Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Research Article
  • Published:

Dislodgeable foliar residues are lognormally distributed for agricultural re-entry studies

Abstract

The Agricultural Reentry Task Force (ARTF) conducted a study to determine if dislodgeable foliar residues (DFR) are either normally or lognormally distributed. This is important because the data are used with worker exposure data, which generally appear to be lognormally distributed, to calculate transfer coefficients that will be used to assess farm worker re-entry exposure. Two chemicals were used for this study. Carbaryl, a moderately water-soluble chemical, was applied to cabbage at a rate of 2.0 lbs active ingredient/acre (lb ai/A), while methomyl, a highly water soluble chemical, was applied to cabbage at a rate of 0.9 lb ai/A. The residues were dislodged following an ARTF standardized procedure of collecting leaf punches and shaking in a solution of 0.01% Aerosol OT 75. A total of 28 samples were analyzed for each chemical. The mean±SD residue of the carbaryl samples was higher than that for methomyl (511±196 and 170±71 μg per sample, respectively). However, several types of statistical analyses of the data indicated that, for both chemicals, the residues are lognormally distributed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ARTF:

Agricultural Reentry Task Force

DFR:

dislodgeable foliar residue

TC:

transfer coefficient

References

  • Johnson D., Day E., Selman F., Klonne D., Bruce E., Eberhart D., Korpalski S., and Clark J. Agricultural Reentry Task Force: approaches for determination of worker exposure and dislodgeable foliar residues for agricultural reentry studies. Submitted for publication.

  • Johnson N.L., Kotz S., and Balakrishnan N. Continuous Univariate Distributions, Vol. 1. Wiley, New York, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS. SAS/STAT® User's Guide, Version 8, Vol. 1–3. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, 1999.

  • SAS. SAS OnlineDoc® HTML Format, Version 8. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, 2000.

  • Snedecor G.W., and Cochran W.G. Statistical Methods, 7th edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlin C.D.S., (Ed.). The Pesticide Manual: A World Compendium, 11th edn. British Crop Protection Council, Farnham, Surrey, UK, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA. Data Call-In Notice 18-Oct-1995, as amended 10-Jan-1997; copied to registrants of specific PC coded pesticide products, 1995.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The AFTF is deeply indebted to the many people who have served on both its administrative and technical committees of the ARTF over the last 7 years. Only through the dedication of such individuals, as well as the commitment of the member companies in allowing their employees to dedicate the time and effort required for such a massive, long-term project, could it have been successfully completed. The product of their labors will be a cornerstone of agricultural re-entry risk assessments for decades to come.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Address all correspondence to: Dr. D. Johnson, Stewart Agricultural Research Services, Inc., 1893 Highway K, Clarence, MO 63437, USA. Tel.: +01-660-762-4240; Fax: +01-660-762-4295; E-mail: davejohn@marktwain.net

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Korpalski, S., Bruce, E., Holden, L. et al. Dislodgeable foliar residues are lognormally distributed for agricultural re-entry studies. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 15, 160–163 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500383

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500383

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links