Volume 110, 1998

Mixed quantum–classical dynamics

Abstract

We present a unified derivation of the mean-field (Ehrenfest) and surface-hopping approaches to mixed quantum–classical dynamics that elucidates the underlying approximations of the methods and their strengths and weaknesses. We then report a quantitative test of alternative mixed quantum–classical methods against accurate quantum mechanical calculations for a simple one-dimensional curve-crossing model. We conclude that, for this model, surface-hopping with the adiabatic representation is decidedly superior to either mean-field or surface-hopping with the diabatic representation.

Article information

Article type
Paper

Faraday Discuss., 1998,110, 407-419

Mixed quantum–classical dynamics

J. C. Tully, Faraday Discuss., 1998, 110, 407 DOI: 10.1039/A801824C

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements