux de recouvrement et hauteur des différentes espèces). Les deux espèces répondent à la lumière, selon une courbe en cloche avec un maximum à 40–50 % pour R. idaeus et une augmentation quasi linéaire jusqu’à 80 % (maximum mesuré dans l’expérimentation) pour C. scoparius. Ces résultats sont discutés en terme de gestion de la végétation forestière pour favoriser la régénération.

References

  1. Baise D., Jabiol B., Guide pour la description des sols, INRA, Paris, France, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Balandier P., Collet C., Miller J.H., Reynolds P.E., Zedaker S.M., Designing forest vegetation management strategies based on the mechanisms and dynamics of crop tree competition by neighboring vegetation, Forestry 79 (2006) 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Balandier P., Sonohat G., Sinoquet H., Varlet-Grancher C., Dumas Y., Characterisation, prediction and relationships between different wavebands of solar radiation transmitted in the understorey of evenaged oak (Quercus petraea, Q. robur) stands, Trees 20 (2006) 363–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Coll L., Balandier P., Picon-Cochard C., Morphological and physiological responses of beech (Fagus sylvatica) seedlings to grassinduced belowground competition, Tree Physiol. 24 (2004) 45–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Coll L., Balandier P., Picon-Cochard C., Prévosto B., Curt T., Competition for water between beech seedlings and surrounding vegetation in different light and vegetation composition conditions, Ann. For. Sci. 60 (2003) 593–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Curt T., Coll L., Prévosto B., Balandier P., Kunstler G., Plasticity in growth, biomass allocation and root morphology in beech seedlings as induced by irradiance and herbaceous competition, Ann. For. Sci. 62 (2005) 51–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Davis M.A., Wrage K.J., Reich P.B., Tjoelker M.G., Shaeffer T., Muermann C., Survival, growth, and photosynthesis of tree seedlings competing with herbaceous vegetation along a waterlight-nitrogen gradient, Plant Ecol. 145 (1999) 341–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Diquélou S., Rozé F., Establishment of broom, impact of previous land use and soil dynamics in old field (Brittany, France), C.R. Acad. Sci. 322 (1999) 705–715.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dzwonko Z., Assessment of light and soil conditions in ancient and recent woodlands by Ellenberg indicator values, J. Appl. Ecol. 38 (2001), 942–951.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ellenberg H., Weber H.E., Düll R., Wirth V., Werner W., et Paulißen D., Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa, Verlag Goltze, Göttingen, 1992, 248 p.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Frochot H., Armand G., Gama A., Nouveau M., Wehrten L., La gestion de la végétation accompagnatrice: état et perspective, Rev. For. Fr. LIV. 6 (2002) 505–520.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Graham J., Marshall B., Squire G.R., Genetic differentiation over a spatial environmental gradient in wild Rubus idaeus populations, New Phytol. 157 (2003) 667–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hill M.O., Roy D.B., Mountford J.O., Bunce R.G.H., Extending Ellenberg’s indicator values to a new area: an algorithmic approach, J. Appl. Ecol. 37 (2000) 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kozlowski T.T., Physiological ecology of natural regeneration of harvested and disturbed forest stands: implications for forest management, For. Ecol. Manage. 158 (2000) 195–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Landolt E., Ökologische Zeigerwerte zur Schweizer Flora, Veröffentlichungen des Geobotanischen Institutes der ETH, Stiftung Rübel 64 (1977) 1–208.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lieffers V.J., Messier C., Stadt K.J., Gendron F., Comeau P.G., Predicting and managing light in the understory of boreal forests, Can. J. For. Res. 29 (1999) 796–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nambiar E.K.S., Sands R., Competition for water and nutrients in forests, Can. J. For. Res. 23 (1993) 1955–1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pages J.-P., Michalet R., A test of the indirect facilitation model in a temperate hardwood forest of the northern French Alps, J. Ecol. 91 (2003) 932–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Paluch J.G., The influence of the spatial pattern of trees on forest floor vegetation and silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) regeneration in uneven-aged forests, For. Ecol. Manage. 205 (2005) 283–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Paquette A., Bouchard A., Cogliastro A., Successful under-planting of red oak and black cherry in early-successional deciduous shelterwoods of North America, Ann. For. Sci. 63 (2006) 823–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Paynter Q., Downey P.O., Sheppard A.W., Age structure and growth of the woody legume weed Cytisus scoparius in native and exotic habitats: implications for control, J. Appl. Ecol. 40 (2003) 470–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Prévosto B., Robert A., Coquillard P., Development of Cytisus scoparius L. at stand and individual level in a mid-elevation mountain of the French Massif Central, Acta Oecol. 25 (2004) 73–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schütz J.P., Opportunistic methods of controlling vegetation, inspired by natural plant succession dynamics with spatial reference to natural outmixing tendencies in a gap regeneration, Ann. For. Sci. 61 (2004) 149–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Stancioiu P.T., O’Hara K.L., Regeneration growth in different light environments of mixed species, multiaged, mountainous forests of Romania, Eur. J. For. Res. 125 (2006) 151–162.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philippe Balandier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gaudio, N., Balandier, P. & Marquier, A. Light-dependent development of two competitive species (Rubus idaeus, Cytisus scoparius) colonizing gaps in temperate forest. Ann. For. Sci. 65, 104 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2007076

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2007076