Abstract
An increased pulse pressure suggests aortic stiffening. New evidence also suggests that pulse pressure is a more sensitive measure of risk than other indexes of blood pressure in middle-aged and older persons. The objective of the study was to relate pulse pressure to the risk of cardiovascular events in the general population, and to assess whether pulse pressure could improve the Framingham risk prediction. A total of 378 men and 391 women over the age of 50 years (mean 62.7 years) were followed. Sex-specific Framingham cardiovascular risk scores were derived from age, systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, total and HDL cholesterol, smoking status and the presence or absence of diabetes mellitus. The cutoff points used to develop a pulse pressure score were calculated by determining the percentile points corresponding to the blood pressure categories in the Framingham risk score. We calculated relative hazard rates by multiple Cox regression. After a median follow-up of 7.2 years (range: 11 months–15 years), a total of 148 cardiovascular events occurred. In Cox regression analysis, a 10 mmHg higher pulse pressure was associated with 31% (P<0.0001) increase in the risk for cardiovascular events (fatal and nonfatal) after adjustment for sex, age, total and HDL cholesterol, smoking and the presence of diabetes mellitus. After adjustment for the aforementioned risk factors, a one-point increment in the blood pressure and pulse pressure scores was associated with a 40 and 48% (both P<0.0001) increase in the risk of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events, respectively. When both the blood pressure and pulse pressure scores were forced into a Cox model, only the pulse pressure score remained statistically significant (P<0.0001) with a relative hazard rate of 1.37 (CI: 1.16–1.69). These prospective data suggest that pulse pressure may improve the Framingham risk prediction among middle-aged and older individuals. Further studies, especially in the Framingham cohort, are warranted.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Burt VL et al. Prevalence of hypertension in the US adult population. Results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1991. Hypertension 1995; 25: 305–313.
De Henauw S et al. Trends in the prevalence, detection, treatment and control of arterial hypertension in the Belgian adult population. J Hypertens 1998; 16: 277–284.
Staessen J, Amery A, Fagard R . Isolated systolic hypertension in the elderly. J Hypertens 1990; 8: 393–405.
Franklin SS et al. Is pulse pressure useful in predicting risk for coronary heart disease? The Framingham heart study. Circulation 1999; 100: 354–360.
Franklin SS et al. Does the relation of blood pressure to coronary heart disease risk change with aging? The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 2001; 103: 1245–1249.
Blacher J et al. Pulse pressure not mean pressure determines cardiovascular risk in older hypertensive patients. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 1085–1089.
Benetos A et al. Pulse pressure: a predictor of long-term cardiovascular mortality in a French male population. Hypertension 1997; 30: 1410–1415.
Staessen JA et al. Risks of untreated and treated isolated systolic hypertension in the elderly: meta-analysis of outcome trials. Lancet 2000; 355: 865–872.
Madhavan S et al. Relation of pulse pressure and blood pressure reduction to the incidence of myocardial infarction. Hypertension 1994; 23: 395–401.
Mitchell GF et al. Sphygmomanometrically determined pulse pressure is a powerful independent predictor of recurrent events after myocardial infarction in patients with impaired left ventricular function. SAVE investigators. Survival and Ventricular Enlargement. Circulation 1997; 96: 4254–4260.
Klassen PS et al. Association between pulse pressure and mortality in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. JAMA 2002; 287: 1548–1555.
Kannel WB et al. Profile of the coronary-prone individual. Assessment of risk of developing coronary heart disease. The Framingham study. Proc Annu Meet Med Sect Am Life Conv 1967; 55: 74–99.
Anderson KM, Odell PM, Wilson PW, Kannel WB . Cardiovascular disease risk profiles. Am Heart J 1991; 121: 293–298.
Wilson PW, Castelli WP, Kannel WB . Coronary risk prediction in adults (the Framingham Heart Study). Am J Cardiol 1987; 59: 91G–94G.
Wilson PW et al. Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation 1998; 97: 1837–1847.
Staessen JA et al. Environmental exposure to cadmium, forearm bone density, and risk of fractures: prospective population study. Public Health and Environmental Exposure to Cadmium (PheeCad) Study Group. Lancet 1999; 353: 1140–1144.
Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care 1997; 20: 1183–1197.
Thijs L et al. Reference values for self-recorded blood pressure: a meta-analysis of summary data. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158: 481–488.
Darné B et al. Pulsatile versus steady component of blood pressure: a cross-sectional analysis and a prospective analysis on cardiovascular mortality. Hypertension 1989; 13: 392–400.
Kannel WB, Gordon T, Schwartz MJ . Systolic versus diastolic blood pressure and risk of coronary heart disease. The Framingham study. Am J Cardiol 1971; 27: 335–346.
Kannel WB et al. Components of blood pressure and risk of atherothrombotic brain infarction: the Framingham study. Stroke 1976; 7: 327–331.
Domanski M et al. Cardiovascular risk assessment using pulse pressure in the first national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES I). Hypertension 2001; 38: 793–797.
Borghi C et al. Relative role of systolic, diastolic and pulse pressure as risk factors for cardiovascular events in the Brisighella Heart Study. J Hypertens 2002; 20: 1737–1742.
Verdecchia P et al. Ambulatory pulse pressure: a potent predictor of total cardiovascular risk in hypertension. Hypertension 1998; 32: 983–988.
Staessen J et al. Ambulatory pulse pressure as predictor of outcome in older patients with systolic hypertension. Am J Hypertens 2002; 15: 835.
Wallis EJ et al. Coronary and cardiovascular risk estimation for primary prevention: validation of a new Sheffield table in the 1995 Scottish health survey population. BMJ 2000; 320: 671–676.
Avolio AP et al. Effects of aging on arterial distensibility in populations with high and low prevalence of hypertension: comparison between urban and rural communities in China. Circulation 1985; 71: 202–210.
Franklin SS et al. Hemodynamic patterns of age-related changes in blood pressure. The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 1997; 96: 308–315.
Aviv A, Aviv H . Telomeres and essential hypertension. Am J Hypertens 1999; 12: 427–432.
Jeanclos E, Schork NJ, Kyvik KO et al. Telomere length inversely correlates with pulse pressure and is highly familial. Hypertension 2000; 36: 195–200.
Aviv A, Aviv H . Reflections on telomeres, growth, aging, and essential hypertension. Hypertension 1997; 29: 1067–1072.
Benetos A et al. Telomere length as an indicator of biological aging: the gender effect and relation with pulse pressure and pulse wave velocity. Hypertension 2001; 37: 381–385.
Dart AM, Kingwell BA . Pulse pressure—a review of mechanisms and clinical relevance. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 975–984.
Van Bortel LM, Struijker-Boudier HA, Safar ME . Pulse pressure, arterial stiffness, and drug treatment of hypertension. Hypertension 2001; 38: 914–921.
Gimbrone Jr MA et al. Endothelial dysfunction, hemodynamic forces, and atherogenesis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2000; 902: 230–239.
Guidelines Subcommittee of the WHO/ISH Mild Hypertension Liaison Committee. 1993 guidelines for the management of mild hypertension. Memorandum from a World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension meeting. Hypertension 1993; 22: 392–403.
de Visser CL et al. Prediction of coronary heart disease: a comparison between the Copenhagen risk score and the Framingham risk score applied to a Dutch population. J Intern Med 2003; 253: 553–562.
Acknowledgements
The FLEMENGHO Study was supported by research grant G.0424.03 from the Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Brussels, Belgium) and by a university grant of KULeuven OT/99/28. This population study would not have been possible without the collaboration of the family physicians of the participants. The municipality of Hechtel-Eksel (Belgium) provided logistic support. We acknowledge the expert assistance of Rina Bollen, Lieve Gijsbers, Marie-Jeanne Jehoul, Alida Hermans and Sylvia Van Hulle.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nawrot, T., Staessen, J., Thijs, L. et al. Should pulse pressure become part of the Framingham risk score?. J Hum Hypertens 18, 279–286 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001669
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001669