The yeast Aft2 transcription factor determines selenite toxicity by controlling the low affinity phosphate transport system

Pérez-Sampietro, María; Serra-Cardona, Albert; Canadell, David; Casas, Celia; Ariño, Joaquín; Herrero, Enrique

doi:10.1038/srep32836

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 13 September 2016

The yeast Aft2 transcription factor determines selenite toxicity by controlling the low affinity phosphate transport system

María Pérez-Sampietro¹,
Albert Serra-Cardona²,
David Canadell²,
Celia Casas¹,
Joaquín Ariño² &
…
Enrique Herrero¹

Scientific Reports volume 6, Article number: 32836 (2016) Cite this article

1893 Accesses
16 Citations
1 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is employed as a model to study the cellular mechanisms of toxicity and defense against selenite, the most frequent environmental selenium form. We show that yeast cells lacking Aft2, a transcription factor that together with Aft1 regulates iron homeostasis, are highly sensitive to selenite but, in contrast to aft1 mutants, this is not rescued by iron supplementation. The absence of Aft2 strongly potentiates the transcriptional responses to selenite, particularly for DNA damage- and oxidative stress-responsive genes, and results in intracellular hyperaccumulation of selenium. Overexpression of PHO4, the transcriptional activator of the PHO regulon under low phosphate conditions, partially reverses sensitivity and hyperaccumulation of selenite in a way that requires the presence of Spl2, a Pho4-controlled protein responsible for post-transcriptional downregulation of the low-affinity phosphate transporters Pho87 and Pho90. SPL2 expression is strongly downregulated in aft2 cells, especially upon selenite treatment. Selenite hypersensitivity of aft2 cells is fully rescued by deletion of PHO90, suggesting a major role for Pho90 in selenite uptake. We propose that the absence of Aft2 leads to enhanced Pho90 function, involving both Spl2-dependent and independent events and resulting in selenite hyperaccumulation and toxicity.

Natural proteome diversity links aneuploidy tolerance to protein turnover

Article Open access 22 May 2024

mTORC1 regulates cell survival under glucose starvation through 4EBP1/2-mediated translational reprogramming of fatty acid metabolism

Article Open access 14 May 2024

eIF4A1 enhances LARP1-mediated translational repression during mTORC1 inhibition

Article 21 May 2024

Introduction

Selenium (Se) is an essential element for life as component of selenocysteine in selenoproteins¹. Some of these are enzymes protecting against oxidation of macromolecules by reactive oxygen species. However, high concentrations of Se become toxic to the cells, particularly in the form of selenide, which forms from environmental selenite^2,3. Since Saccharomyces cerevisiae lacks selenoproteins, this yeast species is employed to study the toxicity effects of Se (and its molecular derivatives) without interference from its requirement as growth factor as occurs in animal cells^2,3. Studies in this microorganism showed that exposure to high concentrations of selenite generates oxidative stress conditions and causes DNA damage, depletion of reduced glutathione and irreversible protein oxidation^4,5,6,7,8.

In glucose-containing media selenite enters yeast cells through the phosphate symporters⁹, while with other carbon sources the monocarboxylic acids transporter Jen1 contributes to selenite import¹⁰. Two phosphate transport systems operate in S. cerevisiae¹¹. The high affinity system is composed of Pho84 and Pho89, and functions at both low and high phosphate concentrations. PHO84 and PHO89 gene expression is upregulated at low phosphate concentration by the Pho4 transcription factor, depending on the PHO pathway¹². The Pho84 transporter operates preferentially at neutral and acidic pH, while Pho89 is functional at alkaline pH. On the other hand, the low affinity transport system operates at higher phosphate concentrations (>1 mM), is composed by Pho87 and Pho90, and in response to low phosphate conditions it is post-transcriptionally downregulated by means of vacuolar targeting by Spl2 (also a member of the PHO regulon)^13,14. At moderate and high phosphate concentration, selenite enters through Pho87 and Pho90, which discriminate poorly between selenite and phosphate, while at low phosphate Pho84 is the main selenite symporter⁹.

Studies on the transcriptional response of selenite-treated S. cerevisiae cells showed upregulation of functional gene categories such as those involved in iron homeostasis and in general stress and protein degradation responses¹⁵. In yeast, iron homeostasis is under the control of the Aft1 and Aft2 transcription factors, that regulate the expression of genes belonging to the so called iron regulon, Aft1 playing the primary role in such function^16,17. In spite of the overlapping roles of Aft1 and Aft2 in the response to changes in iron availability^18,19, both factors may have some independent functions, in accordance with the slight differences between the DNA motifs they recognize²⁰. Thus, although in iron-minus conditions most of the genes of the iron regulon are primarily controlled by Aft1, in these conditions Aft2 is the direct regulator of expression of MRS4 and SMF3, respectively involved in iron transport into mitochondria and vacuoles²⁰. In addition, studies with the full collection of S. cerevisiae null mutants revealed that Aft1 and Aft2 could additionally participate in other functions different from iron homeostasis regulation²¹. Concerning Aft2, this is the primary regulator of GEX1 expression, whose protein product accumulates under iron depletion although it carries out iron-independent functions as a glutathione exchanger at the vacuolar and plasma membranes²².

Based on mutant phenotype studies, the physiological function of Aft1 has been demonstrated also in the defence against diverse environmental stresses, although only in some cases the hypersensitivity of the Aft1-defective mutant could be related to interference of the stress conditions on iron uptake or metabolism^{23,24,25,26,27,28}. The contributing role of Aft2 in parallel to Aft1 to stress defence has been demonstrated in the case of hydrogen peroxide^18,29 and hydroxyurea, an inhibitor of ribonucleotide reductase causing DNA replication stress³⁰, as deduced from the additive effect of the mutations and the rescue of the sensitive phenotype of the double mutant by iron supplementation.

The upregulation of genes for intracellular iron mobilization and high-affinity iron uptake upon selenite treatment of S. cerevisiae cells suggests a role for Aft1 (and perhaps Aft2) in selenite toxicity. In fact, cells lacking Aft1 are hypersensitive to selenite and this phenotype is rescued by iron addition to the medium³¹, indicating interference between selenite effects and iron homeostasis in yeast cells. Here, we study the relationship between Aft2 and selenite toxicity, and show that the hypersensitivity of cells lacking Aft2 to this agent cannot be rescued by iron supplementation and that it is due to increased accumulation of selenite inside cells through the low affinity phosphate transport system. Thus, the present study demonstrates a relationship between the Aft2 factor and phosphate and selenite transporters, and contributes to explain the mechanisms through which Se exerts its toxic effects.

Results

The absence of Aft2 provokes selenite hypersensitivity in an iron-independent manner

To comparatively evaluate the relevance of Aft1 and Aft2 in selenite tolerance we grew wild type, and aft1 and aft2 mutants in the presence of different concentrations of selenite. Cells lacking Aft2 were even more sensitive to this agent than those lacking Aft1 (Fig. 1A). As already described³¹, addition of iron to the medium eliminated the sensitivity to selenite of aft1 cells. On the contrary, the aft2 mutant was still hypersensitive to the agent in the presence of iron supplement. Remarkably, addition of iron significantly improved growth of the aft1aft2 strain the presence of selenite (Fig. 1A). These results support that Aft1 and Aft2 differ in their protective role against selenite and that, in the case of Aft2, this role seems to be unrelated to the iron homeostatic mechanisms. We then analyzed whether the observed activation of genes of the iron regulon upon selenite treatment¹⁵ was dependent on Aft2. Northern blot experiments were done at a lower selenite concentration (2 mM) than the growth phenotype experiments to avoid potential direct effects of selenite on RNA integrity. These are similar conditions to those employed in previous studies^8,31. Statistical analyses (Turkey-Kramer test) of the Northern blot data revealed no significant differences in expression of FIT3, CTH2 or ARN2 (Fig. 1B) between wild type and aft2 mutant cells at equivalent treatment times. On the contrary, expression of other genes of the regulon that are modestly or not activated at all, such as FET3 or FTR1, could be up to some extent dependent on Aft2 (Fig. 1B).

Selenite did not cause significant changes in intracellular iron levels in wild type or in aft2 cells (Fig. 1C). In contrast, the aft1 mutant and the double mutant already displayed lower intracellular iron levels than wild type cells before selenite treatment, and these levels further decreased upon treatment. These observations fit well with the protective effect of iron addition to the medium to the aft1 and aft1aft2 strains (Fig. 1A), and add support to the iron-independent role of Aft2 in protection against selenite toxicity. Since GEX1 is an Aft2 target not related to iron homeostasis, we determined selenite sensitivity in yeast cells lacking GEX1 and/or its paralogue GEX2. Neither the single mutants nor the double mutant were sensitive to selenite (Supplementary Fig. S1), discarding the GEX1/2 genes as possible effectors of Aft2 in relation to protection against selenite.

Genes involved in the oxidative stress response and in DNA metabolism are overexpressed in selenite-treated aft2 cells

To analyze how Aft2 could influence selenite sensitivity in yeast, we carried out a genome-wide transcriptomic study in wild type and aft2 cells treated with this agent. A sublethal dose of selenite (1 mM), smaller than that used in the experiments described above, was employed to avoid interference with growth inhibitory effects, and the transcriptomic profiles were determined at early (1 h), medium (3 h) and advanced (5 h) treatment times.

Comparison of the profiles of wild type and aft2 cells in the absence of selenite stress showed relatively minor changes. Only 18 genes were induced over 2-fold as a result of the absence of the transcription factor, with no obvious common GO signature, whereas the mRNA level of 45 genes decreased by at least 0.5-fold (including AFT2). In this case this set was enriched in genes related to transmembrane transport (p < 2.7E-6), including OPT2, GAP1, PHO89, SUL1 and SUL2. Other targets of the PHO regulon, such as PHO5 and PHO12 were also somewhat repressed.

The effect of selenite was studied for a total number of 5415 genes with valid data for both wild type and aft2 strains. Data clustering analysis (Supplementary Fig. S2) clearly illustrates that mutation of AFT2 strongly potentiates the transcriptional changes induced by selenite. In the wild type strain, a total number of 203 genes showed an increase in mRNA levels in at least one time point after selenite addition (Fig. 2A), including genes involved in oxidation-reduction processes (p < 1.7E-8), glycogen metabolism (p < 2.1E-5) and response to oxidative stress (p < 8.4E-5). Only 20 genes were found to be repressed by selenite, with no specific GO enrichment pattern. In contrast, 858 genes became induced in the aft2 strain, among which genes involved in oxidation-reduction processes (p < 1.15E-30) and in the response to oxidative stress (p < 8.9E-14) were abundantly represented. One hundred seventy genes were induced at least 2-fold by selenite in both the wild type and aft2 strains (Fig. 2A). However, with very few exceptions, induction was much more intense in the aft2 strain, as deduced from the comparison of the median of the changes for this subset of genes (2.43-fold for the wild type vs 4.71 for the aft2 strain). We found 85 genes whose expression was repressed in the aft2 strain exposed to selenite. Among the repressed genes there was an excess of those involved in cell separation after cytokinesis (p < 2.6E-6) and related to the fungal cell wall (p < 8.7E-9).

As observed in our clustering analysis (Supplementary Fig. S2), cluster number 8 is enriched in genes involved in the cellular response to oxidative stress (p < 1.4E-6). We crossed our data with a set of genes known to respond to oxidative stress that was generated by combining genes under Gene Ontology annotation GO:0034599 and those reported by Morano et al.³². Figure 2B shows the expression profile after 5 h of treatment with selenite of 32 selected genes with a protective role against oxidative stress. Only in a few cases these genes are induced in the wild type strain and, even in these cases, the change in the mRNA level is rather modest (average value of 1.80-fold). In contrast, these genes are potently induced by selenite in the aft2 strain (average value of 6.05-fold). We subsequently validated these results for some selected genes (GRX1, TRX2 and GRE2) in time-course studies by employing constructions in which the lacZ reporter was fused to the promoter of the respective tested gene (Fig. 2D). These results confirm that transcriptional upregulation is potently enhanced in the mutant compared to the wild type upon selenite treatment, and supports that the oxidative stress conditions provoked by selenite are more intense in the absence of Aft2.

Aft2-deficient cells display an increased DNA damage response upon selenite treatment

Clustering analysis (Supplementary Fig. S2) revealed that cluster 9 was enriched in genes involved in cellular response to stress (p < 6.8E-7), including diverse genes specifically induced by DNA damage, whose response was strongly potentiated in the aft2 mutant (Fig. 2C). Other genes such as RNR3, XRS2, MAG1, HUG1 and DDR2, known to encode proteins required for the cellular response to DNA damage and/or transcriptionally responding to this condition, were also remarkably induced in the Aft2-deficient strain. mRNA changes for RNR2 and RNR4 were monitored by Northern blot analysis (Fig. 3A), confirming that the expression of these genes became upregulated by exposure to selenite in aft2 but not in wild type cells, with a ca. 4-fold peak over basal levels in the 3h-treatment samples of mutant cells. The RNR genes encode the subunits of ribonucleotide reductase, and they are induced by genotoxic agents through the DNA damage checkpoint pathway³³. Therefore, our results suggested that the lack of Aft2 function increased selenite-provoked DNA damage. To confirm this hypothesis we determined histone H2A phosphorylation at Ser129, as marker of DNA damage³⁴. No constitutive phosphorylation was observed in untreated cultures, but treatment with sublethal concentrations of selenite resulted in higher phosphorylation levels in the aft2 mutant than in wild type cells (8-fold difference at 1 mM selenite) (Fig. 3B). Rad52 is a repair protein that binds DNA ends resulting from double or single strand breaks, and in response to DNA damage it localizes into discrete subnuclear foci³⁵. We measured the presence of Rad52 foci in selenite-treated wild type and aft2 strains. Treatment with this agent caused a significant increase in the frequency of Rad52-YFP foci, and this increase was more dramatic in the aft2 mutant (Supplementary Fig. S3 and Fig. 3C), confirming that the genotoxicity of selenite is more intense in the absence of Aft2.

Dun1 kinase-mediated phosphorylation of the ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor Sml1 and its consequent degradation is a reliable marker of checkpoint activation as a result of DNA damage^33,36,37. Sml1 levels were determined before and upon selenite treatment. Even at a selenite concentration as low as 0.5 mM a very pronounced reduction of Sml1 amount (at least 20-fold) was observed in aft2 cells but not in the wild type, in which the reduction was only two-fold (Fig. 3B), denoting selenite-induced differential activation of the DNA damage checkpoint in the mutant cells. In contrast, no differential activation of the checkpoint seems to occur in untreated cultures. The above results clearly demonstrate that the aft2 mutation is not genotoxic by itself but potently exacerbates the genotoxic effects of selenite.

The aft2 mutant overaccumulates selenium when exposed to selenite

To advance in understanding how Aft2 could influence selenite toxicity in yeast cells, an aft2 mutant was transformed with a yeast DNA overexpression library in the episomal vector YEp13 and clones were selected for growth in 2 mM selenite (see Materials and Methods). In addition to AFT2-containing plasmids, other four different plasmid inserts were found to rescue the hypersensitivity of the mutant (Supplementary Table S1). One of them (clone 4) included the SSU1 and GLR1 genes, which have already been demonstrated to increase tolerance to selenite when overexpressed in wild type cells⁴. In the case of the sulphite efflux pump SSU1 gene³⁸ the effect could be related to its additional role in selenite efflux³, while in the case of the glutathione reductase GLR1 gene it could be related to counteracting the glutathione oxidation effects of selenite^6,8. We have not further considered the function of SSU1 and GLR1 in relation to Aft2 it in the present study. Interestingly, the other plasmid clones were isolated several times each in the selection procedure and included two PHO genes related to phosphate transport and homeostasis: PHO81 and PHO4. PHO4 codes for the transcription factor required for expression of the PHO regulon under low environmental phosphate conditions, while PHO81 encodes an inhibitor of the Pho80-Pho85 complex, consequently leading to nuclear translocation of Pho4 and transcription of the PHO regulon¹². To confirm that PHO4 and PHO81 were responsible for selenite tolerance in aft2 cells when overexpressed, we subcloned separately both genes plus their promoter regions in a multicopy vector and analysed the selenite sensitivity of the respective wild type and aft2 transformants. Indeed, overexpression of PHO4 or PHO81 conferred selenite tolerance to the aft2 mutant cells, while no significant effect was observed on wild type cells (Fig. 4A). To substantiate that under our working conditions overexpression of PHO4 was inducing the PHO regulon, we determined the activity of the secreted repressible acid phosphatase Pho5, a typical readout of PHO activation. Indeed, we observed increases in Pho5 activity ranging from 12 to 30-fold in wild type and aft2 cells, both in the absence or presence of 1 mM selenite, when compared to the same cells harbouring an empty vector (Supplementary Fig. S4). Therefore, these results indicate that activation of the PHO regulon have positive effects on selenite tolerance in Aft2-deficient cells.

High affinity phosphate transporters are members of the yeast PHO regulon, while the low affinity transporters are post-transcriptionally downregulated through this regulon (see Introduction). Given the role of both types of phosphate transporters in selenite uptake the above results suggest that selenite entry could be increased in Aft2-deficient cells with consequent intracellular accumulation of the compound. In fact, we demonstrated that Se overaccumulates inside aft2 cells treated with a sublethal dosis of selenite (1 mM) compared to wild type cells (Fig. 4B), suggesting that alterations in selenite entry occur in the absence of Aft2. This overaccumulation could account for the hypersensitive phenotype of Aft2-deficient cells and explain the genotoxic effects previously observed.

The low affinity phosphate transport system is altered in the absence of Aft2

In the growth conditions employed in the previous experiments (sufficient phosphate levels in the presence of glucose) selenite enters yeast cells mainly through the low affinity phosphate transport system⁹. The selenite hypersensitivity of aft2 cells could therefore be an indication of upregulation of this transport system in the mutant. Spl2 is a post-transcriptional downregulator of the activity of the low affinity phosphate transporters Pho87 and Pho90^13,39, although a more recent study¹⁴ has circumscribed this Spl2-mediated downregulation to Pho87. Since the SPL2 gene is a member of the PHO regulon¹¹, we hypothesised that overexpression of the PHO regulators PHO4 or PHO81 could result in increased levels of Spl2 and, therefore, in decreased activity of the Pho87-Pho90 transport system and consequent reduction of selenite entry, thus counteracting the effects of the absence of Aft2.

To test the former hypothesis, we determined whether (i) the absence of Spl2 was additive with that of Aft2 with respect to selenite hypersensitivity, and (ii) overexpression of PHO4 was still able to suppress selenite hypersensitivity in the double aft2 spl2 mutant. As already described⁹, deletion of SPL2 resulted in increased susceptibility to selenite in an otherwise wild type background. However, this mutation did not further increase the hypersensitivity of Aft2-deficient cells (Fig. 5A), therefore supporting a linear relationship between Aft2 and Spl2. On the other hand, while overexpression of PHO4 rescued the hypersensitivity to selenite in the single aft2 mutant and at a lower extent also in the spl2 mutant it did not in the double aft2 spl2 mutant (Fig. 5A). These results correlated with the quantification of intracellular Se accumulation upon selenite addition to the medium. Thus, overexpression of PHO4 diminished significantly the accumulation of selenium provoked by the absence of Aft2, and this reduction was Spl2-dependent (Fig. 5B).

Prompted by the above observations, we noticed that analysis of the transcriptome of aft2 cells showed the downregulation of SPL2 expression upon selenite treatment. We confirmed this result by Northern blot (Fig. 5C). Untreated aft2 cultures already showed constitutive downregulation of SPL2 mRNA levels compared to wild type cells (about 2.5-fold), and such levels became practically undetectable upon selenite treatment. This result indicates that Aft2 is necessary for proper expression of SPL2 and suggests that, as a consequence, the lack of the transcription factor could increase the activity of the low affinity transport system resulting in enhanced transport of phosphate but also of selenite.

The next step was to determine whether Pho87 and Pho90 transporters are equally important for selenite uptake in the absence of Aft2. Deletion of PHO90 in aft2 cells rescued the hypersensitivity to selenite, while deletion of PHO87 had only a marginal effect, and the triple mutant displayed a wild type phenotype (Fig. 6A). Mutation of PHO84 did not alter sensitivity to selenite in the wild type or in the aft2 strains (Supplementary Fig. S5, compare with Fig. 5A), indicating that this protein does not play a role in selenite transport under our study conditions. To confirm it, we analyzed the levels of the Pho84 protein in untreated and selenite-treated cells (Supplementary Fig. S6). These levels were lower in aft2 cells than in wild type cells, and the aft2 mutation was epistatic over the spl2 one, corroborating that Aft2 acts upstream of Spl2. Importantly, the Pho84 levels were almost undetectable in selenite-treated aft2 cells, discarding a significant participation in the transport of this compound.

The previous results support that both transporters Pho87 and Pho90 do not have an equivalent role in selenite transport when Aft2 is absent, and that in these conditions Pho90, but not Pho87, is competent for selenite entrance. The observations on selenite sensitivities correlated with measurements of intracellular Se accumulation in the respective strains. Thus, while aft2 cells still accumulated Se in the absence of the Pho87 transporter, such accumulation was abrogated in the absence of Pho90, conditions in which intracellular Se levels were even lower than in wild type cells (Fig. 6B). To evaluate the possible impact of selenite on the amount of low-affinity transporters, we monitored the levels of HA-tagged versions of Pho87 and Pho90 by immunoblot. Treatment with selenite was without effect in wild type cells, whereas depletion of phosphate resulted in decreased amounts of Pho87, and this effect was abolished by deletion of SPL2 (Fig. 6C). Given the genetic interaction between the pho90 and aft2 mutations concerning selenite sensitivity, in the case of the Pho90 protein the observations were extended to the aft2 mutant. The amounts of Pho90 were essentially unaffected by phosphate starvation or addition of selenite irrespectively of the presence or absence of Spl2 or Aft2. Taking together, these experiments indicate that selenite toxicity on Aft2-deficient cells results from increased entry of the compound through the Pho90 transporter and that this occurs without significant changes in the amount of the transporter.

Discussion

Although Aft1 and Aft2 have overlapping function in yeast cells, linked to iron assimilation, they also carry out regulatory functions that are specific of each of them. We show here a novel example of functional specificity for these transcription factors, since while cells lacking Aft1 or Aft2 are hypersensitive to selenite, this phenotype is rescued by iron addition only in the case of the aft1 mutant, but not in aft2 cells. That cells exposed to selenite require the Aft1 function to maintain constant intracellular levels of iron is confirmed by the significant iron depletion observed in selenite-treated aft1 cells. This could be the consequence of direct interference of selenite with the mechanisms of iron uptake or derive indirectly from the intracellular oxidative stress generated by selenite^3,15. Oxidant conditions downregulate the Fet4-mediated low affinity iron uptake system⁴⁰, making therefore necessary the expression of the high affinity system, which requires the presence of Aft1. In any case, Aft2 can not substitute Aft1 in these functions, and the hypersensitivity of Aft2-deficient cells to selenite is independent of iron homeostasis. To our surprise deleting the AFT1 gene in Aft2-less cells makes the selenite hypersensitivity of these cells to become in part iron-dependent (Fig. 1A). At this point we have no definite explanation for this result, although it suggests that Aft2 only acts as an additional co-control if Aft1 is present.

To advance in characterizing the relationship between Aft2 and selenite tolerance, we studied the transcriptome of selenite-treated aft2 cells compared to wild type cells. About 60% of the genes upregulated in our study upon 60 min of treatment of wild type cells were also upregulated (more intensely in general) in the study of Salin et al.¹⁵. They are mostly involved in oxidative stress responses and iron uptake and homeostasis. On the contrary, the latter study observed a downregulating response in a large subset of genes that we were not able to observe. These differences could be due to the different methodologies employed or, more probably, to the fact that although the same selenite dose (1 mM) was applied in both cases, the BY4742 strain utilized by Salin et al. is clearly more sensitive to selenite than the wild type strain employed in this work. In fact, in our genetic background, this selenite concentration does not result in measurable growth rate decrease. Importantly, the aft2 mutation strongly potentiates many changes observed in the wild type strain, suggesting a stronger impact of this low dose of selenite in the physiology of the cell. This notion is supported by our observation that selenite causes exacerbated genotoxic effects in the aft2 mutant (Fig. 3). Thus, DNA damage is a good reporter of selenite levels in the cell and the toxic effects of this agent.

In sufficient-phosphate and glucose-rich medium (our experimental conditions), selenite uptake occurs through the low-affinity phosphate uptake system⁹. The identification in our suppressor screen of PHO81 and PHO4, two genes that positively influence high-affinity phosphate transport and, in parallel, downregulate low-affinity uptake, made us to focus attention on the possible influence of Aft2 on selenite transport through the Pho87/Pho90 low-affinity system. We indeed show (Fig. 4B) that Aft2-deficient cells overaccumulate selenium, thus suggesting that Aft2 might influence the function of that system. Remarkably, the analysis of tolerance to selenite in aft2 mutants lacking PHO87 or/and PHO90 shows that the contribution of Pho87 must be only marginal, since deletion of PHO87 improves only slightly selenite tolerance in the aft2 mutant background, whereas, in contrast, deletion of PHO90 practically normalizes tolerance to selenite (Fig. 6A). This notion is confirmed by the observation that deletion of PHO90 greatly decreases intracellular selenium both in wild type and in aft2 cells, whereas that of PHO87 does not. Additionally, the very low levels of Pho84 in selenite-treated aft2 mutant cells support that the high-affinity phosphate transport system does not participate in selenite uptake in these conditions. Also, the decrease in expression of diverse genes belonging to the PHO regulon observed in our RNA-seq analysis (Supplementary Fig. S2), together with the lower expression of Pho84 in aft2 cells compared to wild type cells even in untreated cultures (Supplementary Fig. S6), and the lower levels of Pho5 activity in Aft2-deficient cells (Supplementary Fig. S4) are observations that point towards a general mechanism for Aft2 in regulating the PHO regulon. Altogether, our results suggest that in our experimental conditions selenite enters mainly through the Pho90 transporter, in agreement with the reported observation that, when sufficient amounts of phosphate are available, Pho90 becomes the most relevant phosphate transporter¹⁴. The observations that JEN1 expression is strongly repressed by glucose⁴¹ and that resistance to selenite is not altered by deletion of JEN1 in cells grown with glucose as a carbon source¹⁰, allow discarding any contribution of Jen1 in selenite transport under our study conditions.

There is some controversy about the mechanism controlling stability of Pho87 and Pho90 and its vacuolar degradation fate. A role for Pho4-mediated control of Spl2 levels, which in turn would negatively control low-affinity phosphate uptake, seems clear. However, discrepancies exist about the underlying mechanism, and it has been proposed that it affects Pho87 and Pho90^13,39 or only Pho87¹⁴. It is worth noting that we have been able to confirm by immunoblot a Spl2-dependent decrease in the amount of protein for Pho87 (but not for Pho90) in response to phosphate depletion.

We show that overexpression of PHO4 substantially improves tolerance and reduces selenium content of the aft2 strain. Given the major role of Pho90 in selenium toxicity, this suggests that, indeed, Spl2 is controlling Pho90 function. We have confirmed the previous observation by Lazard et al.⁹ that a spl2 mutant is sensitive to selenite, and we also show here that this effect is alleviated by overexpression of PHO4, similarly to what is observed for the aft2 strain (Fig. 5A). This is an interesting observation, because it suggests that there must be a Spl2-independend, Pho4-responsive process with relevance on selenite toxicity. Also remarkable is the observation that the absence of Aft2 results in lower-than-normal expression of SPL2, and this effect is enhanced by exposure to selenite, leading to undetectable levels of SPL2 mRNA (Fig. 5C). This observation reinforces that Aft2 positively regulates the expression of members of the PHO regulon. We present in Fig. 7 a working model that could explain our results on the light of the existing knowledge. The downregulation of SPL2 expression in aft2 mutant cells and the increase of Se levels in the spl2 mutant argue in favour of the involvement of Spl2 levels in the selenite hypersensitivity of aft2 cells. The fact that the overexpression of PHO4 reduces Se accumulation and toxicity in a Spl2-dependent manner also supports such involvement of Spl2 in the sensitivity of the aft2 cells. However, it is worth noting that, since overexpression of PHO4 still improves tolerance in the spl2 mutant but no longer does in the double aft2 spl2 strain (Fig. 5A) it can be conceived the existence of a Pho4-dependent but Spl2-independent (and likely, Aft2-mediated) component in selenite tolerance. Such notion would be consistent with the proposal by Ghillebert et al.¹⁴ in that other factors besides Spl2 would also mediate endocytosis of both Pho90 and Pho87. It must be noted that our results do not allow explaining the increased sensitivity of the aft2 mutant on the basis of increased total amounts of Pho90 (Fig. 6C). Therefore, it is conceivable to assume that lack of Aft2 might result in relocalization of Pho90 at the cell membrane, increased activity of the transporter and/or gain of specificity for selenite against phosphate.

Methods

Strains, plasmids and growth conditions

The strains employed in this study (W303 genetic background) are listed in Table 1. Plasmid pWJ1314 expresses the Rad52-YFP construction under the control of the own RAD52 promoter⁴². Plasmid pMM1102 contains the PHO4 ORF plus adjacent regions (from −788 from the initiating Met to +336 from the stop codon), cloned between the EcoRI-BamHI sites of multicopy vector YEplac181⁴³. The pMM17-PHO84 plasmid carries the PHO84 gene (expressed from its own promoter) fused with the 3x-HA epitope⁴⁴. Plasmid pMM1103 contains the PHO81 ORF plus adjacent regions (from −684 to +342) cloned between the KpnI-SalI sites of YEplac181. Plasmid-borne expression of 3x-HA N-terminally tagged versions of Pho87 and Pho90 were accomplished by amplification of the corresponding ORFs with the oligonucleotide pairs 5_PHO87_EcoRI/3_PHO87_BamHI, and 5_PHO90_EcoRI/3_PHO90_BamHI, respectively (Supplementary Table S2). The amplification fragments were digested with EcoRI and BamHI and cloned into the same sites of plasmid pWS93 (multicopy, URA3 marker) to allow expression from the ADH1 promoter⁴⁵, resulting in plasmids pWS93-PHO87 and pWS93-PHO90 respectively.

Table 1 Strains employed in this study.

Full size table

YPD (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 2% glucose) or SC medium⁴⁶ were usually employed for S. cerevisiae cell growth. Media were solidified with 2% agar. Sodium selenite (Sigma) was added at the concentrations indicated in each case to mid-exponential cultures (about 1−2 × 10⁷ cells per ml). Cells were grown at 30 °C, with shaking in the case of liquid cultures. Sensitivity to selenite was determined in plate growth assays by spotting serial 1:5 dilutions of the respective strain cultures onto plates with solid medium containing this agent, and recording growth after 2 or 3 days of incubation at 30 °C. Phosphate starvation conditions were generated by growing cells in SD broth with 2% glucose w/o phosphate (Formedium) to which KH₂PO₄ was added at 0.2 mM (final concentration).

Genetic methods

Standard protocols were used for DNA manipulations and transformation of yeast cells. Single null mutants in which the entire open reading frames were removed were generated using the short-flanking homology approach after PCR amplification of the kanMX4⁴⁷, natMX4⁴⁸ or his3MX6⁴⁹ and selection for G418 or nourseothricin resistance, or in the absence of histidine, respectively. Multiple mutants were obtained by crossing the parental mutant strains, followed by diploid sporulation, tetrad analysis or random spore analysis, and selection of the mutant combinations⁴⁴ with the exception of strain ASC69 in which the SPL2 gene was disrupted by short-flanking homologous recombination using a HIS3MX6 cassette, amplified from plasmid pFA6a-HISMX6⁴⁹ with oligonucleotides SPL2-5-NAT and SPL2-3-NAT. Disruptions were confirmed by PCR analysis. Oligonucleotides employed in this study are indicated in Supplementary Table S2.

Isolation of suppressors of the selenite hypersensitivity of aft2 cells

Exponentially growing MML1086 (aft2) cells in YPD medium were transformed with a yeast genomic DNA library in the multicopy plasmid YEp13⁵⁰, using the lithium acetate method⁵¹. Transformants were selected in SC medium plates containing 3 mM sodium selenite plus 0.1 mM ferrous sulfate/0.25 mM ferrozine. Addition of these latter components increased transformation efficiency about 3-fold. Parallel plating was done on medium without selenite to quantify transformation efficiency. Several independent experiments were done to amount a total of about 40,000 transformants on non-selenite medium. Plasmids were recovered from aft2 clones growing in the above selective conditions, amplified in Escherichia coli and retransformed on MML1086 cells to confirm the ability to suppress the selenite hypersensitivity of aft2 cells. Finally, positive plasmids were grouped according to their EcoRI-HindIII restriction pattern. In addition to AFT2-containig plasmids, four different groups were established in this way, and one representative clone was selected from each group for sequencing the ends of the yeast DNA inserts and consequently determining the yeast genes present in each clone.

Transcriptomic analysis by RNA-Seq

Wild type W303-1A and its MML1086 derivative (aft2) were grown in YPD medium until 1 × 10⁷ cells/ml. Sodium selenite was then added to reach a final concentration of 1 mM and growth was continued. Cultures were rediluted in selenite-containing medium when required, to avoid reaching concentrations higher than 5 × 10⁷ cells/ml. Aliquots of the culture (6 × 10⁸ cells) were taken after 1, 3 and 5 h of selenite treatment, and cells collected and processed for total RNA isolation as in Bellí et al.⁵². Poly A (+) RNA was selected with the NEBNext^® Poly(A) mRNA Magnetic Isolation Module (New England Biolabs, Ref. E7490). Preparation of libraries was carried out with NEBNext^® Ultra™ Directional RNA Library Prep Kit (Ref. E7420) and the Illumina oligo set 1 (Ref. E7335). Sequencing was performed in an Illumina MiSeq machine and the MiSeq Reagent Kit v3 (single end, 150 nt/read). Two biological replicates were done.

Mapping of fastq files to generate SAM files was carried out with Bowtie2 software⁵³ in end-to-end mode. The number of mapped reads ranged from 4.96 to 6.01 million per sample. The SAM files were analyzed with the SeqMonk software (http://www.bioinformatics.bbsrc.ac.uk/projects/seqmonk). Mapped reads were counted using CDS probes (extended 50 nt upstream and downstream) and corrected for the largest dataset. Data can be retrieved from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) repository under study GSE70835.

Northern blot analyses

RNA isolation and electrophoresis, probe labelling with digoxigenin, hybridization, and signal detection and quantification were done as described previously⁵². Gene probes were generated by PCR from genomic DNA, using oligonucleotides designed to amplify internal open reading frame sequences. SNR19 mRNA was employed as loading control.

β-galactosidase reporter assays

Determination of the transcriptional activity of GRE2, TRX2 and GRX1 was carried out by generating transcriptional fusions of the respective promoters with the lacZ gene. To this end, upstream regions of GRE2 (positions −1178/+26 nt respective the initial Met codon), TRX2 (−981/+11) and GRX1 (−851/+33) were amplified from genomic DNA with the appropriate oligonucleotides described in Supplementary Table S2. The amplified fragments were cloned into the KpnI-HindIII sites (GRE2), or EcoRI-HindIII (TRX2 and GRX1) of plasmid YEp357⁵⁴. β-galactosidase activity was determined in permeabilized cells as in Ruiz et al.⁵⁵.

Western blot analyses

Western blot analyses and signal quantification were done as described in Bellí et al.⁵⁶, with the following exceptions: for monitoring the HA-tagged versions of Pho87 and Pho90 extracts were prepared as described in Serra-Cardona et al.⁵⁷. For evaluation of HA-tagged Pho84 levels, the procedure described by Canadell et al.⁴⁴ was followed. Rabbit anti-histone H2A (phosphoS129) (from Abcam, dilution 1:1,000), rabbit anti-Sml1 (from Agrisera, dilution 1:1,000) and, for HA-tagged proteins, the mouse monoclonal anti-HA antibody 12CA4 (Roche, dilution 1:1,000) or the rabbit polyclonal anti-HA antibody (Abcam, #ab9110, dilution 1:4,000) were employed as primary antibodies.

Quantification of Rad52-YFP foci

Cells growing in SC, transformed with plasmid pWJ1314 expressing Rad52-YFP, were observed with an Olimpus BX51 fluorescence microscope equipped with an Olimpus DP30BW digital camera, using excitation and emission wavelengths of 480 and 527 nm respectively. Foci were inspected by examining all of the focal planes intersecting each cell. Three independent experiments were performed for each strain and condition, and at least 500 cells were counted per sample.

Determination of selenium accumulation

All plastic ware used was soaked overnight with 10% nitric acid and subsequently thoroughly rinsed with MilliQ water at least five times. Cultures were grown in YPD until 2.5 × 10⁷ cells per ml and sodium selenite added up to 1 mM. Samples (10 ml or the equivalent volume to yield 2.5 × 10⁸ cells) were taken at 0, 30, 60, 120 and 180 min, and rapidly vacuum filtered on Omnipore membrane filters (0.2 μm pore size, Millipore). Filters were washed once with 12 ml and twice with 5 ml of 1 M EDTA Na₂ (pH 8.0) solution, and then three times with 5 ml ice-cold MilliQ water. Filters were then placed on screw-cap microcentrifuge tubes, 500 μl of 30% nitric acid (Ensure^® ISO, #1.000456, Merck-Millipore) was added and samples were digested overnight in a 65 °C water bath. Then, 500 μl of MilliQ water was added, samples were briefly vortexed, centrifuged (10 min, 12,000 × g) and 950 μl of the supernatants transferred to fresh tubes for Se determination. The accumulation of Se was measured in samples diluted in 1% (v/v) nitric acid by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS), using an Agilent 7500 ce apparatus. The values obtained were corrected by subtracting the nearly negligible background determined at time = 0.

Other methods

Intracellular iron was determined as in Tamarit et al.⁵⁸. Determination of extracellular Pho5 activity in liquid cultures was done as in Huang and O’Shea⁵⁹.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Pérez-Sampietro, M. et al. The yeast Aft2 transcription factor determines selenite toxicity by controlling the low affinity phosphate transport system. Sci. Rep. 6, 32836; doi: 10.1038/srep32836 (2016).

References

Lu, J. & Holmgren, A. Selenoproteins. J. Biol. Chem 284, 723–727 (2009).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Brozmanová, J., Mánikova, D., Vlcková, V. & Chovanec, M. Selenium: a double-edged sword for defense and offence in cancer. Arch. Toxicol. 84, 919–938 (2010).
PubMed Google Scholar
Herrero, E. & Wellinger, R. E. Yeast as a model system to study metabolic impact of selenium compounds. Microb. Cell 2, 139–149 (2015).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Pinson, B., Sagot, I. & Daignan-Fornier, B. Identification of genes affecting selenite toxicity and resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Microbiol. 36, 679–687 (2000).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Izquierdo, A., Casas, C. & Herrero, E. Selenite-induced cell death in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: protective role of glutaredoxins. Microbiology 156, 2608–2620 (2010).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lazard, M. et al. Selenodiglutathione uptake by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae vacuolar ATP-binding cassette transporter Ycf1p. FEBS J. 278, 4112–4121 (2011).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mániková, D. et al. Selenium toxicity toward yeast as assessed by microarray analysis and deletion mutant library screen: a role for DNA repair. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 25, 1598–1608 (2012).
PubMed Google Scholar
Pérez-Sampietro, M., Casas, C. & Herrero, E. The AMPK family member Snf1 protects Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells upon glutathione oxidation. PLoS One 8, e58283 (2013).
ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lazard, M., Blanquet, S., Fisicaro, P., Labarraque, G. & Plateau, P. Uptake of selenite by Saccharomyces cerevisiae involves the high and low affinity orthophosphate transporters. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 32029–32037 (2010).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
McDermott, J. R., Rosen, B. P. & Liu, Z. Jen1p: a high affinity selenite transporter in yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 21, 3934–3941 (2010).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Samyn, D. R. & Persson, B. L. Inorganic phosphate and sulfate transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 892, 253–269 (2016).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mouillon, J. M. & Persson, B. L. New aspects on phosphate sensing and signalling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 6, 171–176 (2006).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wykoff, D. D., Rizvi, A. H., Raser, J. M., Margolin, B. & O’Shea, E. K. Positive feedback regulates switching of phosphate transporters in S. cerevisiae. Mol. Cell 27, 1005–1013 (2007).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ghillebert, R., Swinnen, E., De Snijder, P., Smets, B. & Winderickx, J. Differential roles for the low-affinity phosphate transporters Pho87 and Pho90 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem. J. 434, 243–251 (2011).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Salin, H. et al. Structure and properties of transcriptional networks driving selenite stress response in yeasts. BMC Genomics 9, 333 (2008).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Philpott, C. C. & Protchenko, O. Response to iron deprivation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot. Cell 7, 20–27 (2008).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kaplan, C. D. & Kaplan, J. Iron acquisition and transcriptional regulation. Chem. Rev. 109, 4536–4552 (2009).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Blaiseau, P. L., Lesuisse, E. & Camadro, J. M. Aft2p, a novel iron-regulated transcription activator that modulates, with Aft1p, intracellular iron use and resistance to oxidative stress in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 34221–34226 (2001).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Rutherford, J. C., Jaron, S., Ray, E., Brown, P. O. & Winge, D. R. A second iron-regulatory system in yeast independent of Aft1p. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 14322–14327 (2001).
ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Courel, M., Lallet, S., Camadro, J. M. & Blaiseau, P. L. Direct activation of genes involved in intracellular iron use by the yeast iron-responsive transcription factor Aft2 without its paralog Aft1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 6760–6771 (2005).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Berthelet, S. et al. Functional genomics analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae iron responsive factor Aft1 reveals iron-independent functions. Genetics 185, 1111–1128 (2010).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Dhaoui, M. et al. Gex1 is a yeast glutathione exchanger that interferes with pH and redox homeostasis. Mol. Biol. Cell 22, 2054–2067 (2011).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Stadler, J. A. & Schweyen, R. J. The yeast iron regulon is induced upon cobalt stress and crucial for cobalt tolerance. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 39649–39654 (2002).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Serrano, R., Bernal, D., Simón, E. & Ariño, J. Copper and iron are the limiting factors for growth of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae in an alkaline environment. J Biol Chem 279, 19698–19704 (2004).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pagani, M. A., Casamayor, A., Serrano, R., Atrian, S. & Ariño, J. Disruption of iron homeostasis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by high zinc levels: a genome-wide study. Mol. Microbiol. 65, 521–527 (2007).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ruotolo, R., Marchini, G. & Ottonello, S. Membrane transporters and protein traffic networks differentially affecting metal tolerance: a genomic phenotyping study in yeast. Genome Biol. 9, R67 (2008).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Thorsen, M. et al. Genetic basis of arsenite and cadmium tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Genomics 10, 105 (2009).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Batista-Nascimento, L., Toledano, M. B., Thiele, D. J. & Rodrigues-Pousada, C. Yeast protective response to arsenate involves the repression of the high affinity iron uptake system. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1833, 997–1005 (2013).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Castells-Roca, L., Mühlenhoff, U., Lill, R., Herrero, E. & Bellí, G. The oxidative stress response in yeast cells involves changes in the stability of aft1 regulon mRNAs. Mol. Microbiol. 81, 232–248 (2011).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dubacq, C. et al. Role of the iron mobilization and oxidative stress regulons in the genomic response of yeast to hydroxyurea. Mol. Gen. Genomics 275, 114–124 (2006).
CAS Google Scholar
Pérez-Sampietro, M. & Herrero, E. The PacC-family protein Rim101 prevents selenite toxicity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by controlling vacuolar acidification. Fungal Genet. Biol. 71, 76–85 (2014).
PubMed Google Scholar
Morano, K. A., Grant, C. M. & Moye-Rowley, W. S. The response to heat shock and oxidative stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 190, 1157–1195 (2012).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sanvisens, N., de Llanos, R. & Puig, S. Function and regulation of ribonucleotide reductase: cell cycle, genotoxic stress, and iron bioavailability. Biomed. J. 36, 51–58 (2013).
PubMed Google Scholar
Sharma, A., Singh, K. & Almasan, A. Histone H2AX phosphorylation: a marker of DNA damage. Meth. Cell Biol. 920, 613–626 (2012).
CAS Google Scholar
Mortensen, U. H., Lisby, M. & Rothstein, R. Rad 52. Curr. Biol. 19, R676–677 (2009).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhou, B. B. & Elledge, S. J. The DNA damage checkpoint: putting checkpoints in perspective. Nature 408, 433–439 (2000).
ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Barlow, J. H., Lisby, M. & Rothstein, R. Differential regulation of the cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks. Mol. Cell 30, 73–85 (2008).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Park, H. & Bakalinsky, A. T. SSU1 mediates sulphite efflux in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 16, 881–888 (2000).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hürlimann, H. C., Pinson, B., Stadler-Waibel, M., Zeeman, S. C. & Freimoser, F. M. The SPX domain of the yeast low-affinity phosphate transporter Pho90 regulates transport activity. EMBO Rep. 10, 1003–1008 (2009).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Waters, B. M. & Eide, D. J. Combinatorial control of yeast FET4 gene expression by iron, zinc, and oxygen. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 33749–3757 (2002).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chambers, P., Issaka, A. & Palacek, S. P. Saccharomyces cerevisiae JEN1 promoter activity is inversely related to concentration of repressing sugar. Appl. Environm. Microbiol. 70, 8.17 (2004).
Google Scholar
Alvaro, D., Lisby, M. & Rothstein, R. Genome-wide analysis of Rad52 foci reveals diverse mechanisms impacting recombination. PLoS Genetics 3, e228 (2007).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gietz, R. D. & Sugino, A. New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast gens lacking six-base pair restriction sites. Gene 74, 3065–3073 (1988).
Google Scholar
Canadell, D., González, A., Casado, C. & Ariño, J. Functional interactions between potasium and phosphate homeostasis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Microbiol. 95, 555–572 (2015).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Song, W. & Carlson, M. Srb/mediator proteins interact functionally and physically with transcriptional repressor Sfl1. EMBO J. 17, 5757–5765 (1998).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sherman, F. Getting started with yeast. Methods Enzymol. 350, 3–41 (2002).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wach, A., Brachat, A., Pöhlmann, R. & Philippsen, P. New heterologous modules for classical or PCR-based gene disruptions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 13, 1793–1808 (1994).
Google Scholar
Goldstein, A. L. & McCusker, J. H. Three new dominant drug resistance cassettes for gene disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 15, 1541–1553 (1999).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Longtine, M. S. et al. Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 14, 953–961 (1998).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Nasmyth, K. & Reed, S. I. Isolation of genes by complementation in yeast: molecular cloning of a cell-cycle gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77, 2119–2123 (1980).
ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gietz, R. D. & Woods, R. A. Transformation of yeast by lithium acetate/single-stranded carrier DNA/polyethylene glycol method. Methods Enzymol. 350, 87–96 (2002).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bellí, G., Garí, E., Aldea, M. & Herrero, E. Functional analysis of yeast essential genes using a promoter-substitution cassette and the tetracycline-regulatable dual expression system. Yeast 14, 1127–1138 (1998).
PubMed Google Scholar
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9: 357–359 (2012).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Myers, A. M., Tzagoloff, A., Kinney, D. M. & Lusty, C. J. Yeast shuttle and integrative vectors with multiple cloning sites suitable for construction of lacZ fusions. Gene 45, 299–310 (1986).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ruiz, A., González, A., García-Salcedo, R., Ramos, J. & Ariño, J. Role of protein phosphatase 2C on tolerance to lithium toxicity in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Microbiol. 62, 263–277 (2006).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bellí, G., Garí, E., Piedrafita, L., Aldea, M. & Herrero, E. An activator/repressor dual system allows tight tetracycline-regulated gene expression in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 942–947 (1998).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Serra-Cardona, A., Petrezsélyová, S., Canadell, D., Ramos, J. & Ariño, J. Corregulated expression of the Na⁺/phosphate Pho89 transporter and Ena1 Na⁺-ATPase allows their functional coupling under high-pH stress. Mol. Cell. Biol. 34, 4420–4435 (2014).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tamarit, J., Irazusta, V., Moreno-Cermeño, A. & Ros, J. Colorimetric assay for the quantitation of iron in yeast. Anal. Biochem. 351, 149–151 (2006).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Huang, S. & O’Shea, E. K. A systematic high-throughput screen of a yeast deletion collection for mutants defective in PHO5 regulation. Genetics 169, 1859–1871 (2005).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gasch, A. P. et al. Genomic expression responses to DNA-damaging agents and the regulatory role of the yeast ATR homolog Mec1p. Mol. Biol. Cell 12, 2987–3003 (2001).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Silvia Porras and Montserrat Robledo for their skillful technical support and Ignasi Villarroya (Servei d’Anàlisi Química, UAB) for support in Se determinations. We acknowledge the support of Anna Barceló and Roger Lahoz in RNA-Seq experiments. This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (grant BFU2010-17656), the Generalitat de Catalunya (grant 2009/SGR/196) and the University of Lleida to E.H., and by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation and the Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (grants BFU2011-30197-C3-01 and BFU2014-54591-C2-1-P), and the Generalitat de Catalunya (grant 2014SGR-4) to J.A.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Departament de Ciències Mèdiques Bàsiques, Universitat de Lleida, IRBLleida, Lleida, 25198, Spain
María Pérez-Sampietro, Celia Casas & Enrique Herrero
Institut de Biotecnologia i Biomedicina and Departament de Bioquímica i Biologia Molecular, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, 08193, Barcelona, Spain
Albert Serra-Cardona, David Canadell & Joaquín Ariño

Authors

María Pérez-Sampietro
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Albert Serra-Cardona
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
David Canadell
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Celia Casas
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Joaquín Ariño
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Enrique Herrero
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.P-S., A.S-C., D.C. and C.C. performed the experiments, and analyzed and discussed results. J.A. performed RNA-Seq experiments and analyzed the data. J.A. and E.H. analyzed and discussed results and wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pérez-Sampietro, M., Serra-Cardona, A., Canadell, D. et al. The yeast Aft2 transcription factor determines selenite toxicity by controlling the low affinity phosphate transport system. Sci Rep 6, 32836 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32836

Download citation

Received: 11 April 2016
Accepted: 16 August 2016
Published: 13 September 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32836

This article is cited by

Yeast Ppz1 protein phosphatase toxicity involves the alteration of multiple cellular targets
- Diego Velázquez
- Marcel Albacar
- Joaquín Ariño
Scientific Reports (2020)
Lack of 14-3-3 proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae results in cell-to-cell heterogeneity in the expression of Pho4-regulated genes SPL2 and PHO84
- Janneke H.M. Teunissen
- Marjolein E. Crooijmans
- G. Paul H. van Heusden
BMC Genomics (2017)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.