Introduction

Hydrogen, as a clean and renewable energy resource, can be used to tackle the current energy crisis and environmental issues. Among extensive efforts to hydrogen generation, photoelectrochemical(PEC) water splitting attracts considerable attention as it integrats in the same device both solar energy collection and water electrolysis. Recently, metal oxides such as titanium dioxide(TiO2)1,2, zinc oxide(ZnO)3,4, hematite(Fe2O3)5,6 and cuprous oxide(Cu2O)7,8 have shown great potential as photoelectrodes in photoelectrochemical cells for hydrogen evolution. Among these semiconductor candidates, ZnO shows a unique crystalline structure, a direct wide band gap (3.37 eV), a large exciton binding energy (60 meV), excellent electron mobility (115-155 cm2·V−1·s−1) and environmental compatibility9,10,11,12. Recently the strategy of synergistic effect, such as three dimension/plasmonic nanoparticles and three dimension/narrow band gap semiconductor, has been proved to be an effective way to obtain efficient solar water splitting. For example, Bai et al. reported a novel ZnO NAs/RGO/ZnIn2S4 heterostructure as a photoanode for photoelectrochemical water splitting. The ZnIn2S4 acted as visible light sensitizers and RGO was used to facilitate electron transfer synergistically contributed to over 200% enhancement of photo-to-hydrogen efficiency compared to bare ZnO NAs4. However, there is few reports about the synergistic effect of SPR and surface passivation on ZnO nanorods array to improve photoelectrochemical water splitting.

Lately, to increase the light-harvesting efficiency, plasmonic Au-modified ZnO electrodes have been designed to enhance PEC performance13,14,15. For example, Wu et al. reported a novel matchlike zinc oxide (ZnO)/gold (Au) with tunable Au contents. The photocurrent density and the solar-to-hydrogen conversion efficiency of the matchlike ZnO/Au could reach 9.11 mA/cm2 and 0.48%, respectively, which were much higher than that of the pristine ZnO16. Wang et al. synthesized Au nanoparticles sensitized ZnO nanopencil arrays. The Au-ZnO nanopencil arrays yield a photocurrent of ~1.5 mA·cm−2 at 1 V versus Ag/AgCl, which showed a significant enhancement compared with Au-ZnO nanorods array17. Although the recombination of photoexcited electron-hole could be suppressed to some extent after deposition of Au nanoparticles, the surface charge recombination at the Au-uncovered ZnO surfaces is still remained.

The passivation layers by atomic layer deposition (ALD) have shown great potential in the photoelectric devices18,19,20. Al2O3 as a high-κ dielectric has exhibited excellent surface passivation for electrochemical energy conversion devices21,22,23, leading to reduce surface charge recombination. In the case of PEC water splitting, Al2O3 overlayer via ALD have been employed in Al2O3/TiO221, Al2O3/Fe2O322 and Al2O3/WO324 photoanodes with enhanced PEC performance.

In this work, we verified the elevated PEC performance by introducing Au NPs and Al2O3 overlayer to ZnO nanorods array. The optimal thickness of Al2O3 overlayer was acquired through accurately controlling the number of ALD cycles. The results demonstrated the ZnO/Au/Al2O3 with 5 cycles (ZAA-5) delivered the best photocurrent density response compared to the ZnO/Au or pristine ZnO photoanode, respectively. Such enhancement was ascribed to the synergistic effect of SPR induced by Au NPs and surface passivation resulted from the Au NPs and Al2O3 overlayer.

Results and Discussions

Figure 1(a) showed a typical SEM image of the ZnO NRs array with a high density, well-aligned orientation and smooth surfaces. The average diameter and length of the nanorods were ~100 nm and ~3.5 μm, respectively (cross-sectional-view image shown in Figure S1(a) in the Supporting Information). Figure 1(b) showed that Au nanoparticles were uniformly distributed on the surface of each ZnO nanorod and the nanorods still maintained their vertically-oriented characteristics. Figure1(c) showed a HRTEM image taken near the edge of the ZnO nanorods, demonstrating a direct attachment of the Au nanoparticles onto the surface of ZnO nanorods. And the overlayer (labeled by a red arrow in Fig. 1(d)) indicated the amorphous characteristics of Al2O3 shell with an average thickness of about 0.56 nm. The compositions of ZAA-5 were further examined by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) measurements and their atomic ratios were calculated from the EDS spectra, as shown in Figure S1(b) and (c) in the Supporting Information.

Figure 1
figure 1

(a) Top view SEM image of pristine ZnO. (b) Top view SEM image of ZnO/Au. (c) A low-magnification TEM image and (d) a HRTEM image of ZnO/Au/Al2O3 (5cycles). (e) XRD patterns of the ZnO/Au/Al2O3 (5 cycles) on the FTO substrate. XPS spectra of ZnO/Au/Al2O3 (5 cycles): (f) wide scan, (g) Au 4f and (h) Al 2p.

X-ray diffraction spectrum in Fig. 1(e) was performed to reveal that all diffraction peak of ZnO nanorods array correspond to the standard diffraction of a wurtzite structure (JCPDS file No. 36-1451) with no impurity and the intense peak at 2θ = 34.52° for samples showed the significant vertical orientation of ZnO nanorods array. The peaks centered at 2θ of 38.1° and 44.4°, which can be identified as characteristic peaks of (111) and (200) of Au nanocrystal (JCPDS file No. 04-784). However, no significant diffraction peaks of Al2O3 were observed probably due to the formation of the amorphous Al2O3 overlayer after the ALD process.

The XPS spectrum in Fig. 1(f) revealed the existence of Zn, O, Al and Au elements of ZnO/Au/Al2O3 sample. High-resolution spectra of Au and Al species were shown in parts (g) and (h) of Fig. 1, respectively. The two peaks centered at 83.5 eV and 87.2 eV in Fig. 1(g) can be attributed to Au 4f7/2 and Au 4f5/2, respectively. A lower binding energy of Au 4f7/2 was mainly due to electrons transfer from oxygen vacancies of ZnO to Au. The Al 2p spectrum in Fig. 1(h) was assigned a peak at 74.4 eV, corresponding to the typical position of pure Al2O3.

The UV-visible absorption spectra of as-synthesized photoanodes were measured and compared over a wavelength range from 370 nm to 650 nm shown in Fig. 2. The three photoanodes all exhibited a huge absorption in ultraviolet region because of the large band gap of ZnO. The optical band gap of ZnO was estimated to be about 3.21 eV based on the converted (ahν)n versus (shown in the inset of Fig. 2), which was slightly lower than the previously reported band gap value of other groups9. This little deviation should be attributed to inevitable and ineffective carbon doping (shown in Figure S2 in the Supporting Information) during the synthesis process of the ZnO NRs array25. And there was no influence on the optical absorption edge in the UV region with the deposition of Au NPs and Al2O3 overlayer. As Au NPs were attached on the ZnO NRs, there was an absorption peak around 525 nm corresponding to the localized SPR effect of Au NPs, which was another convincing proof of the modification of Au NPs. The dielectric medium of Al2O3 overlayer resulted in the slightly red-shifted and small change of the intensity of the SPR peak.

Figure 2
figure 2

UV-Vis absorption spectra of pristine ZnO, ZnO/Au and ZnO/Au/Al2O3 (5 cycles).

The inset is the corresponding (ahv)n vs hv curves of the three samples. Here, n evaluated to be two.

The PEC performance of as-synthesized various photoanodes were characterized through photoinduced I-V curves. As can be seen in Fig. 3(a), the pristine ZnO photoanode exhibited a very small background current density from −1 to 1.5 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) in the scale of 10−3 mA·cm−2. Under illumination, the pristine ZnO photoanode revealed a pronounced photocurrent density starting at 0.4 V and continued to increase to 0.2 mA·cm−2 at 1.5 V (vs. Ag/AgCl). After the modification of Au nanoparticles, the photocurrent density reached 0.3 mA·cm−2 at 1.5 V (vs. Ag/AgCl). This result demonstrated that the Au nanoparticles on the ZnO nanorods were beneficial to enhance the PEC performance, resulting from plasmonic-improved light absorption and surface passivation. With the deposition of Al2O3 overlayer, the ZAA-5 photoanode showed optimized photocurrent density in the whole potential window and the saturated photocurrent density was as high as 0.55 mA·cm−2 attributed to the surface passivation resulting in the reduction of the recombination. Figure 3(b) showed chronoamperometry at 0 V vs. Ag/AgCl under chopped illumination conditions (1 sun, AM 1.5 G) for ZAA-5 photoanode. At 0 V vs. Ag/AgCl, a high and stable photocurrent density of was obtained, which showed consistent on/off photocurrent behaviors. Figure 3(c) showed the I-t curves of the three photoanodes under the illumination of visible light with λ > 420 nm. For the pristine ZnO, there was barely light response under visible light. In contrast, Au NPs modified ZnO NRs photoanode exhibited a significant photoresponse ascribed to the reason that introduction of Au NPs enhanced the visible light-harvesting efficiency via SPR effect. After the deposition of Al2O3 overlayer, there was no difference compared to ZnO/Au photoanode, which was in line with UV-Vis absorption spectra in Fig. 2.

Figure 3
figure 3

(a) LSV curves recorded for pristine ZnO, ZnO/Au and ZnO/Au/Al2O3 (5 cycles) photoanodes with a scan rate of 10 mV/s in the applied potentials from −1.0 to 1.5 V (vs Ag/AgCl) under AM 1.5 G simulated solar light. (b) Transient photocurrent density for ZnO/Au/Al2O3 (5 cycles) photoanodes measured at 0 V vs Ag/AgCl in 0.5 M Na2SO4 electrolyte (pH = 7). (c) Chronoamperometric I-t curves collected at 0.5 V vs Ag/AgCl for the three different photoanodes under visible light (>420 nm). (d) Photoconversion efficiency of the PEC cell with three different photoanodes as a function of the applied photential (vs RHE).

Furthermore, the solar-to-hydrogen (STH) efficiencies (η) for PEC water splitting of such photoanodes were estimated using the following equation:

Vapp is the applied external potential versus reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE). I is the externally measured current density at Vapp. Plight is the power density of the incident light. The potentials were measured versus the Ag/AgCl reference electrode and converted to the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) scale using the Nernst function:

ERHE is the converted potential versus RHE. EAg/AgCl is the external potential measured against the Ag/AgCl reference electrode. E°Ag/AgCl is the standard electrode potential of Ag/AgCl reference electrode (0.1976 V versus RHE at 25 °C).

As shown in Fig. 3(d), the maximum STH efficiency of the pristine ZnO photoanode was 0.10% at an applied voltage of 0.88 V vs. RHE, whereas the maximum efficiency of the ZnO/Au photoanode reached 0.40% at an applied voltage of 0.47 V vs. RHE under the same conditions. Obviously, the ZAA-5 exhibited the optimal STH efficiency (0.67% at 0.55 V vs. RHE), 1.7 times and 6.7 times that of ZnO/Au and pristine ZnO photoanodes, respectively. The enhanced PEC activities benefited from its unique feature of the ZAA-5 composite structure.

To confirm the effect of the thickness of Al2O3 on the photocurrent enhancement, PEC performance of photoanodes with various cycles were carried out. Figure 4(a) showed the LSV curves of the as-prepared ZnO/Au/Al2O3 (X cycles, X = 0, 5, 10 and 20) photoanodes. The changes of the photocurrent densities measured at 1.0 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) against the deposition cycles were shown in Fig. 4(b). The photocurrent densities were enhanced as the cycles increased from 0 to 5cycles and then decreased with further increase of the cycles. The photocurrent density and STH efficiency reached the maximum (0.512 mA/cm2 and 0.67%), as a result of the reduction of the recombination. However, excessive deposition of the insulation overlayer would possibly hinder the transmission of electron resulting in photocurrent decay.

Figure 4
figure 4

(a) LSV curves recorded for the ZnO/Au/Al2O3 photoanodes with various cycles. (b)Plot of the obtained photocurrent density and photoconversion efficiency as function of the ZnO/Au/Al2O3 photoanodes with various cycles at a scan rate of 10 mV/s under 40 mW/cm2 light illumination.

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy was employed under illumination at 0 V vs. Ag/AgCl to investigate the charge transfer kinetics at the photoanode/electrolyte surface (shown in Fig. 5(a)). Obviously, the arc diameter of the ZZA-5 photoanode was the smallest, while the arc diameter of the ZnO/Au photoanode was much smaller than that of the pristine ZnO photoanode, indicating the reduction of the resistance on the transport of charge. But the arc diameter was larger with the increasing thickness of the insulation overlayer (as shown in Figure S3 in the Supporting Information). In this work, the obtained results were fitted into the model of a RC circuit inserted in Fig. 5(a), in which Rct is the interfacial charge-transfer resistance of the photoanode/electrolyte interface. Accordingly, Rct was 39.78, 3.92 and 2.21 kΩ·cm2 for the pristine ZnO, ZnO/Au and ZAA-5 photoanodes. The smallest Rct of ZAA-5 photoanode indicated the highest photocurrent density in line with the LSV curve shown in Fig. 3(a).

Figure 5
figure 5

(a) Nyquist plots of electrochemical impedance spectra of the different photoanodes measured at 0 V (vs Ag/AgCl) under illumination. The inset is the equivalent circuit employed to fit the Nyquist plots. (b) Photoluminescence (PL) spectra of the diffierent photanodes.

To further investigate the role of Au NPs and Al2O3 overlayer on the PEC performance, the photoluminescence (PL) experiments were carried out with 325 nm pulsed laser as excitation source. As shown in Fig. 5(b), the broad-band emission around 530 nm can be related to the recombination of photoexcited holes with electrons occupying the singly ionized oxygen vacancy (VO) and some structural defects at the surface of ZnO. And the relative intensity of the deep level (DL) emission can serve as an indicator for evaluating the electron-hole recombination. It’s obvious that the DL emission intensity decreased, demonstrating that the recombination rate of photogenerated electron-hole pairs decreased due to the surface passivation effect of Au NPs and Al2O3 overlayer.

Au atoms grown in oxygen vacancies on the surface of ZnO NRs could decrease the density of ionized oxygen vacancies, resulting in suppression of DL recombination26. Additionally, the energy level of defect states in ZnO (−4.99 eV) is close to the Au Fermi level (−5.3 eV), suggesting electrons in the defect states could flow into the Au Fermi level as shown in Fig. 6. And then under visible light illumination electrons by SPR excitation could transfer back to the conduction band of the ZnO NRs, resulting in an enhanced photocurrent.

Figure 6
figure 6

Scheme for the proposed mechanism of PEC water splitting and energy band diagram of ZnO/Au/Al2O3 photoanode.

As a dielectric medium, the ALD acquired Al2O3 overlayer could effectively decrease the surface defect states and thus increased the PEC performance of the photoanodes. Besides, the presence of negative fixed charge in Al2O3, originated from the intrinsic (Al vacancies and O interstitial) and extrinsic (interstitial H) defects27,28, was demonstrated to reduce the recombination of Si29 and TiO230. Such field-effect passivation is also suitable to explain the enhanced PEC performance in ZnO-based system. When UV illumination was applied, the photogenerated holes were trapped on the surface due to the presence of the negative charges, while the unpaired photogenerated electrons could transfer to Pt electrode via nanorods to participate in the water reduction, as shown in Fig. 6.

Conclusions

In summary, Au NPs and Al2O3 overlayer were synergistically integrated into ZnO based photoanode for PEC water splitting. As a result, the increased absorption in visible region due to the SPR effect and the decreased photogenerated electron-hole recombination originated from the surface passivation, lead to a significantly enhanced PEC performance. The acquired PEC efficiency of ZnO/Au/Al2O3 (5 cycles) photoanodes under light illumination was 0.67%, 6.7 times that of pristine ZnO photoanode. The ZnO/Au/Al2O3 configuration showed great potential in hydrogen evolution and further demonstrated the significance of synergetic effect of SPR and surface passivation in PEC system.

Experimental Sections

Fabrication of ZnO nanorods array

FTO were ultrasonically cleaned in acetone, ethanol and deionized (DI) water successively for 10 min, respectively. The colloidal seed solution of zinc acetate [Zn(CH3COO)2·2H2O] (0.5 M) was spin-coated onto the FTO substrate and then annealed at 350 °C in air for 30 min. The ZnO nanorods array were prepared by the hydrothermal process in the aqueous solution containing 50 mM zinc nitrate hexahydrate [Zn(NO3)2·6H2O] and hexamethylenetetramine (HMTA) [(CH2)6N4] at 90 °C for 4 h. Finally, the substrate with products was repeatedly rinsed with deionized water for several times and annealed in air at 450 °C for 3 h to remove residual surface salts.

Modification of Au nanoparticles

Under UV irradiation, the Au NPs were synthesized by photochemical deposition for 10 minutes in a 10 ml chloroauric acid (HAuCl4, 0.01%) solution with a pH = 7 adjusted by 0.1 M NaOH solution, 1 ml 1% polyvinyl alcohol (PVA, [C2H4O]n) and 0.5 ml methanol (CH3OH, 99.5%), followed by calcination at 350 °C in N2 for 30 minutes.

Deposition of Al2O3 overlayer

Al2O3 coatings were performed with TALD-100A (kemicro) with 5, 10 and 20 cycles at a growth rate of ~1 Å/cycle. Argon (99.998%) was used as a carrier gas and employed at 25 sccm. A reactor pressure of 0.2 Torr was maintained at this argon gas flow. During the coating process, the system temperature was kept at 150 °C. Trimethylaluminum(Al(CH3)3) and DI water was pulsed into the reaction chamber separately with a pulsing time of 20 ms and 15 ms followed by 20 s N2 purging. Therefore, one deposition cycles involved 20 ms of trimethylaluminum pulse + 20 s of N2 purging + 15 ms of pulse H2O + 20 s of N2 purging. After deposition, the chamber was allowed to cool down naturally under N2 flow.

Characterization of materials

The structures and morphologies of the electrode materials were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) (Rigaku DMAX-RB, Cu Kα) and field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) (FEI QUANTA 3D). The elements content of the samples was determined by Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy (EDX). The formation of Au and Al2O3 on the ZnO nanorods and these species’ bonding characteristics were investigated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, ESCALAB 250).

Electrochemical characterization

The photoanode was fabricated by securing a copper wire on the exposed electric conductive parts of the FTO with a silver conducting paint. The substrate was subsequently sealed on all edge with epoxy resin except the active working area. All electrochemical measurements were performed in a three electrode mode with a photoanode as the working electrode, a coiled Pt wire as counter electrode and a Ag/AgCl reference electrode. 0.5 M Na2SO4 aqueous solution (with pH buffered to ~7.0) was adopted as the electrolyte. Electrochemical measurements were performed on an electrochemical workstation (Solartron SI 1287/SI 1260). All photoanodes were illuminated from the front side under AM 1.5 G illumination provided by a solar simulator (Oriel, 91159A). The white and visible light intensity was 50 and 40 mW/cm2 measured by a Si diode (Newport), respectively.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Liu, Y. et al. Synergistic Effect of Surface Plasmonic particles and Surface Passivation layer on ZnO Nanorods Array for Improved Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Sci. Rep. 6, 29907; doi: 10.1038/srep29907 (2016).