Issue 3, 2016

Differentiation of two types of pu-erh teas by using an electronic nose and ultrasound-assisted extraction-dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

Abstract

It is a challenging task to discriminate raw pu-erh tea, notably aged raw tea, from ripened pu-erh tea, both of which are the two primary types of pu-erh teas, only based on the taster's sensory evaluation. In the current study, a workflow was proposed to differentiate those two clusters of pu-erh teas, as well as to point out and verify the markers responsible for the discrimination. Initially, an electronic nose was utilized for the rapid discrimination. Then, an efficient method based on ultrasound-assisted extraction-dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (UAE-DLLME-GC-MS) coupled with chemometric methods was developed to disclose the metabolic profiles and pinpoint the markers for discrimination. Afterwards seven methoxyphenolic derivatives were simultaneously determined in both pu-erh teas. The role of volatile components in the classification of pu-erh teas was proved using the electronic nose (E-nose). Diverse parameters were optimized for UAE-DLLME-GC-MS, and a total of 84 volatile constituents were detected and identified. The methoxyphenolic derivatives as well as some alcohol derivatives were screened out as the primary markers by principle component analysis, and significant differences were revealed for the contents of methoxyphenolic compounds in these two types of pu-erh teas. Taken together, methoxyphenolic compounds as well as alcohol derivatives were found and verified as the markers for the differentiation between raw and ripened pu-erh teas, and either an E-nose or UAE-DLLME-GC-MS could be applied as a reliable tool to achieve the discrimination.

Graphical abstract: Differentiation of two types of pu-erh teas by using an electronic nose and ultrasound-assisted extraction-dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
06 Oct 2015
Accepted
23 Nov 2015
First published
25 Nov 2015

Anal. Methods, 2016,8, 593-604

Author version available

Differentiation of two types of pu-erh teas by using an electronic nose and ultrasound-assisted extraction-dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

J. Ye, W. Wang, C. Ho, J. Li, X. Guo, M. Zhao, Y. Jiang and P. Tu, Anal. Methods, 2016, 8, 593 DOI: 10.1039/C5AY02652K

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements