Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bumblebee vulnerability and conservation world-wide

Vulnérabilité des bourdons et conservation au niveau mondial

Weltweite Anfälligkeit und Erhaltung der Hummeln

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Apidologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We review evidence from around the world for bumblebee declines and review management to mitigate threats. We find that there is evidence that some bumblebee species are declining in Europe, North America, and Asia. People believe that land-use changes may be having a negative effect through reductions in food plants in many parts of the world, but that other factors such as pathogens may be having a stronger effect for a few species in some regions (especially for Bombus s. str. in North America). Evidence so far is that greater susceptibility to land-use change is associated world-wide with small climatic ranges, range edges, and late-starting colony-development cycles. More evidence is needed on the roles of pollen specialization, nest sites, hibernation sites, and pesticides. It is still too early to assess the success of schemes aimed at improving forage in agricultural and conservation areas. However, schemes aimed at raising public awareness have been very successful. Until proven safe, we recommend that live bumblebees should not be moved across continents or oceans for commercial pollination.

Zusammenfassung

Wir geben eine weltweite Übersicht für Hummeln über den Rückgang der Vorkommenshäufigkeit oder der Verbreitungsgebiete bestimmter Arten, über den Zeitverlauf dieser Änderungen, über Gefährdungsfaktoren und Charakteristika der besonders gefährdungsanfälligen Arten und über die weltweit daher am meisten gefährdeten Arten, sowie über Maßnahmen zur Abschwächung der Gefährdung. Hiernach finden wir Belege, dass einige Hummelarten in Europa (Abb. 1, 2), Nordamerika und Asien auf dem Rückgang sind. Es wird allgemein angenommen, dass die Verminderung des Futterpflanzenangebots durch die Änderungen in der Landnutzung in vielen Teilen der Welt einen negativen Einfluss ausübt, allerdings könnten andere Faktoren wie Pathogene bei einigen Arten in einigen Regionen (insbesondere bei Bombus s. str. in Nordamerika) einen stärkeren und kurzfristiger wirksamen Effekt haben. Die bisherigen Anhaltspunkte weisen darauf hin, dass die weltweit anfälligsten Arten tendentiell in spezialisierten klimatischen Bereichen und nahe an den Grenzen dieser Bereiche vorkommen und spät beginnende aber lange Kolonieentwicklungszyklen haben. Zur Rolle von Pollenspezialisierung, Nistplätzen, Überwinterungsplätzen und Pestiziden werden noch mehr Angaben benötigt. Aus der derzeitig verfügbaren begrenzten Information aus neueren Sammlungen um die Welt erstellen wir eine vorläufige Einschätzung, welche Arten wahrscheinlich am stärksten gefährdet sind (Tab. I) und wo diese vorkommen (Abb. 4). Es ist noch zu früh, um den Erfolg von Maßnahmen zur Verbesserung des Futterangebots in landwirtschaftlichen oder Erhaltungsgebieten zu beurteilen. Allerdings waren Maßnahmen zur Verbesserung der öffentlichen Wahrnehmung sehr erfolgreich.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alford D.V. (1975) Bumblebees, Davis-Poynter, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alford D.V. (1980) Atlas of the bumblebees of the British Isles, Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1994) Biodiversity: The UK Action Plan, HMSO, London.

  • Barnett E.A., Charlton A.J., Fletcher M.R. (2007) Incidents of bee poisoning with pesticides in the United Kingdom, 1994–2003, Pest Manage. Sci. 63, 1051–1057.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benton T. (2000) The bumblebees of Essex, Lopinga Books, Wimbish.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton T. (2006) Bumblebees, the natural history & identification of the species found in Britain, Collins, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berenbaum M., Bernhardt P., Buchmann S., Calderone N., Goldstein P., Inouye D.W., Kevan P., Kremen C., Medellin R.A., Ricketts T., Robinson G.E., Snow A.A., Swinton S.M., Thein L.B., Thomspson F.C. (2007) Status of Pollinators in North America, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berezin M.V., Beiko V.B., Berezina N.V. (1996) Analysis of structural changes in the bumblebee (Bombus, Apidae) population of Moscow Oblast over the last forty years, Entomol. Rev. 76, 115–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers M.A. (1985) Bumble bee colonization, extinction, and reproduction in subalpine meadows in northeastern Utah, Ecology 66, 914–927.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brasse D. (2003) Poisoning incidents involving honeybees in Germany (1999–2002) and new problems for beekeeping, Bull. Insectol. 56, 199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchmann S., Kevan P.G., Adams L., Dalsimer A. (2008) Birds, bees, and bases: how military natural resource managers can help local pollinators and why they should care, Natural Selections 4, 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvell C. (2002) Habitat use and conservation of bumblebees (Bombus spp.) under different grassland management regimes, Biol. Conserv. 103, 33–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvell C., Meek W.R., Pywell R.F., Nowakowski M. (2004) The response of foraging bumblebees to successional change in newly created arable field margins, Biol. Conserv. 118, 327–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvell C., Roy D.B., Smart S.M., Pywell R.F., Preston C.D., Goulson D. (2006a) Declines in forage availability for bumblebees at a national scale, Biol. Conserv. 132, 481–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvell C., Meek W.R., Pywell R.F., Nowakowski M. (2006b) Assessing the value of annual and perennial forage mixtures for bumblebees by direct observation and pollen analysis, Apidologie 37, 326–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvell C., Meek W.R., Pywell R.F., Goulson D., Nowakowski M. (2007) Comparing the efficacy of agri-environment schemes to enhance bumble bee abundance and diversity on arable field margins, J. Appl. Ecol. 44, 29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvell C., Rothery P., Pywell R.F., Heard M.S. (2008) Effects of resource availability and social parasite invasion on field colonies of Bombus terrestris, Ecol. Entomol. 33, 321–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman R.E., Wang J., Bourke A.F.G. (2003) Genetic analysis of spatial foraging patterns and resource sharing in bumble bee pollinators, Mol. Ecol. 12, 2801–2808.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Colla S.R., Packer L. (2008) Evidence for decline in eastern North American bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae), with special focus on Bombus affinis Cresson, Biodiv. Conserv. 17, 1379–1391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colla S.R., Otterstatter M.C., Gegear R.J., Thomson J.D. (2006) Plight of the bumble bee: pathogen spillover from commercial to wild populations, Biol. Conserv. 129, 461–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbet S.A., Saville N.M., Osborne J.L. (1994) Farmland as a habitat for bumble bees, in: Matheson A. (Ed.), Forage for bees in an agricultural landscape, IBRA, Cardiff, pp. 35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumber R.A. (1949) The biology of humble-bees, with special reference to the production of the worker caste, Trans. R. Entomol. Soc. Lond. 100, 1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darvill B., Ellis J.S., Lye G.C., Goulson D. (2006) Population structure and inbreeding in a rare and declining bumblebee, Bombus muscorum (Hymenoptera: Apidae), Mol. Ecol. 15, 601–611.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De La Rúa P., Jaffé R., Dall’Olio R., Muñoz I., Serrano J. (2009) Biodiversity, conservation and current threats to European honeybees, Apidologie 40, 263–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dias B.S.F., Raw A., Imperatriz-Fonseca V.L. (1999) International Pollinators Initiative: the São Paulo declaration on pollinators. Report on the recommendations of the workshop on the conservation and sustainable use of pollinators in agriculture with emphasis on bees, p. 79, Brazilian Ministry of the Environment, Brasília.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dornhaus A., Chittka L. (2001) Food alert in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris): possible mechanisms and evolutionary implications, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 50, 570–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durrer S., Schmid-Hempel P. (1995) Parasites and the regional distribution of bumblebee species, Ecography 18, 114–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards M. (1999) U.K. B.A.P. Bumblebee Working Group report, 1999, p. 81, Privately published, Midhurst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards M. (2003) U.K. B.A.P. Bumblebee Working Group Report, 2002, p. 45, [online] http:// hymettus.org.uk/reports.htm (accessed 30 January 2009).

  • Edwards M., Williams P.H. (2004) Where have all the bumblebees gone, and could they ever return? Brit. Wildl. June, 305–312.

  • Ellis J.S., Knight M.E., Darvill B., Goulson D. (2006) Extremely low effective population sizes, genetic structuring and reduced genetic diversity in a threatened bumblebee species, Bombus sylvarum (Hymenoptera: Apidae), Mol. Ecol. 15, 4375–4386.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Else G.R. (2000) Observations on Bombus soroeensis (F.) B. humilis Illiger and B. muscorum (L.) on Salisbury Plain, Wiltshire, in 1998–2000, BWARS Newsletter Autumn 2000, 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick Ú., Murray T.E., Byrne A., Paxton R.J., Brown M.J.F. (2006) Regional Red Data list of Irish bees, [online] http://www.npws.ie/en/media/Media,4860,en.pdf (accessed 30 January 2009).

  • Fitzpatrick Ú., Murray T.E., Paxton R.J., Breen J., Cotton D., Santorum V., Brown M.J.F. (2007) Rarity and decline in bumblebees — a test of causes and correlates in the Irish fauna, Biol. Conserv. 136, 185–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Free J.B., Butler C.G. (1959) Bumblebees, New Naturalist Series, Collins, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fussell M., Corbet S.A. (1992) The nesting places of some British bumble bees, J. Apicult. Res. 31, 32–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fye R.E., Medler J.T. (1954) Field domiciles for bumblebees, J. Econ. Entomol. 47, 672–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston K.J., Warren P.H., Thompson K., Smith R.M. (2005) Urban domestic gardens (IV): The extent of the resource and its associated features, Biodiv. Conserv. 14, 3327–3349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genersch E., Yue C., Fries I., de Miranda J.R. (2006) Detection of deformed wing virus, a honey bee viral pathogen, in bumble bees (Bombus terrestris and Bombus pascuorum) with wing deformities, J. Invertebr. Pathol. 91, 61–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Génissel A., Aupinel P., Bressac C., Tasei J.-N., Chevrier C. (2002) Influence of pollen origin on performance of Bombus terrestris micro-colonies, Entomol. Exp. Appl. 104, 329–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulson D. (2003) Bumblebees, their behaviour and ecology, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulson D. (2007) Places to see bumblebees: Poland, Buzzword 2007, 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulson D., Osborne J.L. (in press) Foraging range and the spatial distribution of worker bumblebees, in: Jarau S., Hrncir M. (Eds.), Food exploitation by social insects: an ecological, behavioral and theoretical approach, CRC Press.

  • Goulson D., Darvill B. (2004) Niche overlap and diet breadth in bumblebees: are rare species more specialized in their choice of flowers? Apidologie 35, 55–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulson D., Hughes W.O.H., Derwent L.C., Stout J.C. (2002) Colony growth of the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris, in improved and conventional agricultural and suburban habitats, Oecologia 130, 267–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulson D., Hanley M.E., Darvill B., Ellis J.S., Knight M.E. (2005) Causes of rarity in bumblebees, Biol. Conserv. 122, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulson D., Hanley M.E., Darvill B., Ellis J.S. (2006) Biotope associations and the decline of bumblebees (Bombus spp.), J. Insect Conserv. 10, 95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulson D., Lye G.C., Darvill B. (2008) Decline and conservation of bumble bees, Annu. Rev. Ent. 53, 11.1–11.18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grixti J.C., Wong L.T., Cameron S.A., Favret C. (2009) Decline of bumble bees (Bombus) in the North American Midwest, Biol. Conserv. 142, 75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanley M.E., Franco M., Pichon S., Darvill B., Goulson D. (2008) Breeding system, pollinator choice and variation in pollen quality in British herbaceous plants, Funct. Ecol. 22, 592–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harder L.D. (1986) Influences on the density and dispersion of bumble bee nests (Hymenoptera: Apidae), Holarct. Ecol. 9, 99–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield R.G., LeBuhn G. (2007) Patch and landscape factors shape community assemblage of bumble bees, Bombus spp. (Hymenoptera, Apidae), in montane meadows, Biol. Conserv. 139, 150–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haughton A.J., Champion G., Hawes C., Heard M., Brooks D.R., Bohan D.A., Clark S.A., Dewar A., Firbank L.G., Osborne J.L., Perry J.N., Rothery P., Roy D.B., Scott R., Woiwod I.P., Birchall C., Skellern M.P., Walker J., Baker P., Browne E., Dewar A.J.G., Garner B., Haylock L., Horne S., Mason N., Sands R., Walker M.J. (2003) Invertebrate responses to the management of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant and conventional spring crops. II. Within-field epigeal and aerial arthropods, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B-Biol. 358, 1863–1877.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hawes C., Haughton A., Osborne J.L., Roy D., Clark S., Perry J., Rothery P., Bohan D., Brooks D., Champion G., Dewar A., Heard M., Woiwod I., Daniels R., Young M., Parish A., Scott R., Firbank L., Squire G. (2003) Responses of plants and invertebrate trophic groups to contrasting herbicide regimes in the Farm Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B-Biol. 358, 1899–1913.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heard M.S., Carvell C., Carreck N.L., Rothery P., Osborne J.L., Bourke A.F.G. (2007) Landscape context not patch size determines bumble-bee density on flower mixtures sown for agri-environment schemes, Biol. Lett. 3, 638–641.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hines H.M., Hendrix S.D. (2005) Bumble bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) diversity and abundance in tallgrass prairie patches: effects of local and landscape floral resources, Environ. Entomol. 34, 1477–1484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inouye D.W. (1977) Species structure of bumblebee communities in North America and Europe, in: Mattson W.J. (Ed.), The role of arthropods in forest ecosystems, Springer Verlag, New York, pp. 35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inoue M.N., Yokoyama J., Washitani I. (2008) Displacement of Japanese native bumblebees by the recently introduced Bombus terrestris (L.) (Hymenoptera: Apidae), J. Insect Conserv. 12, 135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List categories and criteria: version 3.1, IUCN Species Survival Commission, Gland and Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2008) Guidelines for using the IUCN Red List categories and criteria. Version 7.0, Standards and Petitions Working Group of the IUCN SSC Biodiversity Assessments Sub-Committee.

  • IUCN (2008) IUCN red list of threatened species: Bombus franklini, IUCN [online] http://www. iucnredlist.org/details/135295 (accessed 30 January 2009).

  • Kearns C.A., Thomson J.D. (2001) The natural history of bumblebees, a sourcebook for investigations, University Press of Colorado, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kells A.R., Goulson D. (2003) Preferred nesting sites of bumblebee queens (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in agroecosystems in the UK, Biol. Conserv. 109, 165–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kevan P.G., Plowright R.C. (1989) Fenitrothion and insect pollinators, in: Ernst W.R., Pearce P.A., Pollock T.L. (Eds.), Environmental effects of fenitrothion use in forestry, Environment Canada, Conservation and Protection, Atlantic Region, p. 166.

  • Kevan P.G., Greco C.F., Belaoussoff S. (1997) Lognormality of biodiversity and abundance in diagnosis and measuring of ecosystemic health: pesticide stress on pollinators on blueberry heaths, J. Appl. Ecol. 34, 1122–1136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleijn D., Raemakers I. (2008) A retrospective analysis of pollen host plant use by stable and declining bumble bee species, Ecology 89, 1811–1823.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kleijn D., Sutherland W.J. (2003) How effective are European agri-environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity? J. Appl. Ecol. 40, 947–969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosior A., Celary W., Olejniczak P., Fijal J., Król W., Solarz W., Plonka P. (2007) The decline of the bumble bees and cuckoo bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombini) of western and central Europe, Oryx 41, 79–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwak M.M. (1996) Bumble bees at home and at school, in: Matheson, A. (Ed.), Bumble bees for pleasure and profit, International Bee Research Association, Cardiff, UK, pp. 12–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis G., Thompson H., Smagghe G. (2007) In focus: Pesticides and honeybees — the work of the ICP-BR bee protection group editorial, Pest Manage. Sci. 63, 1047–1050.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Løken A. (1961) Bombus consobrinus Dahlb., an oligolectic bumble bee (Hymenoptera, Apidae), Trans. XI Int. Congr. Ent. Vienna 1, 598–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Løken A. (1973) Studies on Scandinavian bumble bees (Hymenoptera, Apidae), Norsk Entomol. Tiddskr. 20, 1–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald M. (2001) The colonisation of northern Scotland by Bombus terrestris (L.) and B. lapidarius (L.) (Hym., Apidae), with comments on the possible role of climate change, Entomol. Mon. Mag, 137, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall E.J.P., West T.M., Kleijn D. (2006) Impacts of an agri-environment field margin prescription on the flora and fauna of arable farmland in different landscapes, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 113, 36–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matheson A., Ed. (1994) Forage for bees in an agricultural landscape, IBRA, Cardiff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsumura C., Yokoyama J., Washitani I. (2004) Invasion status and potential impacts of an invasive alien bumblebee, Bombus terrestris L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) naturalized in southern Hokkaido, Japan, Global Environ. Res. 8, 51–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFrederick Q.S., LeBuhn G. (2006) Are urban parks refuges for bumble bees Bombus spp. (Hymenoptera: Apidae)? Biol. Conserv. 129, 372–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney M.L. (1997) Extinction vulnerability and selectivity: combining ecological and paleontological views, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28, 495–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne A.A. (1926) Winnie-the-Pooh, Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray T.E., Fitzpatrick U., Brown M.J.F., Paxton R.J. (2008) Cryptic species diversity in a widespread bumble bee complex revealed using mitochondrial DNA RFLPs, Conserv. Genet. 9, 653–666.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nagamitsu T., Kenta T., Inari N., Kato E., Hiura T. (2006) Abundance, body size, and morphology of bumblebees in an area where an exotic species, Bombus terrestris, has colonized in Japan, Ecol. Res. 22, 331–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne J.L., Williams I.H. (2001) Site constancy of bumble bees in an experimentally patchy habitat, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 83, 129–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne J.L., Clark S.J., Morris R.J., Williams I.H., Riley J.R., Smith A.D., Reynolds D.R., Edwards A.S. (1999) A landscape-scale study of bumble bee foraging range and constancy, using harmonic radar, J. Appl. Ecol. 36, 519–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne J.L., Martin A.P., Shortall C.R., Todd A.D., Goulson D., Knight M.E., Hale R.J., Sanderson R.A. (2008a) Quantifying and comparing bumblebee nest densities in gardens and countryside habitats, J. Appl. Ecol. 45, 784–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne J.L., Martin A.P., Carreck N.L., Swain A.L., Knight M.E., Goulson D., Hale R.J., Sanderson R.A. (2008b) Bumblebee flight distances in relation to the forage landscape, J. Anim. Ecol. 77, 406–415.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Otterstatter M.C., Thomson J.D. (2008) Does pathogen spillover from commercially reared bumble bees threaten wild pollinators? PLoS ONE 3, e2771.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Plowright R.C. (1977) Nest architecture and the biosystematics of bumble bees, Proc. 8th Int. Congr. IUSSI, 183–185.

  • Pywell R.F., Warman E.A., Hulmes L., Hulmes S., Nuttall P., Sparks T.H., Critchley C.N.R., Sherwood A. (2006) Effectiveness of new agrienvironment schemes in providing foraging resources for bumblebees in intensively farmed landscapes, Biol. Conserv. 129, 192–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranta E. (1982) Species structure of North European bumblebee communities, Oikos 38, 202–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmont P. (1988) Monographie écologique et zoogéographique des bourdons de France et de Belgique (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Bombinae), pages 309+lxi, Faculté des Sciences agronomiques de l’État, Gembloux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmont P., Mersch P. (1988) Première estimation de la dérive faunique chez les bourdons de la Belgique (Hymenoptera, Apidae), Ann. Soc. R. Zool. Belg. 118, 141–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmont P., Pauly A., Terzo M., Patiny S., Michez D., Iserbyt S., Barbier Y., Haubruge, E. (2005) The survey of wild bees (Hymenoptera, Apoidea) in Belgium and France, p. 18, Food and Agriculture Organisation, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards K.W. (1978) Nest site selection by bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in southern Alberta, Can. Entomol. 110, 301–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues A.S.L., Pilgrim J.D., Lamoreux J.F., Hoffman M., Brooks T.M. (2006) The value of the IUCN Red List for conservation, Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 71–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenkranz P., Wallner K. (2008) The chronology of honey bee losses in the Rhine Valley during spring 2008: an example of a worst case scenario, pages 94–95 in Teal J., Osborne J.L., Paxton R.J. (Eds.), Eurbee3; 3rd European Conference of Apidology, Queen’s University, Belfast.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rundlof M., Nilsson H., Smith H.G. (2008) Interacting effects of farming practice and landscape context on bumblebees, Biol. Conserv. 141, 417–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rural Development Service (2005) Environmental Stewardship: Look after your land and be rewarded, p. 12, Defra, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sárospataki M., Novák J., Molnár V. (2005) Assessing the threatened status of bumble bee species (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Hungary, Central Europe, Biodiv. Conserv. 14, 2437–2446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid-Hempel P., Loosli R. (1998) A contribution to the knowledge of Nosema infections in bumble bees, Bombus spp., Apidologie 29, 525–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D., Boecklen W. (1981) Santa Rosalia reconsidered: size ratios and competition, Evolution 35, 1206–1228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skovgaard O.S. (1936) Rødkløverens bestøvning, humlebier og humleboer. [Pollination of red clover, bumblebees and bumblebee nests], Kgl. Danske Videnskab. Selskab Nat.-og Mat., Afd. 9. 6, 1–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sladen F.W.L. (1912) The humble-bee, its life history and how to domesticate it, with descriptions of all the British species of Bombus and Psithyrus, MacMillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiewok S., Neumann P. (2006) Infestation of commercial bumblebee (Bombus impatiens) field colonies by small hive beetles (Aethina tumida), Ecol. Entomol. 31, 623–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephen W.P. (1955) Alfalfa pollination in Manitoba, J. Econ. Entomol. 48, 543–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout J.C., Morales C.L. (2009) Ecological impacts of invasive alien species on bees, Apidologie 40, 388–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson B.G. (1979) Patrolling behaviour of bumble bee males (Hymenoptera, Apidae) in a subalpine/alpine area, Swedish Lapland, Zoon 7, 67–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson B., Lagerlof J., Svensson B.G. (2000) Habitat preferences of nest-seeking bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in an agricultural landscape, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 77, 247–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas C.D., Franco A.M.A., Hill J.K. (2006) Range retractions and extinction in the face of climate warming, Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 415–416.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson H.M. (2001) Assessing the exposure and toxicity of pesticides to bumblebees (Bombus sp.), Apidologie 32, 305–321.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson H.M., Hunt L.V. (1999) Extrapolating from honeybees to bumblebees in pesticide risk assessment, Ecotoxicology 8, 147–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson H.M., Maus C. (2007) The relevance of sublethal effects in honey bee testing for pesticide risk assessment, Pest Manage. Sci. 63, 1058–1061.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thorp R.W. (2003) Bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae): commercial use and environmental concerns, in: Strickler K., Cane J.H. (Eds.), For nonnative crops, whence pollinators of the future? Entomological Society of America, Lanham MD, pp. 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorp R.W. (2005) Profile: Bombus franklini Frison, 1921, Franklin’s bumble bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Apinae: Bombini). in: Shepherd M.D., Vaughan D.M., Black S.H. (Eds.), Red list of pollinator insects of North America, The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation, Portland (Oregon), p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorp R.W., Shepherd M.D. (2005) Profile: Subgenus Bombus Latreille, 1802 (Apidae: Apinae: Bombini), in: Shepherd M.D., Vaughan D.M., Black S.H. (Eds.), Red list of pollinator insects of North America, The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation, Portland (Oregon), p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorp R.W., Horning D.S., Dunning L.L. (1983) Bumble bees and cuckoo bumble bees of California (Hymenoptera: Apidae), Bull. Calif. Insect Surv. 23, viii+79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tommasi D., Miro A., Higo H.A., Winston M.L. (2004) Bee diversity and abundance in an urban setting, Can. Entomol. 136, 851–869.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan M., Shepard M., Kremen C., Black S. (2004) Farming for bees: Guidelines for providing native bee habitat on farms, The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation, Portland, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westphal C., Steffan-Dewenter I., Tscharntke T. (2003) Mass flowering crops enhance pollinator densities at a landscape scale, Ecol. Lett. 6, 961–965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westphal C., Steffan-Dewenter I., Tscharntke T. (2006) Bumblebees experience landscapes at different spatial scales: possible implications for coexistence, Oecologia 149, 289–300.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Westrich P. (1989) Die Wildbienen Baden-Wuerttembergs, Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams I.H., Carreck N.L. (1994) Land use changes and honey bee forage plants, in: Matheson A. (Ed.), Forage for bees in an agricultural landscape, IBRA, Cardiff, pp. 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams P.H. (1982) The distribution and decline of British bumble bees (Bombus Latr.), J. Apic. Res. 21, 236–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams P.H. (1985) On the distribution of bumble bees (Hymenoptera, Apidae) with particular regard to patterns within the British Isles, pages 180, Department of Applied Biology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams P.H. (1986) Environmental change and the distributions of British bumble bees (Bombus Latr.), Bee World 67, 50–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams P.H. (1988) Habitat use by bumble bees (Bombus spp.), Ecol. Entomol. 13, 223–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams P.H. (1989a) Bumble bees — and their decline in Britain, Central Association of Bee-Keepers, Ilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams P.H. (1989b) Why are there so many species of bumble bees at Dungeness? Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 101, 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams P.H. (1991) The bumble bees of the Kashmir Himalaya (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Bombini), Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. (Entomol.) 60, 1–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams P.H. (1998) An annotated checklist of bumble bees with an analysis of patterns of description (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Bombini), Bull. Nat. Hist. Mus. Lond. (Entomol.) 67, 79–152 [updated at http://www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation/ projects/bombus/] (accessed 30 January 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams P.H. (2000) Some properties of rarity scores used in site quality assessment, Brit. J. Entomol. Nat. Hist. 13, 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams P.H. (2005) Does specialization explain rarity and decline among British bumblebees? A response to Goulson et al., Biol. Conserv. 122, 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams P.H., Araújo M.B., Rasmont P. (2007) Can vulnerability among British bumblebee (Bombus) species be explained by niche position and breadth? Biol. Conserv. 138, 493–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams P.H., Colla S.R., Xie Z. (2009a) Bumblebee vulnerability: common correlates of winners and losers across three continents, Conserv. Biol. 23, in press.

  • Williams P.H., Tang Y., Yao J., Cameron S. (2009b) The bumblebees of Sichuan (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Bombini), Syst. Biodiv. 7, 101–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter K., Adams L., Thorp R.W., Inouye D.W., Day L., Ascher J., Buchmann S. (2006) Importation of non-native bumble bees into North America: potential consequences of using Bombus terrestris and other non-native bumble bees for greenhouse crop pollination in Canada, Mexico, and the United States, p. 33, A White Paper of the North American Pollinator Protection Campaign (NAPCC), San Francisco.

  • Xie Z., Williams P.H., Tang Y. (2008) The effect of grazing on bumblebees in the high rangelands of the eastern Tibetan Plateau of Sichuan, J. Insect Conserv. 12, 695–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang D.-R. (1999) The status of species diversity and conservation strategy of bumble bees, a pollination insect in Lancang River Basin of Yunnan, China, Chinese Biodiv. 7, 170–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zayed A. (2009) Bee genetics and conservation, Apidologie 40, 237–262.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul H. Williams.

Additional information

Manuscript editor: Tomas Murray

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Williams, P.H., Osborne, J.L. Bumblebee vulnerability and conservation world-wide. Apidologie 40, 367–387 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1051/apido/2009025

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/apido/2009025

Navigation